[quote]nycsoccax wrote:
Hagar wrote:
Our goals are different. I want to get very big and strong then cut down with loosing the least amount of muscle possible. You would like to stay small but get lean. Hey thats alright, and I have nothing against that but DIETING BECOMES A WHOLE LOT MORE COMPLICATED WHEN YOUR TRYING TO HOLD ON TO GAINS. Because of your lack of muscle I believe you are not qualified to give out advice to most of the people on this web site but I’m sure you do well on the weight watchers forum.
Hmm, you’re kind of misinterpreting what i’m saying. I bulked the first two months. I’m already as big as I can get without looking unproportional.
My arms already look big for my body and I don’t want to bench more than what I can now(295 once or twice, which may be nothing compared to most people but weighing 150 thats enough for me), so I feel it’s strictly cutting for me while maintaining what I can already lift – and NOT increase any weights. Which is why i’m leaning towards the very low end of carb intake during the carb ups.
[/quote]
Personally I think you should of bulked up a bit more, to make up for what you’ll probable lose when you diet down into the low bf% Unless you have good genetics, dieting 9% and under with or without drugs can be a real pain in the ass. Almost everyone will lose some muscle doing this. A 295 bench is respectable especially at 150.