My 9/11 Research

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
1

9/11 inside job skeptics, I spend a lot of time on this, so please read it before you blow me off, thanks.

For Starters Here is 8 Examples of People in Government Slipping up in this Scripted False Flag Terror Plot:

  1. Bush saw the first plane hit live on tv:
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=48...tower&hl=en (1min)

  2. Rumsfeld Says Flight 93 was shot down:
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=71…+down&hl=en (30sec)

  3. Rumsfeld Says Missle Hit Pentagon: “Here we’re talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center”
    http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%2…-Flight-77.html

  4. NYC Mayor Slips- Knew Collpase in Advance:
    - YouTube

  5. SilverStein Admits WTC Was Pulled:
    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7...rry+silverstein

  6. EyeWitness Said Missle, eh Plane Hit pentagon:
    9/11/06 Pentagon Missle comment - YouTube

  7. John Kerry Slips says WTC-7 Was Controlled Demolition:
    - YouTube

  8. Bush is scared:
    Bush Addresses the U.N. - tells the world no 911 discussions - YouTube

9.BBC Reported WTC-7 Collpased 26 minutes before it did.

Why would the Govt Kill its own people on 9/11?

They killed there own people so they would gain Power as a one world Government, A one world powerful evil
They are now taking freedoms worldwide, as we lose freedoms, and they have more control. They targeted the U.S. Because they were the SuperPower of the World And needed Freedom Loving Americans To beg to give up there rights. The NWO is gaining More Power
as We are also Moving towards a North American Union, Where Mexico, and Canada Would Merge Together. We are moving into a Dictaorship.
In 1139 St Malachy Had a vision from God that we would have 112 Popes, We are at 111 Popes, with this pope being 80 years old.
The next pope will be the 112th, and Is expected to be the false Prophet to welcome in the Antichrist of the NWO, The World Wide SuperPowerful Evil, As we move towards
the end of the 6000 years as mankind has been on the earth.

Why doesn’t the media tell the truth?

The Media is covering up 9/11 Because They are owned by 4 very corrupt Cooperations such as GE, AOL, DISNEY, Etc…, Which are profitting heavily from the Illegal Wars in the Middle East, They are also Under-Control of the NWO. When the Antichrist Takes Power of the WorldWide Dictaorship, The Media will be under Complete Control of Him. The Free Speech on the internet Will be Gone!!

On a personal note, I am from PA, And The Ashland Daily Tidings Newspaper seems to be the only patriot newspaper in the country that seems to care for 9/11 truth and the 9/11 truth movement. Thanks for the help, and the truth movement encourages more 9/11 truth stories.

9/11 Was carried out by the US GOVT & Osama W BUSH! (War on Terror Is A Scam)

I am going to give reasons proving The U.S. Govt did it, how they did it, and at the end I am going to give reasons why they did it.

  1. Operation Northwoods, “N E W Y O R K, May 1, 2001 In the early 1960s, America’s top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.”:
    U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba - ABC News

  2. Alex Jones Called It: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8...edict&hl=en

  3. Bin Laden First Said He DID NOT DO IT! Fake Confession Tape?

http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/ Also see #30

  1. At least 4 hijackers turned up alive, but i heard as many as 9

  1. The melting Point of Steel is 3000F and Fire is around 500-700F with burning Jet fuel around 1200-1400F. Skeptics have claimed, Steel doesnt Have to melt, but only weaken to collpase, This May be true, HOWEVER, It would not make a 1/4 Mile High Skyscraper, Collapse in 9-10 Seconds. 10 seconds Per Floor Collpased, This is Impossible without Bombs.

  2. An increase of 400% increase in put options on 9-6-01 and 9-7-01 on serveral airline stocks. An increase of 1100% Increase an in increase of put options on airline stocks on 9-10-01

http://www.hereinreality.com/insidertrading.html

  1. FBI confinscated tapes at a nearby hotel and gas station minutes after the “plane” hit the pentagon.

  2. Debris from the building was taken and illegally sold to china before anybody could really investigate.

  3. If you watch the video of the towers coming down, You can notice bombs going off in the building.

  4. Larry Silverstein Admitted blowing up WTC7 On a PBS Documentary. Skeptics Have Claimed He meant He was Pulling the Firefighters From the Building. Thats Funny, I thought When you call a person or persons “him” “them” or “em” not “it”. Meanwhile The firefighters Were already Pulled from the Building 7 Houes before it Collpased. Skeptics Have Claimed, Well Maybe he did hit the Dynamite, But It takes severals weeks for them to carefully place explosives in a building. Call any Demolition Company.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7...rry+silverstein (30sec)

  1. Larry Silverstein got High Insurance on WTC7 Including terrorism insurance.

  2. 6 Months Before 9/11 They passed laws saying No pilots can carry guns, when pilots were allowed to carry guns for 40 years. (I am not sure this is 100% Accurate, I need to look into this more. Please Let me know if you find anything.)

UPDATE: It was actually 2 months, not 6! http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=27647

  1. As Charlie Sheen said, How can a plane make a 270 degree turn and drop 7000 feet in attitude in less then 2 minutes?

  2. I heard it is impossible for cell phones to work on planes moving at 500mph and at 30000 Feet.

  3. The “hijackers” said the wrong islamic message when approaching death. Jim Fetzer/ 911 Panel Discussion Los Angeles - YouTube

  4. Survivors and Eye witnesses Reporting seeing, hearing explosions.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=20...HTERS&hl=en Laugh at the Firefighters!!

  1. Thermite was found at the scene. BYU Professor Steve E. Jones Have tested Postive some substance for Thermite, It was later Proven to cut the Main Pillars in the World Trade Center. It was the yellow goowy substance Dripping From the towers as CNN, FOX, Etc reported on 9/11/01. Also There was MELTED steel at the bottom of the rubble, The Steel MELTED From the THERMITE, Fire jet fuel can NOT MELT steel. This Is the #1 Piece of Evidence Against our Government and I hope they are brought to Justice.

http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635198488,00.html

  1. Janitor was offered Millions of dallors to shut up about the bombs he witnessed going off and he refused. First 5 minutes of the Video Below:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2...erican+scholars

  1. Science Says Buildings Collasping CAN NOT fall at the speed of gravity unless Dynimite.

  2. In the New American Century Dick Cheney Said We need a new Pearl Harbor. “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event �?? like a new Pearl Harbor.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_t...merican_Century

  1. Less then 15 Million Was spend Investigating 9-11 and more then 65 Million on Clinton (Appox)

  2. How can a 757 That is 129’ Wide Make a 16’ Hole? The Pentagon Collpased 30 minutes after impact, making the hole about 75’. Notice how you never see these clips from the media:

  1. Between Both Engines on Flight 77 Or a 757, Its combined weight is 10-12 Tons. It is made of Steel And Titnium. Its melting Point is around 2600F. The Fire didnt get anywhre near that tempurature at the Pentagon. Yet No Engines Were Found.

  2. You think fire can cause this?:

http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20060820.htm

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles...on.com+%2F+News

  1. Do you think People in a Cave can get NORAD to Stand down? NORAD Has drills where planes were hijacked and were on course to crash into the World Trade Center and Pentagon. Coincidence? I think not. That is what Cuased NORAD to stand down, Thinking it was just a Drill

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/20…-18-norad_x.htm

  1. Jimmy Walter Is offering $100,000 To Anybody Who can Prove 9/11 Was NOT An Inside Job. Even PM Couldnt Stand Up.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=41957

Update: He raised it to $1 Million http://www.reopen911.org

  1. Those buildings were blown to Dust. No computers, No desks, No Anything, Dust, A naturally collpasing Building Can Not do That.

  2. The FBI Has No Hard Evidence Connecting Osama Bin Laden to the 9/11 Attacks.

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm

29.People in the Scientific Community Risk there Lives, Jobs, and reputation trying to tell people the inside were an Inside Job:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/arti...in_page_id=1770

  1. The BBC Reported WTC-7 feel 26 minutes before it Actually Did, You can see it standing in the background, while they reported it Collpased:

For more evidence watch these films:

Recommended for Beginners:

  1. http://www.loosechange911.com

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=78...hange&hl=en (90min)

  1. 9/11 Mysteries http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6...eries&hl=en (90min)

  2. Are the Criminals Frightened?: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1...nals+frightened

  3. C-SPAN conference: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5...AMERICAN+C+SPAN (90min)

Recommended for intermediate:

  1. TerrorStorm: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=78...76230&hl=en (2hr)

  2. Martial Law: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6...OF+POLICE+STATE (Excellent Film, 2hr)

  3. 9/11 the Road to Tyranny: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6...ranny&hl=en (2hr)

  4. Masters of Terror: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=77...STERS+OF+TERROR (2hr)

  5. 9/11 The Greatest Lie ever sold: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=69…+SOLD&hl=en (2hr)

Now I am going to give you why they did it, then i will share some links.

  1. Patriot act

  2. Patriot act 2

  3. Eliminate the Consitution & Bill of Rights

  4. Bring forth the NWO and North American Union

  5. Bankrupt the USA to bring forth a NWO

  6. Scare americans to give up there right in exchange for “security” when you will just get tyranny and a police state.

  7. Justify an Iraq and Afganistan Invasion.

  8. Bring forth a Real ID Act, which was passed on 5-11-05, and then the “mark of the beast”

  9. To Pretty Much Allow Bush to do anything He wants. Look at this:

  1. To allow the Military CommissionsAct of 2006 to Pass, Which Took out 7 Sections of the Bill of Rights. Bringing America Down, Helps Bring in World Government.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15220450/

  1. If you Notice Alex Jones speaking at the CSPAN Conference. (Video #5)He says its about World War 3 as well. I dont know to much about this, But If you look at a map. Afganistan is on the Right, Iraq is on the Left, and IRAN Is in the Middle. Once the USA Invades IRAN The US Could control All of the Middle East, and be on the Doorstep with China, for World War 3. According to the Bible 2 Billion+ Will Die (1/3 Population) I have a timeframe of around 2018 (2016-2020) In My Blog Entitled “I know When the End of The Age Begins” Which also connects 9/11 In the End times.

Now if you want links goto http://www.911blogger.com/ and check that out and there are 50 links on the right hand side.

Also check out http://prisonplanet.com http://www.jonesreport.com http://www.infowars.com

This is a pretty cool 1 minute Video, 911 Truther Gets Angry At the NY TIMES: - YouTube

Last But not Least:

http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Evils%20in%...h_about_911.htm

http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html

Lots Of Skeptics give emailing me junk about PM and Debunking this, with Lies. So here debunks them:

  1. Debunking911.com Debunked!http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/debunking_911_website_debunks_itself.htm

  2. Popular Mechanics Debunked! Alex Jones' Endgame

  3. There is no 9/11 conspiracy you morons. This idiot, has no argument at all. All he says Is because Dylan Avery, The maker of Loose Change is still alive, Its Because LooseChange is not true. Okay, If anything Happened to any famous 9/11 Truthers, Every skeptic would become a believer and 70+% of Americans Would believe its an inside Job In less then a week. Lots of people arent interested in historians information until they are dead. This guy should be ashsmed of himself for making such a page, Its sad people actually believe this crap. This guy thinks he knows it all. He has no arguement at all. He is conceded and full of it.

  4. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=75...r+911&hl=en

These American Hating Nazi’s Also have no arguement at all , All they do is Insult Truthers. They say Fire caused the collpase, Like they are some kind of Scientist. Scientists been saying explosives brung down the towers. Skeptics Covered it up.

Hitler Once Said, The Bigger the Lie, The easier it is Believed.

War on terror is a scam!!

"In January of 2003 FBI and CIA whistleblowers told Capitol Hill Blue that the White House was scripting phony terror alerts to maintain hysteria, upkeep President Bushs approval ratings and milk extra defense funding. The report that five Pakistani men had entered the States via Canada and were planning on carrying out a dirty bomb or biological attack was completely conjured up by the Bush administrations black propaganda office. New York Harbor was shut down to visibly pump up the fear. One of the named suspects, Mohammed Asghar (pictured left), was tracked down to Pakistan by the Associated Press. He was a fat guy running a jewellers shop and had never even been to America.

Thank You for reading, We must fight this and expose this and resist The New World Order, and Resist the cashless society.

2

http://www.911myths.com/index.html

Much, if not all, is debunked at this the link above. I’ve personally shown a number of the claims made in your post to be false. I’m not going to do that everytime you guys want to bring up the same “evidence” over and over again.

3

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/
Debunks “Loose Change” and claims you’ve made here.

4

[quote]ssn0 wrote:
3. Rumsfeld Says Missle Hit Pentagon: “Here we’re talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center”
http://www.the7thfire.com/Politics%20and%2…-Flight-77.html

[/quote]

ssn0, are you sure Rumsfeld didn’t mean “using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens AS a missile to damage this buliding and similar…”

Makes sense, right?

5

[quote]ssn0 wrote:
6. EyeWitness Said Missle, eh Plane Hit pentagon:

[/quote]

The dude said “missile-airplane” then goes on to say he was thinking about all the people who “died on the plane”. If he he saw a missile hit the pentagon, what plane he was thinking about?

6

I am not one to believe in these sorts of things but this has always made me wonder:

  1. The melting Point of Steel is 3000F and Fire is around 500-700F with burning Jet fuel around 1200-1400F. Skeptics have claimed, Steel doesnt Have to melt, but only weaken to collpase, This May be true, HOWEVER, It would not make a 1/4 Mile High Skyscraper, Collapse in 9-10 Seconds. 10 seconds Per Floor Collpased, This is Impossible without Bombs

Also at the time of the attacks a number of fire fighters, police officers and citizens mentioned hearing explosions in the buildings. Rescuers in the buildings were recording saying they heard explosions in the lower floors of the buildings how is this explained?

7

[quote]xXSeraphimXx wrote:

I am not one to believe in these sorts of things but this has always made me wonder:

  1. The melting Point of Steel is 3000F and Fire is around 500-700F with burning Jet fuel around 1200-1400F. Skeptics have claimed, Steel doesnt Have to melt, but only weaken to collpase, This May be true, HOWEVER, It would not make a 1/4 Mile High Skyscraper, Collapse in 9-10 Seconds. 10 seconds Per Floor Collpased, This is Impossible without Bombs

Also at the time of the attacks a number of fire fighters, police officers and citizens mentioned hearing explosions in the buildings. Rescuers in the buildings were recording saying they heard explosions in the lower floors of the buildings how is this explained?[/quote]

9 seconds is measured from an exterior panel striking the ground. I believe the core didn’t collapse entirely until 20 seconds later. Btw, the interior of the building was undergoing collapse long before the global collapse. I can show you pictures of floors sagging over time. Not only did the remaining steel supports (remember, many were severed by debris) lose up to 60% (If I remember correctly) of their strength, but the heating was uneven on their surfaces. What happens when one side loses more strenth, at a faster rate, than the other while under load? It’ll distort.

Why wouldn’t you hear “explosions?” Think about what went on in those buildings. I’ve read fire-fighters talking about hearing explosions which they soon realized were human bodies hitting earth. Then you have debris, transformers, monitors in offices exploding from heat, etc.

You can find more from the links I’ve provided.

8

I was under the impression that George W. Bush was the Antichrist, lol. You know, the false representative of the American way … Not to mention Texas, with “think big”.

9

[quote]Sloth wrote:
I’ve read fire-fighters talking about hearing explosions which they soon realized were human bodies hitting earth.
.[/quote]

what a wild imagination

10

[quote]ssn0 wrote:
Sloth wrote:
I’ve read fire-fighters talking about hearing explosions which they soon realized were human bodies hitting earth.
.

what a wild imagination[/quote]

Explain.

11

[quote]Sloth wrote:
I’ve read fire-fighters talking about hearing explosions which they soon realized were human bodies hitting earth.

ssn0 wrote:
what a wild imagination

Sloth wrote:
Explain.[/quote]

It’s called hypocrisy. He is allowed to read anything into any of these things he wants, and will discredit anything that even remotely seems similar to what he has done.

The first 5 links didn’t work at all, and the one with Guliani was total BS. He was warned that the WTC was going to collapse, and it did. And he ended up trapped in another building because of it.

If there was some sort of conspiracy involved, he would not have gotten trapped because they would have waited to “bring it down”.

After seeing how much was read into that little statement, and how it got twisted, there was no reason to go any further. That was enough proof of a bias in all of this.

Conspiracy theories can sound good, especially to somebody without the actual understanding of the science involved, or the confusion following a big event like this.

This link is all you need:

They took an actual objective look at what happened, and tried to find out if all the claims being put out were true or not. If you cannot accept this, you either need to provide proof (real proof) that this work is faulty, or biased in any way, or you are simply a nut.

12

I wouldn’t call smoking crack research.

13

[quote]dk44 wrote:
I wouldn’t call smoking crack research.[/quote]

Damn I needed that laugh!!! Thanks…again!! LOL!

14

Most of your links didn’t work. Then some of the others were really weak.

The one where the reporter says missile plane is a good example of how you are clutching at straws. You are reading more into that than there actually is.

The rate at which the buildings collapsed was calculated by a mathmetician who came to the conclusion that time it took the buildings to collapse was consistant with a structural failure. Once that building started coming down all it was going to do is pick up speed.

The sound of explosions is easily explained. Massive structural steel beams like the ones in the trade center being snapped in half will sound like a bomb going off because it is a rapid release of built up energy. Again you are reading into this what you want it to be and ignoring other likely explanations.

Your research has broken no new ground. Your evidence fails to mention explanations that might be contradictory to your conspiracy theories. Your so called evidence has an agenda behind it.

15

Almost all you really need to know about 9/11…

Bush Opposes 9/11 Query Panel
(CBS) President Bush took a few minutes during his trip to Europe Thursday to voice his opposition to establishing a special commission to probe how the government dealt with terror warnings before Sept. 11
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/15/attack/main509096.shtml

9/11 Commission Funding Woes
The panel has until the end of May 2004 to complete its work, but it will spend the $3 million it was originally allotted by around August 2003 – if it doesn’t get the supplement.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,437267,00.html

9/11 Commission Report: Why No Arab Names on Passenger List?
Why are there no Arab names on the passenger list for the planes used in the September 11, 2001 attack on America: American Airlines Flight 11, United Airlines Flight 175, American Airlines Flight 77, and United Airlines Flight 93?

Why is the “terrorist ringleader Mohamed Atta” not listed on the passenger list for American Airlines Flight 11?
http://www.twf.org/News/Y2004/0726-911Report.html

War not realistic option before 9/11
It was only after the Sept. 11 attacks that public opinion here and abroad changed enough to make an invasion politically possible.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-03-23-war-analysis_x.htm

Jewish Institute For National Security Affairs calls for regime change in Iraq - Sept 13, 2001
http://www.jinsa.org/articles/print.html/documentid/1262

‘Shadow Government’ News To Congress
(CBS) Key congressional leaders say they didn’t know President Bush had established a “shadow government,” moving dozens of senior civilian managers to secret underground locations outside Washington to ensure that the federal government could survive a devastating terrorist attack on the nation’s capital, The Washington Post says in its Saturday editions…

A government official who spoke to The Associated Press said President Bush does not foresee ever needing to turn over government functions to the secret operation, but believed it was prudent to implement the long-standing plan in light of the war on terrorism and persistent threats of future attacks.

The team, drawn from every Cabinet department and some independent agencies, would seek to prevent the collapse of essential government functions in the event of a disabling blow to Washington, the official said…

The underground government would try to contain disruptions of the nation’s food and water supplies, transportation links, energy and telecommunications networks, public health and civil order, the Post reported. Later, it would begin to reconstitute the government…
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/03/01/attack/main502530.shtml

–Woodrow Wilson

16

[quote]Sifu wrote:
Most of your links didn’t work. Then some of the others were really weak.

The one where the reporter says missile plane is a good example of how you are clutching at straws. You are reading more into that than there actually is.

The rate at which the buildings collapsed was calculated by a mathmetician who came to the conclusion that time it took the buildings to collapse was consistant with a structural failure. Once that building started coming down all it was going to do is pick up speed.

The sound of explosions is easily explained. Massive structural steel beams like the ones in the trade center being snapped in half will sound like a bomb going off because it is a rapid release of built up energy. Again you are reading into this what you want it to be and ignoring other likely explanations.

Your research has broken no new ground. Your evidence fails to mention explanations that might be contradictory to your conspiracy theories. Your so called evidence has an agenda behind it. [/quote]

Concrete slabs (floors) collapsing upon those below will sound like explosions.

17

[quote]The Mage wrote:
Conspiracy theories can sound good, especially to somebody without the actual understanding of the science involved, or the confusion following a big event like this.

This link is all you need:

They took an actual objective look at what happened, and tried to find out if all the claims being put out were true or not. If you cannot accept this, you either need to provide proof (real proof) that this work is faulty, or biased in any way, or you are simply a nut.
[/quote]

YES, lets look to Popular Mechanics for the “unbiased truth” about 9/11…

The Military Industrial Porn Complex - Popular science magazines used to be aimed at the geeky wannabe inventor. Today, it’s all about the glamour of war.

Over the last several years, several have turned themselves into military versions of a Victoria’s Secrets catalog.

Take the September 2003 issue of Popular Mechanics. The cover proclaims “American Megapower: Inside the Most Awesome Fighting Force on Earth.” A bat-winged stealth bomber presides over a group shot of tanks, an aircraft carrier and a visored soldier. The text inside amounts to an unabashed love letter to the Pentagon. No mention is made of how this megapower appears to be bogged down in Iraq or that there are any limits to military force, scientific or otherwise.

The megapower issue was only one of five cover stories that Popular Mechanics ran on the U.S. military in 2003, each one announced with all the subtlety of a tabloid (“Floating Self-Propelled Military Base Projects American Power Anywhere!”). Nearly every month last year featured a new celebration of the military’s know-how or sheer force…
http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/feature/2004/03/30/military_mags/index.html?source=search&aim=/tech/feature

Little Trace of Slowdown For Defense Contractors
Associated Press
January 27, 2008
Global markets may be writhing and the U.S. economy teetering at the brink of recession, but for many of the nation’s largest defense firms, the good times keep going.

Most have posted big earnings gains in recent years, largely because of record Pentagon spending on weapons programs and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. And with the government, not consumers, as their biggest customers, defense contractors appear poised to weather any economic downturn that may lie ahead.

“We are about as far removed from the credit risk and those sorts of matters as you can imagine,” said Bruce L. Tanner, chief financial officer at Lockheed Martin of Bethesda. “We feel sort of insulated…”

The level of defense spending in coming years is unclear. The Senate passed a $696 billion budget Tuesday, including $189 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, that will go to President Bush for his expected signature.

Damn those Arabs.

18

[quote]Sifu wrote:

The rate at which the buildings collapsed was calculated by a mathmetician who came to the conclusion that time it took the buildings to collapse was consistant with a structural failure. Once that building started coming down all it was going to do is pick up speed. [/quote]

NIST admitted it only studied the initiation of the collapse, without analysing the ensuing events; the free fall speed rate remains unexplained by their own omission.

NIST scientists have categorically refused any public debate with other scientists; why waste an occasion to demonstrate the foolishness of demolition theory scientists, unless they are the foolish ones themselves ?

No recording of the snapping of massive structrural steel beams ever exists.

Steel beams submitted to excessive heat start to BEND, not SNAP. Those not submitted to excessive heat/ bearing load neither BEND nor SNAP.

Steel beans are required by safety measures to whitstand three times the actual weight of the building.

There’s no scientific explanation for the systematical failure of the structural steel beams unaffacted by the crash and below the fires.

NIST’s own models experiments failed to lead to a collapse, much less at free speed.

They have refused as well to publish the mathematical parameters they used in their studies.

Your arguments are simply pseudo scientific falsehoods and misrepresentations.You have shown zero interest in the scientific truth.

19

The free fall speed perfectly symetric collapse of wtc 7, which was neither hit by an airliner and neither suffered raging infernos on each of his floors, remains unexplained 6 years after the facts.

The governament, of which NIST is an extension ( how many of you people knew it?) admits they found no plausible scientific explanation to the collapse.

20

[quote]jeffdirect wrote:
The free fall speed perfectly symetric collapse of wtc 7, which was neither hit by an airliner and neither suffered raging infernos on each of his floors, remains unexplained 6 years after the facts.

The governament, of which NIST is an extension ( how many of you people knew it?) admits they found no plausible scientific explanation to the collapse.[/quote]

WTC 7 did not collapse at freefall. What is symetric?

WTC was loaded with fuel and it burned for hours before it fell. WTC 7 was missing ~ 25% of one side for hours before it collapsed.

Your short post is full of lies. Go spread your shit elsewhere.