[quote]Chad Waterbury wrote:
Dj…,
You know I respect you, but I’ve gotta disagree with these statements.
Are you saying that controlling joint inflammation ISN’T beneficial to a fighter?
And Surge Workout Fuel will help you recover faster. Proper recovery support is KEY to a hard-training fighter. [/quote]
Yes. But you could have easily said proper nutrition and advertised the Biotest supplements, instead it was done twice. Which seems redundant. I dont have a problem with it, but i see where DJ is coming from.
[quote]
As for the other statements, I simply can’t give super specific programming advice in an article like that. What would be spot on for one guy wouldn’t work for another. That’s why I give examples of exercises and parameters.
I was asked if I would change anything about the HD articles. Yes, I wouldn’t have written them. That two-part system would’ve been more beneficial if I stuck to my instincts and wrote them as programming guidelines - not as specific workouts. [/quote]
I agree.
[quote]
Whenever I hear someone say “Coach _____” designed a better system, it’s perfectly evident that the system in question coincided with the person’s weaknesses. HD does fit the bill for many fighters, but it also misses the boat for others. This is the nature of writing programs with specific guidelines.
What if I posted the EXACT program that I have Kron Gracie on right now to prepare him for his life as a BJJ and MMA fighter? Do you think it would work for you? My guess is it probably wouldn’t. His progress has been incredible on his current program, but the program is specific to HIS needs. [/quote]
There are very few of us who don’t recognize this fact. Yet would be interested in seeing an example of a developing fighters training programming because we can learn from it and tweak it to our own needs. We can learn a lot by seeing what actually works for someone.
[quote]
HD was an experiment on my part. But you won’t see an exact program for MMA fighters by me ever again because it doesn’t do the reader justice. What I’m writing now is a book with specific tests to determine your weaknesses, and ways to correct each.
That’s how you get results. [/quote]
Again, I agree. What I did like about the article is that the first order of business was identifying and correcting movement dysfunction. I felt this could have been explored more but that is an article unto itself.
While the other portions of the article were to give guidelines and basic parameters it seemed TOO broad.
Also my opinion is that there was no mentioning of how a fighter (recreationally or with professional intentions) can segue into weight training while say running 3x a week and training his sport 4-6x a week.
Recovery (other than post workout nutrition) wasn’t touched on and thats a huge part of fighting, which trains the cns heavily.
The specific endurance portion seemed more like general fitness… the guidelines were frankly subpar, if someone can’t do those then the last thing they need to think about doing is fighting.
The whole portion was dedicated to shoulder endurance.
Anaerobic endurance was touched on as walking with a 100lb dummy. While I’m sure thats great GPP thats nothing compared to say
alternating rounds of tabata sledgehammer tire strikes and speed jump rope
carrying the dummy is nothing compared to snatches with a beer keg filled with water.
High rep overhead squats, while i agree is a great gauge is staggeringly subpar to say front squats and sprints (jumprope or actual running)
And i’m pretty sure weighted chinups trumps the bent over crucifix hold, even if it is about static strength.
If this were part of a “how to segue into weight lifting to enhance your athletic performance and simultaneously correct movement efficiency” portion to the article then these would be fitting otherwise it just seems like someone might read that and go “oh thats ALL i need to do to lift weights as an mma fighter?”
“7 steps to a balanced fighter” makes it seem like “Follow these 7 Mandates of the White Heaven Lotus and you shall become Champion of the world” or something… it was more like 7 cool tips for fighters.
Hell, I like the article… and maybe we’re nitpicking, maybe we’re just spoiled (quattro dynamo for instance was the shit)… but it really hit me as less than it could have been.