Minutemen

[quote]BookerT wrote:
You don’t like being judged for something you weren’t around for?

Take that feeling that you get when you think you are being judged for something you didn’t do and multiply that by everday of your life and maybe you might begin to understand where X is coming from.

I realized my skin color affected the way I was jusged/viewed when I was 6 or 7 years old. Didn’t like it then, don’t like it now.

When JW makes a comment about blacks shooting the assholes it does cause shock an awe. For me it’s hard to accept that someone doesn’t realize the consequences of retaliation of blacks would have been awful. The only reason I realized what was going on was because I have met some people who have no idea what the environment was like then or now.

The history of black America is out there.

First thing I would do is to get a basic idea of what racism is and what causes it. That may seem apparent, but it’s not. If JW understood that, then he would see why his comments made my jaw drop.

Try this book description out:

http://www.pupress.princeton.edu/chapters/i7243.html

[/quote]

The funny thing is, we have both said the exact same things yet they want to call me a racist for saying I was shocked by the response. I can’t believe there are many black people who would NOT be shocked by that response.

You know, it’s nice and all to play the reverse racism trump card, but I don’t think you will get much play out of it.

The only way you can imagine it would be worth something is if you were totally clueless as to how life is in fact very different for people within recognizable minorities.

Oh wait. Yes, I see.

It isn’t over. It isn’t all in the past. Things were worse. Things are somewhat better. Things are still bad. Oops. Don’t read the oft repeated phrase that things are better to imply that things are all better now.

People aren’t lynched very often, or dragged behind cars very often, but lesser activities stil occur on a regular basis. As a person in a minority, you just have to suck it up and keep on going, because if you don’t, there are a million people ready to take you on, fire you, or otherwise make an example out of you.

Whether or not ProfX has flown off the handle in a fit of pique or not, he generally comports himself very well.

Do you know what this thread actually looks like?

It looks like ignorant angry white people that don’t like to be schooled by a black man, so they pull the old reverse racism lever.

Hey, I’m just the messenger. Attack me all you want for saying that, but it will still look like that.

ProfX, don’t let them rile you, that is exactly the goal here. Get you riled so you might step over the line and say something you don’t intend. I doubt they can do that, but just offering some moral support in they are starting to get your goat.

Avoid the cortisol, eat a couple cows and chickens, and hit the gym. A much more productive use of your time than trying to give vision to the blind.

[quote]Cream wrote:
Professor X wrote:
rainjack wrote:
Do members of Tippah County make up a huge percentage of the people in the United States? I didn’t think so. The same can not be said of blacks in general and this is not about one particular black person but how clueless Joe seems to be as far as anything that concerns what blacks have experienced in America and how that progressed to where we are today. He knows of small facts but seems completely disconnected. Your attempt at an analogy fails because of that. I can go my whole life and never meet or see a person from Tippah County. I seriously doubt there are many places in the US today where a person could grow up and never meet or see a black person even on tv. This was a sad attempt. Whoops, I judged you again.

Where are “WE” at? Just curious![/quote]

What is your question even referring to? We are “at” the 21st century after nearly 200 years of post-slavery assimilation into American society. Things have greatly changed to the point where I doubt my great grand parents would ever imagine the differences happening now. The past 30 years have led to blacks being more accepted for being human and advancing more in society than perhaps the previous 50 years ever saw in the same time period. As far as where “you” are, that is a different story. “You” claim to be a teacher but every post you have ever posted on this forum seems juvenile and substandard. I hope you have not negatively affected the kids you teach. I do feel sorry for them. Any further questions?

[quote]rainjack wrote:
What’s wrong with us expressing curiosity about what blacks have gone through? [/quote]

I guess this has to be put as basic as possible. No one in this thread faulted you for an attempt to understand. In fact, nothing was said until Joe tried to act as if a comment about a former tragic event in history had nothing to do with racism in the mid-20th century (as if they were so far apart in time and circumstance that there was no need to relate the two). If his goal was to simply learn, the response would have been, “How is that related?”, not acting as if it had no effect. One response shows an attempt to learn. The other show that judgements have already been formed and that those have to be knocked down before any attempt to “teach” can be conducted.

[quote]vroom wrote:
You know, it’s nice and all to play the reverse racism trump card, but I don’t think you will get much play out of it.

The only way you can imagine it would be worth something is if you were totally clueless as to how life is in fact very different for people within recognizable minorities.

Oh wait. Yes, I see.

It isn’t over. It isn’t all in the past. Things were worse. Things are somewhat better. Things are still bad. Oops. Don’t read the oft repeated phrase that things are better to imply that things are all better now.

People aren’t lynched very often, or dragged behind cars very often, but lesser activities stil occur on a regular basis. As a person in a minority, you just have to suck it up and keep on going, because if you don’t, there are a million people ready to take you on, fire you, or otherwise make an example out of you.

Whether or not ProfX has flown off the handle in a fit of pique or not, he generally comports himself very well.

Do you know what this thread actually looks like?

It looks like ignorant angry white people that don’t like to be schooled by a black man, so they pull the old reverse racism lever.

Hey, I’m just the messenger. Attack me all you want for saying that, but it will still look like that.

ProfX, don’t let them rile you, that is exactly the goal here. Get you riled so you might step over the line and say something you don’t intend. I doubt they can do that, but just offering some moral support in they are starting to get your goat.

Avoid the cortisol, eat a couple cows and chickens, and hit the gym. A much more productive use of your time than trying to give vision to the blind.[/quote]

Vroom - shut up and go defend yourself in your other thread. And at least drive by a tanning salon.

Gentlemen,

I’ve gotten several requests to kill this entire thread.

I haven’t followed it very closely, but I can see that we’ve gotten way off topic and it’s gotten to be largely a pissing match.

If I delete it, I’ll get scores of angry complaints.

If I don’t delete it, I’ll continue to get scores of angry complaints.

These are my options:

Jump off the roof of Biotest, hopefully hitting the large dumpster so no one will have to clean up.

Or…

Ask that you curb the anger and get back on topic.

I’m hoping it’s the second option.

Thanks!
TC

How do you follow that post by by the bossman.

I kinda viewed this post as a semi educational embarkment into boyhood, where our intellects were kidnapped by the 7 year old boys hiding inside of us all looking to get out and just wrestle around with eachother. I guess it’s time to wash up and go get dinner now, dads calling from the back porch. See you guys tommorow, and profx i won’t forget that wedgie you gave me today either.

V

So, back on topic…

I was talking to an old colleague (now an economist) of mine from Berkeley who was interviewed on this subject by NBC11 (the local NBC-owned station) and he was suggesting that another way to approach the illegal immigration problem could be to curb the demand, by mechanizing agriculture as much as possible.

His theory is that if there’s less demand for cheap labor in the fields, it will be easier to justify taking strong action against illegal immigrants.

Now, I’ll admit my complete ignorance about US agriculture, and hence I didn’t argue much with him; rather, I believe some people in these forums are better qualified at giving some feedback on how feasible it is (both in practical and economical terms) to reduce the dependency on cheap labor by increasing the level of mechanization.

Thoughts / experiences are welcome.

it’s kind of a chicken and egg thing, isn’t it?

hspder-

In regards to going hi-tech in Ag - it is being done.

Living on the north end of the largest cotton producing region in the world, I can tell you that the need for farm labor has been reduced dramatically in the last 10 years.

With the advent of RoundUp Ready Cotton - a gentically engineered cotton seed that is resistant to herbicides - there is little if any need for hoer’s (individuals that hoe weeds in the cotton field). This cuts most farmer’s seasonal payroll by 8 - 10 individuals.

This brings up a bit of an ethical dilema. We have the ability to genetically engineer a row crop seed to do things that would distrurb most normal folk. There’s already a push for more ‘organic’, ‘natural’ food.

I would hate to disagree out of hand with your TV friend, but for mechanical technology to do away with migrant help, it will have to be assisted by genetic engineering to produce a plant/fruit/seed that mechanical technology can take full advantage of.

So the answer, at least from my edge of the world, is a hspderish yes and no.

I know I am entering into the fray on this thread somewhat late and if this was posted before, my apologies.

A major issue for illegal immigration into the U.S. is not just about there being jobs here that many citizens of Mexico come here for, but the fact as to what the conditions are like in Mexico causing them to come in the first place. It’s more than a little sad that Mexico’s government does so little to improve the lot of its own people besides basically encouraging them to come illegally to the U.S. and then bring back their earnings to Mexico (whose economy is as shoddy as ever). Until that portion is cleared up, I can’t really see that the issue of illegal immigration will subside any time soon.

Kuz

  • Return with honor.

[quote]Joe Weider wrote:
it’s kind of a chicken and egg thing, isn’t it?
[/quote]

Not really. If mechanizing is feasible, it should be done regardless. The US has relied on cheap (or even free…) labor through its history. Fortunately that reliance has been reduced tremendously, but it’s still there.

I believe that regardless of us having a problem with illegal immigration, if we CAN (continue to) replace cheap labor with machines, we should.

So, can we? Or is it that robotics is still not advanced enough to replace cheap labor further than it already has? Or is it that it’s just too expensive? Maybe too big of an investment?

The time frame of mechanization would be the issue. Who wants to wait as they invent/improve machinery to do these jobs.

Some jobs are such that only manual labor will do.

It’s a problem that needs attention and the minutemen are providing that. Let’s hope the President listens to the crys of the people and the poor english of the Governor.

Secure our borders now.

Now back to the real topic here. I for one am opposed to losing the thread. Yes the tone is argumentative instead of informative, but what is gained by removing the thread. Let the venting stay here and off of other areas.
For those offended, just stop reading. For those offending, lets get more educational regarding your stances, and less confrontational.
With all its negativity, there is still some positives coming out of it.

And please, let’s not let this attitude move into other forums or become a source of retaliation on other threads.

Let this thread be just like Vegas:

What happens here–stays here

[quote]rainjack wrote:
With the advent of RoundUp Ready Cotton - a gentically engineered cotton seed that is resistant to herbicides - there is little if any need for hoer’s (individuals that hoe weeds in the cotton field). This cuts most farmer’s seasonal payroll by 8 - 10 individuals.

This brings up a bit of an ethical dilema. We have the ability to genetically engineer a row crop seed to do things that would distrurb most normal folk. There’s already a push for more ‘organic’, ‘natural’ food.[/quote]

That actually is quite fascinating. I was completely unaware that genetically engineering crops could actually reduce the need for manual labor.

I can understand (though not completely agree) being against genetic engineering of food, however, aren’t we talking about cotton that is used in clothing? Why on Earth should anybody be against using only RoundUp Ready Cotton from now on, considering the clear advantages, and the fact that we don’t really eat cotton?

[quote]hspder wrote:
That actually is quite fascinating. I was completely unaware that genetically engineering crops could actually reduce the need for manual labor.

I can understand (though not completely agree) being against genetic engineering of food, however, aren’t we talking about cotton that is used in clothing? Why on Earth should anybody be against using only RoundUp Ready Cotton from now on, considering the clear advantages, and the fact that we don’t really eat cotton?
[/quote]

Read some of your food labels - do you ever remember reading “cotton seed oil” in anything? It is one of the largest food oil/cooking oil sources we have.

But that is beside the point. I generally agree with you that cotton is relatively benign when one speaks of genetic engineering.

I used cotton to show that your point was in fact true.

The problem you have with the hi-tech invasion of the farm is fairly complex. First off farmers are price takers, no added value premiums at the producer level of the food chain.

Couple that with government subsidies, and profit is only made by lowering inputs, not by higher prices. Farmer 'A’s wheat will sell for the exact same price as Farmer 'B’s. They are mostlikely in the same bin at the grain elevator.

My point is, that unless there is a demonstrable cost benefit to it, farmers are risk averse, since they’ve done it this way since 1889. Monsanto practically gave away the first couple of seasons of RoundUp Ready cotton seed just to get it out on the market. This wasn’t totally selfless, as monsanto owns the patent on Roundup - the herbicide that the cotton sseed is immune to.

Another problem with relying soley on mechanical technology is that no matter how advanced a machine is, plants are still a living growing organism, that left to itself will not always produce a uniform crop. It is planted in the dirt. Dirt is different from one end of the field to another. Genetic engineering has been used for years and years to yield a more uniform crop.

The emphasis in G.E. has been focused on yield for the last umpteen years. A marriage between GE and mechanical technology would take advantage of the best both have to offer. Hybrid vigor, if you will.

Potential advances in mechanical technology wrt reducing labor inputs will never be fully realized unless it married to advances in plant engineering. Kind of like cars can only go as fast as the road allows it to, regardless of what’s under the hood.

[quote]hspder wrote:
Joe Weider wrote:
it’s kind of a chicken and egg thing, isn’t it?

Not really. If mechanizing is feasible, it should be done regardless. The US has relied on cheap (or even free…) labor through its history. Fortunately that reliance has been reduced tremendously, but it’s still there.

I believe that regardless of us having a problem with illegal immigration, if we CAN (continue to) replace cheap labor with machines, we should.

So, can we? Or is it that robotics is still not advanced enough to replace cheap labor further than it already has? Or is it that it’s just too expensive? Maybe too big of an investment?

[/quote]

isn’t what you described a chicken and egg thing?
:wink:
In order to justify the initial investment and development, the prices paid to the workers have to be high enough to compete for the farmers pocketbooks, right?

If we keep getting the cheap labor, there’s no no need to mechanize.

Close down the flow of cheap labor, and force mechanization.

But you then have other issues, such as the ones RJ mentioned.

So suddenly we’re using extra chemicals on the planet blah blah etc etc.

Do we really want that?

But do we want to continue putting these people in the position where crossing the border illegally etc and working for peanuts is still better than what they could have in their own country?

Hell, maybe we did the regime change in the wrong damn country.

We could just add another state to the flag–Old Mexico. Whattaya think?

[quote]sasquatch wrote:
The time frame of mechanization would be the issue. Who wants to wait as they invent/improve machinery to do these jobs.

Some jobs are such that only manual labor will do.

It’s a problem that needs attention and the minutemen are providing that. Let’s hope the President listens to the crys of the people and the poor english of the Governor.

Secure our borders now.

Now back to the real topic here. I for one am opposed to losing the thread. Yes the tone is argumentative instead of informative, but what is gained by removing the thread. Let the venting stay here and off of other areas.
For those offended, just stop reading. For those offending, lets get more educational regarding your stances, and less confrontational.
With all its negativity, there is still some positives coming out of it.

And please, let’s not let this attitude move into other forums or become a source of retaliation on other threads.

Let this thread be just like Vegas:

What happens here–stays here
[/quote]

I like that.
Except the Vegas part. I hated Vegas.
Too loud and crowded.

“nopal_juventus, it is quite obvious we are both set in our beleif systems. It isn’t that I mind the discussion, but I feel now it is just getting pointless. I will however address a couple points.”

Agreed. I’ve tried to correct most people’s stances here, but failed. I just hope you’ll see my side of the story, since I see yours completely.

“When you say spending funds on things like Police. Puting it that way does not go around police bashing, because it brings police into the equasion. My rebutle of that study was that it brings police into the equasion when it isn’t part of the problem.”

I used police as an example. I don’t really think extra cops are the main factor for an increase in crime in southern california, I think funds mismanagement is. I showed you an example of this in which said cops were the recipients of said funds.

"As for my coments on Bill Cosby. Blacks do have the same atmosphere and opportunities as whites. Some of our richest and most sucesfull people in the past 50 years have been black. Larry Elder, a black talk show host I listen to puts it this way. Black people have a victom mentalaty. They don’t put effort into there education and such, as they are under this idea that they are allways opressed. They convince themselves that no matter what they do they wont succeed. Things like affirmative action gaurentie them a job , regardless of there skills. So they don’t train there skills. If this is not true, then explain to me this. Imagrents from India and Asia, from 1st to 4th generation do
A: Very well in out education system and generaly get very high scores.
B: In general don’t get involved with gangs, or hive high teen pregancy rates.

Why? Because of the way these people people raise kids, and were raised. As Bill Cosby said, high pregancy rates and slured speach. That has nothing to do with opertunaties, it is everything to do with how you raise your kids. Plenty of people in life lived in ghetos and run down block of societies, yet raised their kids to achive.

A lot of the problem is that the door has been opened for blacks, and they just don’t step through. Asians seem to deal with our society just fine. Even though Asian immagrents generaly are not given a better start or opurtunaties then black people."

This is just plain naive. I used to feel the same way about religious freedom in the U.S., or feminism, until I came back here and saw for myself all the discrimination that there still is. I also used to feel that blacks constantly kept purposely portraying themselves as victims, until I came back to the U.S. BookerT has already adressed the issue, so you only need to read over his posts to see that blacks, whites, and mexicans aren’t yet equal, not by a long shot. Asians most certainly don’t have the same atmosphere and living conditions as blacks and latinos.

“Latino’s that are 3rd and 4th generation latinos do have the same opportunities as whites. One Latino bought a sports team (or was it a stadium) about a year or two ago. He atributed his success in life to his parents being dedicated Americians, and teaching him things like that he had to speak english. Even if a first generation is not given those opertunaties, they can give them to there kids. By raising to adapt to our society. To speak our language and live as we do.”

Nearly all mexicans know english to an extent (enough to comunicate in english). However, they choose to speak in spanish amongst themselves. Is this no different than chinese speaking mandarin, or Indians speaking in their native dialect? The thing is that since there are so many mexicans it’s much more obvious.

“Otherwise you have to explain why Indian and Asian immagrents do so well (a lot of whom came here with very little), and why black people and latino’s don’t.”

So you’re saying that blacks and latinos aren’t trying as hard or equal in a certain way to asians? That is the definition of racism. You imply that there is an ethnic reason for blacks and latinos being perpetually poor, when it’s sociological and economical.

“As I say though, I doubt we will change each others minds so I probaly wont continue beyond this post.”

Same here. If no one even bothers reading the links that I post, it’s of no consequence whether I post or not. I see that at least you haven’t continued arguing the economic necessity of illegals, so I might have won something after all.

further mechanization of food production would probably be a bad idea right now, considering the effect of oil depletion on the price of fuel.

Well, one thing I won’t really buy is the argument that reducing the influx of illegal immigrants will increase the mechanization efforts; that would be akin to saying that reducing the influx of illegal drugs into the US should reduce the consumption – it does not.

Now, having said that, there is the continuing trend of teenagers shifting from “classic”, plain narcotics – like marijuana, cocaine, heroin, and amphetamines – to more sophisticated, targeted stuff. What prompted that shift? Plenty of supply of the “more sophisticated” drugs, i.e. – choice!

To put it another way: it was the increase in supply of different drugs that sustained that shift; not the reduction of supply of the classic drugs.

Hence maybe what would help would be for the government to start sponsoring mechanization efforts, through subsidies, for example. I’ve always heard that the way (and what) the government subsidizes these days is dumb anyway, so change should be well received by farmers.

Maybe we’ve been all looking in the wrong place; maybe the key of fueling the economic growth of this country is focusing on increasing the efficiency of the primary sector by reducing its reliance on cheap labor. After all, if there’s one thing we have over everyone else in the world is our natural resources and a tradition of highly experienced, creative and resourceful farmers. They’ll figure it out if given the proper incentive – which shouldn’t be taking away choice (that’s always bad) but rather making the alternatives less cumbersome.

Am I on the wrong track here?