Meathead Camaraderie

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:
In my experience, while I may sometimes feel a bit sluggish during the day, or even in between sets at the gym as a contest draws near (not for the majority of a prep mind you), my actual strength levels when under the weights never really lags. I attribute this to well thought out nutrition, not trying to drop large amounts of fat in a ridiculously short period of time, and the fact that the majority of my gym-work in anaerobic in nature, and my body can supply ATP for such short durations without any real issues (I like to train with more sets of less reps, so I may fatigue a muscle, but I never really fatigue overall).

Also, I believe that because I never really run my nutrients down (cals, carbs) for more than a single day before raising them back up a bit that I’m avoiding a lot of the wearing down that some people experience.

The human body’s a pretty damned cool thing. Cordova once told me that a great time to make gains is when you’re dieting, because the body goes into defense mode (or something like that), and will make better use of nutrients and adaptive responses (science guys feel free to crap on this all you want, but I’m sticking with it -lol)

S[/quote]

While I agree, I sure as hell miss my strength levels when I was 15kg fatter. It is hard to believe just how much of a difference a good layer of fat makes for powerlifting. Especially for the squat. But yeah, not worth it if you don’t push record weights.

[quote]solidkhalid wrote:

[quote]The Mighty Stu wrote:
If someone wants to post online about how they cut and their strength dropped drastically, all I can think to say is that they probably didn’t approach it as well as they could have.

S[/quote]

I don’t have a problem saying I didn’t approach it as well as I could have, but given that it was my first real “cut” I have a lot to learn still[/quote]

Hope you realize I didn’t mean that as a dig at anyone, merely that we learn a little more each time we go to such levels of leanness.

S

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Waittz wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Waittz wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

First, I never wrote that I have no desire to lean out more. I plan to diet more this summer. I don’t care about PLEASING YOU with my level of leanness.

[/quote]

What? Didnt you just say this like a week ago?

[quote]Professor X wrote:
I don’t think I will be dieting much this summer either and wll just work on avoiding gaining much fat while trying to go up. I am seeing the separation in my pec delt tie in that wasn’t there before.

More carbs around training.[/quote]

[/quote]

I take it as it goes. My goals are not set in stone, but seeing as I am already looking good right now, that is why I am thinking of not worrying about it.

[/quote]

Wait what? A week ago you said you will not be dieting over the summer, a minute ago you said you plan to diet more, a second ago you say I take it as it goes? What exactly are your goals, I am still confused by this. And no I am not attacking you. [/quote]

My goals are to gvet vbigger and leaner…and since my back has gone upo in strength over the last week, I am thinking of riding that out.

That is called listening to your body and not writing shit in stone an not deviating from it buy disregarding it.

I am this size because of doing what I just explained.[/quote]

So you’re continuing on a bulk becuase you did some more reps with a given weight in a back exercise compared to last week?[/quote]

Wow…you mean I shouldn’t base what I do on my results?

It isn’t just “some more reps”. I spent over a year recovering from an accident. My strength is just now really going back up and I am really filling back out in my back and shoulders…so please tell me why I would ignore how my body is responding.

I await your response.

[quote]ryan.b_96 wrote:

this is what i was thinking, what kind of logic is this? ohhhh i added 10lbs to my t-bar rows time to bulk for another year.

i really dont get it. X havent you been training for almost 20 years or something like that? how much more muscle do you honestly think you could be possibly gaining and why couldn’t it be done at a bit lower body fat?[/quote]

Who said anything about “bulking” and who said I was doing ti for another year?

I don’t need to “bulk up” anymore. And asking how much more muscle I plan to gain has to be the dumbest question on a bodybuilding board ever.

I plan to gain as much as I can. Sedentary people asked me the same question when I was only 170lbs. Strange people on this forum lately.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]ryan.b_96 wrote:

this is what i was thinking, what kind of logic is this? ohhhh i added 10lbs to my t-bar rows time to bulk for another year.

i really dont get it. X havent you been training for almost 20 years or something like that? how much more muscle do you honestly think you could be possibly gaining and why couldn’t it be done at a bit lower body fat?[/quote]

Who said anything about “bulking” and who said I was doing ti for another year?

I don’t need to “bulk up” anymore. And asking how much more muscle I plan to gain has to be the dumbest question on a bodybuilding board ever.

I plan to gain as much as I can. Sedentary people asked me the same question when I was only 170lbs. Strange people on this forum lately.[/quote]

I think the question Ryan and I posed was how much more can you EXPECT to gain (not plan) considering after 4 or 5 years of training for a natural, provided everything’s done right, slow to a snail’s pace, and by the 15th year, the gains are dead or come in GRAMS or OUNCES per year.

If I have it correctly, in the past, you were once on a cut, but then decided to halt it because you experienced some lat growth, and I see you’re doing this here now. So it got me curious. I forgot about your most recent accident. Sorry about that. How long ago was the accident?

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]ryan.b_96 wrote:

this is what i was thinking, what kind of logic is this? ohhhh i added 10lbs to my t-bar rows time to bulk for another year.

i really dont get it. X havent you been training for almost 20 years or something like that? how much more muscle do you honestly think you could be possibly gaining and why couldn’t it be done at a bit lower body fat?[/quote]

Who said anything about “bulking” and who said I was doing ti for another year?

I don’t need to “bulk up” anymore. And asking how much more muscle I plan to gain has to be the dumbest question on a bodybuilding board ever.

I plan to gain as much as I can. Sedentary people asked me the same question when I was only 170lbs. Strange people on this forum lately.[/quote]

I think the question Ryan and I posed was how much more can you EXPECT to gain (not plan) considering after 4 or 5 years of training for a natural, provided everything’s done right, slow to a snail’s pace, and by the 15th year, the gains are dead or come in GRAMS or OUNCES per year. [/quote]

Obviously they aren’t dead for me…so for me, instead of guide my actions by what you say can’t be done…I will keep pushing to see what I can actually do.

So research when the accident was seeing how many times I have written about it since you seem so critical of everything else written.

I am seeing growth and strength increases in my back and shoulders. My biceps are looking better also.

A person tuned into what their body was doing would allow their body to grow when it was ready…instead of acting like the human body goes by a hand written schedule.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]ryan.b_96 wrote:

this is what i was thinking, what kind of logic is this? ohhhh i added 10lbs to my t-bar rows time to bulk for another year.

i really dont get it. X havent you been training for almost 20 years or something like that? how much more muscle do you honestly think you could be possibly gaining and why couldn’t it be done at a bit lower body fat?[/quote]

Who said anything about “bulking” and who said I was doing ti for another year?

I don’t need to “bulk up” anymore. And asking how much more muscle I plan to gain has to be the dumbest question on a bodybuilding board ever.

I plan to gain as much as I can. Sedentary people asked me the same question when I was only 170lbs. Strange people on this forum lately.[/quote]

I think the question Ryan and I posed was how much more can you EXPECT to gain (not plan) considering after 4 or 5 years of training for a natural, provided everything’s done right, slow to a snail’s pace, and by the 15th year, the gains are dead or come in GRAMS or OUNCES per year. [/quote]

Obviously they aren’t dead for me…so for me, instead of guide my actions by what you say can’t be done…I will keep pushing to see what I can actually do.

So research when the accident was seeing how many times I have written about it since you seem so critical of everything else written.

I am seeing growth and strength increases in my back and shoulders. My biceps are looking better also.

A person tuned into what their body was doing would allow their body to grow when it was ready…instead of acting like the human body goes by a hand written schedule.[/quote]

You are the only man I’ve ever encountered who is capable of perpetual gains, as expressed in your posts over time. I don’t even think I’ve seen pros making gains or improvements for this long, drugs and all.

I guess I have to accept this at this point and stop questioning it because it seemed so unique to me. I apologize.

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

You are the only man I’ve ever encountered who is capable of perpetual gains, as expressed in your posts over time. I don’t even think I’ve seen pros making gains or improvements for this long, drugs and all.

I guess I have to accept this at this point and stop questioning it because it seemed so unique to me. I apologize.
[/quote]

What “perpetual gains”?

I posted a picture of me at 285lbs when I was carrying the most muscle and got laughed at for it.

What I was showing is that I lost muscle since THE TWO ACCIDENTS I was in over a two year period.

Any fat pic you saw was AFTER THE FIRST CAR ACCIDENT…when I had lost some muscle and gained some fat.

What you see is a really big guy regaining muscle lost over three years of rehab…so most of what you keep writing is nonsense considering this has all been explained.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

You are the only man I’ve ever encountered who is capable of perpetual gains, as expressed in your posts over time. I don’t even think I’ve seen pros making gains or improvements for this long, drugs and all.

I guess I have to accept this at this point and stop questioning it because it seemed so unique to me. I apologize.
[/quote]

What “perpetual gains”?

I posted a picture of me at 285lbs when I was carrying the most muscle and got laughed at for it.

What I was showing is that I lost muscle since THE TWO ACCIDENTS I was in over a two year period.

Any fat pic you saw was AFTER THE FIRST CAR ACCIDENT…when I had lost some muscle and gained some fat.

What you see is a really big guy regaining muscle lost over three years of rehab…so most of what you keep writing is nonsense considering this has all been explained.[/quote]

I dunno man; maybe my reading comprehension isn’t too good, or I haven’t been following your posts accurately enough. It’s just that it seems from your posts over the years that you are in a constant state of progress. Many posts, like, “I’m leaner than that pic now,” “I’m bigger than in the pic now,” “I’m up x amount of pounds,” “I’m not down X amount of pounds,” “I’ve experienced growth in the _____ (bodypart) recently,” “My _____ are bigger now,” and, “I’m nowhere near where I want to be,” (at 30 something years old after 15 years of lifting), all have implied to me perpetual progress of some sort or another or that perpetual progress is even possible.

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

I dunno man; maybe my reading comprehension isn’t too good,[/quote]

No comment.

Question…why does this bother you?

This has to be a personal issue. You are this offset by my progress that you need to literally fuss with everything written even though you can’t really explain exactly what you have an issue with?

You seem distressed that my progress didn’t follow your “limit guide”.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

I dunno man; maybe my reading comprehension isn’t too good,[/quote]

No comment.

Question…why does this bother you?

This has to be a personal issue. You are this offset by my progress that you need to literally fuss with everything written even though you can’t really explain exactly what you have an issue with?

You seem distressed that my progress didn’t follow your “limit guide”.
[/quote]

It does follow my limit guide considering what you’d weight you’d be at if you decided to lean out.

I Don’t have a personal issue with you. Thinking it over, I guess I found your ability to make more progress over time than any other bodybuilder I’ve followed and/or met so remarkable that I felt compelled question it. Like I said, I apologize and I accept the uniqueness and achievement. I guess I had to get over it.

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

It does follow my limit guide considering what you’d weight you’d be at if you decided to lean out. [/quote]

You don’t even know how much I weigh right now. I haven’t weighed myself in over 3 months. I just did for the first time last night.

Clearly. It helps to just accept that yes, I gained more muscle doing it this way than many here doing it any other way.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

I dunno man; maybe my reading comprehension isn’t too good,[/quote]

No comment.

Question…why does this bother you?

This has to be a personal issue. You are this offset by my progress that you need to literally fuss with everything written even though you can’t really explain exactly what you have an issue with?

You seem distressed that my progress didn’t follow your “limit guide”.
[/quote]

I don’t think he’s distressed as much as he’s curious about your unique…huh…“progress”. You should write a book ilustrated with all your progress pictures and call it “fifty shades of dark”.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

It does follow my limit guide considering what you’d weight you’d be at if you decided to lean out. [/quote]

You don’t even know how much I weigh right now. I haven’t weighed myself in over 3 months. I just did for the first time last night.

Clearly. It helps to just accept that yes, I gained more muscle doing it this way than many here doing it any other way. [/quote]

Yeah, and there are people here or WERE here who’ve gained even more muscle.

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

Yeah, and there are people here or WERE here who’ve gained even more muscle.
[/quote]

I am sure there are. I made no claim to have gained the most muscle of anyone here.

i said I gained more than most…which I did…so why do you have an issue with that?

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

It does follow my limit guide considering what you’d weight you’d be at if you decided to lean out. [/quote]

You don’t even know how much I weigh right now. I haven’t weighed myself in over 3 months. I just did for the first time last night.

Clearly. It helps to just accept that yes, I gained more muscle doing it this way than many here doing it any other way. [/quote]

Doesn’t matter how much you weigh now. That doesn’t change what you will likely be when you lean out. Depending on the level of leanness you wish to go for, you’ll probably be in the low 200’s or if you want to get shredded, below 200, likely.

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

Doesn’t matter how much you weigh now. [/quote]

???

You just tried to tell me how much I would weigh dieted down. Wouldn’t that have something to do with how much I weigh now???

??? Dude, I am 5’10". If I have to get to to 220lbs to me shredded, do you realize how big that is at my height?

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

Yeah, and there are people here or WERE here who’ve gained even more muscle.
[/quote]

I am sure there are. I made no claim to have gained the most muscle of anyone here.

i said I gained more than most…which I did…so why do you have an issue with that?[/quote]

As I said, I don’t have an issue.

At this point, I accept your unique ability to perpetually gain, and also your uniqueness as a big guy who needs special diet strategies, for both leaning and gaining, because of his bigness.

I’m over it. I accept it. And I won’t speak to you about it anymore.

Thinking it over, I will also no longer question the existence of 230# pound, lean, drug free, men of average height who are like that without weight training. I will accept that the pool of thousands of natural bodybuilders over the last 100 years isn’t a good one, because the most genetically endowed didn’t go into bodybuilding and aimed for the endless amount of slots in the entertainment or pro sports or music or fashion industries.

I will also continue to wonder, after working and living in THE MOST racially and ethnically diverse area on this planet (LITERALLY), and perhaps the most congested area, Queens, NY (a county in a city of 8 million people) where all the unique and muscular outliers are.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

Doesn’t matter how much you weigh now. [/quote]

???

You just tried to tell me how much I would weigh dieted down. Wouldn’t that have something to do with how much I weigh now???

??? Dude, I am 5’10". If I have to get to to 220lbs to me shredded, do you realize how big that is at my height?[/quote]

You will have to be 220 just be mid double digits of bf. you will not be shredded above 200

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]BrickHead wrote:

Doesn’t matter how much you weigh now. [/quote]

???

You just tried to tell me how much I would weigh dieted down. Wouldn’t that have something to do with how much I weigh now???

??? Dude, I am 5’10". If I have to get to to 220lbs to me shredded, do you realize how big that is at my height?[/quote]

You won’t be shredded at 220, more like 190, or (gasp), a bit lower. Shredded is 5 to 7%.

To be moderately lean, you’d probably be less than 220, PERHAPS 210 or 215 or so.