Mayweather vs Pacquiao

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:

[quote]TheCB wrote:

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:
I dont know what I was thinking. I dont know why I was so naive.

Here I thought there were two of the generations best fighters ready to define their legacies in a historic event, giving it all going out on their shields to a well deserved retirement.

Instead we got a gun-shy pacquiao and a playing it safe mayweather.

boring, boring boring. I saw a flash of brilliance in the first 4 rounds, and then mayweather must’ve saw dollar signs and pac got flashbacks to the marquez fight after he ate a few counter right hands.

Honestly I’ve seen Wlad matches that were more engaging.
[/quote]

you like to portray yourself as some kind of authority on boxing in this forum.

everything in the above post is embarrassing; you really have no clue.
[/quote]

I don’t portray myself as anything but myself. I have opinions and I post them… wow almost like everyone else on a forum!

This speaks more to your insecurities than it does to my portrayal. And FWIW I’m a fighter. I’ve boxed for the better part of a decade with wins at the state level and GG. You? I don’t know shit about you, and I don’t make that assumption, but quit blowing your fucking pipe about people not having a clue simply because they leveled ANY sort of criticism at your boy crush.

The fight was boring. Easily one of the least engaging Mayweather performances. If you can sit there and tell me with a straight face anything after round 5 was engaging, you’re either delusional or lying through your fucking teeth.
[/quote]

the fight was “boring” because floyd utterly dominated a multiple world champion and future HOF with EASE for 10 of the 12 rounds. he made manny look like a complete amateur. manny landed SIX punches per round for the entire fight!

floyd barely got out of 2nd gear and still DOMINATED the fight.

how can you not be impressed by that, seriously?

fwiw i wasnt really much of a floyd fan until he made canelo look like a total novice.

the guy is just a masterful genius, people dont want to agree due to his perceived image that’s all imo.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]TheCB wrote:

[quote]LondonBoxer123 wrote:

[quote]TheCB wrote:

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:
I dont know what I was thinking. I dont know why I was so naive.

Here I thought there were two of the generations best fighters ready to define their legacies in a historic event, giving it all going out on their shields to a well deserved retirement.

Instead we got a gun-shy pacquiao and a playing it safe mayweather.

boring, boring boring. I saw a flash of brilliance in the first 4 rounds, and then mayweather must’ve saw dollar signs and pac got flashbacks to the marquez fight after he ate a few counter right hands.

Honestly I’ve seen Wlad matches that were more engaging.
[/quote]

you like to portray yourself as some kind of authority on boxing in this forum.

everything in the above post is embarrassing; you really have no clue.
[/quote]

In my opinion, Aussie Davo is an authority on boxing in this forum, despite the obvious handicap of being (presumably) Australian.

I have no inclination to go back through threads and confirm this, but you seem to be responsible for a lot of name calling and ‘calling-out’ in this forum at the moment, and that isn’t the type of vibe we generally cultivate. I think, if I remember rightly, you called Aragorn, who is an accomplished and experienced fighter, an ignorant moron earlier in this thread.

It’s none of my business whether you agree with Aussie Davo or not - again, on principle as he is an Austalian, I’ve always assumed he is misinformed about all matters relating to sport (particularly rugby :p), but if you’re a grown up, it would behoove you to behave like one, and save the pettiness and whole internet tough guy thing for the other forums here, where people may be more easily impressed and where that tone may be more generally accepted.[/quote]

anyone who says floyd has “dodged” pacqiuao for years is making an ignorant and moronic statement. maybe aragorn is neither of those things but his statement was.

aussie’s “analysis” of the fight is pretty much at the level of someone who thinks if a boxing match is not like balboa vs creed it’s not worth watching.

if he has watched 12 rounds and came to the above conclusion, his knowledge of the sport is embarrassing imo.
[/quote]

I agree with London. CB, it’d probably be better if you fucked off and found another forum.[/quote]

yawn.

[quote]TheCB wrote:

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:

[quote]TheCB wrote:

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:
I dont know what I was thinking. I dont know why I was so naive.

Here I thought there were two of the generations best fighters ready to define their legacies in a historic event, giving it all going out on their shields to a well deserved retirement.

Instead we got a gun-shy pacquiao and a playing it safe mayweather.

boring, boring boring. I saw a flash of brilliance in the first 4 rounds, and then mayweather must’ve saw dollar signs and pac got flashbacks to the marquez fight after he ate a few counter right hands.

Honestly I’ve seen Wlad matches that were more engaging.
[/quote]

you like to portray yourself as some kind of authority on boxing in this forum.

everything in the above post is embarrassing; you really have no clue.
[/quote]

I don’t portray myself as anything but myself. I have opinions and I post them… wow almost like everyone else on a forum!

This speaks more to your insecurities than it does to my portrayal. And FWIW I’m a fighter. I’ve boxed for the better part of a decade with wins at the state level and GG. You? I don’t know shit about you, and I don’t make that assumption, but quit blowing your fucking pipe about people not having a clue simply because they leveled ANY sort of criticism at your boy crush.

The fight was boring. Easily one of the least engaging Mayweather performances. If you can sit there and tell me with a straight face anything after round 5 was engaging, you’re either delusional or lying through your fucking teeth.
[/quote]

the fight was “boring” because floyd utterly dominated a multiple world champion and future HOF with EASE for 10 of the 12 rounds. he made manny look like a complete amateur. manny landed SIX punches per round for the entire fight!

floyd barely got out of 2nd gear and still DOMINATED the fight.

how can you not be impressed by that, seriously?

fwiw i wasnt really much of a floyd fan until he made canelo look like a total novice.

the guy is just a masterful genius, people dont want to agree due to his perceived image that’s all imo.[/quote]

I have never disputed Floyd’s genius. In fact, if you have been taking such a critical eye to my posting history as you seem to suggest you have being, you would notice I routinely praise Floyd’s ability. Hell I tried to model myself after Floyd and poached several of his pet moves to put in my own game. Imitation is the highest form of flattery and all that jazz.

I don’t care about his image either. I love James Toney, and Toney was as about buck ghetto wild and brash as they come. Floyd the man does not color my perception of Floyd the fighter.

But this was not an engaging performance by floyd. Dominating? I can’t in good conscience use that word to describe someone who spent literally 4 rounds doing nothing to capitalize on a clearly despondent Pacquiao. The alvarez fight was dominant. The Marquez fight was dominant as fuck. GATTI was a DOMINANT fight.

you specifically said floyd never got out of 2nd gear. And right there is a problem. generation defining champions before floyd wanted to not just win but win emphatically. They didn’t just want to build up a nice lead and cruise to the finish line, they wanted to leave no questions behind as to who was the better fighter.

I don’t expect rocky balboa, but i did expect, as irish said, for floyd to step it up a notch and beat that ass in the last half to make a statement about his legacy. Instead we got floyd “fuck you i got money” mayweather that night.

What this fight should’ve looked like was Whitaker-Chavez. Instead we got Klitscko-Haye.

I think the most important factor in this fight that resulted in Floyd’s win wasn’t his footwork, clinching etc. but, his effective use of his substantial reach advantage. When I saw the tale of the tape stats the day before the fight and saw the 5" reach advantage Floyd had, I knew there was no hope for Manny. All night long, he kept him at bay with his jab. Manny could never find his range for longer than a few seconds at a time whereas Floyd found his early and engaged at that distance almost the entire fight. Whenever Manny was able to break through that fence of jabs, Floyd would quickly dance away as he is apt to do.

On another note, if I read another column about how this was boxing’s last gasp and how now with Floyd retiring boxing is dead, I will fucking put on Angel Manfredy’s old El Diablo mask and start dropping fools. What this fight proves more than anything is that people- and I’m talking about your average casual sports fan here, not the hardcore boxing purists- are still drawn to the spectacle that is championship boxing if there is a compelling fight to be made. The fight itself turned out to be another Mayweather dud but, when people were bombarded with the story lines heading into this fight, they tuned in in sure to be record numbers. Just think what this could have done to get a whole new generation of people into boxing if it had been a Ward vs Gatti bloodbath (which is what most casual observers desire). I don’t think boxing will ever regain its primacy among American sports simply because our society has undergone such a pussification.

When boxing reigned supreme in the late 1800s all the way into the mid 1900s, life was fucking harsh. People lived hard and died young with few of the creature comforts that we have today. People at that time were used to suffering as part of regular life and therefore were very accepting of suffering in their forms of entertainment. These days, any sport where there’s a risk of injury, especially brain injury, is vilified and marginalized. Boxing and now hockey and even the sacred goose, football, are beginning to feel the effects of this. However, no matter how “civilized” we become, in our hearts, we will always enjoy seeing someone beat the shit out of someone else. If you come to an intersection and on one corner there is a football game, on another a baseball game, a soccer game on a third and 2 men fighting on the fourth, I’m willing to bet 90% of people will run to watch the 2 men fighting. For this reason, BOXING WILL NEVER DIE.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]YamatoDamashii92 wrote:
First boxing card I ever paid for. Jesus this was boring. There was no action, just one great athlete with amazing reflexes and movement against some dude who throws punches. Boxing just isn’t interesting, how can someone win a round landing 3 punches? This is why regular people find boxing boring as hell. On the positive side Floyd was sinking in that guillotine.[/quote]

Don’t take this as an example of all boxing, thank you.

This why casual fans piss me the fuck off.

It’s like me watching a fucking soccer game once every six years, even though I don’t know how to play soccer, what the rules are, or who the players are, and then complaining that the game is boring (even though I don’t know what’s going on), and saying that because this game is boring, the sport must be stupid.

Douchebags like this guy have been posting on my Facebook feed all day. Don’t like it? Don’t fucking buy it then. But bash on my sport because of it, and I’m going to tell you to fuck yourself.

Meanwhile, Provodnikov - Mattyssee was like 2 weeks ago, but this clown doesn’t shit about the bout that’s probably gonna be fight of the year.[/quote]

Boxing is on in a couple local pubs all the time, both of which are sports orientates and have football on one screen, boxing on another via Eurosport on BTV. I see plenty of your sport and it is mind numbingly boring.

If your sport requires you to be a diehard nerd who loves technical aspects of it despite lack of excitement that in itself is telling. Any sport that almost never produces excitement for casual fans is in serious trouble.

[quote]YamatoDamashii92 wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]YamatoDamashii92 wrote:
First boxing card I ever paid for. Jesus this was boring. There was no action, just one great athlete with amazing reflexes and movement against some dude who throws punches. Boxing just isn’t interesting, how can someone win a round landing 3 punches? This is why regular people find boxing boring as hell. On the positive side Floyd was sinking in that guillotine.[/quote]

Don’t take this as an example of all boxing, thank you.

This why casual fans piss me the fuck off.

It’s like me watching a fucking soccer game once every six years, even though I don’t know how to play soccer, what the rules are, or who the players are, and then complaining that the game is boring (even though I don’t know what’s going on), and saying that because this game is boring, the sport must be stupid.

Douchebags like this guy have been posting on my Facebook feed all day. Don’t like it? Don’t fucking buy it then. But bash on my sport because of it, and I’m going to tell you to fuck yourself.

Meanwhile, Provodnikov - Mattyssee was like 2 weeks ago, but this clown doesn’t shit about the bout that’s probably gonna be fight of the year.[/quote]

Boxing is on in a couple local pubs all the time, both of which are sports orientates and have football on one screen, boxing on another via Eurosport on BTV. I see plenty of your sport and it is mind numbingly boring.

If your sport requires you to be a diehard nerd who loves technical aspects of it despite lack of excitement that in itself is telling. Any sport that almost never produces excitement for casual fans is in serious trouble.[/quote]

So dont watch it, douchebag.

And fuck yourself.

[quote]CMdad wrote:
I think the most important factor in this fight that resulted in Floyd’s win wasn’t his footwork, clinching etc. but, his effective use of his substantial reach advantage. When I saw the tale of the tape stats the day before the fight and saw the 5" reach advantage Floyd had, I knew there was no hope for Manny. All night long, he kept him at bay with his jab. Manny could never find his range for longer than a few seconds at a time whereas Floyd found his early and engaged at that distance almost the entire fight. Whenever Manny was able to break through that fence of jabs, Floyd would quickly dance away as he is apt to do.

On another note, if I read another column about how this was boxing’s last gasp and how now with Floyd retiring boxing is dead, I will fucking put on Angel Manfredy’s old El Diablo mask and start dropping fools. What this fight proves more than anything is that people- and I’m talking about your average casual sports fan here, not the hardcore boxing purists- are still drawn to the spectacle that is championship boxing if there is a compelling fight to be made. The fight itself turned out to be another Mayweather dud but, when people were bombarded with the story lines heading into this fight, they tuned in in sure to be record numbers. Just think what this could have done to get a whole new generation of people into boxing if it had been a Ward vs Gatti bloodbath (which is what most casual observers desire). I don’t think boxing will ever regain its primacy among American sports simply because our society has undergone such a pussification.

When boxing reigned supreme in the late 1800s all the way into the mid 1900s, life was fucking harsh. People lived hard and died young with few of the creature comforts that we have today. People at that time were used to suffering as part of regular life and therefore were very accepting of suffering in their forms of entertainment. These days, any sport where there’s a risk of injury, especially brain injury, is vilified and marginalized. Boxing and now hockey and even the sacred goose, football, are beginning to feel the effects of this. However, no matter how “civilized” we become, in our hearts, we will always enjoy seeing someone beat the shit out of someone else. If you come to an intersection and on one corner there is a football game, on another a baseball game, a soccer game on a third and 2 men fighting on the fourth, I’m willing to bet 90% of people will run to watch the 2 men fighting. For this reason, BOXING WILL NEVER DIE.[/quote]

Yup.

Anyone pay any heed to the shoulder injury Manny sustained a month (or so) ago?

Explains why he threw 300 less punches than usual.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]CMdad wrote:
I think the most important factor in this fight that resulted in Floyd’s win wasn’t his footwork, clinching etc. but, his effective use of his substantial reach advantage. When I saw the tale of the tape stats the day before the fight and saw the 5" reach advantage Floyd had, I knew there was no hope for Manny. All night long, he kept him at bay with his jab. Manny could never find his range for longer than a few seconds at a time whereas Floyd found his early and engaged at that distance almost the entire fight. Whenever Manny was able to break through that fence of jabs, Floyd would quickly dance away as he is apt to do.

On another note, if I read another column about how this was boxing’s last gasp and how now with Floyd retiring boxing is dead, I will fucking put on Angel Manfredy’s old El Diablo mask and start dropping fools. What this fight proves more than anything is that people- and I’m talking about your average casual sports fan here, not the hardcore boxing purists- are still drawn to the spectacle that is championship boxing if there is a compelling fight to be made. The fight itself turned out to be another Mayweather dud but, when people were bombarded with the story lines heading into this fight, they tuned in in sure to be record numbers. Just think what this could have done to get a whole new generation of people into boxing if it had been a Ward vs Gatti bloodbath (which is what most casual observers desire). I don’t think boxing will ever regain its primacy among American sports simply because our society has undergone such a pussification.

When boxing reigned supreme in the late 1800s all the way into the mid 1900s, life was fucking harsh. People lived hard and died young with few of the creature comforts that we have today. People at that time were used to suffering as part of regular life and therefore were very accepting of suffering in their forms of entertainment. These days, any sport where there’s a risk of injury, especially brain injury, is vilified and marginalized. Boxing and now hockey and even the sacred goose, football, are beginning to feel the effects of this. However, no matter how “civilized” we become, in our hearts, we will always enjoy seeing someone beat the shit out of someone else. If you come to an intersection and on one corner there is a football game, on another a baseball game, a soccer game on a third and 2 men fighting on the fourth, I’m willing to bet 90% of people will run to watch the 2 men fighting. For this reason, BOXING WILL NEVER DIE.[/quote]

Yup.[/quote]

Some interesting facts on the 'death of Boxing":

“Remarks such as “UFC/MMA is the real winner” come with a heavy dose of ignorance of the sport of boxing, which has had more than its fair share of successful fights and fighters independent of Mayweather and Pacquiao. Just to cite a few examples from the past two years”:

Carl Froch vs. George Groves II - May 30th, 2014. WBA and IBF super-middleweight champion Carl Froch had a controversial stoppage win over George Groves in November 2013 in a fight he was arguably losing. They had an immediate rematch booked in the famed Wembley Stadium in London, which produced a sellout attendance of 77,000 and broke all attendance and gate records for British boxing. The big fight ended in a big KO for Froch. In the United States, HBO averaged 830,000 viewers despite the early afternoon start time. In the UK, where the pay-per-view market is relatively scared, Sky Box Office had a reported 900,000 buys at the cost of $25 US, which is an increase from the country’s standard PPV costs.

Saul Alvarez vs. Austin Trout - April 20th, 2013. Mexican superstar Canelo Alvarez proved himself to be exactly what the description entailed, as he sold out the Alamodome in San Antonio for his junior middleweight fight against Austin Trout, who came in with an undefeated record and off a big win over Miguel Cotto. Canelo scored a knockdown and eventual decision win over Trout, pulling in an attendance of 39,472 and a Showtime average of 1.1 million viewers.

Bermane Stiverne vs. Deontay Wilder - January 17th, 2015. I know what you’re thinking, “Who and who?”. American Olympic bronze medalist Deontay Wilder became the first US heavyweight champion for any major sanctioning body since 2007, and Showtime attracted a peak number of 1.34 million and averaged out to be the 4th highest-rated bout in the channel’s history.

Gennady Golovkin vs. Martin Murray - February 21st, 2015. “GGG”, as he is affectionately known, is the best middleweight in the world and has finished all but 3 of his opponents in 32 pro fights. In his main event vs. England’s Martin Murray in Monaco, the Kazakh picked Murray apart and forced an 11th round stoppage after knocking him down 3 times prior. Golovkin’s fight was broadcast on HBO with peak viewership of 938,000 for a daytime event and 1.4 million on the primetime replay. His previous bout against Marco Antonio Rubio averaged 1.3 million viewers in 2014 and was the 2nd most watched non-PPV bout in the US last year.

Wladimir Klitschko vs. Bryant Jennings - April 25th, 2015. While UFC 186 was going on, heavyweight kingpin Wladimir Klitschko made his first appearance in the United States since an absolute stinker of a fight against Sultan Ibragimov in 2008. Klitschko’s punch-and-hug style and the general lack of well-known opponents contributed to his fights being held exclusively in Europe and not even televised on HBO. Klitschko was able to keep his dominance over the division going with a decision win over the American, but the real surprise was his drawing capabilities after such a long time away from US shores. More than 17,000 turned up to see him at Madison Square Garden and HBO had a strong 1.7 million rating for the event, which is the highest mark for HBO since 2012. Aside from that, Klitschko is a major draw in Germany and routinely has sold out German soccer stadiums and the O2 World Arena.

Next week – NEXT WEEK! – HBO will televise a junior middleweight fight between Canelo Alvarez and American heavy-hitter James Kirkland at Minute Maid Park, a 40,000 seat baseball stadium in Houston. StubHub ticket sales suggest that only 2,000+ tickets are left on sale. If the sport is dead then someone needs to alert the attendees, because this would mark Canelo’s 2nd stadium show in as many years. The UFC has held exactly the same number of stadium shows in its 22 year history.

Even extending beyond HBO and Showtime, Al Haymon’s new Premier Boxing Champions venture has placed boxing back on network television after multiple decades of HBO and Showtime having a stranglehold on the majority of the sport’s top competitors. It’s early days but NBC’s ratings have proven to be comparable to that of UFC on FOX shows, however duly noting that the UFC still holds the edge in the key 18-49 demographic. Top Rank has just struck a deal with TruTV for Friday night broadcasts, which means that live boxing is available for viewing on CBS, NBC, ABC, Spike TV, HBO, Showtime, ESPN, TruTV, and even BET via their time-buy deal with Roc Nation.

If you want to point to something that is dying for boxing, it’s the pay-per-view market. Neither HBO nor Showtime ran a PPV this year prior to Mayweather vs. Pacquiao, and do not have another one lined up in the next several months. But the decline of the boxing PPV has been almost a benefit to the consumer, as promoters have de-emphasized the quantity of PPVs over time and will likely continue to do so once Mayweather and Pacquiao are retired.

Boxing isn’t going anywhere. It cannot be denied that national public interest in the sport has taken a considerable hit as the decades have passed by, but the repeated premature declarations of its death have got to go. MMA fans perpetuate this more than any other combat sports fanbase, perhaps parroting UFC president Dana White ad nauseam. If it’s not discussing boxing’s death, it’s endless fantasizing over “How would a boxer fare in an MMA fight?” as fighter after fighter boldly states how quickly they’d beat Floyd Mayweather. This is the type of inferiority complex mentality that makes the MMA world continue to look like the attention-craving little brother of combat sports. Boxing and MMA are not in competition against each other and they are perfectly capable of co-existing as they have been for years, and it’s foolish to think last night’s big event spells an entire sport’s imminent doom, especially when the facts and figures suggest otherwise.(From an article on Bloodyelbow.com)

yeah if deontay wilder can sell you on fighting another bum, boxing certainly isnt dead LMAO

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]YamatoDamashii92 wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]YamatoDamashii92 wrote:
First boxing card I ever paid for. Jesus this was boring. There was no action, just one great athlete with amazing reflexes and movement against some dude who throws punches. Boxing just isn’t interesting, how can someone win a round landing 3 punches? This is why regular people find boxing boring as hell. On the positive side Floyd was sinking in that guillotine.[/quote]

Don’t take this as an example of all boxing, thank you.

This why casual fans piss me the fuck off.

It’s like me watching a fucking soccer game once every six years, even though I don’t know how to play soccer, what the rules are, or who the players are, and then complaining that the game is boring (even though I don’t know what’s going on), and saying that because this game is boring, the sport must be stupid.

Douchebags like this guy have been posting on my Facebook feed all day. Don’t like it? Don’t fucking buy it then. But bash on my sport because of it, and I’m going to tell you to fuck yourself.

Meanwhile, Provodnikov - Mattyssee was like 2 weeks ago, but this clown doesn’t shit about the bout that’s probably gonna be fight of the year.[/quote]

Boxing is on in a couple local pubs all the time, both of which are sports orientates and have football on one screen, boxing on another via Eurosport on BTV. I see plenty of your sport and it is mind numbingly boring.

If your sport requires you to be a diehard nerd who loves technical aspects of it despite lack of excitement that in itself is telling. Any sport that almost never produces excitement for casual fans is in serious trouble.[/quote]

So dont watch it, douchebag.

And fuck yourself.
[/quote]

How about I watch it and say how boring it is and how the sport will be dead in another 10 years? This weird personal thing you have with defending a sport is kinda sad. People are free to have opinions and the opinion of most people is that boxing is not entertaining.

Go ahead be the sportive version of the film nerds who pretend Alfred Hitchcock films are amazing and it is the publics fault for not finding them as such. Meanwhile your beloved sport coughs the last guttural spasms of life out of its cold collapsing lungs.

Don’t worry though I am sure you can show how unique and insightful you are by becoming part of the hardcore of another niche sport. You can become one of the hardcore fans telling everyone that the featherweight division of the UFC is exciting and anyone who says otherwise isn’t a real fan. Good luck :slight_smile:

Lol. Dude. Stfu. Floyds the highest paid athlete in the world. So I don’t how you can say most people feel like you.

Niche sport. Lol.
Boxing dead in 10 years.

Poor trolling man. You had people for a little while I’ll concede.

They say the Devils greatest trick was convincing the world he didn’t exist. Floyd s greatest trick was making us think this fight would be exciting.

He’s a lot smarter than people give him credit for. Dull. But smart.

The point about him not dominating pac and stopping him (as previous greats would have done with foes) is very very true.

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:
Instead we got Klitscko-Haye. [/quote]

the problem with trying to make comparisons between floyd and klitschko is the level of opposition.

wlad has been dominating VERY average opponents for years (not his fault).

floyd on the other hand has dominated champion after champion after champion.

in so many eyes manny was the guy floyd has been too “scared” to fight and he was going to bring this mindblowing speed and combinations and aggression and roach had built this 6 year tactical master plan of how it would all fit together.

the reality: manny barely laid a single glove on him. 81 punches landed in 12 rounds; a single hard shot in round 4 and that was it!

[quote]CarltonJ wrote:
Niche sport. Lol.
Boxing dead in 10 years.

Poor trolling man. You had people for a little while I’ll concede. [/quote]

Boxing is a Niche sport. Only time most people watch it is when it is on in a bar and they only watch one in a blue moon hyped up fights. No one buys the Sky package for boxing they buy it for the football. People support basketball teams and football teams and rugby teams, they watch boxing as an oddity and out of vague passing interest once every couple of years for a big fight.

The fight always ends up disappointing and no one watches the run of the mill boxers like they watch the premier league or the NBA. Boxing is not popular. And yes we know a handful of fighters earn a lot of money, that is because they are not on salaries they earn per fight. But if you think on average boxers are anywhere near as rich as footballers, basketball players, soccer players etc you are being delusional.

[quote]YamatoDamashii92 wrote:

[quote]CarltonJ wrote:
Niche sport. Lol.
Boxing dead in 10 years.

Poor trolling man. You had people for a little while I’ll concede. [/quote]

Boxing is a Niche sport. Only time most people watch it is when it is on in a bar and they only watch one in a blue moon hyped up fights. No one buys the Sky package for boxing they buy it for the football. People support basketball teams and football teams and rugby teams, they watch boxing as an oddity and out of vague passing interest once every couple of years for a big fight.

The fight always ends up disappointing and no one watches the run of the mill boxers like they watch the premier league or the NBA. Boxing is not popular. And yes we know a handful of fighters earn a lot of money, that is because they are not on salaries they earn per fight. But if you think on average boxers are anywhere near as rich as footballers, basketball players, soccer players etc you are being delusional.[/quote]

So again - don’t watch it.

And fuck off.

Where’s the hard part here?

Manny Pacquiao is a special fighter.
Speed, power and a terrific engine, he executes Freddie Roach’s game plan to a tee and with his own dynamic flair.
An admirable gentleman, a true sportman and wonderful ambassador for the sport.

Floyd Mayweather, a boxing virtuoso. Razor sharp technique met with a clinical mind and inhuman work ethic.
Not a fighter, a pure boxer with a PhD in boxing defense and countering, but not a fighter.
His character flaws and disinterest in sacrificing his safety for the entertainment of the masses have seen the sports protagonist become a figure of controversy and even hatred.

Mayweather’s flaws are evident, apparent and obvious.
But so are Pacquiao’s.

To take the most obvious, Marquez went 42 rounds with Pacquiao.
He went the distance three times, before stopping Pacquiao in the 4th of their series.
A hugely underrated defensive technician and masterful counterpuncher Marquez never failed to trouble Pacquiao; before, during and after his prime.
Marquez always had sufficient power and counter punching ability to keep Pacquiao from stopping him and doing considerable damage himself. Marquez exposed Pacquiao’s inability or reluctance to adjust with the flow of a fight, as he stuck stubbornly to Roach’s plans- he did adjust on instruction, but this was too later in their fourth fight.

With this in mind it was no surprise that the sports premier counterpuncher and a bigger, stronger, younger, more accomplished and faster athlete whose approach evolves as a fight progresses could out point Pacquiao easily.

It was easy for Mayweather and the excuses are just that, petty excuses from guys who are not used to losing.
All I read about before the fight was how badly Pacquiao was hurting sparring partners, how well his strength and conditioning sessions were going and how the best version of Pacquiao was going to KO Floyd.

Big fan of Roach and Pac, but they were completely outclassed.
The shoulder injury was lame. He never got close enough to do any damage, even if he had three arms.

And when he said he thought he won, I had to roll my eyes.
His wife was ringside and was shaking her head after round 6.
Silly fight.

Maybe Mayweather vs Cotto 2 in Seprember

[quote]TheCB wrote:

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:

[quote]TheCB wrote:

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:

[/quote]

[/quote]

The fight was boring.
[/quote]

the fight was “boring” .[/quote]

The fight was boring because they don’t dislike each other.

It’s a different kind of fight when two opponents want to hurt each other and when they don’t.

Sports wise it was pretty masterful, Manny fought his typical fight it just doesn’t work against Mayweather because he can’t get close enough. Mayweather scored his points. But there’s a reason Chess doesn’t have a lot of fans.

As far as Boxing dying I doubt it, there’s a heavy push for it right now and Marketing Rules the world.

[quote]donnydarkoirl wrote:
Manny Pacquiao is a special fighter.
Speed, power and a terrific engine, he executes Freddie Roach’s game plan to a tee and with his own dynamic flair.
An admirable gentleman, a true sportman and wonderful ambassador for the sport.

Floyd Mayweather, a boxing virtuoso. Razor sharp technique met with a clinical mind and inhuman work ethic.
Not a fighter, a pure boxer with a PhD in boxing defense and countering, but not a fighter.
His character flaws and disinterest in sacrificing his safety for the entertainment of the masses have seen the sports protagonist become a figure of controversy and even hatred.

Mayweather’s flaws are evident, apparent and obvious.
But so are Pacquiao’s.

To take the most obvious, Marquez went 42 rounds with Pacquiao.
He went the distance three times, before stopping Pacquiao in the 4th of their series.
A hugely underrated defensive technician and masterful counterpuncher Marquez never failed to trouble Pacquiao; before, during and after his prime.
Marquez always had sufficient power and counter punching ability to keep Pacquiao from stopping him and doing considerable damage himself. Marquez exposed Pacquiao’s inability or reluctance to adjust with the flow of a fight, as he stuck stubbornly to Roach’s plans- he did adjust on instruction, but this was too later in their fourth fight.

With this in mind it was no surprise that the sports premier counterpuncher and a bigger, stronger, younger, more accomplished and faster athlete whose approach evolves as a fight progresses could out point Pacquiao easily.

It was easy for Mayweather and the excuses are just that, petty excuses from guys who are not used to losing.
All I read about before the fight was how badly Pacquiao was hurting sparring partners, how well his strength and conditioning sessions were going and how the best version of Pacquiao was going to KO Floyd.

Big fan of Roach and Pac, but they were completely outclassed.
The shoulder injury was lame. He never got close enough to do any damage, even if he had three arms.

And when he said he thought he won, I had to roll my eyes.
His wife was ringside and was shaking her head after round 6.
Silly fight.

Maybe Mayweather vs Cotto 2 in Seprember

[/quote]

Exactly. This is why I could never understand the people who thought that Manny was going to give Mayweather problems; Mayweather is essentially a bigger, faster, stronger, and slightly smarter Marquez, and Marquez (in my opinion) outpointed Pac in two of their first three fights and knocked him out in the fourth.

So how Manny would all of a sudden become this counterpuncher-killer is beyond me.

But again, it all goes back to Roger Mayweather’s saying, which, every time there is a super fight, rings more and more true: “Most people don’t know shit about boxing.”