Mayweather vs Pacquiao

[quote]Aussie Davo wrote:
Mayweather is certainly not the athletic specimen he was when he was a lightweight, but I would argue the Mayweather of now is a better boxer than he was 5 years ago.

There seemed to be a period where Mayweather was mostly flat flooted, very little ring movement and relying on his superior timing and defense to win. Seems to me since hooking up again with his father for the Guerrero and subsequent fights, its been nothing but positive impacts. His footwork is a LOT better. He seems to throw more punches, particularly the jab. Against Alvarez he attempted something like 330 jabs, landed 42% of them. In the mosley fight he still had that supernatural connect rate at 40%, but much less work, coming in at only 210 attempts.[/quote]

I wouldn’t argue with him being smarter/more efficient at this point than he was when he was younger. Like I said, some fighters get more tactical and their ring intelligence continues to improve and allow them to excel later in their careers (BHop for example). Like you said though, physically speaking he isn’t the freak he was earlier in his career, and that’s all people are saying.

Manny on the other hand has not seemed to continue to develop tactically at the same rate and had slowed down some, thus again taking him down that one notch that Floyd was looking for before agreeing to fight him; again IMO only.

Gorilla Productions just came out with his promo.

It’s incredible.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Gorilla Productions just came out with his promo.

It’s incredible.

Goosebumps! That was a great edit. 1995’s ‘Heat’ predicts a win for Pacino… er Pacquiao.

I just read some bullshit on a facebook wall about bodybuilders being the hardest working athletes in the world.

Apologies to bodybuilders, but fighters at this level make us all look like bitches.

[quote]Pigeonkak wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
Gorilla Productions just came out with his promo.

It’s incredible.

Goosebumps! That was a great edit. 1995’s ‘Heat’ predicts a win for Pacino… er Pacquiao.

I just read some bullshit on a facebook wall about bodybuilders being the hardest working athletes in the world.

Apologies to bodybuilders, but fighters at this level make us all look like bitches. [/quote]

Werd homie. I can’t bring myself to have this conversation with people any more. ‘X athlete is the hardest working/X is the hardest sport’. I just smile and nod. Until you’ve tried working anaerobically for 36 minutes with your guts on fire and your head ringing and thousands of people baying for your blood, you have no idea what ‘hard’ means. Nothing but love and respect for all my combat sport brethren and their respective disciplines, those on the outside will never even glimpse a snapshot of what it takes to compete and succeed at that top level.

[quote]LondonBoxer123 wrote:

Werd homie. I can’t bring myself to have this conversation with people any more. ‘X athlete is the hardest working/X is the hardest sport’. I just smile and nod. Until you’ve tried working anaerobically for 36 minutes with your guts on fire and your head ringing and thousands of people baying for your blood, you have no idea what ‘hard’ means. Nothing but love and respect for all my combat sport brethren and their respective disciplines, those on the outside will never even glimpse a snapshot of what it takes to compete and succeed at that top level. [/quote]

I know that a lot of these silly sport comparisons are usually based on confirmation bias by people actually playing those sports, but c’mon!

I think I just get rankled by meatheads telling me that boxers aren’t as tough as them. And meatheads who think they can go toe to toe with even a mediocre fighter because they bench 300lbs. Meh.

I really don’t think you can quantify or compare athletes at the very top of the sport and crown any one group as “the hardest working”. Top level bodybuilder a work extremely hard, especially when you consider the extreme dedication and discipline that their dieting practices require to get to their necessary levels of leanness required to win or even place in a top level show; their bodies are literally near the point of organ failure (bodybuilders a have literally died due to the extremes that some go to in order to reach that level). Top level fighters train like freakin animals and their training and weight cutting practices are equally as extreme; top level swimmers like Michael Phelps train 6 hours a day of intense laps in the pool; top level gymnasts train multiple times a day 6-7 days a week; and the list goes on…

Everyone at the pinnacle of sports trains extremely hard and comparing them is both a waste of time and attempts to belittle the efforts of athletes in other sports IMO.

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:
I really don’t think you can quantify or compare athletes at the very top of the sport and crown any one group as “the hardest working”. Top level bodybuilder a work extremely hard, especially when you consider the extreme dedication and discipline that their dieting practices require to get to their necessary levels of leanness required to win or even place in a top level show; their bodies are literally near the point of organ failure (bodybuilders a have literally died due to the extremes that some go to in order to reach that level). Top level fighters train like freakin animals and their training and weight cutting practices are equally as extreme; top level swimmers like Michael Phelps train 6 hours a day of intense laps in the pool; top level gymnasts train multiple times a day 6-7 days a week; and the list goes on…

Everyone at the pinnacle of sports trains extremely hard and comparing them is both a waste of time and attempts to belittle the efforts of athletes in other sports IMO.[/quote]

I can agree with that in terms of conditioning and work ethic.

But boxers and those in the striking arts always get more credit with me simply because on top of the typical fanatical pro-athlete training, you’re also getting punched (or kicked) over and over and over and over just because that’s the nature of fighting.

So yea, soccer and swimming are hard and shit, but you didn’t get punched in the liver Monday, get your lights nearly put out on Thursday, and jump right back in the ring on Saturday.

These sports just require guys with a different level of fucked-up-ness.

True, I would place any contact sports a little higher on the mental toughness scale (boxing, Muay Thai/kickboxing, wrestling, Judo, Rugby, American Football, Lacrosse, etc…) due to the punishment those athletes’ bodies take on a regular basis. But the topic was “hardest working”, not “toughest”, which I think is a little more open for interpretation. If someone tried to suggest that Bodybuilders were the “physically toughest” athletes, then I’d ask them for some of whatever they’ve been smoking, because they aren’t, not even close. But, a case could be made for them being among the “hardest working” (depending on how you define that term).

holy shit this actually happening. i called it lol :wink: boxing is going back to the glory days

i know its better for humanity and man kind if manny wins. i know hes the infinitely better person…but… im pulling for floyd. i dont no why. maybe its because i think hes never truly got the credit his skills deserve. i dunno.

its happening!!

5 years too late. BETTER LATE THAN NEVER!!!

Believe that Mayweather-De La Hoya is the highest purchased PPV of all time (2.5M buys).

Anyone else think May-Pac buyrate will be higher? Perhaps significantly higher? (3M+)

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]idaho wrote:
Well, this fight is two weeks away and based on my limited knowledge, probably the richest prize fight in history. IMHO, Mayweather’s defensive skills will neutralize Pacman’s aggression.

Who you got? [/quote]

Mayweather all day soul brotha. I hate him, but skills pay the bills. Dude might even stop him…[/quote]

Yep. But I can still hope right?

[quote]tmoney1 wrote:
Believe that Mayweather-De La Hoya is the highest purchased PPV of all time (2.5M buys).

Anyone else think May-Pac buyrate will be higher? Perhaps significantly higher? (3M+)[/quote]

Dont know about the buy rate, but, ESPN is quoting over a 400+ million revenue stream.

How is the undercard? Will it be a full night of entertainment?

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]idaho wrote:
Well, this fight is two weeks away and based on my limited knowledge, probably the richest prize fight in history. IMHO, Mayweather’s defensive skills will neutralize Pacman’s aggression.

Who you got? [/quote]

Mayweather all day soul brotha. I hate him, but skills pay the bills. Dude might even stop him…[/quote]

Yep. But I can still hope right?
[/quote]

By God sir, it’s been many years since I’ve heard from you!

How are you?

[quote]stallone wrote:

[quote]Aragorn wrote:
Smart money is on Mayweather, and I see no reason Manny should win this. Unfortunately. Because I really, really like him.

This fight does not interest me at all any more. Years ago, when they were both in their prime, I drooled over the thought of this fight. But they’re both past prime and it seems that Pacman has not aged as gracefully (in the ring that is) as Floyd. There will always be a “what if” component to this for me now, because Mayweather dodged the damn fight his whole career.

I view it more or less as a scavenger meal now—Floyd simply waits out the rust all these years and only NOW goes for the fight because he senses his advantage. Good for his checking account? Maybe. Shitty for a quality fight and a real legacy defining moment IMHO. A legacy defining fight entails them both signing on at the top of their game.[/quote]

 Hordes of mathematically-challenged individuals are saying that Mayweather has deliberately waited for Manny to age and slow down.  This might make some sense if Manny were older than Floyd.  As it happens, Manny is two years younger.

 Another common claim is that Mayweather and Pacquiao are past their primes.  I disagree with this assertion.  Both fighters are still in their primes; they are as quick as ever in terms of reflexes and hand/foot speed.  Bernard Hopkins concurs with this:  "I believe both {fighters} are at their seasoned-best and I believe both fighters have peaked late, and people don't really talk about that. Nobody says anything about an athlete who peaks later."

[/quote]

That’s certainly your prerogative, but I disagree. I find myself reading and nodding along with Sento, Irish, and Pigeon at turns, and I count myself in the camp with them overall. At least you were civil in your argument though, so that’s much appreciated we can agree to disagree.

I will echo what Sento said yet again, age isn’t the same as ring age.

Also btw, Bhop is one of my favorite fighters for the fact he is just damn near immortal in the ring at such a late age and such a high level of performance. Man’s a smart, SMART motherfucker.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:
I really don’t think you can quantify or compare athletes at the very top of the sport and crown any one group as “the hardest working”. Top level bodybuilder a work extremely hard, especially when you consider the extreme dedication and discipline that their dieting practices require to get to their necessary levels of leanness required to win or even place in a top level show; their bodies are literally near the point of organ failure (bodybuilders a have literally died due to the extremes that some go to in order to reach that level). Top level fighters train like freakin animals and their training and weight cutting practices are equally as extreme; top level swimmers like Michael Phelps train 6 hours a day of intense laps in the pool; top level gymnasts train multiple times a day 6-7 days a week; and the list goes on…

Everyone at the pinnacle of sports trains extremely hard and comparing them is both a waste of time and attempts to belittle the efforts of athletes in other sports IMO.[/quote]

I can agree with that in terms of conditioning and work ethic.

But boxers and those in the striking arts always get more credit with me simply because on top of the typical fanatical pro-athlete training, you’re also getting punched (or kicked) over and over and over and over just because that’s the nature of fighting.

So yea, soccer and swimming are hard and shit, but you didn’t get punched in the liver Monday, get your lights nearly put out on Thursday, and jump right back in the ring on Saturday.

These sports just require guys with a different level of fucked-up-ness.[/quote]

I tend to side with you Irish, and London and Pigeon here too. Fighting as a high level sport is the toughest thing there is from a pain threshold standpoint. No question.

But I do think each sport is tough in its own way. Fighters don’t tend to do the 24/7 thing until fight camps even though they train hard whereas bodybuilders literally live their sport at every minute of every day of almost all year and are slaves to food scales, schedules, all the details that a lot of athletes don’t even think about that literally run your days. That makes the sport tough in a completely different way, mentally speaking, but nowhere near as painful or agonizing as fighting.

Then you have sports like olympic lifting where you train multiple times a day for years on end and train through stress fractures of the bone–in some cases actively trying to induce them in order to calcify the collarbone further by dropping heavy weights on them purposefully (don’t ask…yes this is a real thing). That, my friend, is insane. Also painful :). Or powerlifting where you can quite literally feel your bones bending (trust me, that is an interesting sensation). Or ultra marathoning where your shoes melt to the roadway in death valley and you’re dying of thirst. Or any number of other sports doing other crazy things.

All elite level sports are completely different and all take a level of pain tolerance unique to that sport. I mean, look at what happens when you leg kick a pure boxer…his reaction is agony lol, but a thai guy is just standing there going “yeah, so what was that?”. So it’s very sport specific I think.

I’ve always felt like fighters are the absolute toughest in terms of pain tolerance without question, and I thoroughly agree with Irish about doing it in an arena surrounded by people calling for your blood.

Oh, and Pigeon, a 300 lb bench isn’t anywhere close to what a real bodybuilder is putting up ;). But agree with your point overall though.

[quote]Sentoguy wrote:
True, I would place any contact sports a little higher on the mental toughness scale (boxing, Muay Thai/kickboxing, wrestling, Judo, Rugby, American Football, Lacrosse, etc…) due to the punishment those athletes’ bodies take on a regular basis. But the topic was “hardest working”, not “toughest”, which I think is a little more open for interpretation. If someone tried to suggest that Bodybuilders were the “physically toughest” athletes, then I’d ask them for some of whatever they’ve been smoking, because they aren’t, not even close. But, a case could be made for them being among the “hardest working” (depending on how you define that term).[/quote]

Much more concise than my rambling lol. And agreed. Hardest working encompasses a vast array of things and/or attributes that must be in place.

And my post above means mental toughness in a sort of grindy way, not the way of taking punishment.

I think we’re all on the same page here more or less. I have nothing but respect for the work ethic and discipline of any top level athlete, and to be honest, the hardest working in any discipline will all be comparable in terms of insane levels of dedication, professionalism, and crazy punishing training. That’s what sets them apart in many ways, whatever they do. The difference is what comes at the end of the hard work though. For the combat athlete (including rugby etc) it is the demands of competition that set them apart. Most sports do not force you to absorb crippling punishment for prolonged periods and still perform optimally, and it is that ability to perform in spite of extreme physical pain and the emotional response of devastating leg, body and head shots that no other sport, whatever its demands, can truly replicate.

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:

[quote]idaho wrote:
Well, this fight is two weeks away and based on my limited knowledge, probably the richest prize fight in history. IMHO, Mayweather’s defensive skills will neutralize Pacman’s aggression.

Who you got? [/quote]

Mayweather all day soul brotha. I hate him, but skills pay the bills. Dude might even stop him…[/quote]

Yep. But I can still hope right?
[/quote]

By God sir, it’s been many years since I’ve heard from you!

How are you?[/quote]

Very well thank you Irish. I see you are still dispensing some top flight advice and commentary here on T Nation. I hope that those who frequent the site appreciate you.

Take care my friend!

ZEB