[quote]CrewPierce wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
I respect the lifting and nutrition knowledge of Kroc. Kroc is a far greater lifter (and certainly bodybuilder) than I ever was or will be. I’ve enjoyed his articles and learned from them.
I also defend Kroc’s right to believe he is a woman, to pick his name, to wear a dress, and to even go around pretending he is a woman. That’s his business not mine. I would have totally ignored his situation but for his making things public. That’s “tolerance.”
I, however, reject, as matter of both science and faith, that he is anything but an amazingly huge man in a dress.
Yes, biology and sex is sometimes a spectrum, but Kroc was not a hermaphrodite dancing on the grey edge. Kroc is a dude. An impressive dude, in fact.
What he has are mental problems and/or kinks where he likes to wear dresses and pretend he is a lesbian.
This is not intolerant, nor “homophobic” (the dumbest word I’ve ever heard), nor any of the other stupid phrases used to shut down intelligent conversation.
He’s a dude. In a dress.
I tolerate his choice. I am certainly not going to try to stop him (or any other dude that wants to wear a dress). To the contrary, I defend his right to make such a silly choice.
What is intolerant and “phobic” are those who are afraid of the decisions of liked-minded people as myself, who can see this nonsense for a silly choice and whose decisions rest on basic biology and 4,000 years of Judaeo-Christian teachings.
Inevitably, we will be shouted down, called names, and well, not “tolerated” for daring to hold un-PC beliefs.
The Tolerance Movement," if it was a real movement, would leave people alone (e.g., the poor Christian wedding couple who are being persecuted for their religious beliefs in the USA), just as we leave others alone.
[/quote]
Bingo. You just said everything I was thinking and probably in a more thoughtful and articulate manner.
The Krocs and the Jenners and the rest of the weirdos (yep, they are weirdos, not heroes) don’t give me near as much consternation as their applauders. Their applauders, typically, are the ones who insist on being intolerant of my intolerance…for weirdos. A bunch of fuckin’ cheerleaders – those are the ones who cluck, cluck, cluck – busybody hens who want to mold everyone into their pretty lil progressive clan of diversity boosters.
[/quote]
You just applauded someone who would consider yourself and your lifestyle choices a “weirdo” or do we not speak of the Sex and the Male Animal forum posts any more?
I find swinging as odd as a male transitioning to a female but I fully support your right and decision to do what makes you and your wife happy. I’m certainly not calling you a weirdo over it.
Oops sorry, I mean cluck cluck cluck[/quote]
True, JB does not approve of adultery.
And, yes, he’s an asshole about it. Ask me how I know.
But I remain greatly amused at how “liberals” demand religiously conservative people conform to what passes for liberal morals.
Diversity and tolerance for all things, except no tolerance for those with stricter moral codes. So what if those religious freaks don’t interfere — they don’t approve! And they voice dissent when asked!
Those religious freaks must be silenced! They have committed a though crime!