What is this wizardry?
2 Likes
I have an Air Fryer, which means I’m automatically better than everyone that doesn’t have one 
6 Likes
I think most fries in the frozen section are already fried then frozen. There are exceptions. My buddy air fries unfried tator tots. I can’t imagine them being very good. He says they aren’t as good as the pre fried stuff, but with seasoning they are okay.
I find this with powerlifting. It isn’t just one set, but when my working sets get harder over time, there is a lot of pressure to not miss reps (at least in my head). I’ll find myself taking longer than 5 minute rests to ensure I get my set.
If I have a few movements like this in a workout, or lots of sets in one movement, it can really feel unproductive. Like I just spent nearly an hour of my training time doing deadlifts.
I like feeling like I did a lot at the end of a session. I seem to prefer my workouts when I reset a lift and I can get through it faster.
Lately I have been doing less sets of the powerlifting movements, and doing more BBing lifts including some machines. I don’t have the same pressure on me. I feel like I get more done.
4 Likes
I do this - I think they’re pretty good.
1 Like
I hate that I’ve fallen so behind… how have you enjoyed the JP training?
1 Like
It’s miserable, just like DC and every other good program 
JP is a DC disciple and has worked alongside the likes of Paul Carter and Trudel for some time now. I actually like it a bit more than DC honestly; DC makes me feel like my soul is burning out, at least in a deficit. The straight sets to failure are less fatiguing than Rest-Pause I think, probably because the rest time in between sets.
I’d like to see you run it someday, if I were to make a suggestion - I think it’s right up your alley.
No worries, the important parts are that I’m doing more of the same things but with a little help and making solid progress. You’re busy with life as it should be, I’m just glad to know you’re killing it whether you post or not.
2 Likes
@anon6371718
Just out of curiosity, are you able to do more weight (plates only) on back squat or hack squat?
1 Like
Ironically, back squat. It’s mostly because I haven’t done much hack squatting, though I’m sure with equal training time - my hack squat would be miles ahead of back squat.
Hack squat is on an angled plane, meaning 315 is easier on hack than back squat in the grand scheme of things.
I appear to be in the same boat. I did hack squat for the first time today and was 40 lbs below my back squat, but I sure struggled more than my back squat.
1 Like
4char
7 Likes
Glad you’re loving(hating) the program!! I’m actually a big fan of JP’s and follow him on IG, so I was hyped when I saw he was releasing programming and videos free online! I’ve definitely got this on my to-do list, as I find JP and are very likeminded when it comes to training.
Super glad to hear the progress has been coming along smoothly, you definitely are looking lean in your avatar, your weight is down a bit from my last time being regular here and I think you’re absolutely on the right track right now man!
2 Likes
Coming back to this, it’s super interesting. I’ve always been somewhat of a mindset that I count the sets to failure (knowing that the other sets still have an impact). That ends up with me doing ~5-8 sets per session, even if it looks like two dozen on paper.
Even within that, there’s a lot of lifts I simply refuse to come near failure. A failure set of squats hasn’t happened in years, but leg extensions you could do every week.
Edit: I meant to ask a question in there. Do you think you’ve found the “right” weekly volume for yourself (either by bodypart or total)?
1 Like
Data consistently supports that the most effective reps are the last 5 until failure, so if every set is taken to failure…
5xSets=Effective Volume
That’s why I say counting total reps is kind of pointless. Whether you reach failure after 100 reps or 6 reps, the last 5 are the ones that count.
^Mike Israetel and the RP gang based their entire training model off Reps in Reserve (RIR) and adjusting their training volume to coincide with the most effective rep-range/1RM%. The intent was to train as close to failure as possible without suffering the CNS fatigue of actually hitting failure… some of the hardcore DC/Failure Training guys tried it and didn’t like it, but I think that makes sense for them. If you’ve trained to actual failure for a decade, training sub-failure will feel ineffective.
I don’t aim for failure on something that will kill me 
Honestly I’m not in a position to say. I’ve got so many life variables going on that I think it’s premature to say I’ve got it figured out - but I like this PPL program quite a bit. Have considered dropping one of the failure sets on each exercise to make it more maintainable, but haven’t gotten there yet.
Everything from sleep and nutrition to daily stress and hormones are all over the place; I’m just piecing it together as I go and still making progress (much to my surprise).
2 Likes
Can you explain this to me? How are you using sleep time when calculating recovery?
Read.
Yeah… I dunno.
I read this and for the most part agree. Then anecdotally I see dudes that do a couple hundred pushups or pullups or whatever and look jacked. Obviously much of that is because they’re lean, but they’ve also built some muscle. So there’s a spectrum of effective reps, and I don’t think any of them can be 0; by the same token none of them are completely non-fatiguing. I guess I’m talking myself into the old volume vs. intensity balance. In our case, it’s likely that the last 5 are simply the best balance of stimulus to fatigue. I’m also aware that Dr. Mike doesn’t even like that last rep or two because the cost rises exponentially.
Now, on the other hand, we take those studies and combine with conclusions from others (which we aren’t supposed to do, but do all the time with fitness) and say that the optimal weekly volume is 10-20 of those sets per bodypart per week; that would equal 50 - 100 effective reps per week. Fine, but then you get something like DC - no question that builds muscle. Let’s take an example of chest:
One rest-pause exercise (let’s say Hammer Strength bench because it’s awesome).
You get 11 - 15 rest-pause reps.
You’ll knock 8 on your first “round” - that’s 5 effective reps.
4 reps on your next mini-set - all those are effective.
2 on your final push - again all effective.
So that’s 11 effective reps. Frequency is moderately high, so you hit this workout 1.5 times per week, on average, giving you 16 - 17 effective weekly reps for chest. That’s where I think some of this falls apart (although I personally tend to lean to the aforementioned 50 - 100 weekly reps).
This is probably always true to the point that none of us can ever say “this is the way,” to be fair. We can probably say “this works right now,” which you’re obviously nailing.
1 Like
I have a bed that does it for me. Calculates tossing/turning, sleep phases, duration, HRV, RHR, and some other metrics and comes up with a composite score. Tends to be pretty accurate to performance.
This is true, I don’t mean to say that your first xx number of reps are pointless, rather that the most effective reps are the last 5 to failure. There’s a lot of data that supports this, but also data that supports reps leading up to those last 5 being beneficial as well. I think @cdep89 and I got into the weeds on this a couple weeks back.
These studies are always flawed, using untrained individuals, and missing obvious intensification factors (which are required for more advanced lifters), so they lend themselves to inaccurate conclusions IMO. Untrained folks will get gains off of the dumbest routines, which is why so many newbies have outright stupid training ‘programs’… what used to work just doesn’t work anymore and now they’ve ‘stalled’ (lol).
If only it felt that way 
I’m always too hard on myself anyways, which is why I don’t recognize progress until WELL after I’ve made it.
I do plan to run DC when I can lay off the cut. Possibly even my 531/DC template I made a little while back… I just need recovery factors (mainly sleep and nutrition) to be more on board with that. Strangely, I find DC to be far more fatiguing than JP’s PPL and Upper/Lower split. I think it’s the Rest Pause.
Agree with everything you’ve said about DC training, and the reasons why it aligns with the claim of “the last 5 reps to failure are the most beneficial”. No wasted energy on high rep stuff (outside of the 5-reps), training primarily in peak progress zone, heaviest exercises only, progressive overload like a mofo. It has it all.
1 Like
It’s fun to go down the rabbit holes. It’s only a problem for folks that read and think "I better stop doing anything until I figure out everything. I maintain moving metal around is not a game for rocket surgeons.
It’s definitely enjoyable, but it takes a freaking toll.
1 Like
This is like a long-time mechanic having amazing forearms. Whilst we know there are certain “effective” rep ranges, these high sorts of ranges we see in people powering out 100s of pushups or the mailman getting amazing calves… it may not cause the muscle damage required for hypertrophy in a traditional sense, but there still has to be some sort of low-level signal to build muscle. It’s not as if they are tightening up those bolts harder, or pushing that trolley harder over time. Maybe it’s the pump, or maybe there’s something else we don’t quite know the science behind yet. It’s not a worthy endeavor for most though, because who wants to spend 25 years as a mechanic to get big forearms? I think I heard someone talking about this on a podcast recently but I can’t remember which one, too much goes in one ear then out the other. But ultimately “Everything works” seems to be true, some things are just more effective than others.
Everything you listed. 100%. I feel one of the biggest flaws though is that these studies are often done over a short period. It’s the classic “8-12 reps is best for hypertrophy so I’m not gonna do anything else”. Sure for 8 weeks over the course of the hypothetical study, it probably did have the best results in untrained or even trained individuals. What about after that though? Our bodies adapt to all that we do and training history can be everything. The best rep range for an individual could be the one they aren’t doing.
To emphasize the point above a little more. It’s different. There are a ton of people who run body part splits for years with a ton of volume and then get convinced of switching to 3x full body or sometimes as little as 2x a week workouts… and the gains come faster than they’ve had in months. The reverse of this can also be true. With DC training yes the effective reps are lower but with the rest pausing your body is like “woah, wtf is this” and has no other option but to build new muscle. Changing rest times is a little-used tool we have in our arsenals that has been proven time and time again to bring new gains. It can be as important as a different exercise variation, rep ranges, split, exercise order, and any other thing we can use to slightly change our workouts. All this kind of stuff is why I’m always cautious of the “this program is the best program I ever did, this is the one I got the most gains from” kind of chat you hear from people. Sometimes it’s about going as far away from the thing that’s been done for too long.
2 Likes
That applies to all of what we do here…
What’s funny is I totally agree with this, and suggest it to folks, and still have trouble applying it myself! It’s called a comfort zone for a reason, I guess.
2 Likes