Marriage May Tame Testosterone

Creative genius and crime express themselves early in men but both are turned off almost like a tap if a man gets married and has children, a study says.

Satoshi Kanazawa, a psychologist at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand, compiled a database of the biographies of 280 great scientists, noting their age at the time when they made their greatest work.

The data remarkably concur with the brutal observation made by Albert Einstein, who wrote in 1942: “A person who has not made his great contribution to science before the age of 30 will never do so.”

“Scientific productivity indeed fades with age,” Dr Kanazawa says.

“Two-thirds (of all scientists) will have made their most significant contributions before their mid-30s.”

But, regardless of age, the great minds who married virtually kissed goodbye to making any further glorious additions to their CV.

Within five years of making their nuptial vows, nearly a quarter of married scientists had made their last significant contribution to history’s hall of fame.

“Scientists rather quickly desist (from their careers) after their marriage, while unmarried scientists continue to make great scientific contributions later in their lives,” says Dr Kanazawa.

The energy of youth and the dampening effect of marriage, he adds, are also remarkably similar among geniuses in music, painting and writing, as well as in criminal activity.

Previous studies have documented that delinquents are overwhelmingly male, and usually start out on the road to crime in their teens.

But those who marry well, subsequently stop committing crime, whereas criminals at the same age who remain unmarried tend to continue their unlawful careers.

Dr Kanazawa suggests “a single psychological mechanism” is responsible for this: the competitive edge among young men to fight for glory and gain the attention of women.

That craving drives the all-important male hormone, testosterone.

Dr Kanazawa theorises after a man settles down, the testosterone level falls, as does his creative output.

The study appears in in the August issue of the Journal of Research in Personality, published by the Elsevier group.

The British weekly New Scientist reports on it in its upcoming issue on Saturday.

Maybe after marriage his first priority becomes his family, and not himself?

So, ultimately, a man’s great accomplishments arise from him putting the pussy on a pedestal and striving for women’s attention? I can buy that. The motivation for all things comes not from some ‘higher’ purpose, but evolutionary principles? Makes absurdism seem all the more valid.

It is hard to think well when you have a women inducing severe stress over meaningless things.

[quote]DanErickson wrote:
It is hard to think well when you have a women inducing severe stress over meaningless things.[/quote]

Hahahahaha! so true!

That should keep me single another decade!!!

I knew thats why i no longer have a desire to do anything but work and lift…damn me and my lack of needing to impress women…

This HAS to be true.

clarification; by work i mean get paid, not contribute.

I didn’t read the actual study but I see a lot of problems.

Wow, almost 25% percent. So 75% still made significant contributions. Looks like marriage wasn’t much of a problem for the vast majority of scientists.

Right, so we’re going to qualify it as marrying “well”, which is a totally subjective judgement. So if a criminal gets married and continues his unlawful career, we can dismiss this as an anomaly because he must not have married well.

Sounds like another worthless study, in my opinion.

[quote]Uncle Gabby wrote:
Sounds like another worthless study, in my opinion.[/quote]

Well, studies can sometimes be pretty stupid.

But here’s the thing: I studied physics in college. In my field, it is a truism, a known fact, that you either make a difference by the age of 30, or you’re just yet another anonymous nobody.
Also, MotoGP racers tend to be more cautious after they have kids. But that’s kind of obvious if you think about it.

Something definitely rings true in the article. But I agree, the numbers might be a bit off.

[quote]florin wrote:
Uncle Gabby wrote:
Sounds like another worthless study, in my opinion.

Well, studies can sometimes be pretty stupid.

But here’s the thing: I studied physics in college. In my field, it is a truism, a known fact, that you either make a difference by the age of 30, or you’re just yet another anonymous nobody…[/quote]

That is because if you have real talent it does not take decades to manifest itself.

Once you get married and have kids you have less free time to do other things.

I agree with Uncle Gabby. This study is a waste of tax dollars.

Well, the age is said to be 27. Thats the magical number apparently. The musician 27 list:

* Chris Bell (Big Star): car crash
* D. Boon (Minutemen): car crash
* Kurt Cobain (Nirvana): suicide
* Nick Drake: suicide (may have been 26; not sure)
* Les Harvey (Stone the Crows): Electrocuted
* Jimi Hendrix: drug overdose
* Robert Johnson: poisoned
* Brian Jones (Rolling Stones): drowned
* Janis Joplin: drug overdose
* Johnny Kidd: car crash
* Helmut Koellen (Triumvirat): poisoned
* Jimmy McCulloch (Wings): heart attack
* Ron 'Pigpen' McKernan (Grateful Dead): alcohol
* Jim Morrison (Doors): heart attack (oh come on--we know in the long run it was the drugs...)
* Gary Thain (Uriah Heep): drug overdose
* Jason Thirsk (Pennywise): suicide
* Al Wilson (Canned Heat): suicide

So, they made their creative contributions and they all died by 27 But marriage doesn’t seem to be the common denominator. Is it better to burn out or fade away? Either way, the bottom line is they all rose young… and who’s to say what would’ve happened had they lived. Plenty of the living musicians still contribute good music after this age, but I’d be lying if I said it was always as good as in their ‘heyday’. I’d agree there is something to it, but not that marriage has anything to do with the snuffing. Also, that women have a stake in this too. Even though there is only one of that list.

Streamline wrote
“That should keep me single another decade!!!”

That and your mullet.

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
florin wrote:
Uncle Gabby wrote:
Sounds like another worthless study, in my opinion.

Well, studies can sometimes be pretty stupid.

But here’s the thing: I studied physics in college. In my field, it is a truism, a known fact, that you either make a difference by the age of 30, or you’re just yet another anonymous nobody…

That is because if you have real talent it does not take decades to manifest itself.

Once you get married and have kids you have less free time to do other things.

I agree with Uncle Gabby. This study is a waste of tax dollars.[/quote]
But it’s a waste of New Zealand tax dollars so who cares?

Seriously though, this “research” is just some pop-psych crap to get the University into the news. Good for business, bad for science.

Let’s be honest here, there are defiantly a lot of broken, defeated men out there because of marriage and family. Doesn’t happen to everyone, but jeez, look at the divorce rate.

So, this means that I was lied to when I was told that I couldn’t change him?