[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
“Redneck prejudice?” I’m sure the irony of that statement is lost on you. [/quote]
I’m more focused on how you never seem to answer why you hate Islam so much.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
“Redneck prejudice?” I’m sure the irony of that statement is lost on you.
I’m more focused on how you never seem to answer why you hate Islam so much.[/quote]
I’m focused on how you never seem to answer why you love Islam so much.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
You’re actually trying to justify this? Come on HH, there’s trolling, and there’s bad taste.
Gay marriage won’t hurt anyone, but pedophilia and bestiality take away consent. They will never be acceptable.[/quote]
What HH is doing is called parody
[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:
Makavali wrote:
You’re actually trying to justify this? Come on HH, there’s trolling, and there’s bad taste.
Gay marriage won’t hurt anyone, but pedophilia and bestiality take away consent. They will never be acceptable.
What HH is doing is called parody
[/quote]
Thank you.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
I’m focused on how you never seem to answer why you love Islam so much.[/quote]
You’ve never asked. And for the record, I don’t LOVE Islam, but I don’t hate it either. As far as I’m concerned, nearly all religions lead to the same end.
You on the other hand, go out of your way to make derogatory comments about Islam every chance you get. Care to explain?
[quote]Regular Gonzalez wrote:
What HH is doing is called parody[/quote]
I’ll concede that. My bad.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Thank you. [/quote]
For what? As far as I can tell, you’ve been serious throughout this thread.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
You’re actually trying to justify this? Come on HH, there’s trolling, and there’s bad taste.
Gay marriage won’t hurt anyone, but pedophilia and bestiality take away consent. They will never be acceptable.[/quote]
You’re assuming that there is some objective code of values to which we can refer when judging if something is right or wrong. That IS warranted.
Now, religious people use the dictums from Holy Books as their objective code. Some people use a naturalist foundation, by giving a firm definition to what a human being is, and refer to that as a standard. Then there is the modern chic way, where one announces that majority opinion is the standard — if a majority of judges says its okay, then it must be right. If 51% of voters say its right, it must be. Another name for this is ‘politically correct’.
That’s the foundation of your argument. No one is harmed, the judges say its okay, so its alright. Is it? If 49% said it was correct, then it is not. Get out a few more voters, get it up to 51%, and now its moral?
[quote]Makavali wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
The Muslims will get their way. They have billions of Saudi dollars behind their agenda.
Last I checked, it was more than the Wahhabi extremists that wanted pedophilia to be acceptable.
[/quote]
The Saudis ARE Wahhabi extremists.
-edit, sorry, read your post wrong.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
You’re assuming that there is some objective code of values to which we can refer when judging if something is right or wrong. That IS warranted.
Now, religious people use the dictums from Holy Books as their objective code. Some people use a naturalist foundation, by giving a firm definition to what a human being is, and refer to that as a standard. Then there is the modern chic way, where one announces that majority opinion is the standard — if a majority of judges says its okay, then it must be right. If 51% of voters say its right, it must be. Another name for this is ‘politically correct’.
That’s the foundation of your argument. No one is harmed, the judges say its okay, so its alright. Is it? If 49% said it was correct, then it is not. Get out a few more voters, get it up to 51%, and now its moral?[/quote]
So you’re saying an animal can in fact give consent? Or that a child can give INFORMED consent?
You have an interesting point, however. But if I may, I’ll state that the majority is generally very stupid, and I wouldn’t trust the opinion of the stupid.
Headhunter if you keep going you might reach epic troll status. I have to say, you’re coming close already.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
So you’re saying an animal can in fact give consent? [/quote]
If they like peanut butter they will.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
You’re assuming that there is some objective code of values to which we can refer when judging if something is right or wrong. That IS warranted.
[/quote]
It is not the majority that creates morality. You are mistaken in thinking that just because someones morality comes from something other than a religious text, they must be a moral relativist. It is not a matter of what everyone agrees on, it is a matter of right and wrong. Some people’s right and wrong happens to stem from actual logic and conscience rather than the words of monks written thousands of years ago.
As well, how the hell is following the words of a prophet because everyone else does not a majority founded morality? It isn’t like we follow the moralities based in religions that are not popular.
[quote]beebuddy wrote:
Headhunter if you keep going you might reach epic troll status. I have to say, you’re coming close already.[/quote]
He’s getting there. I feed him occasionally, and he pumps himself full of trollesterone pre-workout.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
So you’re saying an animal can in fact give consent? Or that a child can give INFORMED consent?[/quote]
Abyss Creations needs to add an INFORMED consent feature to their RealDolls.
That would be hot.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
beebuddy wrote:
Headhunter if you keep going you might reach epic troll status. I have to say, you’re coming close already.
He’s getting there. I feed him occasionally, and he pumps himself full of trollesterone pre-workout.[/quote]
He’s got everyone going and doesn’t seem to be flinching. He’s got the makings of a legend.
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Makavali wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
The Muslims will get their way. They have billions of Saudi dollars behind their agenda.
Last I checked, it was more than the Wahhabi extremists that wanted pedophilia to be acceptable.
The Saudis ARE Wahhabi extremists.
-edit, sorry, read your post wrong.[/quote]
Last you checked. Huh. Where’d you check? What about this ayatollah here? Since he’s a Shi’a, he can’t be a wahabbi.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Last you checked. Huh. Where’d you check? What about this ayatollah here? Since he’s a Shi’a, he can’t be a wahabbi. [/quote]
How about you answer my question about why you attack Islam so vigorously before posting pictures out of context?
And why do you even know where to find this crap?
[quote]beebuddy wrote:
He’s got everyone going and doesn’t seem to be flinching. He’s got the makings of a legend.[/quote]
He’s got potential. He could cement his place in T-History.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Last you checked. Huh. Where’d you check? What about this ayatollah here? Since he’s a Shi’a, he can’t be a wahabbi.
How about you answer my question about why you attack Islam so vigorously before posting pictures out of context?
And why do you even know where to find this crap?[/quote]
No. And I just know.