Listen To Dr. Udo Erasmus TODAY!

[quote]michaelv wrote:
From what I’ve read, I don’t see any compelling reason to not just use Flax oil instead.[/quote]

Michael,

The way I look at it is that it’s better to get your macronutrients from a mix of sources. With Udo’s Choice you are getting a mix of all these different oils(fat) thus giving you many different sources for your Omega-3’s and Omega-6’s.

For your protien intake do you only eat chicken? I would assume that you eat a variety of different sources to provide your body with everything it needs. I think with the variety in the Udo’s mix, it helps your body get what it wants from different sources.

As Terry said, the Omega-6’s in the blend are in a pure form. Most of the Omega-6’s that people ingest in the United States are tainted in some way. Your body does need Omega-6’s to be healthy so why not add a few more that are complete?

Steve

Thanks Terry - we are all very grateful to you for sharing this invaluable information with us. And thanks to T-Nation for making it possible for the average trainee/trainer to get more advanced nutrition knowledge than most MD’s and RD’s!

Question; Terry, you mentioned per Udo that one of the benefits of the Udo’s Choice are the phytoestrogens they contain. Because of the phytoestrogens in soy protein and their potential negative impact on T:E ratio in males, should we have no concern about these in the Udo’s Choice then??

Comment 1; I tend to agree with Michaelv most of us do get plenty of dietary omega-6’s already. And, If you just quoted Udo as stating that we CAN indeed eat too much O-6 then it would seem very unnecessary to include O-6’s in his formula??? This appears contradictory since his formula would add even MORE O-6’s to an already well stocked diet, no?

Comment 2; According to the Fat Roundtable and other sources, your body CAN and DOES manufacture O-6’s, but cannot synthesize O-3’s. Again, this seems contradictory to what’s been posted.

Sincerely,

TopSirloin

Long-term study shows CLA effective as weight loss aid.

Supplementation with conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) at a dosage of 4.5 grams per day was shown in a 12-month double-blind study to help overweight adults decrease body fat mass and increase lean body mass by as much as 9 percent. This 2004 study, is the first to clearly establish the efficacy of CLA supplementation in over an extended time period without changes in exercise or diet.

Reference: Gaullier JM, Halse J, Hoye K, Kristiansen K, et al. Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation for 1 y reduces body fat mass in healthy overweight humans. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Jun;79(6):1118-25.

Hey, there, TopSirloin! I haven’t had a chance to tell you before, but I’ve been enjoying reading your posts here on the forum. I’m sure I’m not the only one who enjoys and appreciates your contributions to the forum.

Re the phytoestrogens, good catch. (grin) They come from flaxseed lignins. The amount is pretty small; not anything like having soy burger or a tofu stir fry. Often in life a little can be good, with more not being better. One of the things with soy, too, is that some of it (a lot?) is GMO. I avoid soy to the best of my ability, but I’m not afraid of (and don’t feel a need to avoid) the phytoestrogens that I get from flaxseed (oil or seed).

Re whether Omega 6 fatty acids can be made by the body or not, I’d be interested if you find anything that explains how biochemically our body does that.

I’ll quote a few short lines out of Udo’s book, Fats that Heal, Fats that kill, “Both LA and LNA are EFAs for humans (fish require LNA, but LA is not essential for them because they can make it from LNA). This means that our body must have them, but cannot make them. It must therefore get LA and LNA from foods. A third fatty acid, called arachidonic acid (AA, 20:4w6), was thought to be essential in the past, but our body can make it from LA, and therefor AA is not an EFA, but an EFA derivative. If either LA or LNA is missing or deficient in the diet, cells deteriorate and, inevitably, deficiency symptoms will gradually develop.”

There’s also a fascinating schematic in the same book on Page 20, if you get a chance to take a peek. It shows how fatty acids are metabolized in the body. Udo says again, “Essential fatty acids (EFAs) must come from foods. All other fatty acids can come from food sources or can be synthesized in the body.”

I’m sorry that there’s a conflict re what’s in the Fat Roundtable and what Udo says. I can’t stand it when I read conflicting info on a given topic. I end up doing a bunch of research until I’m able to resolve it to my satisfaction. On the plus side, I guess that’s what takes what we know to the next higher level. (grin)

Re people getting too many w6s in their diet, some people have compromised by alternating between purchasing a bottle of Udo’s Choice and then purchasing a bottle of flaxseed oil. I’m sure it’s highly individual. I don’t eat a lot of processed food, and I don’t get a lot of either quality expeller pressed polyunsaturated fat (typically high in w6s) or store-bought/processed/damaged polyunsaturated fat, either. Unless I would get my w6s/Omega 6s from nuts high in w6s or Udo’s Choice, I would inevitably become deficient. It’s got to be highly individual. That’s where nutritional software like Nutribase’s software would come in handy.

Addendum/Edit: An additional source of Omega 6s/w6s is the fat in the meat we eat. Cattle, chickens and pigs are fed or finished off on corn and are, for that reason, higher in w6s than grass-fed cattle or free range chickens. It sure is a juggling act, isn’t it.

Yustas, thanks for the study. That’s pretty well accepted knowledge re CLA. All Udo is saying is that there are about 150 studies that show there are some down sides or negatives associated with CLA.

To everyone that’s been following this thread, I sent Udo an email through his web site with the questions that have come up on this thread. If I hear back from him, I’ll will report what he has to say.

Please join me in crossing your fingers that he does reply!!! (grin)

TT, thanks for doing the extra research, and following up with Udo.

[quote]Tampa-Terry wrote:
Fish Oil. Being members of T-Nation, most of us know the health benefits of supplementing with fish oil that is high in EPA & DHA. But for all its benefits, because of how the fish oil is processed, it comes with downsides and negatives. Udo said that in individuals under high oxidative stress, 5g can actually be PRO-inflammatory!!![/quote]

I appreciate Udo Erasmus’s promotion of healthy fats, but he is massively over-generalizing study results here. All that can reasonably be concluded is that in people who have undergone angioplasty without stenting, taking 5.18 g/d of fish oil will not necessarily prevent the common post-angioplasty problem of restenosis (the artery closing again). It cannot reasonably be concluded that the fish oil was pro-inflammatory, even in this clinical population.

And Udo also ignores the other studies in the same review article he cites, the ones that show positive cardiovascular health benefits for patients who had previously had coronary artery bypass or heart transplant surgeries and then supplemented with fish oil.

The conversion rate is still a big question. I haven’t yet done a thorough review of the literature, but based on the conversion studies I’ve read so far, if you want to increase DHA in your body, you should take DHA. Increasing ALNA intake still resulted in very little conversion to DHA.