[quote]giterdone wrote:
CaliforniaLaw wrote:
LankyMofo wrote: BTW, I’m in the >130 category.
Indeed, it’s the above average who obsess over typos.
Yay! I’m above average!
[/quote]
Fuck…I didn’t mean to quote Lanky. It’s not technically a typo but I still won’t be able to sleep tonight due to the error. Fuck! I think my IQ just went down. I feels more stupider now.
[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
LankyMofo wrote: BTW, I’m in the >130 category.
No, you’re not. You’re another guy with 120 who adds an extra 10 points.
I’ve actually been tested. Have you? What standard and when was the test date?
You’ll stall long enough to do research on Google to pick the right name. You probably won’t even have a typo in your message board post, since it’s very important to use good grammar and get the spelling just right. AFter all, that’s a sign of intelligence!
LOL. Actually, it’s NOT. But that is something you would never know.
Indeed, it’s the above average who obsess over typos. Since, ultimately, that’s the limit of your analytical abilities. You can’t deconstruct arguments with any sophistication; or provide any insights. So you edit! It’s the only way to make yourself feel superior.
It’s endearing and annoying. Forgive them, father, for they know not what they do.[/quote]
Considering I got tested when I was 16 I have no idea and have no desire to prove it to you. Suffice to say I’m over 130, although not by much.
I’m not even saying I’m smarter than you. I’m just saying you consistently overestimate your own intelligence and this has NOTHING to do with your spelling and grammar errors.
Narcissistic Personality Disorder
HAS A GRANDIOSE SENSE OF SELF IMPORTANCE
is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, BRILLIANCE, beauty, or ideal love
BELIEVES THAT HE OR SHE IS “SPECIAL” AND CAN ONLY BE UNDERSTOOD BY, OR ASSOCIATE WITH, PEOPLE OR (OR INSTITUTIONS) WHO ARE ALSO “SPECIAL” OR OF HIGH STATUS
REQUIRES EXCESSIVE ADMIRATION
has a sense of entitlement
is interpersonally exploitative
lacks empathy
is often envious of others OR BELIEVES OTHERS ARE ENVIOUS OF HIM OR HER
SHOWS ARROGANT, HAUGHTY BEHAVIORS OR ATTITUDES
Hmmm, something to think about.
D
Me pointing out your your incorrect usage of < > was just so…ironical.
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
BTW, I’m in the >130 category.[/quote]
I could tell from your nickname
Lol, looks like it’s time to reap the repercussions of dropping the IQ bomb.
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
Me pointing out your your incorrect usage of < > was just so…ironical. [/quote]
“ironical” is not a word!
wait a minute…do you know that and your incorrect use of “ironic” is infact ironic?
fuck man you dudes are bending my mind here with your IQs you are so intelligent!
EDIT: and you typed out “your” twice. i didnt even notice that! was that intentional? or ironical?
[quote]stringer wrote:
LankyMofo wrote:
Me pointing out your your incorrect usage of < > was just so…ironical.
“ironical” is not a word!
wait a minute…do you know that and your incorrect use of “ironic” is infact ironic?
fuck man you dudes are bending my mind here with your IQs you are so intelligent!
EDIT: and you typed out “your” twice. i didnt even notice that! was that intentional? or ironical?[/quote]
You may have missed that I did that on purpose…or maybe you’re just being sarcastical, I can’t tell.
Damn interwebs and miscommunications.
[quote]DJS wrote:
Bill Roberts wrote:
It wouldn’t work. I have briefly tried it, once in my mid teens and once in my early 20’s. I just am not a picture taker. Not of anything.
The time I tried in my early 20’s, I thought it would be interesting to take pics of the Sun through a solar filter, and for a brief period during that time I liked taking some cloud pictures. But both got old and that was that.
Well instead of buying a fancy camera and telling yourself you are going to practice photography… why don’t you just get a regular digital camera solely for the purpose of tracking physique changes on a monthly or quarterly basis. I doubt that is something that you would not follow through on as was the case the last time you had a camera. It is no different then a training log… You may want to look back in five years and wonder what you looked like…[/quote]
I wouldn’t at all want to imply that that is a bad idea for other people. It might be a very good idea for many. But I know myself well enough to know that it wouldn’t happen. Not only wouldn’t I wind up taking the pictures, but if I had them I wouldn’t wind up ever looking at them and undoubtedly would lose them next time I moved. For example, I have no pictures from my childhood (or any other time) and my sister gave me some about 8 years ago. Don’t have them anymore. Didn’t deliberately throw them out, but there was never an occasion of wanting to look at them, and they disappeared in whatever way.
For motivation, what I mentioned about the pet animals would be a much better reason for me. But that hasn’t been enough to get me to do it.
Not everyone is into everything, and some just don’t tend to do some things that others like to do. Perhaps that’s even more common with eccentric sorts.
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
You may have missed that I did that on purpose…or maybe you’re just being sarcastical, I can’t tell.
Damn interwebs and miscommunications.[/quote]
honestly man you’re making my head feel like a watermelon in a vice with this shit stop it my IQ cant take it!
hey bill, if you wanna come over and get semi naked and take pictures, we can use my camera.
you know, purely for research…yeah, research.
btw, my IQ is over 130 as well.
thanks for playing.
[quote]HolyMacaroni wrote:
hey bill, if you wanna come over and get semi naked and take pictures, we can use my camera.
you know, purely for research…yeah, research.
btw, my IQ is over 130 as well.
thanks for playing.[/quote]
when you say semi naked you mean leave the top half on and take the bottom half off dont you?
and when you say research you mean ghey sexts dont you?
and by IQ, i mean ding-ding
and by 130 i mean 9 inches
come on stringer, u’re slacking
Man, could someone explain to me how people get so wrapped up in this? I mean, for one, some user wants “proof” on another guys lifts, height/weight statistics, etcetera. Who cares?
Then guys are actually spending time arguing over a greater than or less than mathematical symbol-- based upon a post about IQ. Now, I get confused there because, well… it is a conversation dependent on IQ.
So, how personal is it to post on an internet forum? If people enjoy posting pictures/videos of themselves on a worldwide accessible library, more power to them. However, I think it should be understood that a lot of people perfer not to or in some cases can not due to jobs or whatever.
Bill Roberts is a good example, he has a wealth of knowledge as everyone has clearly seen, so what does it matter if anyone knows anything personal about him. He helps people, that is all that matters. The man could have no arms, no legs, lying in a hospital bed shaking like a dog shitting razor blades-- it doesn’t make a lick of difference.
All in fun.
How did you find out?!?!?!?
[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
How did you find out?!?!?!?[/quote]
You don’t have any arms or legs and still lift!? Damn, you are hardcore. I feel like such a pussy now what with having all my limbs and all.
[quote]Bill Roberts wrote:
How did you find out?!?!?!?[/quote]
I use to sleep with the nurse that cares for you 
My IQ is
otherwise, any decent internet IQ tests out there? I’ve taken a MENSA test in a psych class, and destroyed it. But I’d be interested in a real IQ test.
This thread is entertaining…and for the record in my time here, Tribunal has rarely given bad or unwise advice.
As Arnold would say “he gives the good advices”
And I can only hope that retard Fightnews10 is really banned, but I doubt I’m that lucky.
[quote]Mattlebee wrote:
but my guess is that it’s the ones who aren’t in Asia anymore, but live in America instead who are so touchy about it.
[/quote]
Correct sir. And where I live, racial tension is a tad higher.