[quote]jithu wrote:
Holy shit…[/quote]
Yup - Arnold will always be “Holy Shit!” to me… : )
Can’t believe nobody mentioned the freakiest of all the freaks…Holy Shit!!!
[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:
Can’t believe nobody mentioned the freakiest of all the freaks…Holy Shit!!![/quote]
I can believe it - because he looks (and sounds) like a turd.
[quote]buzza wrote:
if he is natural is very big hands down.[/quote]
Huh?
LL used to go to my gym; he’s not especially big.
I would say that Derek Poundstone falls somewhere in the Huge +, Holy Shit - category.
-Check out the end of the video, him and Ben White posing.
[quote]VikingsAD28 wrote:
I would say that Derek Poundstone falls somewhere in the Huge +, Holy Shit - category.
-Check out the end of the video, him and Ben White posing.[/quote]
Shit, bring his chest up a smidgen and he could step on stage after a couple week cut.
It disappears in the front double bi
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]jithu wrote:
Holy shit…[/quote]
I respect Arnold, biut that is not “holy shit”. Arnold weighed LESS than 240lbs at about 6’2" on stage. That would possibly be “huge” by today’s standards but not anywhere near the same level as guys like Vic Richards, Ronnie, Cutler or Warren.
[/quote]
This shows the development in bodybuilding in 30 years.
100% holy shit!!
[quote]Bricknyce wrote:
[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:
Can’t believe nobody mentioned the freakiest of all the freaks…Holy Shit!!![/quote]
I can believe it - because he looks (and sounds) like a turd. [/quote]
Hater.
[quote]optheta wrote:
[quote]Bricknyce wrote:
[quote]Proud_Virgin wrote:
Can’t believe nobody mentioned the freakiest of all the freaks…Holy Shit!!![/quote]
I can believe it - because he looks (and sounds) like a turd. [/quote]
Hater.[/quote]
I don’t think Valentino should be put in the same category as Kai, Jay, Yates, and the like.
Holy shit
[quote]jithu wrote:
Holy shit[/quote]
That’s Branch, right? I think we already defined him as a holy shit, he deserves it too.
Skinny. where is the fashion industry going??
[quote]jithu wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]jithu wrote:
Holy shit…[/quote]
I respect Arnold, biut that is not “holy shit”. Arnold weighed LESS than 240lbs at about 6’2" on stage. That would possibly be “huge” by today’s standards but not anywhere near the same level as guys like Vic Richards, Ronnie, Cutler or Warren.
[/quote]
This shows the development in bodybuilding in 30 years.[/quote]
ther is 4"inches differences between the 2, i think the difference would be much more if the photos were scaled better
[quote]hungry4more wrote:
Way turned 21 recently just FYI.
Honestly, I think it’s pretty funny someone put me in “big”…Way’s got around 55-65 lbs on me, and he’s only 6" taller, so yeah.
Not that I really give a shit…being classified as a certain term won’t change my Big 3 :)[/quote]
When I put you in that category, the only choices were
1)skinny
2)just started working out
3) big
4) huge
5) holy shit
I used you as an example because I couldn’t post pics at work and you’re a familiar name and physique on this site. Hope you didn’t mind.
[quote]gregron wrote:
Ok so now that we have a pretty good grasp of the scale the real question is: What category do you think that you fall into?[/quote]
I don’t know what scale we’re using since there was like 3 different ones lol. But I’d put myself in the lower end of works out or higher end just started working out. Unfortunately I had a lot of setbacks this year, so I was actually bigger Dec 09 than I am now. Sucks.