[quote]beeph wrote:
actually before our generation 200+ and under 6ft was 100% guaranteed obese.
Even the heavyweight champs didnt get much over 190 back in the day.
[/quote]
In terms of this, an issue is that weights for people in the 19th and early 20th centuries are hard to find. I personally can’t make assumptions about average bf%, weight, or similar measures for this population.
In regard to the previous champs, according to Steve Reeves’ website he weighed 216. While we can only assume the weights of Atlas and Sandow, seeing that Reeves was sitting at 216, we might be surprised by the earliest bodybuilders weights.
[quote]beeph wrote: 210 lbs of muscle is still 210 lbs that the liver is cleansing, the kidneys are filtering, and the heart is pumping… Organs which probably were designed to work at 160 lbs thru evolution. So the doctor is fine… as long as you’re not 210 lbs at age 70 she will be happy.
[/quote]
I would love to see a study showing that higher lean body mass is a risk factor for any disease, particularly one that controls for the variables of steroid use, the strain on the organs caused by intense weightlifting, various dietary factors, genetics, etc. Use all the anecdotal evidence and assumptions you want, but I don’t buy it.
If you read through the available literature, you will find again and again that higher amounts of LBM, and specifically muscle mass are negatively correlated with heart disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, anemia (of course), etc.
Higher amounts of muscle mass have also been shown to have a hepatic-protective affect during times of protein deficit and caloric deficit. In regard to the issue of the kidneys, lower amounts of muscle mass are an indication in patients with renal failure that the disease is progressing, the inverse indicating better renal function.
So I’ve tried to make 2 points:
-
The fact remains that the BMI is entirely formulaic (it is a formula, after all), not applicable to athletes, and over-used by physicians. It does not idicate an individuals health.
-
There is no literature I have seen to suggest the addition of high LBM alone has negative physiological impacts, and there is actually much literature to the contrary.
A third point would be that the body is incredibly adaptive. One only has to study immunology to see the very tip of the bodies adaptivity, and we cannot assume that our organs “weren’t designed” to do anything until we have seen good empirical evidence that our adaptive responses may not suit whatever that thing may be.
MID