[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:
LarryDavid wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
LarryDavid wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
Professor X wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
Off the top of my head I couldn’t name a single track by Kanye and I probably couldn’t pick him out of a line up.
Everyone going on about how he is a great musician or a great producer or whatever has to be on drugs. Nobody will remember him in 20 years. Within his genre he may well be relevent at the moment but the fact that he has to jump on a stage during someone elses acceptance speach just to make a headline shows how truly irrelevent he is on a wider scale.
Ignorance. I am sure I have friends who don’t give a shit about or even know who Alter Bridge is. I happen to think they may be more talented than most groups over the last 5 years or more as far as that genre. It would make as much sense for them to degrade Alter Bridge because they don’t even listen to their music or know they exist.
Some of you are flat out retarded. Yay, you don’t listen to hip hop. Please tell me why this means the genre sucks or that specific musicians that many people love have no talent.
I happen to be a musician and I like Kanye West’s stuff at least enough to note the man isn’t talentless. He has been around long enough to NOT be some one hit wonder, so again, tell me why YOU have the power to tell us what and who is relevant when you don’t even listen to the music?
I never said he was talentless, he is obviously talented at marketing himself and making money. He also obviously makes music that appeals to a large number of people. That doesn’t meant that it is particularly good musically it just means that he knows that certain hooks, riffs, beats and melodies coupled with the right image will sell.
I was in no way denigrating hip hop. There are some fantastically talented people in hip hop.
LOL @ the attempted self-edit
How so? I at no point said anything against hip-hop, I just said that I don’t think that Kanye is particularly memorable for his music and therefore is not likely to be seen as anything special when people look back in 20 years time.
The part about him being relevant “within his genre” but not in popular music as a whole. What does that imply about hip hop as a genre when one of it’s most relevant artists supposedly isn’t relevant in popular music (other than publicity stunts)?
Not at all, I would say the same about any number of guitar bands or dance music acts. He is relevent at the mooment within his genre because he is selling lots of records and doing dickish things. Give it a few years and he will not even be seen as relevent within his genre let alone outside of it.[/quote]
But would you say that about any massive bands? Like a band as big as Kanye West is in hip hop? A band like Black Sabbath? It doesn’t say much to say that you’d describe other artists that way. He is extremely important to the most vital genre in popular music today, and that alone should warrent his being relevant in the future and now. It’s not like hip hop is going away…
And if you don’t find him relevant that’s fine. A lot of Elvis fans didn’t really find rock bands in the 70s to be all that relevant, but they weren’t supposed to.
Which is to say I agree with you that he is relevant in his genre, I just feel like that alone ensures his relevance in popular music. Hip hop’s a big deal, man. I feel that this who argument may have been something of a minor misunderstanding…