July 7th UFO Sighting in China

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:
for an alien to have tits it would have to be a mammal…[/quote]

Not necessarily. Mammals developed tits as a survival/ evolutionary/ reproductory tool in a specific environment (this planet), so what we consider to be a “reptile” may be able to develop mammalian features given the right evolutionary push (another planet). So all bets are off really.

The human race has already developed several canine characteristics (pack hunting patterns, a set home) which although not physical adaptations, set us on a different evolutionary path to our primate relatives. Also, the human breast is amazingly different in look and function to that of, say, a chimpanzee’s - partly because of the developments mentioned above, which in the long run become physical as well as mental improvements. It’s far too much to go into here. Suffice to say, there are no hard and fast rules when it comes to evolution. Especially when you give it enough time.

[/quote]

yeah you definitely have a point here.

[quote]rrjc5488 wrote:
Wormwoodtheory is an alien.

^True story.[/quote]

good luck proving it, asshole!

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:
The human breast is amazingly different in look and function to that of a Chimpanzee’s.
[/quote]

Thats for sure. [/quote]

Heh. Obviously nobody here has a hankering to suckle a money teet (I hope), but that’s the point. The breast of a human female has evolved more as a sexual signal to the adult male than as a feeding tool for a baby, to the point where the small nipple and large (sometimes) breast size actually impede the baby’s feeding (a chimp’s nip is far more practical in construction).

It’s all good though. Our obsession with breasts and/or ass (which mirror each other as sexual signals) represent how the human brain and our need for stimulus developed in tandem.

So I’d like to dedicate this post to tits and ass, for making me the person I am today. [/quote]

Also, it is pretty likely that the canine-like adaptations which allowed mankind to become so successful as a species also allowed us to bond so successfully with dogs. Our relationship with “man’s best friend” is more about us adapting to them, than they to us. Primates do not bond with wild dogs, yet wild dogs are no different in habits and instinct to domesticated dogs… other than the fact than they are untamed (‘untamed’ here meaning that their pack doesn’t include or recognize humans).

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:

[quote]rrjc5488 wrote:
Wormwoodtheory is an alien.

^True story.[/quote]

good luck proving it! I’m off to probe some trailer-trash asshole![/quote]

I think that’s enough proof right there.


I wouldnt trust anything coming from China…their characters are less than reputable.

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:

[quote]DickBag wrote:

[quote]polo77j wrote:

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:
for an alien to have tits it would have to be a mammal…and then it wouldn’t be very alien then would it? SSC hit the nail on the head, the other beings in our universe are beyond our comprehension, and most likely operate on another plane of existence altogether.[/quote]

I ddn’t read SSC’s post, but what’s the reason for such an assertion? Why wouldn’t most organisms in the universe function like the ones on our planet assuming they all experienced some form of evolution? What do you mean by “another plane of existence”? Why don’t we exist on such a plane? I’d imagine we’d find extraterrestrial organisms to have characteristics that help them survive in their environment; unless that environment is beyond our comprehension, what makes you think these extraterrestrial organisms would be beyond our comprehension?

Would it be fair to say that initially they would be beyond our comprehension but after studying them and their behaviors we would come to understand them? I mean Isaac Newton had an advanced understanding of physics with basically using only his logic and observation and some very rudimentary equipment that’s almost laughable by today’s standards (the equipment, not Newton).[/quote]
i agree.

Jeez talk about selling yourself short with the “aliens are beyond our comprehension”

Its as silly as saying “women are impossible to understand”

[/quote]

i’m talking about beings that exist in multiple dimensions, specifically. I’ve often thought about the things we can’t see viewing everything in the third dimension.

just as a big “what-if”:

what if black holes are the 3rd dimensional representation of a 4th or 5th dimensional being? (3rd dimensional creatures exist in both the 1st and 2nd dimension)

almost like taking a cross section of a sphere and ending up with a circle, you only see a sliver of the whole thing.

That’s what i was getting at: that aliens don’t have to be made of meat like us.[/quote]

Thank you! Can we hang out?

[quote]horsepuss wrote:

[quote]SSC wrote:

[quote]horsepuss wrote:
Anyone who doesnt believe in aliens or UFO’s is a damn fool.[/quote]

By whose standards?

Ask the majority of biologists and they’ll tell you that alien life is non-probable because of the varying and anomolistic conditions in which evolution happened for the human race.

For instance. My figures may be a bit off, but close enough - But organisms originally all lived in the water for like what, 6 billion years? And only within the last billion years have they somehow evolved into something further - an event in which evolutionists still don’t have concrete reasons for. That’s a LARGE portion of time for simple life to exist and only a short time of having anything further, without any kind of explanation for why or how it happened.

Then, eventually these organisms migrated from water to land because there was too much competition in the seas. This alone could’ve been attributed to fluke genes, or rare characteristics in evolution that allowed life outside water possible.

And what about dinosaurs? Without their extinction, one can safely assume that there would be NO human life on this planet if they had continued existence. We simply wouldn’t be able to match them in the competitive life cycle.

Look, I’m NOT saying alien life doesn’t exist, it might. But if it does, I feel there’s a good chance it’s not evolved enough to make conscious decisions of galactic travel and motives that are human-like. I think most concepts of aliens and the way they operate are, as I’ve said, personified and dramaticized by years of theory and, as Vegita showed, ancient myths about people from the skies or what not.

Everyone wants something beyond their own normal and mundane lives to believe in, and that’s cool, I accept that. Some people have Gods, some have aliens, others have doomsday prophecies. It’s all about personal beliefs.[/quote]

Im glad you pointed out that your figures may be off because right off the bat they were. The world is only 4-4.5 billion years old. Scientists have created amino acids out of just water elecricity and heat, now aminos dont lead to us but they do creat a starting point.[/quote]

Thanks, I couldn’t remember the exact numbers there. If that’s the case, then the life form didn’t evolve past a single-cell microbacteria until roughly 3.25 - 3.5 billion years ago. Just for the record and all.

[quote]We know more about the bottom of the marianas trench then we know about the dark side of the moon. Now you mention that scientist are still very confused about our evolution mainly Macro Evolution even tho we can clearly see the path from homo erectus and beyond to us.

Here is my theory. The dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago and us (homo sapiens) evolved out of homo erectus 250,000 years ago in africa. Now lets say a life form like us or atleast with the potential to be as intelligent as us eveolved much sooner like 500,000 years ago or more.Now take a look at where we are in technology and its easy to imagine where we could be in another 250,000 years.

So if you take the idae that there could be thousands of hospitable planets out there somewhere and the figure of 250,000-500,000 and 65million and divide it you get 260 and 130. That means there are 260 and 130 chances for another life form to evolve to atleast our intelligence within the last 65million years.

Lots of poeple think well if there out there why dont we see them or why dont they show themselves, well look at it this way. We drop of Navy Seals on foriegn siol to conduct secret mission all the time. Nobody sees them so why would we see aliens if they didnt want us too.[/quote]

That may be so, and agree, I don’t deny the potential for aliens to exist, that was never my real sentiment. I don’t buy the one-track philosophy of their concept and rationale.

What I’m trying to say is that if we suppose aliens are truly coming to new planets, for whatever reason it may be - to meet and greet, resources, war, etc., we’re backing that theory with secular, if not blind reasoning. Egotistical reasoning. There’s nothing but speculation behind the theory that live has to evolve or exist with similar life patterns as ours.

Yes, there seems to be a constant between life forms. That we know of… on Earth, but that means nothing when we’re talking about planets a very far way from here. For all that we know, Earth has (possibly) 118-122 elements, which could be 1/6 of the amount of elements present between ours and two to other galaxies, let alone the insane amount there is.

Anyway, I already droned on over and over about why there’s an excellent chance aliens aren’t anything like humans. That’s all I’m trying to imply.

Back to the OP:

That light looks kind of the like the ass end of the Millenium Falcon.

Back to the OP:

That light looks kinda like the ass end of the Millenium Falcon.

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]SSC wrote:

Until there’s rock solid evidence, there’s simply no plausible reason to assume that anything ever UFO-related that’s been recorded or documented is more than government ops or testing of new technologies.[/quote]

???

The Roswell Crash had nothing to do with the government testing new equipment.

It’s also interesting to note that there are many governments around the world who have researched UFO sightings and come to different conclusions than the one you made here.[/quote]

And exactly what “conclusions” have been reached? They study UFOs b/c most UFOs are likely advanced craft from other nations. It’s a national security issue for the respective countries.

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]BobParr wrote:

Are you sure about the Roswell Crash?
[/quote]

Fairly certain. Far too many eye-witness accounts (some of whom were threatened not to talk about what they saw), of the crash site, of alien bodies, parts of the craft being moved from New Mexico to a handful of other bases to include Wright-Patterson Airforce base, the alleged resting place for wreckage and alien remains. I’m also of the mind that there is something to what General Arthur E. Exon has stated about the aforementioned materials when it arrived at Wright-Patterson.

And if you believe what Stanton Friedman has stated as the conclusions of his research, and I have no reason not to believe him, I think it’s highly unlikely that what crashed in Roswell was a top secret (military) flying machine.

That is part of the problem. The government/military has changed its story several times, not to mention that when this all first occurred, the military officially released a statement saying that what was recovered was a “flying saucer”.

Perhaps, although there are several modern day scientists, to include Stephen Hawking, that claim that interstellar travel could be possible.[/quote]

If they are covering up something secret (a craft, a program during the cold war), of course the story will evolve and develop. Lemme guess here…and I’m just freelancing/freerolling here…but aliens, with the technology to defeat physics as we understand it, traveled interstellar or interdimensional, only to crash land on our planet? Hmmm. Okay. So, what is more believable? Government cover up of craft or program or, incompetent pilots from a beyond your imagination technologically advanced race?

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
They may have a different understanding of space time, or even the same understanding but the ability to manipulate them in ways we can’t understand.

It is strange the way that what ever it was in that video seemed to emerge from a point consecutive to the previous place that it was, and the contrail re-formed. I’ve heard a description of frames of time described as that appears. It’s as if space and time were separated or resized from the proportions which we exist in and perceive as continuous or inseparable.

Very strange.
[/quote]

or it was simply breaking the sound barrier or it was a rocket stage. who wants to bet a case of your favorite beer that that particular video will be confirmed to be a missile test or rocket launch?

Why do UFOs always seem to have a light. If we’ve been flying spy planes for almost a century without lights on, you’d figure advanced alien civilizations that traveled many light years to get here would catch that memo. If we can reduce light, radar, IR and sound emissions from planes and submarines, I’d assume so can aliens.

I’m of the belief that based on numbers, there has to be life out there, some of it intelligent. Whether they’ve been here or not and seen, would be up to them. Maybe it’s like Men in Black and they’re all living in human suits in the greater New York metropolitan area. I just find it implausible that the technology that allows aliens to travel through space would be given up by blinking lights and anal probing.

Here’s an interesting talk about using spectroscopy to identify sun like stars, stars with planets and potentially planets with life. We might not be visiting life on other planets, but we might know that it’s out there very soon.

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:

[quote]DickBag wrote:

[quote]polo77j wrote:

[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:
for an alien to have tits it would have to be a mammal…and then it wouldn’t be very alien then would it? SSC hit the nail on the head, the other beings in our universe are beyond our comprehension, and most likely operate on another plane of existence altogether.[/quote]

I ddn’t read SSC’s post, but what’s the reason for such an assertion? Why wouldn’t most organisms in the universe function like the ones on our planet assuming they all experienced some form of evolution? What do you mean by “another plane of existence”? Why don’t we exist on such a plane? I’d imagine we’d find extraterrestrial organisms to have characteristics that help them survive in their environment; unless that environment is beyond our comprehension, what makes you think these extraterrestrial organisms would be beyond our comprehension?

Would it be fair to say that initially they would be beyond our comprehension but after studying them and their behaviors we would come to understand them? I mean Isaac Newton had an advanced understanding of physics with basically using only his logic and observation and some very rudimentary equipment that’s almost laughable by today’s standards (the equipment, not Newton).[/quote]
i agree.

Jeez talk about selling yourself short with the “aliens are beyond our comprehension”

Its as silly as saying “women are impossible to understand”

[/quote]

i’m talking about beings that exist in multiple dimensions, specifically. I’ve often thought about the things we can’t see viewing everything in the third dimension.

just as a big “what-if”:

what if black holes are the 3rd dimensional representation of a 4th or 5th dimensional being? (3rd dimensional creatures exist in both the 1st and 2nd dimension)

almost like taking a cross section of a sphere and ending up with a circle, you only see a sliver of the whole thing.

That’s what i was getting at: that aliens don’t have to be made of meat like us.[/quote]

Think about the origin of this thread, however: a UFO sighting in China. Sure, there might be aliens out there somewhere who are non-corporeal beings. We might not able to see them because they are extra-dimensional (they might not be able to see us, for that matter)… So then why would they need a spacecraft made of matter that we CAN see in order to get here?

If there are extra-terrestrials piloting these UFOs, I’m willing to bet they are more like us physically than they are different. Sure, they might breathe air we find poisonous, or they might have tentacles instead of fingers, and they might have a heavy or thin build because their home world has different gravity than ours, but I bet they are not that different.

And dammit, I bet some of them even look like sexy women with green skin and 1960s hair styles!

[quote]BobParr wrote:

And dammit, I bet some of them even look like sexy women with green skin and 1960s hair styles!
[/quote]

We can only hope; cause bitches on this planet is crazy :slight_smile: LOL

oh yeah, definitely. i was using the extra dimensional aspect as an example.

people get hung up on the little green men theories too much, and i just wanted to make sure they understood that not everything sentient is made of meat.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
They may have a different understanding of space time, or even the same understanding but the ability to manipulate them in ways we can’t understand.

It is strange the way that what ever it was in that video seemed to emerge from a point consecutive to the previous place that it was, and the contrail re-formed. I’ve heard a description of frames of time described as that appears. It’s as if space and time were separated or resized from the proportions which we exist in and perceive as continuous or inseparable.

Very strange.
[/quote]

or it was simply breaking the sound barrier or it was a rocket stage. who wants to bet a case of your favorite beer that that particular video will be confirmed to be a missile test or rocket launch?
[/quote]

I’m tempted to take you up on that if we can change the wager. My favorite beer days are long gone, but I’ve never had a genuine Philly Steak. The Pittsburgh equivalent is a Primanti Bros. sandwich- http://www.primantibrothers.com/ , which is considered legal tender in all of the lower 48 states.

Can any of you guys hook me up with your weed man?.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

And exactly what “conclusions” have been reached? They study UFOs b/c most UFOs are likely advanced craft from other nations. It’s a national security issue for the respective countries.
[/quote]

Depends on what reports you read, but the COMETA Report has a section detailing what should be done regarding alien visitation and defense. The researchers openly discuss motivations for aliens visiting Earth. There is enough evidence, at least within this report, to suggest that the craft are not all advanced air-craft of Earthly origins.

In comparison, the U.S government, in the past, has given only a half-assed effort in studying the UFO phenomenon, usually dismissing credible information and sightings outright.

http://www.ufoevidence.org/topics/Cometa.htm

[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
Can any of you guys hook me up with your weed man?.[/quote]

The aliens absconded with it. They just stopped by China for some opium to smooth it out.