Im not sure if it was you or the European guy. Tough to check the database on cellphone but it sure makes for a more entertaining read. So. What’s your take on Obummer husein warming relations with Cuba?
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Im not sure if it was you or the European guy.[/quote]
For days I have been making – and defending from your and Sexmachine’s ahistorical and unevidenced garbage – one argument. You don’t know what it is because you did such an impossibly terrible job of debating me that you never even got to the stage whereat you weigh and understand your opponent’s reasoning. This is entirely your problem.
[quote]
So. What’s your take on Obummer husein warming relations with Cuba?[/quote]
I’ve already told you whether or not I’m going to be opening a new and different conversation with you. And I’ve already told you why. You aren’t good enough at this. It’s really that simple. Lest you think that’s unfair, I’ve explained in great detail exactly how and why you aren’t good enough at it. See the opening-words post for a fine and shining example. But please, ask me again what I think of Obama’s warming relations with Cuba. Once you get to five times, I’ll be bound by magical law to answer you.
Because there’s no defending it. You won’t try cause you know you can not win
Any thoughts on Giuliani’s comments about Obama?
Maybe you could extensively document his fireworks show of fallacy.
He’s obviously a racist according to people here…
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Because there’s no defending it. You won’t try cause you know you can not win
[/quote]
You don’t know whether I would defend it, attack it, or express ambivalence about it. I won’t “try,” which means I won’t talk to you about it, because – again – I get absolutely nothing out of debating you. It’s like beating a toaster at chess. It doesn’t even have meaning.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Any thoughts on Giuliani’s comments about Obama?
Maybe you could extensively document his fireworks show of fallacy.
[/quote]
You made a bunch of horseshit claims rooted in obvious ignorance, and then, when asked for evidence, gave up in a big sarcastic cop-out. Whatever bitterness is left over is yours to deal with.
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Any thoughts on Giuliani’s comments about Obama?
Maybe you could extensively document his fireworks show of fallacy.
[/quote]
You made a bunch of horseshit claims rooted in obvious ignorance, and then, when asked for evidence, gave up in a big sarcastic cop-out. Whatever bitterness is left over is yours to deal with.[/quote]
You say they’re horseshit. I say they’re not and I stick by them. The Arab Spring and the civil war in Libya were incited by Obama, State Department, Google and a host of Democrat NGOs. Their dealings in Libya and Eastern Europe were “extensively documented” by wikileaks. They state Obama’s plans to oust Gaddafi went back years before the 2011 and 2010 protests. Nothing I said is horseshit.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Any thoughts on Giuliani’s comments about Obama?
Maybe you could extensively document his fireworks show of fallacy.
[/quote]
You made a bunch of horseshit claims rooted in obvious ignorance, and then, when asked for evidence, gave up in a big sarcastic cop-out. Whatever bitterness is left over is yours to deal with.[/quote]
You say they’re horseshit. I say they’re not and I stick by them.[/quote]
And then I asked you to evidence them specifically (and not some sad lesser set of claims not remotely adding up to the sweeping garbage [“a few civil demonstrations and then”; “a few dozen {protesters}”] you were pushing). And you gave up. That is decisive, and it’s all I have to say about it any more.
Ok, this is beginning to boggle my mind.
I requested someone respond to a question about Obama warming America’s relations with Cuba based upon a comment made in this thread about how America could excuse the Libyan dictator after decades of tyranny and suddenly become his ally. Why is it wrong in the case of Libya and not in the case of Cuba?
first off, if this is or was not your stance or opinion, why respond?
second why respond if your response is not responding?
third, why the impulse to suddenly compare yourself to a toaster?
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
It doesn’t even have meaning.[/quote]
/thread.
lol.
[quote]Gkhan wrote:
Ok, this is beginning to boggle my mind.
I requested someone respond to a question about Obama warming America’s relations with Cuba based upon a comment made in this thread about how America could excuse the Libyan dictator after decades of tyranny and suddenly become his ally. Why is it wrong in the case of Libya and not in the case of Cuba?
first off, if this is or was not your stance or opinion, why respond?
second why respond if your response is not responding?[/quote]
If you care to get yourself straight on this (which is unlikely), you can go back and see that I wrote that post specifically to comment on your error having been big and logical rather than small and semantic. I merely prefaced that point with a line about the Cuba reasoning not applying to my Libya argument – because I suspected that this would be news to you.
[quote]
third, why the impulse to suddenly compare yourself to a toaster?[/quote]
Not terrible. A little cheap and derivative of my having just made exactly that joke (i.e., a little too “I know you are but what am I?”) – but not terrible, and not a bad note on which for me to take my leave.
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Any thoughts on Giuliani’s comments about Obama?
Maybe you could extensively document his fireworks show of fallacy.
[/quote]
You made a bunch of horseshit claims rooted in obvious ignorance, and then, when asked for evidence, gave up in a big sarcastic cop-out. Whatever bitterness is left over is yours to deal with.[/quote]
You say they’re horseshit. I say they’re not and I stick by them.[/quote]
And then I asked you to evidence them specifically (and not some sad lesser set of claims not remotely adding up to the sweeping garbage [“a few civil demonstrations and then”; “a few dozen {protesters}”] you were pushing). And you gave up. That is decisive, and it’s all I have to say about it any more.[/quote]
Google is getting WH [White House] and State Dept support and air cover. In reality they are doing things the CIA cannot doâ?¦
[Cohen] is going to get himself kidnapped or killed. Might be the best thing to happen to expose Googleâ??s covert role in foaming up-risings, to be blunt. The US Govâ??t can then disavow knowledge and Google is left holding the shit-bag." - Fred Burton State Department Security
He’s talking about Jared Cohen of Google. They helped foment the Arab Spring on social media for the Obama regime.
I can only assume you are a proponent of Obama’s foreign policy nightmare which is the warming of relations with Cuba which flies in the face of decades of isolation and anti-communist policies. Unlike Libya which was forced to concessions to become a US ally Obama ignorantly has warmed relations unilaterally which is the equivalent of throwing the baby out with the bath water so to speak.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
Any thoughts on Giuliani’s comments about Obama?
Maybe you could extensively document his fireworks show of fallacy.
[/quote]
You made a bunch of horseshit claims rooted in obvious ignorance, and then, when asked for evidence, gave up in a big sarcastic cop-out. Whatever bitterness is left over is yours to deal with.[/quote]
You say they’re horseshit. I say they’re not and I stick by them.[/quote]
And then I asked you to evidence them specifically (and not some sad lesser set of claims not remotely adding up to the sweeping garbage [“a few civil demonstrations and then”; “a few dozen {protesters}”] you were pushing). And you gave up. That is decisive, and it’s all I have to say about it any more.[/quote]
Google is getting WH [White House] and State Dept support and air cover. In reality they are doing things the CIA cannot doâ?¦
[Cohen] is going to get himself kidnapped or killed. Might be the best thing to happen to expose Googleâ??s covert role in foaming up-risings, to be blunt. The US Govâ??t can then disavow knowledge and Google is left holding the shit-bag." - Fred Burton State Department Security
He’s talking about Jared Cohen of Google. They helped foment the Arab Spring on social media for the Obama regime.
[/quote]
You’re vastly overstating the importance that social media played in the Arab Sping, which experts maintain was a small contributing factor once popular demonstrations were well under way, not a precipitant. The CIA can no longer carry out its own white, grey, and black propaganda campaigns? I also find it indicative of our biases that you have swallowed wikileaks hook, line, and sinker.
Swallowed wikileaks? I just go by the official SD cables I read.
[quote]knee-gro wrote:
Hey beansie, ya scrotum prospector, if I invaded your home and deadlifted yo bed with you n yo hag sleeping there, would you shoot me?
[/quote]
Dude, seriously?
That’s it?
/no bueno
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
[quote]knee-gro wrote:
Hey beansie, ya scrotum prospector, if I invaded your home and deadlifted yo bed with you n yo hag sleeping there, would you shoot me?
[/quote]
Dude, seriously?
That’s it?
/no bueno[/quote]
It might be the saddest reply I’ve ever seen on the internet.
If that entire account wasn’t a blatant attempt to troll X back in the day, and an actual person, I’d feel bad for him.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
[quote]knee-gro wrote:
Hey beansie, ya scrotum prospector, if I invaded your home and deadlifted yo bed with you n yo hag sleeping there, would you shoot me?
[/quote]
Dude, seriously?
That’s it?
/no bueno[/quote]
It might be the saddest reply I’ve ever seen on the internet.
If that entire account wasn’t a blatant attempt to troll X back in the day, and an actual person, I’d feel bad for him. [/quote]
It’s obviously a second account…it’s becoming a full time job to figure out what idiot is trolling.