Jordan 2, ISIS/L 1

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
961

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Really?

I mean, I’m not denying there are without a doubt some narcissist on both sides, do you think it’s a majority?

Maybe once were talking about POTUS, Speaker, Majority Leader etc… Sure. [/quote]

If you think you can genuinely change the world or make some positive impact on it, I can only think that you have some sort of egomaniac streak.

People who run for the POTUS are probably the greatest egomaniacs, but anyone who runs for Congress must have some over-inflated sense of self-importance.

962

[quote]Musashi92 wrote:

Show me where the study mentions the fact America has 5 crimes that classify as violent crime and European nations have many, many, many more crimes that fall into that category? They don’t which is why the study does not tell the full picture.

But keep ignoring that fact.
[/quote]

Read the preface.

For the 18th time. Everything in that study is based on the surveys they did. The surveys were standard across nations. The standardization was peer reviewed, and deemed comparable across nations.

If you actually read the fucking link you’d know this. People qualified to say so, have said your refutation (that you have never once substantiated yourself) is total bunk.

963

Musashi92: The earth is flat

Beans: Nah man, look here, this study shows it isn’t the case at all.

Musashi92: That study is wrong because of a bunch of things I’m not going to link to, but claim anyway

everyone else: Dude, the study addresses that, and yeah, you’re wrong

Musashi92: show me

Beans: read the preface.

Musashi92: That study is wrong because of a bunch of things I’m not going to link to, but claim anyway

Everyone else: Dude, the study addresses that, and yeah, you’re wrong

Musashi92: That study is wrong because of a bunch of things I’m not going to link to, but claim anyway

everyone else: Dude, the study addresses that, and yeah, you’re wrong

Musashi92: show me

Beans: read the preface.

Musashi92: That study is wrong because of a bunch of things I’m not going to link to, but claim anyway

everyone else: Dude, the study addresses that, and yeah, you’re wrong

Musashi92: show me

Beans: read the preface.

Musashi92: That study is wrong because of a bunch of things I’m not going to link to, but claim anyway

everyone else: Dude, the study addresses that, and yeah, you’re wrong

Musashi92: show me

Beans: read the preface.

Musashi92: That study is wrong because of a bunch of things I’m not going to link to, but claim anyway

everyone else: Dude, the study addresses that, and yeah, you’re wrong

Musashi92: show me

Beans: read the preface.

Musashi92: That study is wrong because of a bunch of things I’m not going to link to, but claim anyway

everyone else: Dude, the study addresses that, and yeah, you’re wrong

Musashi92: show me

Beans: read the preface.

Musashi92: That study is wrong because of a bunch of things I’m not going to link to, but claim anyway

everyone else: Dude, the study addresses that, and yeah, you’re wrong

Musashi92: show me

Beans: read the preface.

Musashi92: That study is wrong because of a bunch of things I’m not going to link to, but claim anyway

everyone else: Dude, the study addresses that, and yeah, you’re wrong

Musashi92: show me

Beans: read the preface.

Musashi92: That study is wrong because of a bunch of things I’m not going to link to, but claim anyway

everyone else: Dude, the study addresses that, and yeah, you’re wrong

Musashi92: show me

Beans: read the preface.

Musashi92: That study is wrong because of a bunch of things I’m not going to link to, but claim anyway

everyone else: Dude, the study addresses that, and yeah, you’re wrong

Musashi92: show me

Beans: read the preface.

Musashi92: That study is wrong because of a bunch of things I’m not going to link to, but claim anyway

everyone else: Dude, the study addresses that, and yeah, you’re wrong

Musashi92: show me

Beans: read the preface.

Musashi92: That study is wrong because of a bunch of things I’m not going to link to, but claim anyway

everyone else: Dude, the study addresses that, and yeah, you’re wrong

Musashi92: show me

Beans: read the preface.

964

Epic take down Beansie.

965

Lol…

967

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]Musashi92 wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]Musashi92 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:

[quote]Musashi92 wrote:

[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
How is “Obummer” even considered racist…[/quote]

In and of itself it is not racist, however as I stated when people who never used name pun before start, when they call the first black man to be president a marxist, a muslim, secret supported of islamic terrorism, when they go mad about his administrations infringement on civil liberties yet supported GW twice, there is a pattern. [/quote]

Ummm, did you miss all of those years where GW’s approval rating was setting records for how low it was?

Do you know how many times GW was referred to as a retarded on this very website?

None of what you listed has anything to do with race… “A pattern,” ya they don’t like him, so what?

You can’t truly be this stupid.
[/quote]

It’s called “cultured” in Europe.

969

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]OGrady wrote:
I’m just trolling Brosef.
[/quote]

Then how did you think people would react?[/quote]

With levity.

971

[quote]magick wrote:

[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
Given the pushoverness of the GOP, and should they win in 2016, I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama’s ideological agenda is continued, despite their claims to being against his policies.
They’re all talk and no action, or at least not the action their voters elected them for, serving the same masters.
Biggest difference is that they’ll lie to your face about their priorities.
Seems almost like a one party system.[/quote]

Isn’t it possible that most of the parties agree on so many things because most Americans agree on so many things?[/quote]

Yeah, things like 2nd amendment rights, healthcare, immigration, IRS targeting, DOJ targeting. Seems to me that Americans have more in common on smaller issues than bigger issues, but I’m not going to act like I’m aware of all of them.

I think the problem is that the citizens disagree, but the (GOP) parties ignore their voting base.

The blog I follow most is Ace of Spades, and with the shit that the GOP does, they’re talking about voting their own out of their seats from their two-facedness.

972

[quote]Musashi92 wrote:

Also if this is the case is the U.S forever in the debt of France?
[/quote]

Huh?

Bien sûr que non , Amérique remboursé cette dette envers la France sur les plages de Normandie .

Die Französisch sollten unsere Merican Arsch Kuss, weil ihre Kinder nicht Deutsch lesen.

973

[quote]Musashi92 wrote:

And yeah my age does not mean I am wrong. Obama is a secret Muslim who wants Sharia over the U.S. That is a basic logical position.
[/quote]

Fixed it for ya.

974

[quote]Musashi92 wrote:
Yeah, OJ is innocent. Common sense is also a factor.[/quote]

True.

He was judged and found not guilty by a jury of his peers. That’s the American way.

975

[quote]MattyG35 wrote:
Given the pushoverness of the GOP, and should they win in 2016, I wouldn’t be surprised if Obama’s ideological agenda is continued, despite their claims to being against his policies.
They’re all talk and no action, or at least not the action their voters elected them for, serving the same masters.
Biggest difference is that they’ll lie to your face about their priorities.
Seems almost like a one party system.[/quote]

I’d vote for anyone, Dem or Rep., who will repeal the damned Obamacare.

976

[quote]OGrady wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]OGrady wrote:
I’m just trolling Brosef.
[/quote]

Then how did you think people would react?[/quote]

With levity. [/quote]

You gotta be funny then.

977

[quote]Musashi92 wrote:

Unless you think he is a secret Marxist Muslim. For which there is no evidence.[/quote]

He is actually a double-secret Marxist Muslim right wing Christian fanatic.

978

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

But Euros have NO problem jumping in and telling us what WE should be thinking and doing.
[/quote]

YES x 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

979

[quote]Gkhan wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

But Euros have NO problem jumping in and telling us what WE should be thinking and doing.
[/quote]

YES x 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000[/quote]

They are also typically the first to ask the U.S. to be the worlds policeman.

980

[quote]OGrady wrote:

Man, you’ve got a lot of hate for me stemming from a relatively few words exchanged. The more you attack me, the more foolish you look. Rule #1 of dealing with my unoriginal and tired approach: don’t feed the trolls! I’m just trolling Brosef. I’m sorry if I genuinely offended you – I didn’t mean anything personally, just for a bit of fun.

Have a good debate y’all! [/quote]

Ok, if you are not being your “real personality” in this thread, and have come aboard merely to troll, then why are you pissed because other posters have picked up on this? If you are generally concerned about showing your “real” personality, why not try adding something useful or constructive to the thread & argument? Then, maybe people would respect what you have to say.

Just my 2 cents.