Without the eight and a half MILLION casualties suffered by Russia in the First World War, there wouldn’t have been as great an impetus to revolt against the Tsar.
[/quote]
You realise of course the Bolshevik revolution was set off by Ludendorff and the German General Staff right? After the failed Spring offensive of 1916 they put Lenin on a private train from Switzerland to St Petersburg to start an uprising.[/quote]
Well, then.
In that case, the lack of a First World War would have really made the revolution unlikely.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
But he’s not just a “douchebag”. He’s a radical. He’s an extremist. Frankly, he’s the kind of guy who should be on an FBI watch list like his mentor Frank Marshall Davis. This is what I’ve been trying to explain to otherwise intelligent people like smh for yonks now. But they just don’t get it. They think he’s just a run of the mill, left of centre Democrat. He’s not. He’s a hardcore Commie for Christ’s sake![/quote]
So I’ve heard: a Commie who came to power at the single best moment for a reorientation of the fundamental nature of the American economic paradigm in half a century, and then spent his first year in office making sure that no such fundamental reorientation could happen. (I have argued this point in detail before. I’m not going to do it again. I will say though that the Obama administration’s actions from 2009 on, vis-a-vis the Great Recession, are literally inexplicable on your hypothesis. They eviscerate it.)
And an “anticolonialist” who bombs indigent brown people often enough for Glenn Greenwald to sob into his corn flakes each and every morning (after, of course, masturbating to the 2015 ISIS beefcake calendar).
I’ve heard so much about this Phantom Obama. I just hope we get a glimpse of him before 2017, lest future generations claim that he never was.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
But he’s not just a “douchebag”. He’s a radical. He’s an extremist. Frankly, he’s the kind of guy who should be on an FBI watch list like his mentor Frank Marshall Davis. This is what I’ve been trying to explain to otherwise intelligent people like smh for yonks now. But they just don’t get it. They think he’s just a run of the mill, left of centre Democrat. He’s not. He’s a hardcore Commie for Christ’s sake![/quote]
So I’ve heard: a Commie who came to power at the single best moment for a reorientation of the fundamental nature of the American economic paradigm in half a century, and then spent his first year in office making sure that no such fundamental reorientation could happen. (I have argued this point in detail before. I’m not going to do it again. I will say though that the Obama administration’s actions from 2009 on, vis-a-vis the Great Recession, are literally inexplicable on your hypothesis. They eviscerate it.)
And an “anticolonialist” who bombs indigent brown people often enough for Glenn Greenwald to sob into his corn flakes each and every morning (after, of course, masturbating to the 2015 ISIS beefcake calendar).
I’ve heard so much about this Phantom Obama. I just hope we get a glimpse of him before 2017, lest future generations claim that he never was.
Edited.
[/quote]
You addressed the single post that contained a strong opinion. You did not address the links provided that showed the president going OUT of his way to not speak the plain truth.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
But he’s not just a “douchebag”. He’s a radical. He’s an extremist. Frankly, he’s the kind of guy who should be on an FBI watch list like his mentor Frank Marshall Davis. This is what I’ve been trying to explain to otherwise intelligent people like smh for yonks now. But they just don’t get it. They think he’s just a run of the mill, left of centre Democrat. He’s not. He’s a hardcore Commie for Christ’s sake![/quote]
So I’ve heard: a Commie who came to power at the single best moment for a reorientation of the fundamental nature of the American economic paradigm in half a century, and then spent his first year in office making sure that no such fundamental reorientation could happen. (I have argued this point in detail before. I’m not going to do it again. I will say though that the Obama administration’s actions from 2009 on, vis-a-vis the Great Recession, are literally inexplicable on your hypothesis. They eviscerate it.)
And an “anticolonialist” who bombs indigent brown people often enough for Glenn Greenwald to sob into his corn flakes each and every morning (after, of course, masturbating to the 2015 ISIS beefcake calendar).
I’ve heard so much about this Phantom Obama. I just hope we get a glimpse of him before 2017, lest future generations claim that he never was.
Edited.
[/quote]
You addressed the single post that contained a strong opinion. You did not address the links provided that showed the president going OUT of his way to not speak the plain truth.
That was the takeaway.[/quote]
“Violent, vicious zealots” seems pretty apt to me.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
But he’s not just a “douchebag”. He’s a radical. He’s an extremist. Frankly, he’s the kind of guy who should be on an FBI watch list like his mentor Frank Marshall Davis. This is what I’ve been trying to explain to otherwise intelligent people like smh for yonks now. But they just don’t get it. They think he’s just a run of the mill, left of centre Democrat. He’s not. He’s a hardcore Commie for Christ’s sake![/quote]
So I’ve heard: a Commie who came to power at the single best moment for a reorientation of the fundamental nature of the American economic paradigm in half a century, and then spent his first year in office making sure that no such fundamental reorientation could happen. (I have argued this point in detail before. I’m not going to do it again. I will say though that the Obama administration’s actions from 2009 on, vis-a-vis the Great Recession, are literally inexplicable on your hypothesis. They eviscerate it.)
And an “anticolonialist” who bombs indigent brown people often enough for Glenn Greenwald to sob into his corn flakes each and every morning (after, of course, masturbating to the 2015 ISIS beefcake calendar).
I’ve heard so much about this Phantom Obama. I just hope we get a glimpse of him before 2017, lest future generations claim that he never was.
Edited.
[/quote]
You addressed the single post that contained a strong opinion. You did not address the links provided that showed the president going OUT of his way to not speak the plain truth.
That was the takeaway.[/quote]
“Violent, vicious zealots” seems pretty apt to me. [/quote]
How about “muslim extremists” “who targeted jews, and later admitted it”
How about “I did not go to France with the rest of the leaders of the free world to speak out against muslim terror groups because…profit?”
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
But he’s not just a “douchebag”. He’s a radical. He’s an extremist. Frankly, he’s the kind of guy who should be on an FBI watch list like his mentor Frank Marshall Davis. This is what I’ve been trying to explain to otherwise intelligent people like smh for yonks now. But they just don’t get it. They think he’s just a run of the mill, left of centre Democrat. He’s not. He’s a hardcore Commie for Christ’s sake![/quote]
So I’ve heard: a Commie who came to power at the single best moment for a reorientation of the fundamental nature of the American economic paradigm in half a century, and then spent his first year in office making sure that no such fundamental reorientation could happen. (I have argued this point in detail before. I’m not going to do it again. I will say though that the Obama administration’s actions from 2009 on, vis-a-vis the Great Recession, are literally inexplicable on your hypothesis. They eviscerate it.)
And an “anticolonialist” who bombs indigent brown people often enough for Glenn Greenwald to sob into his corn flakes each and every morning (after, of course, masturbating to the 2015 ISIS beefcake calendar).
I’ve heard so much about this Phantom Obama. I just hope we get a glimpse of him before 2017, lest future generations claim that he never was.
Edited.
[/quote]
I’ve said this before too:
He IS a communist, and he IS a radical. He just doesn’t govern like one (outside of obamacare), because he is smart enough (and his ego could never ever stand the historical destruction of his “legacy”) to know that shit wouldn’t fly in America outside the fringe coo-koo birds.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
But he’s not just a “douchebag”. He’s a radical. He’s an extremist. Frankly, he’s the kind of guy who should be on an FBI watch list like his mentor Frank Marshall Davis. This is what I’ve been trying to explain to otherwise intelligent people like smh for yonks now. But they just don’t get it. They think he’s just a run of the mill, left of centre Democrat. He’s not. He’s a hardcore Commie for Christ’s sake![/quote]
So I’ve heard: a Commie who came to power at the single best moment for a reorientation of the fundamental nature of the American economic paradigm in half a century, and then spent his first year in office making sure that no such fundamental reorientation could happen. (I have argued this point in detail before. I’m not going to do it again. I will say though that the Obama administration’s actions from 2009 on, vis-a-vis the Great Recession, are literally inexplicable on your hypothesis. They eviscerate it.)
And an “anticolonialist” who bombs indigent brown people often enough for Glenn Greenwald to sob into his corn flakes each and every morning (after, of course, masturbating to the 2015 ISIS beefcake calendar).
I’ve heard so much about this Phantom Obama. I just hope we get a glimpse of him before 2017, lest future generations claim that he never was.
Edited.
[/quote]
You addressed the single post that contained a strong opinion. You did not address the links provided that showed the president going OUT of his way to not speak the plain truth.
That was the takeaway.[/quote]
There’s nothing for me to address. I have exactly the same view of it as you. I despise the fact that some kind of weird, pointless order has gone out to the administration urging representatives to avoid using certain plain and correct terms. I despise political correctness.
However, I also understand enough to judge presidents by what they do, not what they say. What Obama has done to combat terrorism has been, more often than not, what I would have done. It’s certainly better than what his predecessor did, which was to create more terrorists out of thin air in as short a span of time as possible by irrevocably (and on mendacious grounds) fucking up one of the two countries on whose destabilization IS is existentially dependent.
He IS a communist, and he IS a radical. He just doesn’t govern like one (outside of obamacare), because he is smart enough (and his ego could never ever stand the historical destruction of his “legacy”) to know that shit wouldn’t fly in America outside the fringe coo-koo birds. [/quote]
He IS a communist?
He wants to abolish private property and nationalize the means of production?
On what evidence exactly? A professor he knew before the invention of the DVD player? Something he said when he was a college student?
No. He is what he does. In some undiscoverable realm of pure Platonian identity, Bush might have been a pacifist, Carter might have been a vertebrate, and Obama might be a communist/capitalist/anarchist/satanist/cactus. But for our purposes, they are what they do.
So I’ve heard: a Commie who came to power at the single best moment for a reorientation of the fundamental nature of the American economic paradigm in half a century, and then spent his first year in office making sure that no such fundamental reorientation could happen. (I have argued this point in detail before. I’m not going to do it again. I will say though that the Obama administration’s actions from 2009 on, vis-a-vis the Great Recession, are literally inexplicable on your hypothesis. They eviscerate it.)
And an “anticolonialist” who bombs indigent brown people often enough for Glenn Greenwald to sob into his corn flakes each and every morning (after, of course, masturbating to the 2015 ISIS beefcake calendar).
I’ve heard so much about this Phantom Obama. I just hope we get a glimpse of him before 2017, lest future generations claim that he never was.
Edited.
[/quote]
That just demonstrates he’s a hypocrite like all leftists. And he is what he does? I agree. I just showed you he’s covering up for Muslims, attacking Christianity and deliberately whitewashing the anti-Semitic mini-pogroms going on in Europe. You sat through Trayvon and Big Mike and the race baiting. You saw it. That’s what he does. He’s a radical leftist.
And do I need to point out there have been a number of incidents recently of white people being brutally murdered by black thugs who have then said in court or elsewhere that it was revenge for Trayvon and Big Mike? Obama incited that. That’s like Goebbels inciting the attacks on synagogues. He’s sick. A sick individual.
So I’ve heard: a Commie who came to power at the single best moment for a reorientation of the fundamental nature of the American economic paradigm in half a century, and then spent his first year in office making sure that no such fundamental reorientation could happen. (I have argued this point in detail before. I’m not going to do it again. I will say though that the Obama administration’s actions from 2009 on, vis-a-vis the Great Recession, are literally inexplicable on your hypothesis. They eviscerate it.)
And an “anticolonialist” who bombs indigent brown people often enough for Glenn Greenwald to sob into his corn flakes each and every morning (after, of course, masturbating to the 2015 ISIS beefcake calendar).
I’ve heard so much about this Phantom Obama. I just hope we get a glimpse of him before 2017, lest future generations claim that he never was.
Edited.
[/quote]
That just demonstrates he’s a hypocrite like all leftists.[/quote]
Joe: “Obama is a Communist.”
John: “He neither says he’s a Communist nor acts like a Communist.”
Joe: “Then he’s a hypocrite too!”
That reads like a parody of a right-wing tinfoil-hat blogger, not like something you’d write.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
And do I need to point out there have been a number of incidents recently of white people being brutally murdered by black thugs who have then said in court or elsewhere that it was revenge for Trayvon and Big Mike? Obama incited that. That’s like Goebbels inciting the attacks on synagogues. He’s sick. A sick individual.[/quote]
Except that he had very, very little to do with either of those cases.
What did he say to incite people to violence in either case? Be specific.
So I’ve heard: a Commie who came to power at the single best moment for a reorientation of the fundamental nature of the American economic paradigm in half a century, and then spent his first year in office making sure that no such fundamental reorientation could happen. (I have argued this point in detail before. I’m not going to do it again. I will say though that the Obama administration’s actions from 2009 on, vis-a-vis the Great Recession, are literally inexplicable on your hypothesis. They eviscerate it.)
And an “anticolonialist” who bombs indigent brown people often enough for Glenn Greenwald to sob into his corn flakes each and every morning (after, of course, masturbating to the 2015 ISIS beefcake calendar).
I’ve heard so much about this Phantom Obama. I just hope we get a glimpse of him before 2017, lest future generations claim that he never was.
Edited.
[/quote]
That just demonstrates he’s a hypocrite like all leftists.[/quote]
Joe: “Obama is a Communist.”
John: “He neither says he’s a Communist nor acts like a Communist.”
Joe: “Then he’s a hypocrite too!”
That reads like a parody of a right-wing tinfoil-hat blogger, not like something you’d write.[/quote]
When I use the word “Communist” I’m speaking of “Western Marxism” and the new left. I’ve meticulously described his ideology. He’s not an old school Communist. He’s a cultural Marxist of the new left. And by “hypocrite” I mean he runs on a certain platform then does the opposite. That’s got nothing to do with his fundamental ideology.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
And do I need to point out there have been a number of incidents recently of white people being brutally murdered by black thugs who have then said in court or elsewhere that it was revenge for Trayvon and Big Mike? Obama incited that. That’s like Goebbels inciting the attacks on synagogues. He’s sick. A sick individual.[/quote]
Except that he had very, very little to do with either of those cases.
What did he say to incite people to violence in either case? Be specific.[/quote]
What did Goebbels say to incite Kristallnacht? Be specific.
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
Oh and what he said should, you know, actually incite people to violence.[/quote]
How about this…he did not just come out and say KEEL ALL ZEE JOOOS!!
But the angry folks in the black community felt empowered by how Obama and Holder rushed in and defended two black suspects simply because they were BLACK.
It might make a portion of the black population think “hey, we can kill whitey and the Prez has our back”
[quote]smh_23 wrote:
Oh and what he said should, you know, actually incite people to violence.[/quote]
How about this…he did not just come out and say KEEL ALL ZEE JOOOS!!
But the angry folks in the black community felt empowered by how Obama and Holder rushed in and defended two black suspects simply because they were BLACK.
It might make a portion of the black population think “hey, we can kill whitey and the Prez has our back”[/quote]
He was fuelling phoney grievances, pretending that the cop who shot Mile Brown was a racist murderer, telling the nation that white cops are racist and shoot unarmed blacks and basically, you know inciting black thugs to attack white people and cops.
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
And do I need to point out there have been a number of incidents recently of white people being brutally murdered by black thugs who have then said in court or elsewhere that it was revenge for Trayvon and Big Mike? Obama incited that. That’s like Goebbels inciting the attacks on synagogues. He’s sick. A sick individual.[/quote]
Except that he had very, very little to do with either of those cases.
What did he say to incite people to violence in either case? Be specific.[/quote]
What did Goebbels say to incite Kristallnacht? Be specific.[/quote]
He hinted very strongly that the bastards had a green light. Then Reinhard Heydrich drew up the plans. Do you have an analogous set of hints? Do you have an analogy for the Heydrich telegram? Of fucking course not.
Anyway, I don’t argue against Nazi analogies. It’s a waste of my time. So:
You say Obama’s words incited violence. Be specific: what words?