[quote]Alffi wrote:
[quote]Neuromancer wrote:
[quote]Alffi wrote:
[quote]makkun wrote:
[quote]pushharder wrote:
It literally pained me to read the Alf post.
Why do I do this?
What is it about PWI that attracts so many of the asinine to its shores?[/quote]
Me too, and I am German. I can just reiterate, as I have in many threads before, that the holocaust is a well documented fact - and that there’s no law in Germany forbidding any form of proper research into it. There is a law against using distorted facts about it for the purpose of inciting racial hatred and dishonouring its victims. I know that’s debatable from a purist free speech perspective - but there’s no jewish (or lizard people, or whoever else) conspiracy behind it.
It’s posts like Alffi’s which make me sometimes ashamed of T-Nation.
Makkun[/quote]
A simple Wikipedia (encyclopedia founded by jews) search would cast doubt on your assertion.
“Holocaust denial consists of claims that the genocide of Jews during World War IIÃ???Ã??Ã?¢??usually referred to as the Holocaust[1]Ã???Ã??Ã?¢??did not occur at all, or that it did not happen in the manner or to the extent historically recognized.”
That’s from the Wiki article on holocaust denial. It then desperately goes on to try to link holocaust deniers to controversial political factions which is irrelevant as far as the truth of their statements is concerned. You can then look up the article on the list of countries which prohibit perceived holocaust denial.[/quote]
Please,point out the truth in their statements.The links of Holocaust deniers to extremist groups is a fact,because they are batshit fucking crazy revisionists with warped agendas.If it sounds like a duck and quacks like a duck…[/quote]
This discussion has been tainted by the status quo so severely that it’s extremely difficult to come out without having someone or something linked to perceived extremism, racism, antisemitism, supremacism or whatever. Your (apparent) side in this issue has assumed the power to define what exactly counts as one or more of the above things.
If we want to reach, then we can probably link anyone as being a neo-nazi or whatever because they addressed that community some time in their lives. In a similar vein, I can claim that anybody involved in perceived antiracism, for example, has connections to non-white supremacism and anti-white organizations. That does not mean that people involved in antiracism, holocaust enforcion (the opposite of holocaust denial), semitic supremacism, anti-white’ism or whatever do not have a clue about anything or that all they say is wrong.
Back before this was such taboo, governments made estimates of holocaust victims amounting to one million and even today, numbers regarding deaths in this or that area are being radically revised but the establishment does not persecute itself for doing that. [/quote]
The facts are the facts,and I have never read anything from Holocaust deniers that stands up to scrutiny or hasn’t been thoroughly debunked to my complete and utter satisfaction.Just because you want it to be something else,or have an agenda that is not supported by the facts,does not negate the reality of what happened.Do you also debate the numbers of Russians killed on the Eastern front?Or is revisionism just limited to the ‘Jewish problem’?Or do you agree with the deniers that there never was a ‘Jewish problem’ in Nazi eyes?Please,point me to ‘government estimates’ that existed reducing numbers to 1 million.