Israel and Smugglers/Aid Workers

I’ve watched the videos linked above and others like it… people really should watch these before they spout things like “massacre by the IDF” and what not.

Gandhi would slap these people silly if they actually claimed to be “peace activists” :wink:

Mark Regev’s been on CNNI a lot lately talking about how boarding the other ships went peacefully (“same IDF, same approach, different result”, to paraphrase). Assuming he’s right about that, it supports that 1: The IDF didn’t board these ships guns blazing, looking for frag points, and 2: That the majority of the passengers were actually peaceful.

There were a lot of decent people involved here, basically trying to “right a wrong” as they see it. Please don’t paint everybody with the same brush…

[quote]Neuromancer wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Neuromancer wrote:
The Israelis are fast backing off the claim that the people on the ships had guns.I support their right to search these ships,but they really got sucker punched here.I don’t see how this was allowed to go down the way it did.It’s a fuck up for them.Stop and board them close to your territorial waters,at least.[/quote]

What difference does it make how close they let them get?[/quote]

From a p.r. standpoint?Territorial waters are considered sovereign territory.You don’t think that makes a difference?[/quote]

International law especially international maritime law is insanely complex and no one on these boards understands it. HOWEVER, there is precedent for intercepting blockade runners in international waters. Allies in WWII and others I have heard.

[quote]Mishima wrote:
if a “real man” goes out in the neighborhood and shoots somebody who is armed with a stick, because he asumes he is a threat, than he would face jailtime.[/quote]

The action was supposed to be nonviolent hence the paintball guns. It was both ill-conceived and botched and I criticize israel and the blockade but the boarding of those ships was not criminal.

Everything else is propoganda.

I’m having a tough time sifting through the propaganda on both sides as to what exactly happened. I don’t know, so I can’t say if either side is at fault. But what I do know is that it is probably in America’s best interest to not take a side at this point.

[quote]Charlemagne wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

???

I’m not sure how you got his out of Charlemagne’s post.[/quote]

I had edited that post to include:
If they are against opressive regiems why not attack the likes of ahmadinejad or saddam?
Answer: because it isn’t about freedom it’s about killing infidels.

Maybe it will show back up.

Anyways, he is talking about basing foreign policy and going to war on trying to not upset radical Muslims. My point is that us not being an Islamic nation already pisses them off.

Not to mention the fact that I personally support Israel because they are on the right side. It’s that simple, people will try to hurt you for doing the right thing. Doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do the right thing.[/quote]

I’m talking about following a sensible foreign policy. Remember the famous line by George Washington “Not to get involved in entangling alliances”? Well, we certainly have one with Israel. And what is even more interesting about that is that we DO NOT have any sort of treaty or official document saying that there is in fact an alliance between America and Israel. Because if there was an official treaty Israel would have to disclose it’s full nuclear and military capacity to us and before acting in any sort of military capacity would have to get approval. And we all know that is never going to happen.

And if you support Israel that’s great. Good for you. During Israel’s next war (which is bound to happen sooner rather than later), you should sign up for the Israeli Army, put on your combat gear, grab a rifle and go fight. What you do personally doesn’t matter.

But what America does as a collective does matter. And what is in Israel’s best interest is NOT in America’s best interest. Israel is not the 51st state, though some politicians and lobby groups in America would have you believe that.

[/quote]

america’s and israel’s fates are intertwined. you fail utterly, to see the strategic picture or consequences. if the US abandons israel. one of the main reasons. is to avert a nuclear war. that would kill 10’s if not 100’s of millions of people. it would spread nuclear fall out, over major trade routes. destroy the global economy.

[quote]Charlemagne wrote:
I’m having a tough time sifting through the propaganda on both sides as to what exactly happened. I don’t know, so I can’t say if either side is at fault. But what I do know is that it is probably in America’s best interest to not take a side at this point.[/quote]

THIIIIIISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS. Everyone else is a fuckhead.

[quote]kodiak82 wrote:

america’s and israel’s fates are intertwined.
[/quote]

No they are not, in any way, shape, or form.

You fail.

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]kodiak82 wrote:

america’s and israel’s fates are intertwined.
[/quote]

No they are not, in any way, shape, or form.

You fail.[/quote]

Sure they are. You have a nuclear armed country in the middle east that is being harassed by all its neighbors. They are in a situation where they cannot back down as the other side will increase the pressure 10 fold as they “know” they are winning.

Many of the surrounding countries have repeatedly stated they will not stop until Israel is no longer a state. Israel is not going to give up their statehood.

So it comes down to war. If at any point it becomes clear Israel is going to lose then we have a nuclear situation. Then of course oil prices etc will be out of control. Big problem for the US.

[quote]kodiak82 wrote:

[quote]Charlemagne wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

???

I’m not sure how you got his out of Charlemagne’s post.[/quote]

I had edited that post to include:
If they are against opressive regiems why not attack the likes of ahmadinejad or saddam?
Answer: because it isn’t about freedom it’s about killing infidels.

Maybe it will show back up.

Anyways, he is talking about basing foreign policy and going to war on trying to not upset radical Muslims. My point is that us not being an Islamic nation already pisses them off.

Not to mention the fact that I personally support Israel because they are on the right side. It’s that simple, people will try to hurt you for doing the right thing. Doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do the right thing.[/quote]

I’m talking about following a sensible foreign policy. Remember the famous line by George Washington “Not to get involved in entangling alliances”? Well, we certainly have one with Israel. And what is even more interesting about that is that we DO NOT have any sort of treaty or official document saying that there is in fact an alliance between America and Israel. Because if there was an official treaty Israel would have to disclose it’s full nuclear and military capacity to us and before acting in any sort of military capacity would have to get approval. And we all know that is never going to happen.

And if you support Israel that’s great. Good for you. During Israel’s next war (which is bound to happen sooner rather than later), you should sign up for the Israeli Army, put on your combat gear, grab a rifle and go fight. What you do personally doesn’t matter.

But what America does as a collective does matter. And what is in Israel’s best interest is NOT in America’s best interest. Israel is not the 51st state, though some politicians and lobby groups in America would have you believe that.

[/quote]

america’s and israel’s fates are intertwined. you fail utterly, to see the strategic picture or consequences. if the US abandons israel. one of the main reasons. is to avert a nuclear war. that would kill 10’s if not 100’s of millions of people. it would spread nuclear fall out, over major trade routes. destroy the global economy.

[/quote]

What planet are you on?

[quote]phaethon wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]kodiak82 wrote:

america’s and israel’s fates are intertwined.
[/quote]

No they are not, in any way, shape, or form.

You fail.[/quote]

Sure they are. You have a nuclear armed country in the middle east that is being harassed by all its neighbors. They are in a situation where they cannot back down as the other side will increase the pressure 10 fold as they “know” they are winning.

Many of the surrounding countries have repeatedly stated they will not stop until Israel is no longer a state. Israel is not going to give up their statehood.

So it comes down to war. If at any point it becomes clear Israel is going to lose then we have a nuclear situation. Then of course oil prices etc will be out of control. Big problem for the US.[/quote]

Israel has one the most advanced militaries in the world. There is no way any of the countries surrounding Israel are going to beat it in a straight up fight.

[quote]Charlemagne wrote:
Israel has one the most advanced militaries in the world. There is no way any of the countries surrounding Israel are going to beat it in a straight up fight. [/quote]

I know. And they are in that situation because of the US training and arming them. So the US could stop aid but only if they stop aid to all the surrounding countries too. Giving money to Egypt and not Israel is kind of retarded and will lead to problems.

[quote]Charlemagne wrote:
I’m having a tough time sifting through the propaganda on both sides as to what exactly happened. [/quote]

How could one not?

The status quo is completely unsustainable. Israel may not technically be “occupying”, but they have effectively cordoned off a large population into a walled-off area.

[quote]Carl_ wrote:
The status quo is completely unsustainable. Israel may not technically be “occupying”, but they have effectively cordoned off a large population into a walled-off area. [/quote]

With the help of Egypt, Jordan, and Syria…

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]Otep wrote:

[quote]Dustin wrote:

[quote]Charlemagne wrote:
The bottom line is this:

Israel is going to find it increasingly difficult to maintain its current political positions (foreign policy, domestic policy, economic policy, nuclear policy) within the world community.

The United States is a crumbling empire and the European Union is coming apart at the seams. Within the near future, Israel will not be able to count on as much political, financial or military backing from either of these because they will simply not be able to afford to. Americans have enough problems, we don’t need to be worrying about another country’s foreign policy concerns. I’m sorry, but Israeli and American interests are not one in the same.
[/quote]

This thread should have ended here.
[/quote]

I disagree.

If anything Israel’s existence keeps the arab states off-balance. They’re tempermental, confrontational, and usually in the right. They’re our first line of defense against Iran. An early-warning system, if you will. That’s worth subsidizing.[/quote]

They are usually not in the right, but that’s not the point.

The United States is a crumbling empire and the European Union is coming apart at the seams. Within the near future, Israel will not be able to count on as much political, financial or military backing from either of these because they will simply not be able to afford to.

I don’t care, for the moment, if you (not necessarily you, Otep) statist war mongers support Israel or not. The point is that it won’t be too long before they will have to fend for themselves as stated by the quoted text. And when this happens, Israel won’t be able to throw their weight around without consequence.

And Otep, I’m not buying Iran as any threat to the US anymore than Iraq was. Trust me, I’ve been over there. These countries are shit holes. Their militaries are garbage. This notion that there are all these boogy men out there that want to destroy “Murika” is nonsense.

And, to be frank, I’m really fucking tired of my tax dollars being given to the government of country halfway around the world. You want to “subsidize” Israel with your money, go for it, just don’t expect me to.[/quote]

I disagree that America is a crumbling empire. It has problems. Europe does too. So do the BRIC’s. So do these shitholes. I agree that America needs to get it’s fiscal head out of it’s ass and adopt a more small-state, pro-individual-rights attitude. I do not see it as crumbling.

American Aid comprises 4 out of 68 billion government expenses (Got budget figures from Wiki, assume aid is expensed in the same year its given, because… I doubt ANY government can save). That’s not a drop in the bucket, but even if completely cut off from it, I think Israel will manage to survive.

I’m less concerned about Iran declaring war on the US, and more about them funding terrorist attacks against us. Their alliance with Hezbollah has shown they’re a huge fan of it. Theoretically, this would stop if American ended it’s support for Israel. I don’t beleive that, because Islam as a whole has shown itself to have an incredibly thin skin when criticized, while simultaneously performing a host of actions to be criticized for.

I hear you on the ‘tax dollars to countries halfway around the world’. Really, I do. For a government set up to protect individual liberty, foreign aid fulfills neither the spirit nor the letter of the Constitution. I support cutting down America’s foriegn aid budget with the goal of eventually ending it, and if people want to support Israel themselves, and Israel can purchase munitions with their funds, then so be it. Israel should not be the first country whose aid should be cut. I deem them too politically valuable.

[quote]phaethon wrote:

[quote]Charlemagne wrote:
Israel has one the most advanced militaries in the world. There is no way any of the countries surrounding Israel are going to beat it in a straight up fight. [/quote]

I know. And they are in that situation because of the US training and arming them. So the US could stop aid but only if they stop aid to all the surrounding countries too. Giving money to Egypt and not Israel is kind of retarded and will lead to problems.[/quote]

The U.S. needs to stop giving aid to everybody. Number 1 we can’t afford it and number 2 it hasn’t done a whole lot of good anyway. There is a whole laundry list of issues that needs to be taken care of in our country before we can even begin to worry about any other country’s problems. Here’s some greatest hits that need to be taken care of:

  1. Immigration woes, federal government refuses to it’s job
  2. Financial Woes, we are broke
  3. The environmental disaster in the Gulf
  4. Fighting 2 wars at the same time
  5. Fiat currency backed by nothing
  6. Shadowy Federal Reserve operating in secrecy
  7. Educational Woes, trillions of dollars spent since the 60’s and America doesn’t win, place or show any more in any educational capacity (let’s start the “war on stupidity”, congress would be the first to be taken out)
  8. Banks that essentially are gambling casinos, robbing people blind
  9. A middle class that is squeezed ever more tightly and shrinking by the day
  10. Growing homelessness in America and ever widening gap between the rich and the poor
  11. A failed drug policy, “the war on drugs” has cost about a trillion dollars and produced no results. More people use drugs now than ever. And let’s not forget the growth of the Mexican cartels.

and this is just a taste of how far America has fallen. So before we go subsidizing a foreign government any where let’s take care of our own problems. Sound good?

[quote]Valor wrote:

[quote]Carl_ wrote:
The status quo is completely unsustainable. Israel may not technically be “occupying”, but they have effectively cordoned off a large population into a walled-off area. [/quote]

With the help of Egypt, Jordan, and Syria…[/quote]

Agreed.

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]Neuromancer wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Neuromancer wrote:
The Israelis are fast backing off the claim that the people on the ships had guns.I support their right to search these ships,but they really got sucker punched here.I don’t see how this was allowed to go down the way it did.It’s a fuck up for them.Stop and board them close to your territorial waters,at least.[/quote]

What difference does it make how close they let them get?[/quote]

From a p.r. standpoint?Territorial waters are considered sovereign territory.You don’t think that makes a difference?[/quote]

International law especially international maritime law is insanely complex and no one on these boards understands it. HOWEVER, there is precedent for intercepting blockade runners in international waters. Allies in WWII and others I have heard.[/quote]

I’m sure in war time there is,because then a blockade is something different entirely.But that’s not the point.Read my post again.And saying something is insanely complex is no argument.What isn’t complex at all,is that if they had done the same thing in their territorial waters or damn near to them,the shit storm generated would have been nowhere near as big.Or do you think this is incorrect?

[quote]Neuromancer wrote:

[quote]Eli B wrote:

[quote]Neuromancer wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Neuromancer wrote:
The Israelis are fast backing off the claim that the people on the ships had guns.I support their right to search these ships,but they really got sucker punched here.I don’t see how this was allowed to go down the way it did.It’s a fuck up for them.Stop and board them close to your territorial waters,at least.[/quote]

What difference does it make how close they let them get?[/quote]

From a p.r. standpoint?Territorial waters are considered sovereign territory.You don’t think that makes a difference?[/quote]

International law especially international maritime law is insanely complex and no one on these boards understands it. HOWEVER, there is precedent for intercepting blockade runners in international waters. Allies in WWII and others I have heard.[/quote]

I’m sure in war time there is,because then a blockade is something different entirely.But that’s not the point.Read my post again.And saying something is insanely complex is no argument.What isn’t complex at all,is that if they had done the same thing in their territorial waters or damn near to them,the shit storm generated would have been nowhere near as big.Or do you think this is incorrect?[/quote]

Did you read my post about what the law actually says? It doesn’t look like Israel did anything illegal.

TORPEDO THEIR A$$E$!!