Is Peeing on Jesus Really Funny?

Sheesh…Atheism must be different in America.

All the Atheists I know here couldn’t give a rats ass about “converts” or having there so called “faith” taken seriously and tend to just have disscusions about such matters…not proselytize.

I’ve lost count of the amount of times annoying religous hawkers have disturbed my sunday sleep in, by telling me the world is going end or trying to convert me.

No Atheists have ever come to my door.
Well, they may have been Atheists (the guy selling vacumn cleaners look suspiciously like a non-believer) but they didn’t announce themselves as such and had no Atheistic wares to hawk.

They certainly aren’t stupid enough to be giving money to pay for the head of their so called “religion” to have better worldy trappings than his/her “congregation.”

pat wrote:[quote]
And if atheism isn’t a kind of religion then why do some sects of atheists feel they need to evangelize and make their beliefs known? Why do atheists have unity in thought? Sounds pretty religious like to me.
[/quote]

Yes some atheists probably do. But you want to paint the whole building with the one brush? I don’t confuse you with Jerry Falwell, or the fuckwits who announced the Japanese Tsunami tragedey was God’s vengance for pearl harbour, or the retard who stated when Bin Laden was shot that “it’s jugdement day…and we’re winning.”

Unity of thought is the definition for religion? WTF?

That means I already am in the religion of all the people who think 2+2=4.

[quote]forlife wrote:
I think Pat makes a good point. While it’s likely untrue that atheism per se has caused more deaths than religion per se, there’s no question that people have been persecuted and killed by atheists specifically for having religious beliefs. Had they been fellow atheists, they would have been left alone.[/quote]

These people were killed by Communists for having religious beliefs as they veiwed them as being the tool of Western colonialism.
The communnits killed anyone who got in their way.
The range for agnostics and non-religious in China was/is about 40%-60%, atheists about 14%. They were killed as well if found to be “detrimental to socialist reconstruction.”

The Communists under Mao had no Qualms about killing atheist, agnostic, taoist,christian, confucian, non-religious, animist, and Shenist alike.

For political aims…not religious ones.

.

[quote]therajraj wrote:
And no it’s not just semantics. When Muslims kill Christians, they are doing it based on their interpretations of scripture. In their minds they are doing gods work and following their religion. Atheism has no dogma or scripture to interpret. [/quote]

  1. “Atheism has no dogma…” Right, so killing in it’s name isn’t prohibited. Unless you’re playing the part of Atheist Pope, excommunicating those who cross your doctrine of 'thou shall not kill." So yeah, one can kill in the name of atheism.

  2. “…or scripture to interprest.” You guys don’t have books, forums, and other materials?

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Cheeky_Kea wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

Yes an atheists action can be peaceful or violent.

[/quote]

I know. That’s what I said.[/quote]

And you also said they were killing in the name of atheism, which is stupid.

[/quote]

http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM

Atheism is a belief, not a not belief. Even if you’ve decided God does not exist, you made a choice and there for a belief. The opposite of belief isn’t atheism, the opposite of belief is an absence of opinion on the matter. Therefore, if you believe there is no God, then it’s still a belief and one atheists wish to spread because they think it’s superior.
[/quote]

The link you provided states that (with copious disclaimers for inaccuracies at the bottom) Governments have killed approxiamately 262,000,000 people.

Nowhwere does it say Atheists killed anyone.

What was that supposed to prove?

There are also a bunch of inaccurate, estimated stats that put deaths in the name of religion at about 809,000,000.

How can I make a choice about something that doesn’t exist?, it isn’t there to choose to believe in or not.
How can I not believe in something that doesn’t exist…it isn’t there to not believe in.

If it doesn’t exist it doesn’t make a difference wether I believe in it or not.
[/quote]

Ok, so Pol Pot, Mao Se Tung, Stalin, lenin, aren’t atheists? Your denying the historical fact that they had policy to kill theists to squash religious belief in their prospective countries?

You don't [b]know[/b] 'it' does not exist. You just think it, therefore you made a choice. 
[/quote]

I explained this to Sloth 2 pages back and I'll paste my response again. 

[quote]therajraj wrote:

Yes an atheists action can be peaceful or violent. But his/her actions have nothing to do with atheism itself. It's not atheism that "has gone off the reservation" it's the person behind those actions. Sure there are no scriptures to tell an atheist they should not kill. But human beings, through their ability to empathise, are capable of determining ethical ground.  [/quote]

[/quote]

So you're just going to flatly deny history, so you can feel better about yourself? Eradication of religion through murder is a policy. I am not sure that needs much translation. 
I suppose the holocaust was a farce too? 

Yeah, it never happened....
"The main target of the anti-religious campaign in the 1920s and 1930s was the Russian Orthodox Church, which had the largest number of faithful. Nearly all of its clergy, and many of its believers, were shot or sent to labor camps. Theological schools were closed, and church publications were prohibited. By 1939 only about 500 of over 50,000 churches remained open."

http://www.ibiblio.org/expo/soviet.exhibit/anti_rel.html

http://www.globalmuseumoncommunism.org/features/war_on_religion

Yeah, it's all made up.
Do some research.
[/quote]

I think Pat makes a good point. While it's likely untrue that atheism per se has caused more deaths than religion per se, there's no question that people have been persecuted and killed by atheists specifically for having religious beliefs. Had they been fellow atheists, they would have been left alone.[/quote]

I disagree. If those fellow atheists would've had the same political and personal clout that the church did, they would've been killed without a thought. It was all about control for them, plain and simple. Pol Pot and Stalin weren't interested in competing for control of the people with another political authority (religion), so they worked to eliminate the competition. They weren't killing in the name of atheism, they were killing in the name of power and control. If anything, their religion was government.

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:
And no it’s not just semantics. When Muslims kill Christians, they are doing it based on their interpretations of scripture. In their minds they are doing gods work and following their religion. Atheism has no dogma or scripture to interpret. [/quote]

  1. “Atheism has no dogma…” Right, so killing in it’s name isn’t prohibited. Unless you’re playing the part of Atheist Pope, excommunicating those who cross your doctrine of 'thou shall not kill." So yeah, one can kill in the name of atheism.

  2. “…or scripture to interprest.” You guys don’t have books, forums, and other materials? [/quote]

You’re right, technically it’s possible kill in the name of atheism. But with respect to Stalin, and the other ruthless dictators as Cheeky wrote:

[quote] Cheeky_Kea wrote:

These people were killed by Communists for having religious beliefs as they veiwed them as being the tool of Western colonialism.
The communnits killed anyone who got in their way.
The range for agnostics and non-religious in China was/is about 40%-60%, atheists about 14%. They were killed as well if found to be “detrimental to socialist reconstruction.”

The Communists under Mao had no Qualms about killing atheist, agnostic, taoist,christian, confucian, non-religious, animist, and Shenist alike.

For political aims…not religious ones. [/quote]

They all attached something to atheism to get to killing to people.

Yeah there are books, forums and other materials dedicated to atheism. In your mind you consider this scripture for atheists? Is that what you’re saying?

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:
Here’s the thing, and the reason the brand of hot-headed atheism we normally encounter on internet message boards is labeled a religion in its own right: To claim the existence of God is an absurdity (or that belief in him is) creates an equally absurd assumption on the part of the claimant. That is, if there is no God, then all of existence as we know it was created from absolutely nothing at all. There is a thread already dedicated to it so I’m not going to delve into it any further here, but NO MATTER WHAT, theist or so-called atheist, when you peel away every layer and get down to the very core of what we can know, ALL OF US make assumptions of the nature of existence based on pure faith.

[/quote]

That depends on the definition of “faith” being used…but it doesn’t matter, and here’s why:

The sort of thing that we all do that might be labeled “faith”, at that rudimentary level, is definitely not the same sort of “faith” that religious people are attempting to justify. It’s a dishonest word game to make their ridiculously unjustified beliefs seem to be more plausible.

It’s like saying “When you really get down to it, we all occasionally have a desire for something that isn’t good for us…” in an attempt to make eating feces appear to be as justified as eating too much ice cream.

So no I think you are wrong and being dishonest when you call us “so-called atheists”[/quote]

Sorry, wait, why?

Why is your belief that all matter, energy, space, time, everything just poofed into existence from absolute nothingness in any way more rational than my belief in an Uncaused Cause?

That’s what you are saying here, right? Because that’s what I was talking about.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

…And if atheism isn’t a kind of religion then why do some sects of atheists feel they need to evangelize and make their beliefs known? Why do atheists have unity in thought? Sounds pretty religious like to me.

[/quote]

They are currently one the most rabid religions around. They proselytize, give money to their leaders and groups, scoff at their religious adversaries, have faith in unproved, untested theories, believe in miracles, and get all miffed when their faith isn’t taken seriously by others and converts aren’t being made in sufficient numbers.
[/quote]

LOL

What miracles do atheists believe in?

What untested theories?

[/quote]

Think about it.[/quote]

Seriously, that you don’t get this whereas the theists do is not exactly making your side look like the calm, disinterested, rational one.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

…And if atheism isn’t a kind of religion then why do some sects of atheists feel they need to evangelize and make their beliefs known? Why do atheists have unity in thought? Sounds pretty religious like to me.

[/quote]

They are currently one the most rabid religions around. They proselytize, give money to their leaders and groups, scoff at their religious adversaries, have faith in unproved, untested theories, believe in miracles, and get all miffed when their faith isn’t taken seriously by others and converts aren’t being made in sufficient numbers.
[/quote]

LOL

What miracles do atheists believe in?

What untested theories?

[/quote]

Think about it.[/quote]

I know! I know!

[quote]Cheeky_Kea wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:
I think Pat makes a good point. While it’s likely untrue that atheism per se has caused more deaths than religion per se, there’s no question that people have been persecuted and killed by atheists specifically for having religious beliefs. Had they been fellow atheists, they would have been left alone.[/quote]

These people were killed by Communists for having religious beliefs as they veiwed them as being the tool of Western colonialism.
The communnits killed anyone who got in their way.
The range for agnostics and non-religious in China was/is about 40%-60%, atheists about 14%. They were killed as well if found to be “detrimental to socialist reconstruction.”

The Communists under Mao had no Qualms about killing atheist, agnostic, taoist,christian, confucian, non-religious, animist, and Shenist alike.

For political aims…not religious ones.[/quote]

So like historical facts mean nothing? Yes, it’s true it was a political agenda and a political policy to eradicate religion by eradicating the religious. Ergo, they killed believers because they were believers and not atheists…
This is a matter of plain stubborn historical fact. No amount of spin is going to make this not a fact.

[quote]bigflamer wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Cheeky_Kea wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

Yes an atheists action can be peaceful or violent.

[/quote]

I know. That’s what I said.[/quote]

And you also said they were killing in the name of atheism, which is stupid.

[/quote]

http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM

Atheism is a belief, not a not belief. Even if you’ve decided God does not exist, you made a choice and there for a belief. The opposite of belief isn’t atheism, the opposite of belief is an absence of opinion on the matter. Therefore, if you believe there is no God, then it’s still a belief and one atheists wish to spread because they think it’s superior.
[/quote]

The link you provided states that (with copious disclaimers for inaccuracies at the bottom) Governments have killed approxiamately 262,000,000 people.

Nowhwere does it say Atheists killed anyone.

What was that supposed to prove?

There are also a bunch of inaccurate, estimated stats that put deaths in the name of religion at about 809,000,000.

How can I make a choice about something that doesn’t exist?, it isn’t there to choose to believe in or not.
How can I not believe in something that doesn’t exist…it isn’t there to not believe in.

If it doesn’t exist it doesn’t make a difference wether I believe in it or not.
[/quote]

Ok, so Pol Pot, Mao Se Tung, Stalin, lenin, aren’t atheists? Your denying the historical fact that they had policy to kill theists to squash religious belief in their prospective countries?

You don't [b]know[/b] 'it' does not exist. You just think it, therefore you made a choice. 
[/quote]

I explained this to Sloth 2 pages back and I'll paste my response again. 

[quote]therajraj wrote:

Yes an atheists action can be peaceful or violent. But his/her actions have nothing to do with atheism itself. It's not atheism that "has gone off the reservation" it's the person behind those actions. Sure there are no scriptures to tell an atheist they should not kill. But human beings, through their ability to empathise, are capable of determining ethical ground.  [/quote]

[/quote]

So you're just going to flatly deny history, so you can feel better about yourself? Eradication of religion through murder is a policy. I am not sure that needs much translation. 
I suppose the holocaust was a farce too? 

Yeah, it never happened....
"The main target of the anti-religious campaign in the 1920s and 1930s was the Russian Orthodox Church, which had the largest number of faithful. Nearly all of its clergy, and many of its believers, were shot or sent to labor camps. Theological schools were closed, and church publications were prohibited. By 1939 only about 500 of over 50,000 churches remained open."

http://www.ibiblio.org/expo/soviet.exhibit/anti_rel.html

http://www.globalmuseumoncommunism.org/features/war_on_religion

Yeah, it's all made up.
Do some research.
[/quote]

I think Pat makes a good point. While it's likely untrue that atheism per se has caused more deaths than religion per se, there's no question that people have been persecuted and killed by atheists specifically for having religious beliefs. Had they been fellow atheists, they would have been left alone.[/quote]

I disagree. If those fellow atheists would've had the same political and personal clout that the church did, they would've been killed without a thought. It was all about control for them, plain and simple. Pol Pot and Stalin weren't interested in competing for control of the people with another political authority (religion), so they worked to eliminate the competition. They weren't killing in the name of atheism, they were killing in the name of power and control. If anything, their religion was government.
[/quote]

So, this makes killing religious people because they are not atheists, not really killing them because they are religious how? 
If they were atheists they would have lived, but because they were religious they were killed, period.

And I am so glad the soviets gave it some thought before they blew them away. That makes it better. And when is killing a whole swath of people, not about control? I mean seriously.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Cheeky_Kea wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Sloth wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

Yes an atheists action can be peaceful or violent.

[/quote]

I know. That’s what I said.[/quote]

And you also said they were killing in the name of atheism, which is stupid.

[/quote]

http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM

Atheism is a belief, not a not belief. Even if you’ve decided God does not exist, you made a choice and there for a belief. The opposite of belief isn’t atheism, the opposite of belief is an absence of opinion on the matter. Therefore, if you believe there is no God, then it’s still a belief and one atheists wish to spread because they think it’s superior.
[/quote]

The link you provided states that (with copious disclaimers for inaccuracies at the bottom) Governments have killed approxiamately 262,000,000 people.

Nowhwere does it say Atheists killed anyone.

What was that supposed to prove?

There are also a bunch of inaccurate, estimated stats that put deaths in the name of religion at about 809,000,000.

How can I make a choice about something that doesn’t exist?, it isn’t there to choose to believe in or not.
How can I not believe in something that doesn’t exist…it isn’t there to not believe in.

If it doesn’t exist it doesn’t make a difference wether I believe in it or not.
[/quote]

Ok, so Pol Pot, Mao Se Tung, Stalin, lenin, aren’t atheists? Your denying the historical fact that they had policy to kill theists to squash religious belief in their prospective countries?

You don't [b]know[/b] 'it' does not exist. You just think it, therefore you made a choice. 
[/quote]

I explained this to Sloth 2 pages back and I'll paste my response again. 

[quote]therajraj wrote:

Yes an atheists action can be peaceful or violent. But his/her actions have nothing to do with atheism itself. It's not atheism that "has gone off the reservation" it's the person behind those actions. Sure there are no scriptures to tell an atheist they should not kill. But human beings, through their ability to empathise, are capable of determining ethical ground.  [/quote]

[/quote]

So you're just going to flatly deny history, so you can feel better about yourself? Eradication of religion through murder is a policy. I am not sure that needs much translation. 
I suppose the holocaust was a farce too? 

Yeah, it never happened....
"The main target of the anti-religious campaign in the 1920s and 1930s was the Russian Orthodox Church, which had the largest number of faithful. Nearly all of its clergy, and many of its believers, were shot or sent to labor camps. Theological schools were closed, and church publications were prohibited. By 1939 only about 500 of over 50,000 churches remained open."

http://www.ibiblio.org/expo/soviet.exhibit/anti_rel.html

http://www.globalmuseumoncommunism.org/features/war_on_religion

Yeah, it's all made up.
Do some research.
[/quote]

No I was 100%  wrong and making that Holocaust thread was stupid. I wish I hadn't done it.


In this case, I'm not flatly denying people were killed for their religious beliefs, I am saying they weren't killed in the name of atheism. I have explained why I hold this position and am not going to bother try explaining it again.



[/quote]

You playing on semantics. the people who watch their entire family get shot and then got shot themselves for being a Christian or a Jew or in some a cases a Muslim, really couldn't tell the difference between doing it in the 'name' of atheism or doing it because the leadership was atheist and didn't like to theist point of view so he had them killed.
That's what the terrorists do, they don't like your point of view if your not Muslim so they kill you. 
If your looking for redemption in the innocence of atheism you will not have it.

And if atheism isn't  a kind of religion then why do some sects of atheists feel they need to evangelize and make their beliefs known? Why do atheists have unity in thought? Sounds pretty religious like to me.[/quote]

You're trying to play on emotion with this post. 

 "entire family get shot and then got shot themselves for being a Christian or a Jew or in some a cases a Muslim, really couldn't tell the difference between doing it in the 'name' of atheism or doing it because the leadership was atheist and didn't like to theist point of view so he had them killed."

What does this have to do with our discussion?
[/quote]
I was illustrating a point based on something that happened. Would prefer I used the example of the time when Lenin brought out all the Christian school children and had them shot during the Bolshevik Revolution?

The bottom line religious people were killed or persecuted because they were religious and not atheist. You cannot spin this to me particularly, my parents escaped from Czechoslovakia in 1969. They saw this shit first hand, my family had everything taken from them and force to farm because they were religious. They were lucky in that many of their friends didn't. The stories of the horrors due to religious persecution in the eastern block are endless.
[quote]

And no it's not just semantics. When Muslims kill Christians, they are doing it based on their interpretations of scripture. In their minds they are doing gods work and following their religion. Atheism has no dogma or scripture to interpret.
[/quote]
Correct, you have no scripture but you do have dogma. For instance, do you not believe that 'Religion is the opiate of the masses'? Do you not believe that religious people are brainwashed and programmed. Do you not believe we're stupid for believing in God. Do you not believe that religion makes people do evil shit? Ever heard of the 'Flying Spaghetti monster'?Bet you have.
Basically, you have a set of beliefs that if you did not hold them would not be considered atheist.
In fact aren't you right now defending atheism as being guiltless because people haven't done evil in 'it's name' and is therefore superior?
[quote]
Evangelize?  First off, that's a term to describe converting someone to Christianity. Secondly, in what capacity have you seen atheists trying to convert people in your life?  Debating over an internet forum? Please. 
[/quote]
Oh? You guys aren't trying to "Spread the word"? Then why do you need to advertise? See the attached picture. 

[quote]
Atheists do not have "sects" that's another religious term but organizations. Why? It's simple. There is a stigma associated with being an atheist in America and Canada (to a lesser degree), you can't get elected to office and in many cases would be considered an outcast in your community. Atheist groups work to remove this stigma. Wasn't it just last week you thought atheist run charities did not exist until I posted links to some? That's exactly what I'm talking about. 
[/quote]

Sure you do...You have groups that advertise, political groups defending 'atheist rights', you have protest groups....You folks have all kinds of groups. Little groups with in a larger group are sects....

[quote]pat wrote:

Oh? You guys aren’t trying to “Spread the word”? Then why do you need to advertise? See the attached picture.
[/quote]

WTF? Pic did not attach…Let’s try this again.

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

Oh? You guys aren’t trying to “Spread the word”? Then why do you need to advertise? See the attached picture.
[/quote]

WTF? Pic did not attach…Let’s try this again.[/quote]

It is obvious that atheism is growing (from many different angles it’s obvious) but is there actually a governing body to atheism? Something similar to the Vatican is what I’m thinking of. Otherwise, isn’t it just individuals expressing their beliefs, like Westboro?

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:
Here’s the thing, and the reason the brand of hot-headed atheism we normally encounter on internet message boards is labeled a religion in its own right: To claim the existence of God is an absurdity (or that belief in him is) creates an equally absurd assumption on the part of the claimant. That is, if there is no God, then all of existence as we know it was created from absolutely nothing at all. There is a thread already dedicated to it so I’m not going to delve into it any further here, but NO MATTER WHAT, theist or so-called atheist, when you peel away every layer and get down to the very core of what we can know, ALL OF US make assumptions of the nature of existence based on pure faith.

[/quote]

That depends on the definition of “faith” being used…but it doesn’t matter, and here’s why:

The sort of thing that we all do that might be labeled “faith”, at that rudimentary level, is definitely not the same sort of “faith” that religious people are attempting to justify. It’s a dishonest word game to make their ridiculously unjustified beliefs seem to be more plausible.

It’s like saying “When you really get down to it, we all occasionally have a desire for something that isn’t good for us…” in an attempt to make eating feces appear to be as justified as eating too much ice cream.

So no I think you are wrong and being dishonest when you call us “so-called atheists”[/quote]

Sorry, wait, why?

Why is your belief that all matter, energy, space, time, everything just poofed into existence from absolute nothingness in any way more rational than my belief in an Uncaused Cause?

That’s what you are saying here, right? Because that’s what I was talking about.

[/quote]

If that uncaused cause is a hypothetical, supernatural agent which is entirely untested and unsupported by evidence, then yes, it’s more rational to accept scientific explanations…though that wasn’t at ALL what I was saying.

Look at my last response. Do you see anything about the origins of the universe in that? So your confusion about my response lead you to ask a question that ASSUMES a position that I didn’t state and frames it in a way that makes it sound less plausible. If you’d have stated it like this:

“Are you saying that tentatively accepting the scientific, naturalistic explanation that is supported by physics and proposes that it may be possible for a universe to arise from ‘nothing’ is more rational than believing that a magical, transcendent being created everything?”

That would have been a more accurate representation of my position.

But the original discussion was about the nature of faith and how that term is used…what a strange distraction from that.

[quote]USMCpoolee wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

Oh? You guys aren’t trying to “Spread the word”? Then why do you need to advertise? See the attached picture.
[/quote]

WTF? Pic did not attach…Let’s try this again.[/quote]

It is obvious that atheism is growing (from many different angles it’s obvious) but is there actually a governing body to atheism? Something similar to the Vatican is what I’m thinking of. Otherwise, isn’t it just individuals expressing their beliefs, like Westboro? [/quote]

I would think of it more in the evangelical tradition where each locality runs thier own ship but submit to the larger ideal together.