[quote]CaliforniaLaw wrote:
Axel wrote:
2. It’s not arbitrary or unrealistic.
I will explain once why this # is stupid. Hopefully you get why.
If I were building an MMA robot, I would give it inhuman strength and power. Strength and power matter. No debate.
The problem is you don’t get to build a robot from scratch. You have a human being who has finite time. In this time he has to develop strength, endurance, and most importantly, technique.
To get a 2.5x BW deadlift, you have to devote scarce time to lifting and recovery. So if someone can somehow optimize his technique while getting a 2.5 x BW deadlift, great. Really. But it’s unlikely that the time would not be better be spent training technique. There is not single expert (no, not one) who claims otherwise.
So there is a likely a very good reason few (if any) champion mixed martial artists put up big numbers.
I’m not sure why guys like you make shit up instead of focusing on what winners do. I guess you know better than everyone else, 'eh?[/quote]
Why not be nicer, C-Law? If you’re not your parents might stop paying your internet bill and your paper-route money will only go so far.
My feeling is that lifts like a 2.5 bodyweight dead are well within reach of an average person also training MMA. Of course, the heavier you get, the less likely this is to be the case. But is it really unreasonable for a 160 pounder to have a 400 lb. dead?
Of course it varies fighter to fighter. A 2.5 bodyweight dead would, I assume, be nothing to a Sean Sherk or a Rampage Jackson. Maybe,say, Anderson Silva doesn’t do them (but I’m guessing he does) yet he’s an extraordinary fighter.
I’m out after this, C-Law, say all the “naughty” words you want. I’m not getting into “flaming” with a “Troll”.