Hysterical Rolling Stones on Palin and Political Landscape

Off Topic Politics & World Issues
81

I see. So she’s got a college education, is a mother, and a governor of a state, but she’s “uneducated” and “hasn’t lived up to potential.”

Because the Marxism espoused by Obama and everyone he surrounds himself with, including that of his dead biological father and “Rev.” Wright, is such a better policy macro-economically! Perhaps I’ll need to re-think my support of Palin as the vanguard of proletarian revolution. Meanwhile, Obama’s foreign policy adventures will include sitting down with Ahmadinejad and every other third-world dictator. I wonder what Obama and Ahmadinejad will discuss - boyhood in the madrassa? The nuances of twelver Khomeinist apocalyptic Shi’ism vs. Shafi’i Sunni Islam? I’d love to be a fly on the wall for that sit-down.

82

Prcal Dude,
from your source, that

[quote]
looks like estimates of her IQ put her at least a SD above the white mean (100), and at about the level of JFK: [/quote]

[i]
I guarantee you that she has at least a 120 IQ.

You simply do not survive in Alaska politics unless you are extremely intelligent and streetwise.

From the recent biography on her:

Sarah had two childhood traits that her family says played trajectory roles in her life. From the time she was in elementary school, she consumed newspapers with a passion. �??She read the paper from the very top left hand corner to the bottom right corner to the very last page,�?? said Molly. �??She didn�??t want to miss a word. She didn�??t just read it�??she knew every word she had read and analyzed it.�??
[/i]

this is more then just weak, it’s downright funny, this time clearly unintentionally;)

So some dude from a blog swears she’s smart-NICE!
And on top of that, he claims she practically devours newspapers.
So why can’t she name one newspaper in her interview?

Maybe because she…doesn’t…read them ?

But you’re right, it can’t be, since a blogger claims she’s smart.

83

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:

So why can’t she name one newspaper in her interview?

Maybe because she…doesn’t…read them ?

But you’re right, it can’t be, since a blogger claims she’s smart.[/quote]

It was a “Gottcha” question from the liberal media.

84

If you read (and you didn’t) through the comments, you would see that you can back out IQ estimates from SAT scores, and the University of Idaho has published mean SAT scores, and SAT is a measure of general intelligence. It’s not a perfect estimate, like an IQ test, but it suffices for most purposes.

Did it ever occur to you that Palin may have gotten flustered and nervous standing next to a turkey-necked bitch like Katie Couric who interrupts frequently? You’ve never had any brain farts when you’ve gotten nervous, huh?

What did you say your IQ was again?

85

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
I don’t think Palin is dumb, I think she’s uneducated. It’s not that she doesn’t have potential, it’s that she hasn’t lived up to that potential.
I see. So she’s got a college education, is a mother, and a governor of a state, but she’s “uneducated” and “hasn’t lived up to potential.”
[/quote]

Did you watch the debate? The Couric interview? She simply couldn’t answer some rather basic questions.

[quote]
One day she may know a lot about macroeconomics and foreign affairs, but that day is not today based upon everything she’s said (and failed to say) so far.

Because the Marxism espoused by Obama and everyone he surrounds himself with, including that of his dead biological father and “Rev.” Wright, is such a better policy macro-economically! [/quote]

She’s has proven unable to articulate a clear economic policy. McCain, Biden, and Obama could easily do so.

86

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
Sorry, but I call a spade a spade and she is an ageing bimbo.
Allow me to speak a language you’ll understand.

Your Palin-hatred is borne of elitism and bourgeois arrogance against the eternal proletarian revolt represented by Sarah Palin and supported by those of blue-collar, proletarian American roots. You bourgeoisie cannot stand that a person of such proletarian origins has risen to such a level, and are determined to suppress her campaign and the Worker’s Uprising it represents. Perhaps you will succeed, but not before we Oppressed Workers try our hardest to overthrow your bourgeois shackles. [/quote]

My last president was the son of a tramway operator.

He was also a career diplomat, spoke several languages and had a university degree.

87

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:

Did it ever occur to you that Palin may have gotten flustered and nervous standing next to a turkey-necked bitch like Katie Couric who interrupts frequently? [/quote]

You think Couric frequently interrupted Palin? You haven’t watched the interview, have you?

88

[quote]skaz05 wrote:
Raaarrrrggggghhhh! Palin is a dumb hick bitch! Raarrghghghg! Arrrggghhh! Anyone who votes for Palin is a dumb white trash hick retard! Aarrrrrggggghhh! I hate people who have any different political opinion than mine! Raaaaarrrrgggghhhh!!!

Raaaaaaaarrrrggghhhhh! Everyone should agree with me! If they don’t, then they are a stupid, white trash hickbilly, inbred, retarded, piece of sister fucking trash! Raaaarrrrgggghhhhh!

DAMN IT, I AM SO MUCH SMARTER, AND BETTER, THAN ANYONE WHO IS VOTING FOR ANY OTHER CANDIDATE THAN THE ONE I AM VOTING FOR!!! IF YOU DON’T VOTE FOR OBAMA, YOU ARE A STUPID, IGNORANT, RETARDED, WHITE TRASH, HICK, HILLBILLY, INBRED, FAT, RACIST, SISTER FUCKING, TRAILER PARK, TOOTHLESS, PIECE OF WHITE TRASH, WHITE TRASH, WHITE TRASH SHIT!

Wow. Is this how Obama supporters feel all the time?[/quote]

No.

Actually I would more often agree with her than with Obama.

And yet Obama has a well functioning brain and she does not.

Lord help us, the future VP of the US is playing cute and winks at the camera…

O tempora, o mores…

89

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
But you’re right, it can’t be, since a blogger claims she’s smart.

If you read (and you didn’t) through the comments, you would see that you can back out IQ estimates from SAT scores, and the University of Idaho has published mean SAT scores, and SAT is a measure of general intelligence. It’s not a perfect estimate, like an IQ test, but it suffices for most purposes.

Did it ever occur to you that Palin may have gotten flustered and nervous standing next to a turkey-necked bitch like Katie Couric who interrupts frequently? You’ve never had any brain farts when you’ve gotten nervous, huh?

What did you say your IQ was again?[/quote]

So she can think, just not in stressful situations.

Thank God leading the free world in an economic crisis while two wars are going on can hardly be taxing.

90

[quote]orion wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
But you’re right, it can’t be, since a blogger claims she’s smart.

If you read (and you didn’t) through the comments, you would see that you can back out IQ estimates from SAT scores, and the University of Idaho has published mean SAT scores, and SAT is a measure of general intelligence. It’s not a perfect estimate, like an IQ test, but it suffices for most purposes.

Did it ever occur to you that Palin may have gotten flustered and nervous standing next to a turkey-necked bitch like Katie Couric who interrupts frequently? You’ve never had any brain farts when you’ve gotten nervous, huh?

What did you say your IQ was again?

So she can think, just not in stressful situations.

Thank God leading the free world in an economic crisis while two wars are going on can hardly be taxing.

[/quote]

Earth to Orion: SHE’S A VP CANDIDATE!1!!1111!!!

91

[quote]orion wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Sorry, but I call a spade a spade and she is an ageing bimbo.
Allow me to speak a language you’ll understand.

Your Palin-hatred is borne of elitism and bourgeois arrogance against the eternal proletarian revolt represented by Sarah Palin and supported by those of blue-collar, proletarian American roots. You bourgeoisie cannot stand that a person of such proletarian origins has risen to such a level, and are determined to suppress her campaign and the Worker’s Uprising it represents. Perhaps you will succeed, but not before we Oppressed Workers try our hardest to overthrow your bourgeois shackles.

My last president was the son of a tramway operator.

He was also a career diplomat, spoke several languages and had a university degree.

[/quote]

Shall we now move on to discuss Haider and Strache?

92

[quote]Christine wrote:
Gambit_Lost wrote:
skaz05 wrote:
Raaarrrrggggghhhh! Palin is a dumb hick bitch! Raarrghghghg! Arrrggghhh! Anyone who votes for Palin is a dumb white trash hick retard! Aarrrrrggggghhh! I hate people who have any different political opinion than mine! Raaaaarrrrgggghhhh!!!

Raaaaaaaarrrrggghhhhh! Everyone should agree with me! If they don’t, then they are a stupid, white trash hickbilly, inbred, retarded, piece of sister fucking trash! Raaaarrrrgggghhhhh!

DAMN IT, I AM SO MUCH SMARTER, AND BETTER, THAN ANYONE WHO IS VOTING FOR ANY OTHER CANDIDATE THAN THE ONE I AM VOTING FOR!!! IF YOU DON’T VOTE FOR OBAMA, YOU ARE A STUPID, IGNORANT, RETARDED, WHITE TRASH, HICK, HILLBILLY, INBRED, FAT, RACIST, SISTER FUCKING, TRAILER PARK, TOOTHLESS, PIECE OF WHITE TRASH, WHITE TRASH, WHITE TRASH SHIT!

Wow. Is this how Obama supporters feel all the time?

Good post. Funny, but this is the exact reaction I get to most of my posts. Hell, I think PR has only answered me with ad hominems

It is a tatctic that is employeed frequently by both sides.

You can easily replace “Palin” with “Clinton” and “Obama” with “Bush” in the above.

[/quote]

Fist statement true. Second statement is a stretch. I am sure there are better examples.

93

[quote]Christine wrote:
Schwarzfahrer wrote:

So why can’t she name one newspaper in her interview?

Maybe because she…doesn’t…read them ?

But you’re right, it can’t be, since a blogger claims she’s smart.

It was a “Gottcha” question from the liberal media.[/quote]

It is an absolute standard question. According to you, ANYTHING could be a liberal assassination attempt.

I’m tired of this nonsense.
Good Night.

94

[quote]Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Christine wrote:
Schwarzfahrer wrote:

So why can’t she name one newspaper in her interview?

Maybe because she…doesn’t…read them ?

But you’re right, it can’t be, since a blogger claims she’s smart.

It was a “Gottcha” question from the liberal media.

It is an absolute standard question. According to you, ANYTHING could be a liberal assassination attempt.

I’m tired of this nonsense.
Good Night.[/quote]

My response was meant to be facetious.

95

[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:

Did it ever occur to you that Palin may have gotten flustered and nervous standing next to a turkey-necked bitch like Katie Couric who interrupts frequently?

You think Couric frequently interrupted Palin? You haven’t watched the interview, have you?

[/quote]

I counted two interruptions in 45 seconds, and heard a distinct tone of condescension and forced amiability from Couric. Palin’s crossed arms indicated that Couric made her feel defensive. Contrast Couric’s behavior toward Palin with that of the rest of the media’s fawning over Obama, their glossing of relationships with unsavory characters in his life, and their mindless repetition of Obama’s “hope” drivel.

I’ve seen plenty of other Couric interviews. In this video, she interviews Obama and McCain. To be fair, she did get tough with Obama on the surge, but the smile present in the Obama interview was gone in the McCain interview. Her tone was decidedly different as well:

Here’s part II of her Obama interview:

Notice her softer tone and her attempts at suppressing a smile?

96

[quote]Christine wrote:
Schwarzfahrer wrote:
Christine wrote:
Schwarzfahrer wrote:

So why can’t she name one newspaper in her interview?

Maybe because she…doesn’t…read them ?

But you’re right, it can’t be, since a blogger claims she’s smart.

It was a “Gottcha” question from the liberal media.

It is an absolute standard question. According to you, ANYTHING could be a liberal assassination attempt.

I’m tired of this nonsense.
Good Night.

My response was meant to be facetious.
[/quote]

LOL. He needs to set his sarcasm detection threshold a bit lower.

97

[quote]PRCalDude wrote:

I counted two interruptions in 45 seconds, and heard a distinct tone of condescension and forced amiability from Couric. Palin’s crossed arms indicated that Couric made her feel defensive. Contrast Couric’s behavior toward Palin with that of the rest of the media’s fawning over Obama, their glossing of relationships with unsavory characters in his life, and their mindless repetition of Obama’s “hope” drivel.

I’ve seen plenty of other Couric interviews. In this video, she interviews Obama and McCain. To be fair, she did get tough with Obama on the surge, but the smile present in the Obama interview was gone in the McCain interview. Her tone was decidedly different as well:

Here’s part II of her Obama interview:

Notice her softer tone and her attempts at suppressing a smile?
[/quote]

Ah, yes, the future V.P. of the U.S. of A., beaten by that inscrutable devil dog of journalism, Katie Couric, into spouting nigh incomprehensible gibberish!

How did she do it?

  • a distinct tone of condescension AND forced amiability!!!

  • TWO interruptions!

  • Palin was made to feel defensive as evidenced by crossed arms! (OHHH No!)

LOL. This is the most tragi-comic piece of apologistic crap I’ve read in ages. Maybe you stop obsessing over Katie Couric interviews and go back to reading the hard stuff, Cosmo, for more of those “How To Tell if He’s Not THAT Into You!” articles, you nimwit. Your attempt at a pop psych deconstruction of Palin’s crossed arms was appropriately pathetic.

(BTW, I cross my arms because it feels comfortable, or when I’m about to wiggle my nose and grant a wish to some PYT and let her rub my magic lamp.)

98

I guess that dude in PRCalDude’s avatar was MADE to feel defensive too by having his picture taken, huh?

99

[quote]Qthulhu wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:

I counted two interruptions in 45 seconds, and heard a distinct tone of condescension and forced amiability from Couric. Palin’s crossed arms indicated that Couric made her feel defensive. Contrast Couric’s behavior toward Palin with that of the rest of the media’s fawning over Obama, their glossing of relationships with unsavory characters in his life, and their mindless repetition of Obama’s “hope” drivel.

I’ve seen plenty of other Couric interviews. In this video, she interviews Obama and McCain. To be fair, she did get tough with Obama on the surge, but the smile present in the Obama interview was gone in the McCain interview. Her tone was decidedly different as well:

Here’s part II of her Obama interview:

Notice her softer tone and her attempts at suppressing a smile?

Ah, yes, the future V.P. of the U.S. of A., beaten by that inscrutible devil dog of journalism, Katie Couric, into spouting nigh imcomprehensible gibberish!

How did she do it?

  • a distinct tone of condescension AND forced amiability!!!

  • TWO interruptions!

  • Palin was made to feel defensive as evidenced by crossed arms! (OHHH No!)

LOL. This is the most tragi-comic piece of apologistic crap I’ve read in ages. Maybe you stop obsessing over Katie Couric interviews and go back to reading the hard stuff, Cosmo, for more of those “How To Tell if He’s Not THAT Into You!” articles, you nimwit. Your attempt at pop psych deconstruction of Palin’s crossed arms was appropriately pathetic.

(BTW, I cross my arms because it feels comfortable, or when I’m about to wiggle my nose and grant a wish to some PYT and let her rub my magic lamp.)

[/quote]

This is great stuff, much like the Rolling Stone article. Thanks for providing yet another example of the typical Palin-hater. I almost don’t need to write anything when people such as yourself are here to make my case for me.

BTW, why are Canadians so obsessed with what goes on in our politics? Do you hear us telling us how stupid your candidates for prime minister are (what is your current one’s name again? Nevermind, it’s as irrelevant as Canada.)

100

[quote]jsbrook wrote:
Rocky101 wrote:
PRCalDude wrote:
Here’s one Palin hater who said that if Palin came to New York, she would have some of her “black brothers rape her.” Sarah Bernhard.

Please don’t post a picture of the ugliest (wo)man alive.
Is that Quentin Tarantino in a wig?

She really is one of the ugliest women I’ve ever seen. I don’t say it about many people, but Congress really needs to pass some law forbidding her to go out in public. Or tax her for going out in public, the money going a fund to care for the people who see her and go blind. I think it’s a bipartisan initiave everyone could get behind.[/quote]

She’d be hot in a Burkha!