[quote]SSC wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]roguevampire wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
I honestly think the weight used for traps is way more important than how many sets are actually done.
I have done just 3 sets for traps for about a decade…but I also use more weight than most people.[/quote]
I couldn’t disagree more. It has very little to do with the amount of weight you use. A perfect example, is this guy at another gym i once trained at, piled on the weight 6 45’s on each side, he’d bang out 4 or 5 reps and done. yet, his traps were nothing. me, I do maybe 4 plates per side on the smith machine, i bring them up high, hold them for a split second, then down. do that for a good 10-12 reps. and my traps are huge. form is everything with traps. The amount of weight used is only good for the ego. If you can do alot of weight with good from, then great. but heavy is different for everyone. [/quote]
I agree with twilight. I see people at the gym that stack a ton of weight on the bar and do these little bounce thingies with their shoulders and call them shrugs. Not saying ProfX does that obviously but a lot of people that are so concerned with shrugging a shit ton of weight over form do. It is such a small range of motion that just does not really justify cheating imo. 15-20 rep sets w/ 315 really strict will torch the hell out of my traps.
[/quote]
Hmmm, I see people all of the time in the gym for years who look exactly the same or worse. Clearly it is the gym that is the problem.[/quote]
To add to this, Josh86 did shrugs with like 685 or something retarded for those “twitch” reps or whatever. Find his picture of HIS back and tell me he doesn’t know what he’s doing. This also applies for Hungry4More also, with the ridiculous weights and “twitch” reps. I could be wrong about this, but I think Bug does them this way too, and his traps are retarded.
Wait, am I detecting another pattern…?[/quote]
Not sure what you mean by “twitch” reps. If it means fast explosive reps with a full ROM, that’s fine. But if it means limiting the already small 3inch ROM of shrugs to 1 inch bounces then I don’t see point. I cannot beleive 1 inch bounces will build bigger traps than full ROM. Not saying hold peak contraction all the time, every time, but atleast full ROM.