[quote]countingbeans wrote:
ugh… Imagine:
shudder
Any day over that… [/quote]
Lol.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Will207 wrote:
Number of Owners VS Mileage
Which is more of a concern; a woman who has had many partners, or a woman who has been extremely liberal in her sexual encounters? A friend of mine revealed to me that his smart, good-looking, high earning girlfriend had been air-locked one night by two guys she was friends with. Her overall number was low, but I thought this was a dealbreaker for relationship material.
Thoughts?
[/quote]
I don’t really see that as much of a problem. It’s like the chicks that are “gay” in college… Not a big deal.
Heck, I don’t even see it as an issue if you’re in the relationship and do some “taboo” things. [/quote]
Neither of those examples are equal to your girl getting gang-banged.
[quote]Will207 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Will207 wrote:
Number of Owners VS Mileage
Which is more of a concern; a woman who has had many partners, or a woman who has been extremely liberal in her sexual encounters? A friend of mine revealed to me that his smart, good-looking, high earning girlfriend had been air-locked one night by two guys she was friends with. Her overall number was low, but I thought this was a dealbreaker for relationship material.
Thoughts?
[/quote]
I don’t really see that as much of a problem. It’s like the chicks that are “gay” in college… Not a big deal.
Heck, I don’t even see it as an issue if you’re in the relationship and do some “taboo” things. [/quote]
Neither of those examples are equal to your girl getting gang-banged. [/quote]
Well, that was only one example really…
A gang-bang would fall into the “taboo” things comment and some people like that stuff. It ain’t for me, but who am I to judge.
As Bean’s said, if she had to have it, ya it would be a dealbreaker. If it was a “I wanted to try it” type thing, not a dealbreaker.
For some people a gay experience is way worse than a gang-bang anyway.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Will207 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Will207 wrote:
Number of Owners VS Mileage
Which is more of a concern; a woman who has had many partners, or a woman who has been extremely liberal in her sexual encounters? A friend of mine revealed to me that his smart, good-looking, high earning girlfriend had been air-locked one night by two guys she was friends with. Her overall number was low, but I thought this was a dealbreaker for relationship material.
Thoughts?
[/quote]
I don’t really see that as much of a problem. It’s like the chicks that are “gay” in college… Not a big deal.
Heck, I don’t even see it as an issue if you’re in the relationship and do some “taboo” things. [/quote]
Neither of those examples are equal to your girl getting gang-banged. [/quote]
Well, that was only one example really…
A gang-bang would fall into the “taboo” things comment and some people like that stuff. It ain’t for me, but who am I to judge.
As Bean’s said, if she had to have it, ya it would be a dealbreaker. If it was a “I wanted to try it” type thing, not a dealbreaker. [/quote]
I see where you’re coming from. Everyone has a different line in the sand.
[quote]Will207 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Will207 wrote:
Number of Owners VS Mileage
Which is more of a concern; a woman who has had many partners, or a woman who has been extremely liberal in her sexual encounters? A friend of mine revealed to me that his smart, good-looking, high earning girlfriend had been air-locked one night by two guys she was friends with. Her overall number was low, but I thought this was a dealbreaker for relationship material.
Thoughts?
[/quote]
I don’t really see that as much of a problem. It’s like the chicks that are “gay” in college… Not a big deal.
Heck, I don’t even see it as an issue if you’re in the relationship and do some “taboo” things. [/quote]
Neither of those examples are equal to your girl getting gang-banged. [/quote]
What if you are part of the gang bang? And the condition is that if SHE get’s two, YOU get two… Speaking from personal experience, having TWO (or more) chicks at the same time MORE than makes up for you and a buddy gang banging a chick. Trust me, it’s AWESOME!
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
[quote]Will207 wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Will207 wrote:
Number of Owners VS Mileage
Which is more of a concern; a woman who has had many partners, or a woman who has been extremely liberal in her sexual encounters? A friend of mine revealed to me that his smart, good-looking, high earning girlfriend had been air-locked one night by two guys she was friends with. Her overall number was low, but I thought this was a dealbreaker for relationship material.
Thoughts?
[/quote]
I don’t really see that as much of a problem. It’s like the chicks that are “gay” in college… Not a big deal.
Heck, I don’t even see it as an issue if you’re in the relationship and do some “taboo” things. [/quote]
Neither of those examples are equal to your girl getting gang-banged. [/quote]
What if you are part of the gang bang? And the condition is that if SHE get’s two, YOU get two… Speaking from personal experience, having TWO (or more) chicks at the same time MORE than makes up for you and a buddy gang banging a chick. Trust me, it’s AWESOME![/quote]
If it’s some chick, sure. I’ve been in a group setting and it was fun, but I wouldn’t want to marry the girls. It’s a double standard I know, but that’s just how it is for me.
[quote]EmilyQ wrote:
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
and a track record of CHANGE for her to be considered.
[/quote]
There, THIS is what I can agree with.
Past behavior, his or hers, isn’t the issue. Present and near-past are. Depending on age I would expect the length of time to be shorter or longer for reform.
[/quote]
Well, not quite.
Women tend to have their epiphany phase when they power in the SMP shifts towards men.
If a man changes his ways if he is at the peak of his power I respect that much more than if a woman does that right around the time the rules no longer favor her.
http://www.xojane.com/sex/30-is-the-new-50-old-age-is-killing-my-dating-life
Many Women lie about their numbers, due to the stigma attached.
Many men can’t handle the truth, anyway.
So, don’t ask.
You dont have to ask, they always tell.
Women like to be loved for who they are, if they trust you.
What am I, if not trustworthy?
[quote]
I don’t believe I used the words, “never be marriage material”. I believe I said there needs to be some serious compensating factors and a track record of CHANGE for her to be considered.
But if you all want to MARRY a slut, KNOCK YOUR SELF OUT! I can recommend a great divorce attorney. Boggles my little brain when people throw common fucking sense out the window just be politically correct. What ever - it’s YOUR assets at risk, not mine.[/quote]
Well 3 other people jumped in with the same assessment before I responded. If you don’t like how your grandiose paragraphs are summarized maybe you should consider how they’re going to be interpreted before you use words and phrases like “dog, butterfly, marriage material, bad lock, slut” etc etc.
As for your backtrack I specifically said that a given experience in someone’s past might not be an indicator of their current state. You jumped the example up to 260 and shit all over that pearl of wisdom.
[quote]MementoMori wrote:
You dropped a pearl of wisdom about ONE SINGLE ONE NIGHT STAND. It wasn’t even a legitimate contribution to the conversation (which was about women with a HIGH number). I (and everyone participating in this thread) could give a flying fuck about a single one night stand in Costa Rica. That isn’t the point. I then threw out some situations for what I considered to be some average numbers for a high novelty seeking index female, and you proceeded to actually DO THE MATH and missing the point entirely… Do I think it’s likely that a woman get’s to 260? Hell no - not unless she’s a prostitute. It was an EXAMPLE of what we were talking about juxtaposed against your single one night stand example. It was driving home a POINT, nothing more. But you took that ball and ran with it, attacked me, ignored my points and engaged in a tit for tat discussion while ignoring everything I wrote. You also never backed up ANYTHING you wrote with anything other than your opinion.
Which is fine, opinions are like assholes, because everyone has one - but some stink more than others. I’m personally finding your posting/debating style to lack substance and it’s becoming tiresome. So I hope you find your heart of gold in a woman who, if she had the same number of dicks sticking out of her as she’s had stuck in her, would resemble a porcupine. And you should NEVER use common sense and <<>> JUDGEMENT about someone (after all, you might hurt their feelings, and didn’t you know? Feelings are more important that facts…) Good luck with that. Maybe when she takes half your shit you’ll look back and remember this little conversation and you just MIGHT think to yourself, “maybe porcupines aren’t so great to marry after all…”.
And your concept of sex being exactly the same for men and women is just plain WRONG. I mean, what planet are you from? Sex is a VERY different experience for men and woman, from the courtship to attraction to comfort to anticipation to the act to the aftermath to the emotions throughout the entire process… It’s a COMPLETELY different experience and process. It has different ramifications, expectations and social consequences that are VERY gender specific. Your crass generalization of, “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander” is ignorant at best and completely disingenuous at worst.
Why would you give that advice to people? It’s wrong… And with the court system the way it is, that advice could potentially cost a man HALF HIS SHIT… But it’s politically correct and progressive and doesn’t discriminate, right? LMAO! Seriously, you have no fucking clue if you actually believe these things… But I suspect you’re just trolling. Which is fine and why I ultimately disengaged. I most certainly didn’t backtrack on a single thing I said, but that’s just your style - you make shit up and then believe it… Have fun with that.
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
[quote]Will207 wrote:
Gents, how would you go about learning how many dicks have been in the woman you may be considering a relationship with? How is that discussion broached? Do you bluntly ask for a number, or glean the information over time to not arouse suspicion? Assume a history cannot be established.
[/quote]
It has to be established WHILE IN a relationship. I don’t care how many if it’s just dating, or seeing each other exclusively. Ask me no questions and I’ll tell you no lies LOL. But if shit get’s serious, you should be able to pick up an approximate number from conversations over time. And if you catch them lying, call them on it.
For example, I am dating a chick right now that I’ve known for about 8 months or so. The other day she made the statement that she’s only been with ten guys. Since I knew of at least 4 guys within the year before we started seeing each other and at least 4 more that she’d mentioned as prior boyfriends, I called bullshit. I rattled them off and said, “so you mean to tell me that you’ve only been with TWO other dudes besides them?”. Her reply was, “well, OK, it didn’t seem like that much, but the number is DEFINITELY under 20”. LOL I’m guessing it’s about 25 - 30. Closer to 40 if you count blowjobs. And I really don’t give a shit, I’m not thinking about marrying her so it doesn’t really matter.
Women lie. And they don’t even know they are lying. She honestly believed the number as it was coming out of her mouth. But she had completely confabulated it. It’s not malicious, it’s just in their nature.[/quote]
My experience is women always know their exact number. At some point I’m sure they lose track but I’d guess if a woman’s number is below 50 or so, they always know the exact number. I’ve known two women who knew their exact number into the sixties.
are we still discussing this?
I suggest ya’all visit the “belfie” thread, and stop all this nonsense.
you too, AC~