[quote]batman730 wrote:
[quote]Bismark wrote:
[quote]batman730 wrote:
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
Basically, the underlying TRUTH of the matter is that you can’t turn a ho into a housewife. Seriously. Why anyone disputes this is beyond me. Women who have experienced a lot of cock have a high “novelty seeking index”… It’s how they are WIRED… You think that a ring on her finger is just going to turn that off? There are so many emotional and psychological layers to this it’s not even funny.
But despite our insistence as a culture that we can ALL be special snowflakes (cough, cough BULLSHIT!!!) it comes down to this: is she a “good” girl, or a “bad” girl? A good girl can be a lady in the living room and taught to be a whore in the bedroom. A bad girl is just a whore everywhere she goes. And everybody knows it. She betrays it with the looks she gives, her body language and her lack of boundaries.
I can spot a whore a mile away. It’s just a matter of seeing how she responds when I push a few buttons. And the sad sad truth of it is that in today’s society, where the MEDIA is conditioning our younger generations to care more about which guy XYZ Kardashian is fucking than who their state senator is, more and more young women are turning into whores. Before they are even old enough to think responsibly, they’ve already had a dozen dicks up in them. And they call it “progress”… LMAO
It’s fine by me. I like fucking strange pussy and these days it’s like shooting fish in a barrel. I literally don’t have to try anymore. The biggest challenge is the schedule.[/quote]
I can’t agree with you wholesale on this issue, however anecdotally, in my experience you have a point. My sample is much smaller than your own, but I still reached a few conclusions.
I came VERY close to marrying a girl with, ahem… a very high “novelty seeking index”. By the time we got together at age 20, I was her number 12 as I recall, and that included some fairly exotic stuff. This was 15 years ago, so I expect that made her even more of an outlier than a girl of the same age and number would be today. We lasted 3 years, which I actually consider something of an accomplishment given her temperament.
She engaged in a lot of high risk activity (sexual and otherwise) and was dating somebody when we got together. Unsurprising, in hindsight, she was unable to “turn it off” despite her (IMO) heartfelt professions of undying love and desire to build a future together. She just wasn’t made that way. I don’t blame her, I should have known she was a scorpion when we started swimming across the river. Did I mention I was 20 and she was… very attractive.
Now I can recognize “that” girl in seconds, fractions of seconds even. There are clearly identifiable patterns that are unmistakable. I also agree that “that” girl is being heavily promoted in the media under the guise of empowerment etc. I personally don’t see how hedonism, drug abuse, promiscuity and lack of impulse control are especially empowering, but what do I know?
I believe we should deal with people on a case by case basis. However, I have also noticed that we fall into very definite “types” which exhibit extremely predictable patterns of thought and action. An individual, through self awareness and a concerted effort of will can break out of their type/pattern and on occasion anybody can surprise you, but more often than not, you can bet on the pattern.
Past behaviour is the best indicator of future behaviour. [/quote]
What are the signposts of such a women? Over the long and short term?[/quote]
Well, it’s more of a visceral impression than a hard and fast checklist I run through. Very much like when you’re deciding whether or not you trust someone you just met. It’s not necessarily evidence based, but it’s generally accurate.
Attempting to break it down a little, here’s what I’ve noticed. these women’s issues generally centre around excessive pleasure/attention seeking behaviour and inability to establish and respect adequate boundaries. What this looks like, IME: excessively “open” body language, especially in settings where it’s not particularly appropriate (i.e. work vs the club), tendency to encroach on personal space, tendency to give TMFI and/or ask excessively personal questions and put people on the spot, deliberately creating uncomfortable situations, need to monopolize attention and conversation in group settings, binge behaviour of all kinds (eating, drinking, partying, spending, sex, drugs etc), high risk behaviours (sexual and otherwise), making major presumptions about people’s (especially, but not exclusively guys’) willingness to put up with generally socially unacceptable behaviour, chronic lateness and general unreliability, addiction issues, frequent significant life changes, disproportionate number of male acquaintances (“beta orbiters” for the Game oriented), difficulty spending time alone (need an audience), continuing to actively cultivate new male acquaintances when in a relationship, difficulty maintaining healthy female friendships, forming inappropriate, although not necessarily explicitly sexual, relationships with males in positions of authority (bosses, teachers etc), seeming inability to flirt without coming across like they “mean it”, history of dysfunctional sexual conduct and/or abuse, relevant to this thread a large number of sexual partners and often an early first sexual experience.
There are more, but this should get you started. I’m sure some out there would say this describes the majority of girls/women aged 17-24. I can’t say, as I rarely hang out with women in that age group anymore. I would say however that more girls are trying to be this girl than actually are this woman. If they practice long enough though, it probably doesn’t matter.
Out of curiosity, are you asking so you can find this woman, or so you can avoid her?
Edited[/quote]
Thank you for the response. Avoid, avoid like the plague.
