Home Work Out

Hey guys, Thanks for all of your input and such. I now have a dip station, will be great, i also have a belt which i could attach the kettle bell to for dips and chins, Im confident that between weighted dips and chins also banded push ups will help with my upper body development.
As for legs i am a bit concerned for how i can load them, between goblet squats, lunge variations, and swings. I don’t feel a 40 lb KB is enough. How would you recommend that i program these?

Box Jumps, Vertical Jumps, Long Jumps, Goblet squat, Forward/Backward Lunge, Wall sits (Isometric), Kb Swings, SLRDL all with KB
KB Snatch, KB clean, KB jerk,Banded KB swings.
Weighted Pull ups and Dips, Banded Push Ups, Push ups, Banded KB Row, Hand Stand push ups.

Ab work
Ab wheel roll out, Side plank, Med ball twist

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]Jarvan wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:
But pure bodyweight exercises don’t accomplish too much after a point, unless you add resistance. Once you’re able to do 30 or so consecutive pushups, you’re not going to get much more out of them.[/quote]

I’m afraid that is your belief because you yourself haven’t tried it.
I’m willing to bet that you yourself would have a hard time hitting 30 rigid push ups. 1 second up, 2 seconds down. Chest touching the floor, full pause at the top.

Theory is great, but without evidence it’s ignorance. [/quote]

I made my statement based on my own experience and the experience of people I’ve personally known who’ve spent plenty of time training pushups, some of whom were former military, some who weren’t. It wasn’t theory.

Once upon a time, I honestly believed that all you had to do was more and more pushups to get bigger, and do that for awhile. I’d worked myself up to doing 300 pushups, 300 situps every other day, but never saw those benefits. These were good chest to the ground, fully locked out pushups.

Going from barely being able to do one pushup, to being able to do 30 consecutively, yes, there’s muscular growth. Once you hit that point, there doesn’t seem to be much more improvement in size, without additional resistance.

My point wasn’t that pushups were a useless exercise, but that if all you’re going to do is bodyweight pushups for chest and arm growth, after a point you hit diminishing returns as far as size is concerned.

Maybe I am ignorant on something, but I’m not sure what it is.[/quote]

We are all ignorant of something. It’s when we decide to stay ignorant is when it becomes an unfavorable connotation. And to claim that hypertrophy is not possible beyond 30 push ups, with your limited experience, is choosing to stay in the shadow.

If you haven’t yet strived for 50 or 100 push ups in a set, you have no place to say that there’s a point of ‘diminishing returns’. Wouldn’t you agree?

[quote]jake_richardson wrote:
Hey guys, Thanks for all of your input and such. I now have a dip station, will be great, i also have a belt which i could attach the kettle bell to for dips and chins, Im confident that between weighted dips and chins also banded push ups will help with my upper body development.
As for legs i am a bit concerned for how i can load them, between goblet squats, lunge variations, and swings. I don’t feel a 40 lb KB is enough. How would you recommend that i program these?

Box Jumps, Vertical Jumps, Long Jumps, Goblet squat, Forward/Backward Lunge, Wall sits (Isometric), Kb Swings, SLRDL all with KB
KB Snatch, KB clean, KB jerk,Banded KB swings.
Weighted Pull ups and Dips, Banded Push Ups, Push ups, Banded KB Row, Hand Stand push ups.

Ab work
Ab wheel roll out, Side plank, Med ball twist

[/quote]

Looks fine, would throw in band pull aparts/rear delt move and some band tricep pressdowns once in awhile

[quote]Jarvan wrote:
We are all ignorant of something. It’s when we decide to stay ignorant is when it becomes an unfavorable connotation. And to claim that hypertrophy is not possible beyond 30 push ups, with your limited experience, is choosing to stay in the shadow.

If you haven’t yet strived for 50 or 100 push ups in a set, you have no place to say that there’s a point of ‘diminishing returns’. Wouldn’t you agree?
[/quote]
I would, and do agree.

I, personally, have found minimal benefit between doing sets of 30 and sets of 40 or 50. There was a benefit in going from sets of 10 to sets of 20. There was a bit more benefit increasing that number. 30 is about where things had clearly dropped off.

This was the point of diminishing returns for me. Others I’ve talked to have had similar experiences. Nobody I’ve talked to has had contrary experiences.

If I hadn’t had the personal experience, I wouldn’t be speaking from a point of personal experience.

What increase in size have you, personally, found by going from 30 a set to 50 a set? What proof, anecdotal or otherwise, do you have to demonstrate that?

There are already several, in this thread, who have mentioned (or have done, but haven’t explicitly mentioned) doing high volumes of pushups on a regular basis, but none of those people are saying they achieved significant size gains from it.

I realize this isn’t purely an either or situation, but at some point the benefits of any exercise taper off. In my experience, that number, for pushups, seems to be around 30.

Where do you see it?

Obviously there are one armed pushups, diamond pushups, uneven pushups, planche pushups, other ways to increase the resistance, as well as using them as finishing work in the context of other lifting… but that’s not what I’m talking about.

[quote]jake_richardson wrote:
So i still want to keep my numbers up and am worried about loosing muscle and looking sh*tty.![/quote]

OP never said anything about gains. This is about maintenance. If OP has a fair amount of muscle mass, can BW exercises maintain it? Will OP lose substantial muscle just doing pushups, even if the sets are challenging?

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]Jarvan wrote:
We are all ignorant of something. It’s when we decide to stay ignorant is when it becomes an unfavorable connotation. And to claim that hypertrophy is not possible beyond 30 push ups, with your limited experience, is choosing to stay in the shadow.

If you haven’t yet strived for 50 or 100 push ups in a set, you have no place to say that there’s a point of ‘diminishing returns’. Wouldn’t you agree?
[/quote]
I would, and do agree.

I, personally, have found minimal benefit between doing sets of 30 and sets of 40 or 50. There was a benefit in going from sets of 10 to sets of 20. There was a bit more benefit increasing that number. 30 is about where things had clearly dropped off.

This was the point of diminishing returns for me. Others I’ve talked to have had similar experiences. Nobody I’ve talked to has had contrary experiences.

If I hadn’t had the personal experience, I wouldn’t be speaking from a point of personal experience.

What increase in size have you, personally, found by going from 30 a set to 50 a set? What proof, anecdotal or otherwise, do you have to demonstrate that?

There are already several, in this thread, who have mentioned (or have done, but haven’t explicitly mentioned) doing high volumes of pushups on a regular basis, but none of those people are saying they achieved significant size gains from it.

I realize this isn’t purely an either or situation, but at some point the benefits of any exercise taper off. In my experience, that number, for pushups, seems to be around 30.

Where do you see it?

Obviously there are one armed pushups, diamond pushups, uneven pushups, planche pushups, other ways to increase the resistance, as well as using them as finishing work in the context of other lifting… but that’s not what I’m talking about.[/quote]

Well, take a look at my candid picture my girlfriend took of me yesterday. You can’t deny these kinds of results.

But yea, why wouldn’t you include those push up variations? Aren’t they still push ups? And to be frank, you are still fresh in the game and 50 GOOD push ups in a row is no easy task. Are you sure you can do that? Or are you speaking hypothetically? Because I have a ton of clients and friends that can bench respectable numbers and they can’t perform 50 reps.

As for anecdotal evidence, I know I’ll catch flak for this, but just take a look at the barstar athletes’ physiques. Calisthenics is beautiful because it’s simply movements our inherent biomechanics are derived from. And my philosophy is that 2.4 million years of evolution didn’t fuck up. If you can climb and pick up shit efficiently, you will work all of your muscles… and it’s also a reason why I personally believe sprinting adds muscle and jacks up test, but I digress.

With that said, our bodies don’t necessarily want to be grotesquely enormous. It’s too big of an upkeep and being deprived of food from a possible famine (primal, hypothetically speaking) would mean death. I think anyone would agree Jay Cutler wouldn’t fair too well in the midst of nature. But with yeeeears of reassurance of consistent, potent, high quality food (and shakes and supps), the body being a slave to our demands… will grow to ones liking.

But also because of the aforementioned, calisthenics does pose a limitation when it comes to growth AND strength. But the majority of us aren’t nearly at the point where calisthenics would give a ‘diminishing return’ as you said.

If you are a push up master, go for one arm push ups. But of course, why would we only divulge in calisthenics when we can use iron? The answer is simple for me. A solid foundation. Regardless of your goals, you need a firm fundamental foundation of how your body works.

BIG ASS TANGENT
For example, I despise (heavy) incline presses. Being a fitness professional for over 10 years has built this disdain for incline pressing like none other. Not only do I see it as futile, but the risk outweighs the benefits. I’m sure most of us has a life outside the forum. So next time you speak to a lifter with a shoulder problem, ask how it happened. If it wasn’t from a broken clavicle from football, it’s most likely from incline pressing (sometimes OHP or flat benching).

Bret Contreras put out an article a few years back noting the amount of stimulation certain exercises had on specific muscles. I read it and of course my favorite dips had the greatest overall chest stimulation. But then I quickly searched the incline press and it showed very poor upper chest stimulation. The incline press actually showed more mid chest stim than the regular flat bench!

What I’m getting at is that you can stimulate the upper pecs by simply modifying the dips.

Nerding out***
Your chest, outside of being the main agonist for a transverse press, is also a pronator. Fact is our muscles are at its greatest contraction when it is stretched. So simply supinating your arm will expose/stretch your pecs, namely the upper portion. Perform your dips on an angled bar, with your hands slightly supined, and you’ll be attacking the upper pecs efficiently… Granted, you have the mobility to go far beyond parallel.
END TANGENT

But yea, push ups and fundamentals.
Because we see the biggest men on the planet use heavy iron we are undoubtedly compelled to do the same. And by all means, the iron has taught and still teaching me valuable lessons. However, it doesn’t mean that I will shun my push ups in place of bench pressing.

For beginners I think it would be more wise to conquer the push ups/dips before thinking about going super heavy on benching, even if it’s for size. Whereas the majority solely focuses on size, I try to incorporate ‘building armor’ prior to… in order to reduce injury and offer a better proclivity for the trainee to add muscle on top.

To conclude this fiasco, I want to stress that 500 shitty push ups won’t do jack shit for size, strength or anything. If you’re not getting results from push ups, it’s because they are absolute shit, or you aren’t trained enough to create enough tension via MMC.
You can get an actual picture of myself from last year in my profile. I don’t personally train for size, but my tits aren’t that bad

@Jarvan - Solid post above. I would agree with most of what you said, and won’t waste time with the minor disagreements. 50 strict, good form pushups is no easy task. It appears you have built a nice physique from bodyweight movements. Yet, I know two guys I workout with that have very little chest development, and once benches 275, and the other 320, both at around 205 bodyweight.

Is having access to equipment better than just access to BW movements? Yes! But if someone works hard and smart with what they have, they can build a respectable level of muscle and strength with no equipment whatsoever. Since the OP was looking to maintain, and not lose what he has built, that shouldn’t be a problem.

Jarvan, you were Mike Chang all along and you never told us? :slight_smile:

I do find it interesting all the tangents you took. Honestly, I’m in agreement with almost everything you said.

My statement, generalized, was essentially “the SAME movement, performed the SAME way, won’t have much benefit additional on SIZE after you’re able to perform roughly 30 reps”. Followed with, “I say this based on my personal experience, and the experience of people I’ve known”.

I think we’re all in agreement that someone who can perform 30 straddle planche pushups on rings, with 5 second eccentrics, is going to be bigger than someone who can only do 30 “normal” pushups (chest/chin to ground, then to lockout) with a 1 count up, 1 count down tempo.

I also think we’re in agreement that by changing tempo and rest times, and other sundry details, you can get different/additional benefits out of the same movement.

Also, at no point was I saying that bodyweight calisthenic work was a waste of time.

I used bodyweight work for over 10 years before I ever used a barbell as part of my training.

It took me a few months to work up to 300 pushups in a session, during which I experimented with all sorts of set and rep schemes; sets of 30, sets of 50, AMRAP sets. Repeating what I said above: going from being able to do sets of 10 to 30, I noticed a difference in size; going much over that, it didn’t make much of a difference.

(I did work up to a few one-arm pushups on each side, but it wasn’t something I pursued much. That was when I first got into kettlebells, so my attention had shifted.)

I’m just not sure why you’re saying this is purely hypothetical on my part.

Given someone who only knows how to do pushups 1 count up, 1 count down, rigid torso, chest/chin to the ground, lockout at top.

How would you progress them, over time, for size gains (short of adding external weight)? Would you start with slower eccentrics before increasing reps? Would you add sets and decrease rest times?

Genuinely curious.

[quote]jake_richardson wrote:
As for legs i am a bit concerned for how i can load them, between goblet squats, lunge variations, and swings. I don’t feel a 40 lb KB is enough. How would you recommend that i program these?
[/quote]

Pistol squats. Google / youtube them.

[quote]LoRez wrote:
I think we’re all in agreement that someone who can perform 30 straddle planche pushups on rings, with 5 second eccentrics, is going to be bigger than someone who can only do 30 “normal” pushups (chest/chin to ground, then to lockout) with a 1 count up, 1 count down tempo.
[/quote]

If you somehow know anyone that can perform 30 planche push ups on a ring, please relay a message to him/her that I would like to study under their tutelage.

And if this person exists, I doubt they are too heavy, or even too muscular. So no, performance doesn’t always equate to size.

[quote]LoRez wrote:
Also, at no point was I saying that bodyweight calisthenic work was a waste of time.
[/quote]

Not sure if I said that about you, but if I did, my fault.

[quote]LoRez wrote:
My point wasn’t that pushups were a useless exercise, but that if all you’re going to do is bodyweight pushups for chest and arm growth, after a point you hit diminishing returns as far as size is concerned.[/quote]

What I was concerned about was you using ‘diminishing returns’ to describe push ups beyond a certain point. It just shows me you just haven’t explored the push ups far enough, yet.

[quote]LoRez wrote:
I used bodyweight work for over 10 years before I ever used a barbell as part of my training. [/quote]

Time spent on anything doesn’t always make you proficient. Many people go to school for 12 years, and they don’t know jack shit. We all know some of these.

[quote]LoRez wrote:
It took me a few months to work up to 300 pushups in a session, during which I experimented with all sorts of set and rep schemes; sets of 30, sets of 50, AMRAP sets. Repeating what I said above: going from being able to do sets of 10 to 30, I noticed a difference in size; going much over that, it didn’t make much of a difference. [/quote]

Too much bro. Way too much. A solid set of 10’s would suffice (to start). But of course high reps have their place as well.

[quote]LoRez wrote:
Given someone who only knows how to do pushups 1 count up, 1 count down, rigid torso, chest/chin to the ground, lockout at top.

How would you progress them, over time, for size gains (short of adding external weight)? Would you start with slower eccentrics before increasing reps? Would you add sets and decrease rest times?

Genuinely curious.[/quote]

To be frank, it’s a whole process I put through new trainees and constantly reinforce even with clients I’ve had for 6+ years.

You must demonstrate a solid push up plank position before you even begin to flex the elbow or extend at the shoulder. Even the slightest dip in the hips would fuck up the entire process.

No template, tempo, or whatever will help without a solid base. And you can refer to my thread “This Answers Everything” thread for more backdrop.

Thank you every one for your help! I really appreciate it!

[quote]dt79 wrote:
Jarvan, you were Mike Chang all along and you never told us? :)[/quote]
I was hoping for a reply to this, but Jarvan didn’t oblige.

[quote]dt79 wrote:
OP, why the fuck do you have a bosu ball at home hahahaha[/quote]

Do lunges stepping on it. Good for ankle strength

How heavy is your punching bag? If you can easily detach it you’ve a world of opportunities.

Btw great quote T3hpwnisher.