[quote]tontongg wrote:
I’m saying this, nothing more
[quote]tontongg wrote:
Depends on tempo obviously, but high reps+low % isn’t going to affect your strength DIRECTLY[/quote]
Which means that hypertrophy is good for strength but this is NOT what OP talks about
And for some reason I trust this guy. I dont see 30@50% for maximal strength here ?? Nor any long duration effort/lactate in the first 2 parts ?
Anyway, as TUT and cycling must have been discussed a million times already no need to derail thread further implying things I didnt even think about. Indeed I see how misleading it seems to be for some[/quote]
Oh but he is…
He is just confused because people keep referring to sacroplasmic vs myofibrillar hypertrophy as if one can exist without the other by doing some magical rep range.