[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
[quote]kakno wrote:
I’ve seen the term compartment syndrome used pretty freely. As in if someone has really sore calves. Apparently that doesn’t really fit the bill, but we know how journalists can blow up things without checking if it’s true. So maybe this actually just means that their triceps are really fucking sore and that they got dehydrated and nauseated.
Still think it’s teh creatinez though. If you don’t put it in your socks, shit will happen.[/quote]
Let me just say a couple things here. First, this thread is why I’m happy I’m on this site after all these years- because there’s guys on here with more knowledge than what’s being thrown out there in the comments.
However, let me defend my journalist brethren for a second and say that when you’re a reporter, you’re expected to report on all sorts of shit, running the gamut from stuff on nature and science to things like books and literature- regardless of whether you know about them at all or not.
You’re forced to be a “jack of all trades” and know just enough that you can write the bare essentials of the story out and not lose the ADD prone readers’ (your) attention.
So give them a break if they’re not exactly right on what all this shit does- the odds are is they only know what the cops on the scene and the doctors at the hospital told them, and they have neither the time nor the resources to check it out with every weightlifter in the gym or every creatine user.
/end rant
[/quote]
I disagree. I wrote marketing copy for technical companies for years. I was forced to learn enough about certain products from an array of industries to write about them intelligently not for the general public but for engineers who would be the ones buying that stuff. Guess what? It’s not THAT difficult. I’m no genius.
Today’s journalists have become incredibly lazy. I bet that most of those reporting on this story did not even interview anyone involved. The first reporter did, and then the rest just regurgitated what the first one reported. Why did it not occur to anyone to even inquire about just what these kids were DOING that day? Apparently it involved hundreds upon hundreds of reps for triceps.* OK, I’ll grant that most reporters wouldn’t have enough knowledge to question WHY a coach would have these kids focusing so hard on isolating their triceps, but you would think a reporter would at least be curious enough to ask what kind of training they were doing that day.
Lord help us if there is another Watergate. The days of investigative reporters like Woodward and Bernstein are long gone.
*I’m sure that the coach had a legit reason for hammering the kids’ triceps. Because, as we all know, proper sweep and good separation of all three heads is essential during the back double biceps pose, and that’s basic to winning football games, right? /end sarcasm/