We had Zues on our side.
[quote]The Greek wrote:
We had Zues on our side. [/quote]
Who seems to be your avatar.
[quote]Brant_Drake wrote:
The Greek wrote:
We had Zues on our side.
Who seems to be your avatar.[/quote]
Unfortunately I do not know.
[quote]The Greek wrote:
Brant_Drake wrote:
The Greek wrote:
We had Zues on our side.
Who seems to be your avatar.
Unfortunately I do not know. [/quote]
Looks like Markus Ruhal (?sp).
[quote]Madman2 wrote:
The Greek wrote:
Brant_Drake wrote:
The Greek wrote:
We had Zues on our side.
Who seems to be your avatar.
Unfortunately I do not know.
Looks like Markus Ruhal (?sp).[/quote]
I know it’s Ruhl, I was just saying . . . . Zeus = god, so does Ruhl . . . cause he’s so fucking huge . . .dammit . . . .
[quote]Brant_Drake wrote:
Madman2 wrote:
The Greek wrote:
Brant_Drake wrote:
The Greek wrote:
We had Zues on our side.
Who seems to be your avatar.
Unfortunately I do not know.
Looks like Markus Ruhal (?sp).
I know it’s Ruhl, I was just saying . . . . Zeus = god, so does Ruhl . . . cause he’s so fucking huge . . .dammit . . . .[/quote]
Some of us knew what you’re saying. Some didn’t.
They may of look good, but i don’t think they perform anywhere near as well as their modern counterparts. If we transported them through time i think a lot of em would love our modern supps, and that 300 movie.
[quote]The Greek wrote:
We had Zues on our side. [/quote]
is that picture of him real or enhanced? i knew he was big but holy cow!
Thanks guys (even the haters). I’ll read those threads.
WTF??
You said you would read the articles, instead you posted the EXACT SAME THING on figureathlete.com!!
grr I hate trolls
She’s been doing that with every thread she starts.
[quote]shugrblossm2 wrote:
Thanks guys (even the haters). I’ll read those threads.[/quote]
your welcome
[quote]Rach2784 wrote:
She’s been doing that with every thread she starts. [/quote]
ah, I never noticed. I don’t usually read the threads over on the other site, but I saw this one with the same title and it caught my attention.
Yeah, well I frequent both sites. I have posted on FA longer than on here. Every single thread has been on both sites, and she doesn’t really listen to the answers on either one…so it’s like she’s a double troll.
[quote]Rach2784 wrote:
Yeah, well I frequent both sites. I have posted on FA longer than on here. Every single thread has been on both sites, and she doesn’t really listen to the answers on either one…so it’s like she’s a double troll.[/quote]
haha so it seems!
How do we not know that the Greek statues weren’t depictions of thier ideal?
Or weren’t depictions of super human physique?
We know today that one can reach that level without drugs.
Also, you don’t know that they didn’t have “supplements” back in the day.
Like cocaine?
Like some berries or leaves that were muscle hardneners?
Like a root that would improve your testosterone?
There was stuff in nature and prepared that they knew, that they used.
Is it likely that the artists chose individuals with non-exceptional physiques as their models?
Or more likely that they chose those with exceptional physiques as models? Even perhaps extremely exceptional?
Extremely exceptional, and they did a “photoshop” on it in the marble so that we see what it is today.
When’s the last time any of you looked at ancient Greek sculpture? The athletes depicted are not all that muscular when compared to today’s standards.