Gored Matador

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Vash wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

We are talking about COWS here…another animal that only due to our culture is seen in some alternative light. We view puppies as cute life-long friends, therefore, to us, killing a puppy is HORRIBLE. In some countries, that same puppy could be food and no one would think anything about it.

[/quote]
In this instance, you are implying two things: ALL destroying of puppies would be seen as bad by ALL members of our culture.

Again, the issue is not the ending of the animal, but the treatment before death. Or, by ignoring this aspect of the issue, are you implying that the treatment of animals premortem is irrelevant?[/quote]

It sure as hell isn’t that important if they still end up dead and you still end up eating them. In a universal context, the animal is still D E A D.

Why do you think it is right to kill the animal at all?

Because you need it?

Is that right or wrong?[/quote]

If you think your argument holds water you are delusional, otherwise this is just semantics masturbation.

[quote]Alffi wrote:

[quote]goldengloves wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:
The majority of Spaniards are against bullfighting so there goes the whole moral relativism and judging cultures argument. [/quote]

There has been a decline in popularity, the only place where people are actually against bullfighting is Catalonia. There’s a huge difference between being against something and simply not going to watch it. Catalonia is only one region of Spain and really only dislikes bullfighting because they’re trying distance themselves from things viewed as Spanish.

[quote]Berserkergang wrote:

[quote]WestCoast7 wrote:
B. That’s exactly what you should expect when you tease a powerful beast[/quote]

Not exactly. If I recall correctly in Europe (Spain and southern France) EVERY YEAR there are ten of thousands of bulls tortured to death by those effeminate clowns. On the other hand only a dozen of those jerks (Spain) have been killed in the last 200 years. By the way writing “torturing” a powerful (but nonetheless helpless) animal would be more accurate than “teasing”. This is actual torture.

Of course this is not the killing of an animal per se which is problematic but its systematic torture beforehand.

Some “cool” vids:

[/quote]

Those aren’t cool videos, this is a cool video:

Do you think factory farming isn’t torture? A animal is kept in a confined space that is densely packed with other animals, it’s then injected with hormones and fed so it can be slaughtered as soon as possible. Then the cow will be rendered unconscious, hung upside, and its jugular is cut. The bulls[who happen to bred only for bullfighting] are stabbed a limited amount of times with a lance, have sticks stuck in its back, then are ultimately killed in one motion by the matador[if they’re good]. The final strike of the matador should kill the bull in 20 seconds or less.

The only difference between killing animals for food and doing so for sport is there’s no audience, both are equally as brutal. Besides, I can’t see why people focus on the bulls, the horses are the ones people should care about. Where’s the outcry for the horses? I can’t say I’ve ever heard any. I suppose it’s because there’s no group of people[PETA] distorting facts and making ridiculous attempts at trying to stop stress and pain imposed on horses.

[/quote]
I’m not going to defend factory farming but two wrongs don’t make a right. Besides, the aim of factory farming is efficient food production, not animal abuse for animal abuse’s sake. It’s much easier to talk people out of animalfighting than meat consumption. And for the record, I do not eat meat so that cannot be thrown against me. [/quote]

Where’s the abuse in bullfighting? The bull is killed, it however just has a slower path to death. A bull will be stressed before it’s killed regardless of where and who it’s killed by, will be weakened, and will eventually be killed. The ring and the slaughterhouse are similar, however only the ring provides a opportunity to be spared.

[quote]Carlitosway wrote:
LOL @ people using google for references in to how bulls are kept and prepped for bullfighting, most likely in a country they have NEVER stepped foot in whatsover. Unless you have lived/live in Spain or know an extensive amount of people from Spain, you have no say in this matter and your assumptions are full of shit.

Some people…seriously.

When I go to Spain, I’m going to watch a bull fight and enjoy the entertainment. After I’ll go hit up the infamous bar with all the pictures of famous matadores/bulls plastered over the walls and enjoy a drink with the locals and take it all in, hell maybe even take a picture with the Matadores and dead bulls . I’m going to go eat some steak now, oooh boo hoo hoo poor little cow , I’ll have to force myself to eat it and I’ll season it’s nicely grilled flesh with my tears. (ps you vegans who subtly make it known “I don’t eat meat” like we’ll praise you or actually really care, can fuck off)

nice vid too golden gloves…haters gonna hate:)[/quote]

Where do you go, Madrid? Sounds like Madrid or Seville.

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
Oh, and as far as powerful displays of manhood go, I’d rather watch a large man in a small singlet hoisting 600+ lbs of iron over his head, than a swarthy skinny little ugly dude in shiny pants “outsmarting” a stupid angry bovine to death.[/quote]

x2

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Hmmmm. Scenario:

Aliens land on Earth after leaving their own planet where broccoli is considered a legitimate citizen of society and gets to vote. They are appalled by the fact that we eat broccoli here. Do they have right to stop us?

Is eating broccoli bad?

Push is right. Right and wrong are relative and we do not have the right to stick our noses into EVERYONE ELSE’S business and decide for them what is right and wrong. That is what led to Native Americans losing their land…the belief that “those savages” didn’t know what to do with it…which is WRONG according to our own society.

You don’t have to agree with it. You don’t have to take part in it.

That is THEIR culture and TO THEM it is not wrong. Therefore, why whine about them doing it?[/quote]

Are you serious? Dude you have an opinion on everything so don’t tell me I can’t have an opinion.

Broccoli is not a tradition. Another analogy fail.[/quote]

What? How could you miss the point? In that scenario, BROCCOLI has a very deep tradition TO THE ALIENS. How simple do I need to make this shit?

[quote]

The native americans lost. Another analogy fail. Every great nation is founded on the bones of conquered people. Every one. I’m so sick and tired of hearing that dead dog argument. It is broken and doesn’t work. [/quote]

Again, WHAT? Remember MANIFEST DESTINY? There is way more to that story than just “they lost”.

Wow.

OG, you’re doing it again…i love it when you talk like this!!

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

X… being falsely disingenuous is not well done.

You had some failed analogies. It’s okay, seems to happen a lot.

The natives lost. How far back do you want to go on what is someone’s land? Again, just a really bad analogy and also a bad example

And no… I do not support animal torture. I do not regard the humane butchering of animals for food the same as driving barbs, spears, knives, and swords into bulls, in and out, and cutting off their ears or tails while still alive to the raucous cries and cheering and jeering of slavering spectators.

failed analogy X. It’s okay.

Batter up.
[/quote]

LOL at “failed analogies” and LOL at “the natives lost”…which obviously means that what is right or wrong is based on who wins?

I asked you if it would be RIGHT to kick some Native Americans off their land today. You didn’t answer.

I will take this as you simply not having the skill to do so.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

X… being falsely disingenuous is not well done.

You had some failed analogies. It’s okay, seems to happen a lot.

The natives lost. How far back do you want to go on what is someone’s land? Again, just a really bad analogy and also a bad example

And no… I do not support animal torture. I do not regard the humane butchering of animals for food the same as driving barbs, spears, knives, and swords into bulls, in and out, and cutting off their ears or tails while still alive to the raucous cries and cheering and jeering of slavering spectators.

failed analogy X. It’s okay.

Batter up.
[/quote]

LOL at “failed analogies” and LOL at “the natives lost”…which obviously means that what is right or wrong is based on who wins?

I asked you if it would be RIGHT to kick some Native Americans off their land today. You didn’t answer.

I will take this as you simply not having the skill to do so.[/quote]

That was a clumsy insult.

I have repeated ad nauseum the point I am making has nothing to do with right or wrong. It has to do with me not supporting animal torture.

Your analogy fails because conquest is not a tradition, it is history. Your analogy fails because conquest is both right and wrong. Your analogy fails because it is not currently continuing as a traditional form or animal torture entertainment.

Stick to the point.

Bull fighting is animal torture.

Do not tell me you support all traditions because you respect another country’s traditions because I know there are some traditions you would not support.

Traditions have changed, traditions end, some traditions should end, and some traditions mutate.

But, I am not a supporter of animal torture even though some of macho guys praise it for a testosterone event. Not very manly to torture a captive animal.

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

Bull fighting is animal torture.[/quote]

…In American Culture.

[quote]

Do not tell me you support all traditions because you respect another country’s traditions because I know there are some traditions you would not support.[/quote]

Gee, I actually specifically wrote that you do NOT have to support it, so how the hell am I telling you to support it? That wasn’t what was being debated at all.

Good for you.

[quote]Makavali wrote:

[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
Oh, and as far as powerful displays of manhood go, I’d rather watch a large man in a small singlet hoisting 600+ lbs of iron over his head, than a swarthy skinny little ugly dude in shiny pants “outsmarting” a stupid angry bovine to death.[/quote]

x2[/quote]

Surely it’s very easy for you guys sitting behind a keyboard to boast about other stuff and try to belittle this long going tradition. Yet there’s women/men right now who are as passionate about bullfighting as you guys are about art, martial arts and weight training. Been into since before they were even in their teens! It’s literally their life and you talk as if “anyone” can be a matador. A woman, who bullfights (Maripaz Vega) today out of all her brothers who tried desperatley, she was the only one to become a true matador.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

Bull fighting is animal torture.[/quote]

…In American Culture.

[quote]

Do not tell me you support all traditions because you respect another country’s traditions because I know there are some traditions you would not support.[/quote]

Gee, I actually specifically wrote that you do NOT have to support it, so how the hell am I telling you to support it? That wasn’t what was being debated at all.

Good for you.[/quote]

Geee what is it that you DO think is being debated?

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

Bull fighting is animal torture.[/quote]

…In American Culture.

All you have to do is go back and read and respond directly to what was written. No need at all to REwrite it.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

Bull fighting is animal torture.[/quote]

…In American Culture.

All you have to do is go back and read and respond directly to what was written. No need at all to REwrite it.[/quote]

Did that.

If you want to stay on point that would be great too.

sit down…spit out that mouth guard. good, you’ve got him on the ropes. keep up the pressure, go to the body, wear him down, combinations to the guts, don’t let up. Listen to that crowd…they’re in your corner!! Now go finish him!

[quote]PDJD wrote:

sit down…spit out that mouth guard. good, you’ve got him on the ropes. keep up the pressure, go to the body, wear him down, combinations to the guts, don’t let up. Listen to that crowd…they’re in your corner!! Now go finish him![/quote]

Professor X doesn’t get riled and he doesn’t fall on the ropes. Like Push he can argue/debate without getting his panties in a twist and getting personal or having his panties in a twist.

And yes… I would only verbally spar with X. Cuz… anything else would be stupid.

Animal torture? I don’t see how anyone can claim the bull is tortured during a bullfight, it’s killed. However the horses at one time were tortured and the padding has helped prevent it, I think more sufficient padding should be mandated to protect the horse though.

[quote]goldengloves wrote:
Animal torture? I don’t see how anyone can claim the bull is tortured during a bullfight, it’s killed. However the horses at one time were tortured and the padding has helped prevent it, I think more sufficient padding should be mandated to protect the horse though.[/quote]

sucks to be stupid

Anyone hungry for steak?

That’s a cool picture. You do it yourself?

And that bull deserved to die. He deserved to die because he didn’t honour his fodder, his mother and all his udder relatives.

Hahahah! I crack myself up sometimes.

Q: What do you call a Cow with no legs.
A: Ground Beef

Q: What do you call it when a cow tries to jump over a barbed-wire fence?
A: UDDER destruction!

Q: What do you call a cow with 2 legs?
A: Lean meat

Q: Where do baby cows go for lunch?
A: To a calf-a teria!

What kind of car does a cow drive?
A: A Cattelac!

Theres 2 cows in a field, One cow looks at the other cow and says “moo.” The other cow looks back and says “I was just going to say that”

[quote]goldengloves wrote:
Animal torture? I don’t see how anyone can claim the bull is tortured during a bullfight, it’s killed. However the horses at one time were tortured and the padding has helped prevent it, I think more sufficient padding should be mandated to protect the horse though.[/quote]

No, they should get ride of the picador entirely, exchange the barbed metal rods (forgot the name, sorry) with suction cups, and make the matador use a sword that telescopes like my kids light saber. Then I’d be all for it.

[quote]PDJD wrote:

[quote]goldengloves wrote:
Animal torture? I don’t see how anyone can claim the bull is tortured during a bullfight, it’s killed. However the horses at one time were tortured and the padding has helped prevent it, I think more sufficient padding should be mandated to protect the horse though.[/quote]

No, they should get ride of the picador entirely, exchange the barbed metal rods (forgot the name, sorry) with suction cups, and make the matador use a sword that telescopes like my kids light saber. Then I’d be all for it.[/quote]

If an average joe had to survive against a fully aware, well fed, well riled and well angry bull for 5 minutes in an arena like that, could they do it?

I’m just curious. Not going to get involved in the debate, but I’m just interested in what the capabilities of a bull like that actually are.