I tend be a bigger fan of the backside, but it’s definitely a biological drive in hetero men to be attracted to those curves too.
1 Like
I look at the bounce and think: “ouch, ouch, ouch… thank god those aren’t mine”
well, the boobs are part of the woman. People find Kate Upton attractive. Her boobs are part of her.
Are you just surprised that men like large, or bouncing, boobs? That seems like an odd thing to question.
and men do not. lol.
not really- It’s one of those things that’s always perplexed me about most men (among other things)
@ChickenLittle Thanks for the comment. It inspired me to go down a rabbit hole and found the work of this really really cool professor who studies the psychology of branding.
1 Like
And a cunt to boot. Her pay gap argument is embarrassing and cringy
1 Like
Someone drinks off brand soda…^^^
Jk
1 Like
You’re assuming I drink soda 
It isn’t one of the other. I like both. As for the boobs, my big requirement is that they exist. I would take smaller boobs, and a nice ass over big boobs, and no ass. Nice but boobs and a nice ass is my preference though. Kate Upton has it going on.
Agreed, I don’t want one or the other - full package needed/desired.
1 Like
The problem with boobs is that they’re quite genetic (unless one gets implants of course)
Asses can be reliably built (not that I have a good one myself)
She has no ass, she is built like a barrel or mrs potato head. Completely lacks any shape aside from big tits.
1 Like
Not really.
what do you mean?
I know arses can be genetic too, but you can build them. you can’t build boobs
Men can’t change their height, or the size of their mid body. Some women really care about these things. Just the way it is.
2 Likes
A large part of what makes an ass attractive is the hips and waist ratio. Both are genetic, a girl can “perk up” her glutes but, I have never seen a good transformation. All before and afters are just learning to pose.
1 Like
I did not know that
I prefer the athletic looking physique of a woman more so than the Victoria’s Secret Angel look. Not necessarily the look of a highly tuned athletic woman, but I’d prefer the look one with about an extra 5% of body fat. Toned round curves with enough body fat to be soft. I like contrast. But that’s just me.
1 Like
I don’t mind some great definition, but I hear you. A picture of a strong yet very feminine physique comes to mind.
1 Like
Idk if it’s me, but I find Dana Lynn Bailey pretty hot. Same with this high level cross fit chicks. Not really into any bigger than that. I do like lots of body types though. Don’t really have a type other than attractive women.
1 Like
As are 50%ish of human qualities, including, to a large extent, intelligence and general disposition.
It’s always a little interesting to me when people don’t value physical genetic predispositions in the opposite sex, but then heavily value many other characteristics that are largely inherited or born into (IE having parents who push education hard, leading to a well educated adult. Even work ethic is generally a thing that is ingrained from a young age, and has more to do with circumstance than self-determination in most cases). Not saying this is you necessarily, maybe you don’t value those things either. I have no idea what you look for. I know that the things I appreciate in a woman include both things that are and are not within a person’s control. And there’s really nothing wrong with that, there’s no moral failing in appreciating someone with favorable genetics, whether they’re related to physical traits or not.
5 Likes