After completing a training session, the trainer ejaculated on a woman’s feet.
He either came really fast…or she is oblivious to someone masturbating for minutes right on her feet.
What, does he have three hands?
This sounds ridiculous…I would actually put money on there being two sides to this story that don’t pair up.
His word against hers …he can say it was consensual or deny it out right. Unless she has proof IE video or DNA sample. I suspect money grab. But knowing our society just her saying he assaulted her is enough to wreck this guys rep.
You have to wonder if criminal charges were brought up?
Whats the big deal?
[quote]dirtman wrote:
His word against hers …he can say it was consensual or deny it out right. Unless she has proof IE video or DNA sample. I suspect money grab. But knowing our society just her saying he assaulted her is enough to wreck this guys rep.
You have to wonder if criminal charges were brought up? [/quote]
Even still, this isn’t much difference than spitting on someone according to her. No “abuse” actually happened…and I find it hard to believe that someone can have someone masturbate behind them standing that close in a private room and not know it until the orgasm.
She wasn’t raped. I hoped this gets thrown out unless she can PROVE something.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]dirtman wrote:
His word against hers …he can say it was consensual or deny it out right. Unless she has proof IE video or DNA sample. I suspect money grab. But knowing our society just her saying he assaulted her is enough to wreck this guys rep.
You have to wonder if criminal charges were brought up? [/quote]
Even still, this isn’t much difference than spitting on someone according to her. No “abuse” actually happened…and I find it hard to believe that someone can have someone masturbate behind them standing that close in a private room and not know it until the orgasm.
She wasn’t raped. I hoped this gets thrown out unless she can PROVE something.[/quote]
Makes me think that if criminal charges were brought up the case would be strong. But if not then the case is a weak one. Either way you shake it, that is sexual assault. If its true which I have my doubts based on lack of evidence according to the article.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]dirtman wrote:
His word against hers …he can say it was consensual or deny it out right. Unless she has proof IE video or DNA sample. I suspect money grab. But knowing our society just her saying he assaulted her is enough to wreck this guys rep.
You have to wonder if criminal charges were brought up? [/quote]
Even still, this isn’t much difference than spitting on someone according to her. No “abuse” actually happened…and I find it hard to believe that someone can have someone masturbate behind them standing that close in a private room and not know it until the orgasm.
She wasn’t raped. I hoped this gets thrown out unless she can PROVE something.[/quote]
Hahaha,
Dude, spitting on someone is not comparable to cumming on them. One is a sexual act, one isn’t.
I agree proof should be validated in the interest of innocence until proven guilty however if he were rubbing a hand up and down her calf, with her face shoved in that little face hole on massage tables, in a relaxed state with music playing, he could’ve wacked off with his other hand.
It’s not impossible he would play his jizz off like heated oil and rub her feet with it either.
Regardless, I’m willing to bet he broke workplace rules and was fired, criminality aside.
[quote]CargoCapable wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]dirtman wrote:
His word against hers …he can say it was consensual or deny it out right. Unless she has proof IE video or DNA sample. I suspect money grab. But knowing our society just her saying he assaulted her is enough to wreck this guys rep.
You have to wonder if criminal charges were brought up? [/quote]
Even still, this isn’t much difference than spitting on someone according to her. No “abuse” actually happened…and I find it hard to believe that someone can have someone masturbate behind them standing that close in a private room and not know it until the orgasm.
She wasn’t raped. I hoped this gets thrown out unless she can PROVE something.[/quote]
Hahaha,
Dude, spitting on someone is not comparable to cumming on them. One is a sexual act, one isn’t.
I agree proof should be validated in the interest of innocence until proven guilty however if he were rubbing a hand up and down her calf, with her face shoved in that little face hole on massage tables, in a relaxed state with music playing, he could’ve wacked off with his other hand.
It’s not impossible he would play his jizz off like heated oil and rub her feet with it either.
Regardless, I’m willing to bet he broke workplace rules and was fired, criminality aside.[/quote]
I was being hyperbolic about the spitting. The point was, she was NOT assaulted here and she was apparently blind and deaf for at least…what…two-six minutes? What’s the average jerk time?
I am guessing…unless EXTREMELY talented, he would need at least one hand for this deed and at least one to massage someone.
I don’t care what anyone says…this guy was a MASTER!!!
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]CargoCapable wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]dirtman wrote:
His word against hers …he can say it was consensual or deny it out right. Unless she has proof IE video or DNA sample. I suspect money grab. But knowing our society just her saying he assaulted her is enough to wreck this guys rep.
You have to wonder if criminal charges were brought up? [/quote]
Even still, this isn’t much difference than spitting on someone according to her. No “abuse” actually happened…and I find it hard to believe that someone can have someone masturbate behind them standing that close in a private room and not know it until the orgasm.
She wasn’t raped. I hoped this gets thrown out unless she can PROVE something.[/quote]
Hahaha,
Dude, spitting on someone is not comparable to cumming on them. One is a sexual act, one isn’t.
I agree proof should be validated in the interest of innocence until proven guilty however if he were rubbing a hand up and down her calf, with her face shoved in that little face hole on massage tables, in a relaxed state with music playing, he could’ve wacked off with his other hand.
It’s not impossible he would play his jizz off like heated oil and rub her feet with it either.
Regardless, I’m willing to bet he broke workplace rules and was fired, criminality aside.[/quote]
I was being hyperbolic about the spitting. The point was, she was NOT assaulted here and she was apparently blind and deaf for at least…what…two-six minutes? What’s the average jerk time?
I am guessing…unless EXTREMELY talented, he would need at least one hand for this deed and at least one to massage someone.
I don’t care what anyone says…this guy was a MASTER!!![/quote]
I don’t know everything sexual assault law encompasses but if somebody came on me, I would certainly feel sexually violated.
Every massage I’ve had has consisted of at least 30 minutes face down on a bed with with a hole in it, blocking my vision except for the floor beneath me, and music playing. Not so loud I can’t hear anything but loud enough somebody wacking off at the foot of the table could go unnoticed, especially as I’m usually half asleep anyways. And he does have two hands.
For the record, I use female therapists and if I caught one fingering herself, I’d bang her.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
“It follows research which shows that seminal fluid contains chemicals that elevate mood, increase affection, induce sleep and also contain at least three anti-depressants.”
This explains why gay men always seem so cheerful.
Sounds like a sticky situation. Her feet must have been askin’ for it!
[quote]aeyogi wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
“It follows research which shows that seminal fluid contains chemicals that elevate mood, increase affection, induce sleep and also contain at least three anti-depressants.”
This explains why gay men always seem so cheerful.
[/quote]
Bwahahahahaha
^ a hot massage therapist in her past coupled with a foot fetish?
arguing about spitting on or cumming on. Reminds me of that scene in pulp fiction where they’re arguing about a foot massage and sticking your tongue in the holy of holies.
[quote]pushharder wrote:
I told my girl this story and it turned her on.
Seriously.
A lot.
I’m still recovering.[/quote]
Only you push would this work in your favor …hahahah well done
Glad I could help. Later dude.
[quote]CargoCapable wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]CargoCapable wrote:
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]dirtman wrote:
His word against hers …he can say it was consensual or deny it out right. Unless she has proof IE video or DNA sample. I suspect money grab. But knowing our society just her saying he assaulted her is enough to wreck this guys rep.
You have to wonder if criminal charges were brought up? [/quote]
Even still, this isn’t much difference than spitting on someone according to her. No “abuse” actually happened…and I find it hard to believe that someone can have someone masturbate behind them standing that close in a private room and not know it until the orgasm.
She wasn’t raped. I hoped this gets thrown out unless she can PROVE something.[/quote]
Hahaha,
Dude, spitting on someone is not comparable to cumming on them. One is a sexual act, one isn’t.
I agree proof should be validated in the interest of innocence until proven guilty however if he were rubbing a hand up and down her calf, with her face shoved in that little face hole on massage tables, in a relaxed state with music playing, he could’ve wacked off with his other hand.
It’s not impossible he would play his jizz off like heated oil and rub her feet with it either.
Regardless, I’m willing to bet he broke workplace rules and was fired, criminality aside.[/quote]
I was being hyperbolic about the spitting. The point was, she was NOT assaulted here and she was apparently blind and deaf for at least…what…two-six minutes? What’s the average jerk time?
I am guessing…unless EXTREMELY talented, he would need at least one hand for this deed and at least one to massage someone.
I don’t care what anyone says…this guy was a MASTER!!![/quote]
I don’t know everything sexual assault law encompasses but if somebody came on me, I would certainly feel sexually violated.
[/quote]
Pretty much…
This is beyond spit, although I believe spit is considered assault in some places. Sexually getting off by touching some form of my body without permission is definitely sexual assault, otherwise Sandusky would be a free man.