[quote]batman730 wrote:
[quote]jj-dude wrote:
[quote]orion wrote:
I think what get neglected is that she hit him while HE WAS DRIVING A FUCKING BUS.
With people in it and whatnot. [/quote]
That is the point everybody is missing. If she’d manage to stun him she could have seriously injured of killed everyone on the bus. So this was not a situation where she just hit him, this was indeed a lethal force encounter. She didn’t understand that cause she was mad. He did and he knew that dealing with her was going to go poorly.
He got fired for the simple fact that the incident got taken out of context and the administration then needs to manage expectations about the new context. Sucks to be him but someone has to pay so the public knows their best interests are being taken care of.
I’m amazed at how many people miss the entire point of this video… It is sexist in the extreme to assume that a woman can’t kill you or that she is the weaker sex that needs everyone to come to her aid. She started swinging and was a hazard to all and the driver is charged with their safety.
So try this as an experiment. Next time you are driving down the road, what would you do if the passenger starts beating you? Are you going to be all understanding about where they are coming from or are you going to stop immediately and get them out of your car? Even if they are not terribly effective THE VEHICLE is the danger.
I’m probably just full of shit as usual, so don’t mind me…
– jj[/quote]
Is it still a lethal force encounter after he has safely (presumably) stopped the bus? Genuine question. I absolutely think it was while the bus as in motion, but it seems to me that his response came after the “lethal” portion of the threat had passed.
I don’t think that this should primarily be about gender, but behaviour. Her physical aggression appeared (to me at least) to have deescalated by the time he responded, quite possibly because she no longer had the advantage of his being occupied driving the bus, but this is speculation. Does this affect his justification? I don’t want to armchair quarterback the guy, he did what he did and I wasn’t there. I’m just trying to have a discussion.
[/quote]
A discussion I can certainly appreciate. I agree that she was backing off because she was losing tactical advantage. But was that de-escalation, or tactical retreat? The driver had to decide almost instantly whether or not she was going to resume if he dropped his guard.
From what it looks like, he hit her because he needed to interrupt her assault long enough to get her off the bus – and this was not a beating, it was a stun & evict move. Attacking him shows very poor personal safety on her part, since (and this is with us sitting here all nice and sober), if the bus crashes, she gets hurt too. Obviously she wasn’t thinking that way. So if I were the driver, I have a passenger who is being a hazard to everyone and shows what is legally termed reckless endangerment. Would you really want to wait around to see what she’s going to do next? Remember there are passengers he has to watch out for too. I think this is more of what was going through his mind.
Oh and that she was pretty hot to re-enter the bus after the ejection shows some serious intent on her part. Obviously the upper cut didn’t interrupt her enough to have her reconsider what she was doing. Either he just tapped her (doesn’t look that way) or he got it right that she had a serious bug up her ass about something and wasn’t going to back down without a fight. It is very hard to judge intent from a video, but the evidence supports the driver I think.
I’m not so sexist as to think hitting a girl is intrinsically wrong. Don’t forget that the absolute vast majority of child abusers are women. Assault is not gender specific, it is about a violent nature coupled with figuring that you can get away with it.
A recent example: My youngest son got beaten up a couple of weeks ago. Some kid tried to take his bike and my son got it back. The kid took a swipe him an missed and my kid got away from him and went back with his friends. Then the kid hung around for like 5 minutes trying to get closer. Once he finally did, he punched my son out. Point is that the kid made his decision to attack, then waited for an opening. He also faked not being mad anymore, just to get closer (and this worked). Such are how violent people behave. For them, violence is their trump card and always works (or so they think), so once they have elected to engage, they’ll keep at it until they succeed.
– jj
Edit: One other thing is the interaction at the very beginning. She didn’t just walk up and hit him, there was some chat going on. Here’s another scenario: She’s a regular on his route and has been a handful several times. Now she’s decided to go after him. He might know what’s coming next. Ever consider that? Assaults don’t usually happen at random (especially when women instigate). Victim and assailant usually know each other and possibly quite well. This fact I have no information on, but it sure looks enough like it at the beginning to make me wonder.