Geek S**T NUMBER 5

Not impressed with the Rage vid tbh. Both graphics (not bad at all mind you, but hmm. This is ID software, right?), animations and esp. gameplay.

Serious Sam 3 is in the works, I have a feeling that unless they mess it up, it’s going to beat Duke Forever and Rage at their own game, so to speak: Mindless shooting fun.

SS may have some humor on top of it… DF only has “for old time’s sake” going for it, and incredible amounts of cheese (done badly it seems? Maybe the developers will positively surprise everyone anyway… Not like they have to, because the name alone will sell the game).
Rage has zero identity. I would have preferred Quake 5, with a nice singleplayer continuation of the quake 2/4 war… Plus some nice squad level action maybe. You know, brothers in arms: quake edition hahaha

[quote]jwesus wrote:

[quote]undecimber wrote:

Looks promising! [/quote]

but wheres teh boobies?

if im playing tomb raider I want too see some dd’s in my face. [/quote]

I completely forgot about that franchise. Oh well. I think the second game (for the younger kids: it came out back when dinosaurs still walked the earth) was alright.

Might be good though, who knows…

[quote]Davinci.v2 wrote:
What specs on your computer do you have?

[/quote]
Asus G73Jh

Main downside is it’s retarded native resolution of 19xx.
So I have to reduce it for top of the line games, down to 12xx, which means textures and everything look ugly. And activate AA and everything. Runs everything with no hiccups, but god, why not just make the native resolution 12xx or 13xx or something people actually use for gaming? I mean… Most textures need upscaling for 19xx anyway, and no gaming hardware around can handle that resolution for next gen graphic intense games etc… Idiotic designers really shot themselves in the foot here.

[quote]

Mine isn’t all that great currently, quad core, geforce 260 gtx, 4 gigs of ram and after playing around for a bit I eventually turned everything on ultra, turned off uber sampling and am now locked at about 50-60 fps and it looks phenomenal and runs smoothly.

[/quote] Same here. [quote]

Also, that’s the perfect strategy and easy is too easy…until you have to fight another witcher.[/quote]

[quote]TEMPLAR wrote:

2011 really is an awesome year for gaming…RAGE, Skyrim, BF3, Diablo III…[/quote]

Well, as mentioned, I don’t really care about Rage… But BF3 and especially Diablo 3… Got some high expectations here. I hope to god they don’t cartoon-ify D3 because of the change to a full 3d engine… Don’t make it Diablocraft… Please…

Skyrim I’m not sure about… I did spend quite a bit of time on both morrowind (moreso) and Oblivion (not great, but there was fun to be had I suppose).

I guess it’ll really just be a typical elder scrolls game with better graphics. Hopefully no monster scaling problems again. Maybe some more interesting plotlines and whatnot.

[quote]Cephalic_Carnage wrote:
Not impressed with the Rage vid tbh. Both graphics (not bad at all mind you, but hmm. This is ID software, right?), animations and esp. gameplay.

Serious Sam 3 is in the works, I have a feeling that unless they mess it up, it’s going to beat Duke Forever and Rage at their own game, so to speak: Mindless shooting fun.

SS may have some humor on top of it… DF only has “for old time’s sake” going for it, and incredible amounts of cheese (done badly it seems? Maybe the developers will positively surprise everyone anyway… Not like they have to, because the name alone will sell the game).
Rage has zero identity. I would have preferred Quake 5, with a nice singleplayer continuation of the quake 2/4 war… Plus some nice squad level action maybe. You know, brothers in arms: quake edition hahaha

[/quote]

Have you had a chance to check out Brink?

Personally I thought it was pretty average.

[quote]Bujo wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:

I honestly believe that Fox have will have well and truly boxed themselves up story-wise if this tanks. There will be nowhere else to go. Officially they say it’s a reboot, but it has direct and indirect links back to the other X-movies? A full-on reboot would have been less confusing, but they keep trying to present an ensemble superhero movie which - for the wrong reasons - puts a handful of characters in the spotlight and sidelines the rest .

The execs at Fox treat audiences like idiots, even going as far as to lie when the unfinished cut of Wolverine was leaked (granted, some are, but even if they don’t get the concept of a fresh start they’ll still watch it… that’s why they’re idiots) know nothing about comics, and just have zero trust in the material (that’s why they screwed up Wolverine, and Deadpool by association).

I’ll reserve judgement until I’ve seen it: I like Matthew Vaughan, even though he was responsible for casting Vinnie Jones as Juggernaut (that was him, not Brett Ratner); Bryan Singer is a good director on the whole, but his reliance on love triangles to bring emotional depth and conflict in in X-Men and Superman Returns were unnecessary and transparent. If First Class gets an ‘f’, don’t expect a sequel to it or to Wolverine.

Hopefully the rights will revert back to Marvel then. [/quote]

What makes you think this movie will tank? It seems to have a lot of fan excitement surrounding it. The early preview and reviews have been very positive. The cast and crew selection is very strong. I think we have a winner on our hands here. I can’t wait to go see it when I get home.

I thought you were a comic book fan? You’re not seriously finding this movie plot confusing, are you? There were a lot of good ideas in the first films coupled with a lot of shitty ones and terrible execution. First Class looks like it’s taking the gems and tossing the shit. I’m hoping for a hit. 5th time’s a charm right?

Regardless of how First Class performs, does anyone really want another Wolverine movie?[/quote]

I didn’t say the movie would definitely tank; I meant that it could suffer from the same creative decision-making that gave us a poorly handled continuity, that’s why I wondered if it was a prequel or a reboot (I’ve since found out that it is a full-on prequel, when I originally heard it was to be a reboot). My fear was that even though Matthew Vaughan should be able to start with a clean slate, he couldn’t, not completely because of having to foreshadow the previous movies - which I totally understand as that is the whole point of a prequel.

It’s just that the chronology he has to follow is so damned patchy. How do I find it confusing? Beast, Emma Frost, Storm and Moira Mactaggart were all in previous movies and in ways that contradict their First Class counterparts. Who wouldn’t find that confusing?

You can excuse Beast and Storm because they were deleted scenes, but Frost and Mactaggart were featured characters in Wolverine and X-Men 3 respectively. It’s more than having a whinge over minor details. In other words, I was concerned that some of the shit would stick to the gems.

I’ve now seen the movie and it was great - good enough to forget about the clashes and contradictions for the moment. But these will still hang over all subsequent X-movies including Wolverine 2, which will definitely go ahead now because there’s obviously life left in the franchise, and the Deadpool solo movie, which is another sure thing after the positive buzz surrounding First class(that’s another two movies that’re going to have work overtime to rise above the critical stink left by Wolverine).

Had First Class bombed, that would have been it for Fox. First Class was last chance saloon for them after Last Stand and X-Men Oranges: Tangerine. I never came out and said that First Class would suck; in the thread for the first trailer I championed it for merging history and fiction, and for having the courage to use the classic costume design in lieu of leather flight suits.

I thought that Matthew Vaughan had his work cut out to make up for the shortcomings of the previous movies, some of which were inescapable but he succeeded with ease. I’m glad because he’s a good director.

[quote]Bujo wrote:

[quote]Vash wrote:

[quote]Johnny T Frisk wrote:

Never played the first one but heard it was good except for having to backtrack at the end, this looks pretty cool though.[/quote]

I played it through on every skill level just to collect the extra items.

I’ve never played a game so hard as that.

Killer.

And it’s good to see Joe M. putting out video games more often than he put out comics.[/quote]

Did you play Bayonetta, or Devil May Cry, or Ninja Gaiden? Just trying to gauge the difficulty. I might pick up the first one, just debating it for now.
[/quote]

Less difficult than Hard Devil May Cry on it’s worst setting.

But I think a game that asks me to put a bandage on my vagina before letting me out of the first scene is going to be harder than others.

I personally believe that rage is going to be a COMPLETELY different game than Duke and Serious Sam. When you’re stacking up games as pure run and gun, Serious Sam is a pure run and gun with essentially no story or objectives…just continue to move through the level, perhaps flip a switch to open a door.

Then Duke Forever closely behind, but perhaps with slightly more story and plot and then Rage coming in third. Rage is going to be different because it’s going to more closely resemble borderlands with a bit more depth. As you collect weapons, you can upgrade and personalize them. I’m looking foward to all 3 of them with Rage perhaps being at the top.

Here is the newest trailer showing some mission based objectives and some of the modified weapons found in Rage. I’m also surprised that you aren’t impressed by the gfx CC. I’m impressed by not only the visuals, but also that the AI respond with respect to where you shoot them. If someone is rushing at you and you shoot them in the right shoulder, they wield back on their right side. Similarly if you shoot someone in the left leg, they’ll topple over left side first etc.

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]Bujo wrote:

[quote]roybot wrote:

I honestly believe that Fox have will have well and truly boxed themselves up story-wise if this tanks. There will be nowhere else to go. Officially they say it’s a reboot, but it has direct and indirect links back to the other X-movies? A full-on reboot would have been less confusing, but they keep trying to present an ensemble superhero movie which - for the wrong reasons - puts a handful of characters in the spotlight and sidelines the rest .

The execs at Fox treat audiences like idiots, even going as far as to lie when the unfinished cut of Wolverine was leaked (granted, some are, but even if they don’t get the concept of a fresh start they’ll still watch it… that’s why they’re idiots) know nothing about comics, and just have zero trust in the material (that’s why they screwed up Wolverine, and Deadpool by association).

I’ll reserve judgement until I’ve seen it: I like Matthew Vaughan, even though he was responsible for casting Vinnie Jones as Juggernaut (that was him, not Brett Ratner); Bryan Singer is a good director on the whole, but his reliance on love triangles to bring emotional depth and conflict in in X-Men and Superman Returns were unnecessary and transparent. If First Class gets an ‘f’, don’t expect a sequel to it or to Wolverine.

Hopefully the rights will revert back to Marvel then. [/quote]

What makes you think this movie will tank? It seems to have a lot of fan excitement surrounding it. The early preview and reviews have been very positive. The cast and crew selection is very strong. I think we have a winner on our hands here. I can’t wait to go see it when I get home.

I thought you were a comic book fan? You’re not seriously finding this movie plot confusing, are you? There were a lot of good ideas in the first films coupled with a lot of shitty ones and terrible execution. First Class looks like it’s taking the gems and tossing the shit. I’m hoping for a hit. 5th time’s a charm right?

Regardless of how First Class performs, does anyone really want another Wolverine movie?[/quote]

I didn’t say the movie would definitely tank; I meant that it could suffer from the same creative decision-making that gave us a poorly handled continuity, that’s why I wondered if it was a prequel or a reboot (I’ve since found out that it is a full-on prequel, when I originally heard it was to be a reboot). My fear was that even though Matthew Vaughan should be able to start with a clean slate, he couldn’t, not completely because of having to foreshadow the previous movies - which I totally understand as that is the whole point of a prequel.

It’s just that the chronology he has to follow is so damned patchy. How do I find it confusing? Beast, Emma Frost, Storm and Moira Mactaggart were all in previous movies and in ways that contradict their First Class counterparts. Who wouldn’t find that confusing?

You can excuse Beast and Storm because they were deleted scenes, but Frost and Mactaggart were featured characters in Wolverine and X-Men 3 respectively. It’s more than having a whinge over minor details. In other words, I was concerned that some of the shit would stick to the gems.

I’ve now seen the movie and it was great - good enough to forget about the clashes and contradictions for the moment. But these will still hang over all subsequent X-movies including Wolverine 2, which will definitely go ahead now because there’s obviously life left in the franchise, and the Deadpool solo movie, which is another sure thing after the positive buzz surrounding First class(that’s another two movies that’re going to have work overtime to rise above the critical stink left by Wolverine).

Had First Class bombed, that would have been it for Fox. First Class was last chance saloon for them after Last Stand and X-Men Oranges: Tangerine. I never came out and said that First Class would suck; in the thread for the first trailer I championed it for merging history and fiction, and for having the courage to use the classic costume design in lieu of leather flight suits.

I thought that Matthew Vaughan had his work cut out to make up for the shortcomings of the previous movies, some of which were inescapable but he succeeded with ease. I’m glad because he’s a good director. [/quote]
Beast was a character in X2(on tv) and very prominant in X3(Kesley Grammar) but yeah I thought that first class had a lot of flaws I didn’t enjoy it as much as X2(seeing WOlverine go Berserk and having Colossus and Nightcrawler) but it didn’t suck as bad as X3(where even the directors gave you multiple endings in the dvd as if to yeah we fucked up).

I think this Spoiler-free Review of X-Men: First Class! explains my position better, it’s real hard to give a review without spoilers but this person does a good job.

[quote]kevinm1 wrote:
Beast was a character in X2(on tv) [/quote]

You’re right. The news report with human Hank McCoy wasn’t a deleted scene. Got my deleted scenes mixed up again.

^ The X3 Beast however, seems consistent with the younger version in First Class. That’s why I didn’t list it as an inconsistency.

[quote]roybot wrote:

[quote]kevinm1 wrote:
Beast was a character in X2(on tv) [/quote]

You’re right. The news report with human Hank McCoy wasn’t a deleted scene. Got my deleted scenes mixed up again. [/quote]
Yeah the deleted stuff was the fanboy service of Gambit gaining powers and the Beast mutating more. I stand by the review I posted I don’t want to spoil anything for anyone but there was a few times I wanted to beat my head and I said bullshit at the screen a couple of times

Started playing Oblivion because i got excited by Skyrim trailers and it’s DEFINITELY not a game for anyone with ODD about catching itens, i got insane since the beginning since you can grab ANYTHING from the ground and i’m always like: Oh, i bet this old rusty sword will turn into Masamune later, i better keep it!

This is part 2 of Xcorpion v Sub Zero, live action.

One episode left.

[quote]Vash wrote:

This is part 2 of Xcorpion v Sub Zero, live action.

One episode left.[/quote]

a part from the raiden episode, the whole series has been an incredible dissapointment. I don’t get why they got the raiden episode right, yet the others so wrong.

I know budget was a big concern and I know it’s something we got for free BUT you could almost do an entire movie on the story of sub zero and scorpion.

on second thought - the johnny cage episode wasn’t too bad. But I think it would have been a better choice to make it more ‘realistic’ than cartoonish.

on the topic of the new xmen movie, i think half the issue was that kevin bacon’s character came off too cartoonish. I may put my flame retardent suit on for the next statement but at times it felt like I was watching an austin powers movie.

that being said - i did enjoy the movie, I havent really enjoyed any of them so far. I don’t get why they can’t make a great movie with the source material but then again I thought I’d never enjoy batman then batman begins comes out.

[quote]Vash wrote:

This is part 2 of Xcorpion v Sub Zero, live action.

One episode left.[/quote]

Shit I forgot all about this, going to have to have a marathon tonight after work.

I just played Wipeout HD (one of my free welcome back to psn games) and anyone who’s not sure what free games to get, I would highly recommend Wipeout. It’s one of the best arcade racers I’ve ever played. Kinda mad I haven’t played it until now, but I have so many disc based games I haven’t really had time to buy a bunch of stuff from the psn store.

E3 2011 live on G4tv! They just showed Dead Island and it looks like a pretty sweet zombie game. Open world anyone?

Have any of you played Brink? Thoughts?