Gear Reality

[quote]KBCThird wrote:
DPH wrote:
RickJames wrote:
The gear has gotten ridiculous, and there’s no competitive reason (other than for seamstresses) to have the kind of gear we have today. But it’s what powerlifters want. If they didn’t, there wouldn’t be any gear companies around to take our money.

perhaps the sport needs a name change…maybe it would be best to call it gearlifting instead of powerlifting?

much like pole-vaulting has a completely different name than high-jumping…

powerlifting could be knee wraps, wrist wraps, and a belt…

gearlifting could be what ‘powerlifting’ is today…

anyways, just a thought…which will probably just piss most powerlifters off…I’m pretty good at that I suppose…

i still dont understand why its “ok” to claim that a belted lift is raw. I can, squat, bench and dead more when i have something to push my abs against. it adds pounds to my lifts. period. how is this raw?[/quote]

did I write ‘raw’ anywhere in my post?

I suggested that powerlifting could use knee wraps, wrist wraps, and a belt because that would bring powerlifting back to where it was before the gear craze began…

[quote]Professor X wrote:
When someone just casually asks you how much you bench, which is almost daily for me so I assume the same of others, what do you all tell them? Do you give them some number that matches the day you used gear or your raw number?[/quote]

Just tell them you bench 50 lbs and they usually get the point and won’t ask again.

I don’t think too many of them are lying, either. I heard an Olympic gold medalist wrestler speak, and who this scrawny man that eveeryone seemed to respect so much could possibly be. There was a number of other top-level wrestlers present and he looked like the least athletic of the bunch by far but he was in fact by far the most accomplished. But he introduced himself and surprised me by being a Gold medalist, and from a poster he showed he used to be pretty jacked. He looks like he hasn’t touched a weight in his life now though.

Well normally choose to stay out of these Gear vs Raw discussions due to the fact they normally just turn into pissing matches and nothing is solved. While nothing will most likely come from this one either its actually a damn good discussion.

My take plain and simple on the gear etc… I have NO problem with those who choose to wear gear. I dont and just dont have the desire I find more satisfaction out on me lifting the weight my self. If I cant get a projected weight I want. SHIT its my fault in to damn weak or something in ME was not right its not that my shirt was applied wrong, my briefs were riding up etc…

I honestly had no interest in even taking part in the sport until very recent. I respected it for what it is, and kind of felt sorry for what it has become. That awesome records are falling that were set with minimal to no gear. Just plain busting ass to force ones body to limits that no one feels possible (not that many of todays PLr’s dont bust ass).

I think to many this has turned them away from the sport. The weights are amazing yes but a certain area of respect is gone with the addition of “he did it in gear,” not just simply John Doe came out and benched or squated some odd LBS in a damn singlet and belt. Why because people can relate to this feet. I dont care who they are they know that putting that many hundred lbs on your back and doing it is a task to be looked up upon. That said lifter has worked his tail to the bone to reach that.

They, I simply cant relate to the gear. Why do they wear it. How much carry over does it have, do they get. How many people does it take to put that silly looking contraction on and hell the damn thing wont even close in the back. Why not just find your limits etc always press to beat ones self, if its to much weight FIND a way, adapt, get stronger, get faster, get physically and mentally tougher, get bigger.

Yhea yhea then ppl scream its for safety/ longevity. BULLSHIT!!! maybe thats where it started but its WELL beyond that realm now. You know its a truely sad state when you can read in MULTIPLE training and competition logs everyday things like this: (pulled from a competition log from the 06 Senior National in Vegas, leavinjg the lifter Anonymous)[quote] My warm-up with 395lbs came about an inch from touching my chest, so I knew 407lbs, my opener, would touch. [/quote] Now come the hell on this is way past safety. You can get near 4 friggin plates to touch your chest. WTF. That and everyone has seen a video or two of shirted benchers lifting a weight well the hell out of their raw capability only to have their equipment fail and Bam all hell breaks loose MAJOR injury.

You cant tell me the ability to think you can attempt lifts hundreds of lbs over your natural un equipped ability is safer. Hell and injury its prevention, overcoming the pain. Thats what half this shits about. Who the hell can endure the physical and mental strain to be or beat the best. Who has the shit it takes to grind through, to get smart no when to back off and when you just got to push the envelope.

This and like stated earlier the lift standards are why many people cant, or dont watch enjoy, or hell even respect the sport today. There needs to be a standard all the way around or differing classes / records. Yes in a sense segregation but in this case its warranted where talking about two different animals here all together thats how far this stuff has gone.

Its more marketing than lifting. More technology than shear strength and will power. Its, I hate to say it, becoming the lazy mans way to become elite. To brag and say I did that. I reached the pinnacle. To a standard set years ago, BUT it was done with this and this and this and this, in half the time and much less work.

I mean hell I feel I have a LONG ways to go. I aim to compete. I have a strong desire to get my elite status. It burns at me every day that hell I may be able to get that today if I give in buy the gear. Vest some time into not getting stronger, but learning the gear, Id be at or DAMN close to elite if I got some reasonable carry over. It sucks it suck me having to set goals. saying i want to lift in this fed with these standards, where years ago this lifter hoisted this much weight. That I have to aim not at being the BEST, not at being # friggin 1 but to settle for being elite.

Settle I say like thats a bad thing but in ways it is but hell its my choice as well. Thats where I go back to I have nothing against geared lifters I know a ton of guys who are great lifters, great ppl and use gear. I could choose to join them to buy the gear, learn it, change my lifting technique, etc but no I choose not to. IMO I want to do this on my own.

Hell I hadnt put on a belt in over ten years until two weeks ago. Man that felt good. But it hasnt stopped me from lifting some damn fine (for me) weight in the mean time. It has led to me having a strong core, which has also led IMO to me being injury free for the most part. I havent had more than a few days away from training in years and mainly those due to choice more than forced to stop.

OK sorry this is very un thought out and kind of a blabb. What im getting at is. Until there is a standard set. Until there are either multiple classes and lift standards. The good thing is I can go. I can lift aside geared and non geared lifters alike. No one is stopping you. We can all go, put our shit on the table. Give it our all, and try to consistently add that extra LB to beat Your own limitations. gear or none.

Largely its a self competition and if we stop trying to piss on one anothers post toasties about this gear crap and Lift some damn weight. Bust ass, chear the others on for having the drive and determination to do something instead of sit by and watch.

Same goes for powerlifters vs BBer’s, vs strongman, vs highland games. Hell anyone who enjoys lifting heavy shit or pushing their physical limits. Doesnt look for the easy way out and stand Idle until they think they found it. They have a goal go after it with intensity and drive.

Why the hate between things that are so closely related. Sure they have different goals, different ends to a means, but when the hell did it all change. The sports as a whole would be MUCH stronger if everyone could “JUST GET ALONG” Hell we can prob learn something from one another. I have lifted for aesthetics, for sport and well just for the love of it and due so with Groups of people who have an array of goals. I dont limit myself to just those interested like myself in Powerlifting/strongman. I go will lift with anyone that has that fire that determination to drive themselves to that next level and we can all feed off that drive. Gyms today are just FUCKED there is NO passion, no commitment, no community, its all im better than you are. Who gives a shit Im better than I was and am doing everything to be better than I am. If you have the same drive come here get under the damn bar Ill spot you and we can share a beer and brawt after, or you can have a green tea and skinless chicken breast if that fits your goal I respect that.

OK large rant that went way the hell of gear/equipment but i think its all tied in and hopefully some of it makes some sense. In short. Gear use fine great we need multiple classes and records. Gear for safety as its sole purpose BULLSHIT!!! its way past that. Its now marketing, big business, and all about MORE weight beyond ones physical means, once again NOT all in all a bad thing just realize it is DIFFERENT ands needs a different standard. You like gear FINE lift with gear, You dont like gear FINE lift Raw. Your a BBer, a strongman, a PLer, a discus thrower, a football player, etc etc. FINE to all the above just dont try and push your agenda on me, I have my own goals. Now if you want to train hard, need a spot, etc… lets get it on. Show me what you got. We can talk shop and what gets us to our goals without the twisted BS of trying to PUSH our crap, our views, our opinions on oneanother. If we unite and inform instead of fight and moan we may all learn form one another. Largely by Getting in there putting the time in UNDER the bar, pushing ourselves and one another to the limit. Busting ass and having a good time doing it in a lifting community instead of the constant bitching and pissing matches.

Time for me to wake up and go try and push the limits yet again.

Phill

[quote]heavythrower wrote:
hey guys, i have not posted in my log lately because there has been NOTYHING interesting about my workouts. but yesterday was interesting.

over the last month or so, i have been trying to rehab my low back, by trying to do 100 reps of abds and back raises every training day. i started out with 3-5 sets of 20, then 4x25, and recently (the last week or so i have been doing 3x33)

so i decided to try to box squat heavy.

no if you have been looking at my logs, i have been going RAW on the box squat, and my usual drop out set was about 365-405 for a few reps.

this is how yesterday went.

100% RAW:

  • bar x 25
    -bar x 25
    -135x 10
    -225x5
    -315x3
    -365x3
    -405x2

BELT AND KNEE SLEEVES:
-425x2,
-455x1(tough!)

LOOSE SINGLE PLY INZER POLY BRIEFS(POWER PANTS) ADDED
-485x2(added 5 lbs collars on the here on out)
-505x1

PUT DENIM BRIEFS ON TOP OF THE POLYS
-515x1(took REAL small jumps here on out as i was terrified of getting injured)
-525x1
-535x1
-555x1

ok, i stopped here, i would like to say like EVERYBODY ELSE that i had more in me, but i did not. it came up fast, but i felt bad things in my right knee and groin, my low back and my left outer thigh)

whats the point? i think we all need to reevaluate and take a look inward to how strong we THINK we are, when we use gear. so i can talk like i am a big man saying i squatted 550, but in reality when i see a guy reping 315 in an ATG raw squat(which is about all i can do) i have to be real with myself and say that i am not really stronger than that guy.[/quote]

Excellent post, its about time gear users face the real world.

[quote]DPH wrote:
that is the reality of gear…

geared lifting is to the pole-vault what non-geared lifting is to the high-jump…they’re completely different sports now…

Tommy would always tell me that’s not a perfect analogy because no one gets more than double out of their gear what they can get without it…and I would reply with “for now”…[/quote]

Shit analogy, these are 2 different sports, powerlifting raw and equipped is the same sport except one is assisted.

A good analogy would be a high jump with jumps boots is like geared powerlifting. The human cant really jump that high without the jump boots.

A litle video to show equipped high jumping :slight_smile:

The thing that annoys me most about it is, when somone tells me their lifts you alway have to ask their raw numbers.

Like somone will say i squatted 500, i think inside “no what can you really lift.”

[quote]superscience wrote:
DPH wrote:
that is the reality of gear…

geared lifting is to the pole-vault what non-geared lifting is to the high-jump…they’re completely different sports now…

Tommy would always tell me that’s not a perfect analogy because no one gets more than double out of their gear what they can get without it…and I would reply with “for now”…

Shit analogy, these are 2 different sports, powerlifting raw and equipped is the same sport except one is assisted.

A good analogy would be a high jump with jumps boots is like geared powerlifting. The human cant really jump that high without the jump boots.

A litle video to show equipped high jumping :slight_smile:
[/quote]

I respect that jumping about as much as I respect some guy wearing 3 different suits who has “learned” to bench in gear. If you take everything off and your weight lifted drops in excess of 100lbs, only some powerlifter oblivious to where that sport is headed would think it was legit. It is even worse if that guy happens to weigh all of 160lbs and normally couldn’t benchpress anywhere near that much. But…that’s just my opinion.

[quote]superscience wrote:
The thing that annoys me most about it is, when somone tells me their lifts you alway have to ask their raw numbers.

Like somone will say i squatted 500, i think inside “no what can you really lift.”

[/quote]

Then you should say that.

a friend of mine just pointed this out to me… but it rang true… so here it goes:

what i think is equally stupid is equating the Joe average PL who needs 4 plys of gear to squat 600-700 and bench 400-500lbs, who cant lift anymore than the typical BB RAW, the elite guys who are putting up unreal numbers with gear, but are still some of the strongest motherfuckers on the planet RAW. Donnie Thompson, Brian Siders, Chuck Vogelpohl, to name a few. these guys can squat over 800lbs RAW and bench over 600 RAW and they don’t even train full time for RAW lifting. and they are jacked too.

a

I think one of the best things about powerlifting is that, in theory, anybody can show up to a meet and see how they fare. It’s possible to just compete in powerlifting for fun, while bodybuilding requires a serious commitment- two months of dieting etc.

If you have to spend a few hundred bucks to be remotely competitive then its not something you can test the waters with. You have to be serious from the beginning, which I think hurts the sport.

[quote]superscience wrote:
The thing that annoys me most about it is, when somone tells me their lifts you alway have to ask their raw numbers.

Like somone will say i squatted 500, i think inside “no what can you really lift.”

[/quote]

Of all the posts on here, yours is the least credible.

You basically are a detractor of eveybody on here except yourself, and quite frankly, I cannot even figure out what you are/do. Not that I have spent much time on it because frankly I am disinterested.

As far as I am concerned, keep it to yourself, pal.

[quote]Professor X wrote:
Ghost22 wrote:
I’m a fan of gear, so far.

It adds an element of technical proficiency to powerlifting and makes it so that even if you’re not the strongest, you can win if you know your gear better.

And that alone is why it sucks. This is powerlifting, not mechanical engineering.[/quote]

oh come on. there are unfair advantages in every sport. Even without gear powerlifting will have some guys who are blessed with a preponderance of fast-twitch muscle fibers, other guys who perhaps have the ideal limb lengths/muscle insertion points.

Learning gear has become part of powerlifting, period. It’s the equivalent of the designated hitter, or the three point line. there are multiple inequities in every aspect of every sport; gear use is just one more variable.

[quote]KBCThird wrote:
DPH wrote:
RickJames wrote:
The gear has gotten ridiculous, and there’s no competitive reason (other than for seamstresses) to have the kind of gear we have today. But it’s what powerlifters want. If they didn’t, there wouldn’t be any gear companies around to take our money.

perhaps the sport needs a name change…maybe it would be best to call it gearlifting instead of powerlifting?

much like pole-vaulting has a completely different name than high-jumping…

powerlifting could be knee wraps, wrist wraps, and a belt…

gearlifting could be what ‘powerlifting’ is today…

anyways, just a thought…which will probably just piss most powerlifters off…I’m pretty good at that I suppose…

i still dont understand why its “ok” to claim that a belted lift is raw. I can, squat, bench and dead more when i have something to push my abs against. it adds pounds to my lifts. period. how is this raw?[/quote]

Because its purpose is safety, not to add to your lifts. And because, frankly, only really anally retentive people care if it was with a belt or not.

[quote]cap’nsalty wrote:
KBCThird wrote:
DPH wrote:
RickJames wrote:
The gear has gotten ridiculous, and there’s no competitive reason (other than for seamstresses) to have the kind of gear we have today. But it’s what powerlifters want. If they didn’t, there wouldn’t be any gear companies around to take our money.

perhaps the sport needs a name change…maybe it would be best to call it gearlifting instead of powerlifting?

much like pole-vaulting has a completely different name than high-jumping…

powerlifting could be knee wraps, wrist wraps, and a belt…

gearlifting could be what ‘powerlifting’ is today…

anyways, just a thought…which will probably just piss most powerlifters off…I’m pretty good at that I suppose…

i still dont understand why its “ok” to claim that a belted lift is raw. I can, squat, bench and dead more when i have something to push my abs against. it adds pounds to my lifts. period. how is this raw?

Because its purpose is safety, not to add to your lifts. And because, frankly, only really anally retentive people care if it was with a belt or not.
[/quote]

I have no idea of the science of this, i cant back it up with any studies, but i refuse to believe that a belt provides any more safety that increased work on your abs and low back would provide.

I dont put my belt on to feel any safer, I put it on at ~90% the same way I would warm up raw to ~85-90% then add boards until I was where I wanted to be to throw on my shirt.

Mainly, I just dont think that the PURPOSE should be whats being looked at, the OUTCOME is what should be looked at.

[quote]superscience wrote:
DPH wrote:
that is the reality of gear…

geared lifting is to the pole-vault what non-geared lifting is to the high-jump…they’re completely different sports now…

Tommy would always tell me that’s not a perfect analogy because no one gets more than double out of their gear what they can get without it…and I would reply with “for now”…

Shit analogy, these are 2 different sports, powerlifting raw and equipped is the same sport except one is assisted.

A good analogy would be a high jump with jumps boots is like geared powerlifting. The human cant really jump that high without the jump boots.

A litle video to show equipped high jumping :slight_smile:
[/quote]

hilarious!

Yes, a belt is for safety especially for those lifters that have not trained their core strength properly. You don’t think a belt adds to increased lifts? How long have you been lifting? One day? For most people the belt will add 50-60lbs. to the lift. Most powerlifters live in their belt and that is the reason their abs/core strength is not up to par. If that’s conditioned properly then you don’t need a belt. Powerlifters could learn a lot from the Olympic lifters on this one.

When I first started competing in powerlifting I used all the gear that I could that the federation allowed. After a while it just turned into a circus for me personally. I found it more personally challenging to take all the gear off and compete the way that I train - raw. The AAU offers a RAW division but a belt is allowed to be worn for some reason. Most would argue that using the belt isn’t really lifting RAW. I would agree with that. The last meet I went to I didn’t use a belt. For me, those PR’s were really satisfying and legit.

There really isn’t any money to be made from competing in powerlifting especially if one is drug-free and lifting in a drug tested federation. Yeah, one can gear up and get higher numbers. Soon, the plastic trophies and $5 medals that you get don’t mean that much. It comes down to personal satisfaction and challenge. When you do the weight RAW you really know that you did it and it wasn’t because of gear that a lifter put on to make up for muscle tissue and conditioning that he doesn’t have. Just my opinion…

[quote]Raw Power wrote:
Yes, a belt is for safety especially for those lifters that have not trained their core strength properly. You don’t think a belt adds to increased lifts? How long have you been lifting? One day? For most people the belt will add 50-60lbs. to the lift. Most powerlifters live in their belt and that is the reason their abs/core strength is not up to par. If that’s conditioned properly then you don’t need a belt. Powerlifters could learn a lot from the Olympic lifters on this one.

When I first started competing in powerlifting I used all the gear that I could that the federation allowed. After a while it just turned into a circus for me personally. I found it more personally challenging to take all the gear off and compete the way that I train - raw. The AAU offers a RAW division but a belt is allowed to be worn for some reason. Most would argue that using the belt isn’t really lifting RAW. I would agree with that. The last meet I went to I didn’t use a belt. For me, those PR’s were really satisfying and legit.

There really isn’t any money to be made from competing in powerlifting especially if one is drug-free and lifting in a drug tested federation. Yeah, one can gear up and get higher numbers. Soon, the plastic trophies and $5 medals that you get don’t mean that much. It comes down to personal satisfaction and challenge. When you do the weight RAW you really know that you did it and it wasn’t because of gear that a lifter put on to make up for muscle tissue and conditioning that he doesn’t have. Just my opinion…[/quote]

You are making some really ridiculous generalizations.

Most Powerlifters live in their belts?

Get the fuck out of here.

Name 1, yes I said 1 top 3 powerlifter, AAU or USAPL, your pick, that “lives” in their belts.

Now, before you do this, realize that I know probably 80% of them, so choose carefully because I will follow up.

Why don’t you rephrase your little tirade to state that you couldn’t hang with the big dogs, regardless, so you decided to become a RAW guy so you could at least explain it to yourself.

[quote]ExNole wrote:
I think one of the best things about powerlifting is that, in theory, anybody can show up to a meet and see how they fare. It’s possible to just compete in powerlifting for fun, while bodybuilding requires a serious commitment- two months of dieting etc.

If you have to spend a few hundred bucks to be remotely competitive then its not something you can test the waters with. You have to be serious from the beginning, which I think hurts the sport.[/quote]

Well sorry bud sounds pretty and yes any of us can compete in PLing, but any of us can do so in BBing. Just sign the damn sheet and GO. and they both require a serious commitment differt approaches but a hell of a commitment if you want to be anywhere near competetive raw or not. I could go today and step on the stage at a low level BB contest. Look like a fool but same would be said for someone who didnt invest the time training, eating etc who entered a PLing contest or strongman raw or no. They take commitment and god bless they should thats what should seperate the top the elite from the rest of the world.

This thread started off with some really good points from both sides. Dont let this turn into pissing contests and internet tough talk.