Are you a top or a bottom?
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
forlife wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
So, your first post in this thread, what civil rights were those passages being used to take away from you. Yeah, that was a real logical argument and not some immature attempt to make fun of people who believe something different than you.
My first post illustrated the hypocrisy of cherry picking biblical passages about gays, while ignoring numerous other passages that are no longer considered culturally relevant, despite being divinely sanctioned at the time.
Plus, it was funny.
It was pretty funny, but that isn’t the point.
You don’t think the Bible in entirety says homosexuality (and polygamy) is wrong?[/quote]
The Bible clearly says homosexuality is wrong. But the Bible is enormous and only says it two passages that I’m aware of. Assuming you accept the Bible is words to live by, it’s never been explained to my satisfaction why passages renouncing homosexuality are clung to while passages sanctioning slavery or benning shellfish can be freely ignored.
Where is the objective distinction? Why is one ‘God’s law’ while the other is just ‘customs of the time.’
[quote]pat wrote:
Hmmm, I always thought a “fairy tale” was the ass of a gay man… weird.[/quote]
That is fucking funny.
I think I just woke my puppy up I laughed so loud.
I have a Canadian slave.
[quote]PRCalDude wrote:
jlesk68 wrote:
Thank God that gays can’t reproduce among themselves, otherwise they’ll be passing that gay gene to future generations…
Actually, the gene the same gene that contributes to homosexuality also contributes to the mother’s maternal fecundity. Given that birth control is now ubiquitous (thus artificially limiting the maternal fecundity), and that homosexuality is a huge reproductive fitness hit, we should expect the homosexuality/maternal fecundity gene(s) to become much less common (!).
Of course, that gene is only part of the cause of homosexuality, but it’s the only one forlife cares to discuss. The obvious psychological causes can’t be investigated because of gay militants who tamper with the scientific investigation.[/quote]
Very cool! You made me look up a word (fecund).
Excellent post and good news about the gene becoming less common. Makes me wonder why nature would put such a gene there anyway — time bomb on a species maybe?
[quote]forlife wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
If you can’t tell, forlife isn’t really arguing for homosexual marriage as much as insulting christianity. If you don’t like the message, attack the messenger.
I have no beef with Christians or any other religious group, as long as they don’t advocate denying me equal civil rights. Believe in whatever you want, but keep your beliefs in your church rather than the courthouse.[/quote]
Well, there’s your trouble right there — you don’t have the ‘equal’ right to marry. It’s been voted down and only liberal (evil) judges have subverted the will of the people and allowed these practises.
Just can’t accept those votes, can you now?
[quote]Mick28 wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
forlife wrote:
DoubleDuce wrote:
If you can’t tell, forlife isn’t really arguing for homosexual marriage as much as insulting christianity. If you don’t like the message, attack the messenger.
I have no beef with Christians or any other religious group, as long as they don’t advocate denying me equal civil rights. Believe in whatever you want, but keep your beliefs in your church rather than the courthouse.
Well, there’s your trouble right there — you don’t have the ‘equal’ right to marry. It’s been voted down and only liberal (evil) judges have subverted the will of the people and allowed these practises.
Just can’t accept those votes, can you now?
HH anyone who doesn’t think that photo is sick has a real psychological problem.
[/quote]
Yep. Imagine your kids taking a field trip to the county courthouse and they see something like that, with the judge leading the marriage service.
Now imagine having to answer their questions! Yikes!
While I don’t know the history about Forlife- there’s always those people on here that make a lot of threads about the same thing that no one reads (headhunter), there really is no reason for the absolute hatred of the gays shown on this board.
As I’ve said before, it truly reinforces the “stupid fucking meathead” image that is portrayed about those of us who weightlift.
This reminds me of that “Politically incorrect joke thread” that immediately turned into pages about how coons love their watermelon.
There’s some terrible, angry, hateful people on this website.
It’s amusing that it isn’t the gay guy posting gay pics on this thread, and it’s the straight guys that won’t shut up about them. Got some repression issues there HH?
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
While I don’t know the history about Forlife- there’s always those people on here that make a lot of threads about the same thing that no one reads (headhunter), there really is no reason for the absolute hatred of the gays shown on this board.
As I’ve said before, it truly reinforces the “stupid fucking meathead” image that is portrayed about those of us who weightlift.
This reminds me of that “Politically incorrect joke thread” that immediately turned into pages about how coons love their watermelon.
There’s some terrible, angry, hateful people on this website.[/quote]
In his defense, really, Mick28 just acts like a douchebag because he thinks it earns him points with HH and Rainman. He’s too stupid and impressionable to know any better, so cut him a little slack.
Or maybe not, and he really is just another fucking douchebag piece of shit. Some people seem to think that hating one group or another somehow makes them “belong” to the group they most want to associate with. Some people grow out of that, some don’t. Some just take a little longer.
I like Mick outside of this forum.
But political views are one thing- absolute hatred of one group and the spewing of enmity regardless of whether it makes sense or not amazes me.
[quote]FightinIrish26 wrote:
While I don’t know the history about Forlife- there’s always those people on here that make a lot of threads about the same thing that no one reads (headhunter), there really is no reason for the absolute hatred of the gays shown on this board.
[/quote]
No one is hating on gays. Look, you guys bitched and moaned about idiots trolling the bodybuilding boards — but then we’re haters when forlife clogs up this area with this gay marriage crap?
I think maybe you took too many shots to the head.
[quote]jayski wrote:
It’s amusing that it isn’t the gay guy posting gay pics on this thread, and it’s the straight guys that won’t shut up about them. Got some repression issues there HH?[/quote]
How many times do I have to tell you that mules can’t talk…so STFU already!
What I don’t get is why people keep posting in the gay threads if they think the boards are too full of gay threads. If you truly think there is too much discussion about gay issues, why are you contributing to it?
Enough with the gay troll. Back to some humour!
"Three friends – two straight guys and a gay guy – and their significant others were on a cruise. A tidal wave came up and swamped the ship; they all drowned, and next thing you know, they’re standing before St. Peter.
First came one of the straight guys and his wife. St. Peter shook his head sadly. “I can’t let you in. You loved money too much. You loved it so much, you even married a woman named Penny.”
Then came the second straight guy. “Sorry, can’t let you in, either. You loved food too much. You loved to eat so much, you even married a woman named Candy!”
The gay guy turned to his boyfriend and whispered nervously, “It doesn’t look good, Dick.”