Future Music

Great thread. I hope everyone checks out a band or three recommended by others that they might not ordinarily have checked out. Trying out a different genre of music might be even better.

I recently saw Nickelback, Breaking Benjamin and Three Days Grace in concert and they were great. My wife is mostly a modern country music girl but now BB is her most played cd. Go figure. Just shows exposure to new music is a v good thing.

On a side note I was wondering if Breaking Benjamin is becoming big nationally? I am East Coast and BB is from PA so it’s diff to tell if they are breaking bigger nationally/internationally or if it’s just more radio play here closer to their home turf.

I am not sure if Velvet Revolver will take their sound in a new direction but I am looking forward to their 2nd cd this summer to find out. So much talent there.

Funny to see how mant T-Nation men admit they also like some of JT’s music! Count me among them though-can’t say I am big fan really, but then again when I hear his songs or see the videos-it stays with you and I actually do like it. When the dance music mood hits you-JT is a good place to start.

Future bands I hope will pan out and take things forward? Wolfmother, Breaking Benjamin…maybe Jett too.

I agree-don’t waste time whining about how EVERYTHING today sucks etc…but it’s also not a bad thing to look in the past a little if some current music bores you…recently got into some older blues types like Buddy Guy and even Muddy Waters. New to YOU is still new right?

Here’s how I see the future of music, no matter what the genre.

Guitars and drums will be replaced by software.

The vocals will be re-engineered to precise tonal specifications.

Digital compression will ensure audio perfection.

Wait a minute… the recording studios are already doing this.

BTW…some great bands mentioned here. There will always be a musical underground available to those of us who want to hear a real human voice, with all it’s tonal imperfections, facemelting guitar solos, and the unbeatable back line of bass and drums coming at you like a train. And you can’t engineer the soul out of that!

prof, what’d you think of timbaland’s solo album? it seemed lacking compared to the hits he’s put out lately.

also, have you ever listened to jedi mind tricks? the producer, enemy of mankind, has to be considered one of the best producers out there right now.

I haven’t read the entire thread, so my apologies if some of these have been said.

Trivium
Killswitch Engage
Mastodon
Unearth
Atmosphere
Brother Ali
Dustin Kensrue (frontman from Thrice)
Damien Rice

[quote]Professor X wrote:

This is a good discussion, but I would LOVE to see some numbers proving that Justin Timberlake (and those like him, like Usher) are simply hurting that much with ticket sales. It isn’t like artists like P. Diddy, Jay Z or R. Kelly are having trouble filling seats at shows.[/quote]

i would think that they fill their seats but their tours aren’t nearly as extensive because they’re not tapped into the vente-latte audience.

here’s a list for mid-year 2006. the first # is millions of dollars. the second is tickets sold. check out elton john with 15.3 mil on 89 thousand tickets ! wtf did his tickets cost ? !! and look @ this guy luis miguel with over 500,000 mid-year tickets ! i’ve never even heard of him !

http://www.pollstar.com/news/viewnews.pl?NewsID=7092

2006 Mid-Year Top 50 Tours
1 54.3 Madonna 291,621
2 52.5 The Rolling Stones 309,554
3 47.2 Billy Joel 613,002
4 46.5 Tim McGraw / Faith Hill 574,605
5 43.3 Cirque Du Soleil - Delirium 473,378
6 42.4 Celine Dion 312,441
7 32.7 Bon Jovi 424,459
8 31.2 Kenny Chesney 523,226
9 27.6 Coldplay 457,483
10 23.1 George Strait 387,713
11 22.0 Luis Miguel 542,808
12 21.8 Aerosmith 233,824
13 17.5 Rascal Flatts 396,134
14 17.2 Pearl Jam 330,197
15 16.2 RBD 257,756
16 16.1 Dave Matthews Band 381,720
17 15.5 Nickelback 403,344
18 15.3 Elton John 89,069
19 14.9 U2 191,625
20 14.4 Jimmy Buffett 202,190
21 14.0 Larry The Cable Guy 334,768
22 13.9 INXS 278,278
23 13.4 Queen + Paul Rodgers 166,712
24 12.8 Brad Paisley 312,983
25 12.5 Motley Crue 234,643
26 12.5 David Copperfield 269,388

http://www.pollstar.com/news/viewnews.pl?NewsID=7092

anyway i suppose my point is that when there was a mainstream singles market new acts had a chance of putting together a major tour(financed by the company) by virtue of having a hit single. the purpose of the tour was to support the album.

it’s completely different now. the acts on that list aren’t touring to sell new albums. they’re barely recording any new music ! they’re touring solely on the strength of their back catalogue, which was built on the single.

[quote]rainjack wrote:
Malevolence wrote:
Well, that’s just a dumb point to make. First off, it’s not even true. As long as there is money in it, there is no need to move in a new direction.

I think that’s all you ever had to say. You are looking at the money side of the industry. I am talking about the artistic side - the side that should matter to the artists themselves - not the marketing execs. You should have stated from the get go that you are not in it for that art, but for the money.

Secondly, it’s not true, as long as people still enjoy it, there is no need to move in a new direction.

Once again - you are talking about commercialism. I am talking about the artistic side. Apples and oranges.

Thirdly, the term ‘pop music’ refers to music in all genres. What you are claiming ‘infests’ every genre, is nothing more than pop marketability.

What the fuck is it with you and pop music? You are wrong. No one has ever called country pop music as a descriptor for the genre. A genre can become more mainstream - but your assertion that it’s all pop music is just dumb.

Now, today, is an interesting time, because more so than ever, we’re getting ‘cookie cutter’ artists(following the traditional model of that that means) that actually have talent and original production, and are making some great music.

That wouldn’t have a thing to do with the proliferation of internet airplay/internet exposure as opposed to the old recording company way of doing things, would it? You have already exempted yourself from any type of artistic discussion since, in your opinion, it’s all about the money anyhow.

As far as ‘cookie cutter bands’ are concerned, again, it is about marketability, it has nothing to do with saturation. The buying masses decide whether or not they are going to spend money, it has very little to do with originality, in any genre(the term for this, in case you still don’t get it, is ‘pop music’)

As I said earlier - you are about the money. Nothing wrong with that as everyone is about the money to some degree. You just need to keep focusing on the money - and equaling the quality of music with the size of the bank account.

Lastly, You seem to be really angry about this, are you alright?

You must be a noob. All I asked is who the fuck are you? Why do I sound angry? because I use the ‘F’ word? Or because I think you are a flaming idiot?

[/quote]

Saturation doesn’t force new music. Even from an ‘artistic’ angle. How many songs have been written using the exact same chord changes? rhythmic feel, melodic ideas even? thousands, every year. It has nothing to do with how many of those songs already exist. An artist creates what they want to create, marketability and originality be damned. They are not requisites to making art or music.

Nothing forces an artist to make something new and different.

But aside from that, why would you be talking about cookie cutter bands if you were trying to talk about ‘art’? Cookie cutter bands are a byproduct of the industry, which is why I mentioned money and the industry as being tied in with cookie cutter bands, one-hit wonders, and pop music.

When you try and make a point that the industry is over-saturated with cookie cutter bands, you are not talking about art. Bands that make music solely for their art will exist regardless, they are completely independent of what the mainstream is doing. Sometimes the mainstream converges with them, and sometimes it diverges, but they keep on doing what they are doing regardless.

People making music without any commercial sense is nothing new, they would be doing their thing even if the market(or more specifically their genre) wasn’t saturated with cookie-cutter pop singles.

Also, Country music is just as much pop as anything else can be, I have heard it referred to as such. Which is not to say all country music is pop. Every genre can be ‘pop music’.

Your assumption that I am ‘in it for the money’ is incorrect. But when you bring up things like cookie-cutter bands and one hit wonders, you are talking about the music business. Artists don’t give a fuck what is going on in the music business.(which is not to say that is a requirement to being an artist or anything, just that it doesn’t necessarily affect them)

[quote]SBT wrote:
I haven’t read the entire thread, so my apologies if some of these have been said.

Trivium
Killswitch Engage
Mastodon
Unearth
Atmosphere
Brother Ali
Dustin Kensrue (frontman from Thrice)
Damien Rice[/quote]

Someone forgot children of bodom.

I actually heard on Jay Leno a few nights ago that the sales of rap music are down 31%, after concluding that instead of gold teeth they’ll need plastic ones; instead of bitches, they’ll have to downgrade to whores.
That would be a sad day in rap music.

[quote]Yo Momma wrote:
Here’s how I see the future of music, no matter what the genre.

Guitars and drums will be replaced by software.

The vocals will be re-engineered to precise tonal specifications.

Digital compression will ensure audio perfection.

Wait a minute… the recording studios are already doing this.

BTW…some great bands mentioned here. There will always be a musical underground available to those of us who want to hear a real human voice, with all it’s tonal imperfections, facemelting guitar solos, and the unbeatable back line of bass and drums coming at you like a train. And you can’t engineer the soul out of that!

[/quote]

This will NOT happen to Metal.

[quote]Malevolence wrote
Saturation doesn’t force new music. Even from an ‘artistic’ angle. How many songs have been written using the exact same chord changes? rhythmic feel, melodic ideas even? thousands, every year. It has nothing to do with how many of those songs already exist. An artist creates what they want to create, marketability and originality be damned. They are not requisites to making art or music.

Nothing forces an artist to make something new and different.

But aside from that, why would you be talking about cookie cutter bands if you were trying to talk about ‘art’? Cookie cutter bands are a byproduct of the industry, which is why I mentioned money and the industry as being tied in with cookie cutter bands, one-hit wonders, and pop music.

When you try and make a point that the industry is over-saturated with cookie cutter bands, you are not talking about art. Bands that make music solely for their art will exist regardless, they are completely independent of what the mainstream is doing. Sometimes the mainstream converges with them, and sometimes it diverges, but they keep on doing what they are doing regardless.

People making music without any commercial sense is nothing new, they would be doing their thing even if the market(or more specifically their genre) wasn’t saturated with cookie-cutter pop singles.

Also, Country music is just as much pop as anything else can be, I have heard it referred to as such. Which is not to say all country music is pop. Every genre can be ‘pop music’.

Your assumption that I am ‘in it for the money’ is incorrect. But when you bring up things like cookie-cutter bands and one hit wonders, you are talking about the music business. Artists don’t give a fuck what is going on in the music business.(which is not to say that is a requirement to being an artist or anything, just that it doesn’t necessarily affect them) [/quote]

Whatever, Einstein. I guess we will have to agree to disagree.

I will direct you to outlaw movement in the 70’s, the hairband/metal movement of the 80’s, and grunge of the 90’s to make my point that people get tired of the mass produced crap - and flock to the newer edgy stuff, until the edgy stuff becomes mass produced crap and the cycle repeats.

[quote]“Goodbye METALLICA hello MASTODON” - ROCK SOUND

Mastodon is one of the only metal bands I can think of that has done something different in the scene today-themed albums. Plus, they put on the best live show I have ever been to.
[/quote]

I haven’t ever seen a live show but Mastodon is definitely breaking ground.I just think it’s refrehsing because the trend right now seems to be more emo.At least that’s what is popular at my high school.I’m just glad to see newer bands that still relentlessly shove metal in your face

No offense but most metal bands listed here pretty much are bland and boring.

[quote]detazathoth wrote:
Chris Jayne wrote:
Ulver ‘It is not sound’

Isis 'In Fiction

Porcupine Tree ’ Fear of a Blank Planet’

OMG, you know good music![/quote]

Cheers, just what i am listening to at the moment along side some more prog/metal music like Frost, Adagio, Symphony X, opeth, spocks beard, etc.

I havent read all the post but from what i read its some good stuff. Check out Shinedown.

I really thought Candiria had promise some years back before they began to drastically change. It’s a shame the van accident caused them to stop altogether.

Ok, I found another guy that I want everybody to go check out RIGHT NOW. He’s a guitarist/songwriter. His name is Erik Mongrain. This man is unbelievable. Watch some of his videos.

[quote]Bulkington wrote:
“Goodbye METALLICA hello MASTODON” - ROCK SOUND

Mastodon is one of the only metal bands I can think of that has done something different in the scene today-themed albums. Plus, they put on the best live show I have ever been to. [/quote]

MASTODON IS the answer and by far my favorite band. They have complicated drumming, awesome guitar playing, and contrasting singers.

I wish I could go to one of their live shows and they were here in Atlanta yesterday (their hometown). I knew someone would post about Mastodon.

Justin Timberlake can sing? I only heard songs, he sounds ok, I like him as an artist, but it never made me think of him as a great singer. Maybe I need to listen again.

Skip all the rock and metal heads, anybody know some hardcore rap thats good for getting amped up in the gym. These new t-pain/akon \w fill-in-the blank rapper songs are cool, but I don’t want to dance with weights. I need something angry like DMX, or original Wu-tang.

[quote]rainjack wrote:

There mere fact that Nate Green is championing the genius that is JT should speak volumes.

[/quote]

Championing genius? Hardly. He’s talented. I respect talent.

Go question my manhood somewhere else.

-Nate

Great thread guys. I’m gonna check some of these bands out. One band you guys might like is the Drive by Truckers. They have a lynyrd skynyrd feel to them. They have been around for awhile but they don’t get much radio play that I know of.