[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
Shut up[/quote]
He said early 20’s. Not knee deep in a homosexual mid-eternal presence crisis
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
Shut up[/quote]
Yea I thought you were like 26 or something, that is almost out of brain damaged age.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
Shut up[/quote]
He said early 20’s. Not knee deep in a homosexual mid-eternal presence crisis[/quote]
Look Prof. If you wanna fuck me just say so. All your flirting is making my dick soft.
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
Shut up[/quote]
Yea I thought you were like 26 or something, that is almost out of brain damaged age. [/quote]
Nope. Im super braindead.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
I’m 21 and I ain’t even mad 
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
Alright fine, I’ll get off your damn lawn…
[quote]Consul wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
I’m 21 and I ain’t even mad :)[/quote]
[quote]csulli wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
Alright fine, I’ll get off your damn lawn…[/quote]
LOL
I wasn’t referring to YOU guys.
I meant those douchebags in the Lee Priest thread.
lol
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]Consul wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
I’m 21 and I ain’t even mad :)[/quote]
[quote]csulli wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
Alright fine, I’ll get off your damn lawn…[/quote]
LOL
I wasn’t referring to YOU guys.
I meant those douchebags in the Lee Priest thread.
lol
[/quote]
Well fuck you too then
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]Consul wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
I’m 21 and I ain’t even mad :)[/quote]
[quote]csulli wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
Alright fine, I’ll get off your damn lawn…[/quote]
LOL
I wasn’t referring to YOU guys.
I meant those douchebags in the Lee Priest thread.
lol
[/quote]
Last time I was on ID’s lawn, he and Mrs. ID were going at it in their bathrobes.
[quote]super saiyan wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]Consul wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
I’m 21 and I ain’t even mad :)[/quote]
[quote]csulli wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
Alright fine, I’ll get off your damn lawn…[/quote]
LOL
I wasn’t referring to YOU guys.
I meant those douchebags in the Lee Priest thread.
lol
[/quote]
Last time I was on ID’s lawn, he and Mrs. ID were going at it in their bathrobes. [/quote]
LOL!
SS, you consistently have the best zingers lately!
[quote]Consul wrote:
[quote]harrypotter wrote:
Firstly my internet grammar isn’t the argument here. Yes its that time for an e-argument.
Firstly this is what made me choke on my apple;
"Granted, I am assisted, but I don’t think the underlying principles are so different. "
The underlying principles being the base principles of exercise or being able to go harder for longer based on genetics and then boosting them with chemicals?
[/quote]
Really, no photos in your hub, and you’re arguing with an advanced lifter (judging by Cortes’ avi)?[/quote]
Really you care enough about this to demand pictures?
No wonder a lot of posters here are considered a joke on another site I frequent.
Also yes I can argue with an advanced lifter based on dietary intake and the bulking/cutting stage but anything else such as routines can just be adapted to anybody.
Ive seen plenty of ‘advanced’ lifters spout utter shit on internet forums and RL. If they say something I am curious about I’ll look into it but mostly after 3 years of lifting I have come to see that most of what is said about fitness is merely recycled.
Westside barbell and Diesel are the exceptions however.
[quote]harrypotter wrote:
[quote]Consul wrote:
[quote]harrypotter wrote:
Firstly my internet grammar isn’t the argument here. Yes its that time for an e-argument.
Firstly this is what made me choke on my apple;
"Granted, I am assisted, but I don’t think the underlying principles are so different. "
The underlying principles being the base principles of exercise or being able to go harder for longer based on genetics and then boosting them with chemicals?
[/quote]
Really, no photos in your hub, and you’re arguing with an advanced lifter (judging by Cortes’ avi)?[/quote]
Really you care enough about this to demand pictures?
No wonder a lot of posters here are considered a joke on another site I frequent.
Also yes I can argue with an advanced lifter based on dietary intake and the bulking/cutting stage but anything else such as routines can just be adapted to anybody.
Ive seen plenty of ‘advanced’ lifters spout utter shit on internet forums and RL. If they say something I am curious about I’ll look into it but mostly after 3 years of lifting I have come to see that most of what is said about fitness is merely recycled.
Westside barbell and Diesel are the exceptions however.[/quote]
LOL what gave you the impression I cared? I was just surprised that an anonymous poster had the the braggadocio to argue with someone who is demonstrably more advanced than them.
What the fuck am I reading here?
To Frank, great work on both your body and violin, I adore the Tchaikovsky concerto.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]super saiyan wrote:
[quote]digitalairair wrote:
[quote]sstewart22 wrote:
How much do you weight now?
[/quote]
195… debating whether or not to get up to 205 if that means more fat and messing up my insulin level (possibly) ?[/quote]
Why do you assume that you will mess up insulin sensitivity by gaining 10 pounds? Were you planning on gaining the weight by consuming massive amounts of Twinkies and Sunny Delight?[/quote]
The higher bf% you have the more messed up your insulin level gets. [/quote]
Wait…so a person with “16% body fat” has “more messed up insulin levels” than the same person at 12%?[/quote]
Yeah, I assume that’s what Frank was saying. I was asking a question, but it seems I made a typo.
[quote]Professor X wrote:
Great post. Agree 100%.
Most of the people talking about insulin levels don’t seem to be basing their comments on actual science anyway.
I would like for one person to prove that insulin levels are somehow driven into the negative as a direct reaction to body fat levels in everyone no matter how fat they are or their activity level or age.[/quote]
I always thought it was based on the amount of carbohydrates you consumed. Or, am I misremembering?
[quote]harrypotter wrote:
Really you care enough about this to demand pictures?
No wonder a lot of posters here are considered a joke on another site I frequent.[/quote]
Yes, like asking for studies or results makes us a joke. That’s like getting made that a peer-reviewed journal requires proof of claims.
Always appreciate your videos and seeing your progress, keep up the good work.
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]super saiyan wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]Consul wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
I’m 21 and I ain’t even mad :)[/quote]
[quote]csulli wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
Alright fine, I’ll get off your damn lawn…[/quote]
LOL
I wasn’t referring to YOU guys.
I meant those douchebags in the Lee Priest thread.
lol
[/quote]
Last time I was on ID’s lawn, he and Mrs. ID were going at it in their bathrobes. [/quote]
LOL!
SS, you consistently have the best zingers lately!
[/quote]
If “lately” means " since April 2004, I totally agree.
[quote]Cortes wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]super saiyan wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]Consul wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
I’m 21 and I ain’t even mad :)[/quote]
[quote]csulli wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
WAY too many noobs in their early 20s with huge chips on their shoulders around here lately. [/quote]
Alright fine, I’ll get off your damn lawn…[/quote]
LOL
I wasn’t referring to YOU guys.
I meant those douchebags in the Lee Priest thread.
lol
[/quote]
Last time I was on ID’s lawn, he and Mrs. ID were going at it in their bathrobes. [/quote]
LOL!
SS, you consistently have the best zingers lately!
[/quote]
If “lately” means " since April 2004, I totally agree.
[/quote]
Hahaha. Thanks fellas.