Starting my forth cycle and chose to go a different route than before
First cycle was t400 with a nolva only pct went well and would say I recovered well without having bloods I suppose
Second was the same but added dbol for the first six week nolva and clomid pct all went well again
Third same again but with t500 all good
This time going with a mass blend 400 which is
100tren e
100mast e
200test e
Thinking pin every five days
Also was thinking about adding sus 250 @ 1ml every five days
Got adex which I may or may not use as not gyno prone but maybe to help with bloat if it becomes a problem got clomid nolva for pct ,and hcg which I’m going to start around six weeks until pct
Question was could I just split the sus into two pins .5 in every shot with the mass so it would be 1.5ml every five days as thinking the mass has already 200mg test in, so if I have two 1ml shots of sus I would be getting like 700mg of test, which I don’t think I would need at all, so could I split the dose so I drop it to 450mg every five days, I know this sounds a bit farfetched but any advice would be a help
Skip the sustanon. Seriously. There’s no reason to run it alongside test e. You’ll end up having to do way more math than is necessary for a cycle and you won’t gain anything from sust that you wouldn’t get from test e.
Why not run the blend you mentioned e3d and keep consistent blood levels of all three compounds?
Realistically they don’t provide you with enough of two out of the three compounds that are in them. 200mg mast e or tren e per week is not how you’d dose either of those if you were building a cycle from scratch (unless you were doing a very deliberate, low dose cycle and intended to keep sides low and gains within a moderate range). Most tren dosing is something like 100mg eod, and that’s with ace. Tren e at that equivalent dose—call it 300mg/w for the purposes of easier math—is obviously not as strong as ace. So to get that much tren while using that blend you’d be at 600mg test per week. That’s fine. But it’s also a situation where it has to be fine because it’s a blend and if you want that much tren then you have to take that much test. There’s no ability to adjust with a blend. What if the tren is a nightmare and you want to stop taking it? Well, your cycle is over then. If it’s dosed separately then you just drop one compound and keep going. Blends lock you in to a very narrow path for your cycle and it’s a “take it or leave it” scenario. I personally want to decide what I take and not let some guy at an UGL in Bulgaria choose that for me. But that’s me.
Sound advice the reason why was just to try and keep the sides down but i could just got with e3d I probably wouldn’t just stop cycle dead as I would just run test only till the end then properly pct I go a different route next time I don’t make a habit of cycleing once maybe twice a year ATM I’ve a injury so wouldn’t be till I’m back to a 100 I’ll start this
Compounds chosen are great, but as stated, blends are usually a bad idea for the simple fact that you can’t alter anything/add as you go to/or know what might be the issue, should you have one, because you are implementing 2 new variables and not just one. You are probably stuck I’m assuming, but in the future, stick to separate compounds. It’s just so much easier to adjust on the fly.
And by all means even though it’s a long ester, the more often the better.
I haven’t started this yet, I know I should of went the way of getting separate compounds, but this seemed a better idea at the time, originally I was going to do 1ml every five days, then .5ml of sus with it so every pin would have around 325ml of test, but after reading this I think I might just go with the blend every 3-4 days, if I don’t get on with it, think I will be OK though, famous last words, I’ll drop the blend and continue with test at around the same dose, then pct,
Everyone’s already said this, but I’ll be another voice suggesting the blend sucks. I don’t like your plan at all. If you’re growing with every cycle, that’s awesome, as these are relatively low doses. But your approach is far from conventional.
I am curious: How tall are you, what was your bodyweight before your first cycle, and what is it now? And what are some of your lifting numbers now? Just trying to gauge the level of effectiveness of your previous cycles, that would be helpful in figuring out how to advise you on this one.