[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
Any idea how high your cals will be in this gaining phase?[/quote]
Whatever they need to be.
I make adjustments every week or so based on two main things:
- Am I able to make progress in the gym?
- Is the scale going up?
#1 is the most important, obviously, if progress is an issue on a bulk than I am really messing up. Either I am under feeding if I can’t progress on barbell movements or I am getting fat if I start to struggle on bodyweight movements.
As long as #1 is in order, than I like to see 0.75 to 1.0 pound gain per week or so. If performance is good and the scale is constant, then I will bump up calories to try and get it nudging up.
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
What the macro breakdown will be?[/quote]
The macro breakdown will change because protein will be relatively constant, I figure you only need so much protein, after that base amount, increases in calories will come from fat and carbs.
I’m not scared of either, lol. I’ve taken both up pretty high like when I was on the tail end of my bulk I was over 200 grams of fat and nearly 600 grams of carbs.
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
Eating sytle any different by that i mean pulse feasting/IF or just normal meals?[/quote]
I like IF for two reasons:
- I believe it really helps with nutrient partitioning.
- Plus, I REALLY enjoy training on an empty stomach. I used to get nauseous from grueling squat workouts, but never since switching to IF.
That said, I do believe there is some efficacy to eating more meals for the sole purpose of being able to squeeze in more total calories for the day. Of course, you put that idea to shame with your ability to jam in 5k calories in like three hours!
So if I am having trouble putting on mass, I will consider eating breakfast to get in more total food. But for now, I’m sticking with IF.
[quote]ryanbCXG wrote:
You going to push your BW past your last high?[/quote]
We shall see, I think so, but I am also going to really watch my grocery bill. I don’t want to make my family go broke just so I can break past 202 (my previous high).
Plus, I may not need to go past 202 if I can maintain a decent level of leanness.