The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years been aware of Stanley Levison’s Communist activities. It was Levison’s close association with King that brought about the initial FBI interest in King.
Lest you be tempted to believe the controlled media’s lie about “racists” in the FBI being out to “get” King, you should be aware that the man most responsible for the FBI’s probe of King was Assistant Director William C. Sullivan. Sullivan describes himself as a liberal, and says that initially “I was one hundred per cent for King…because I saw him as an effective and badly needed leader for the Black people in their desire for civil rights.” The probe of King not only confirmed their suspicions about King’s Communist beliefs and associations, but it also revealed King to be a despicable hypocrite, an immoral degenerate, and a worthless charlatan.
According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had direct access to the surveillance files on King which are denied the American people, King had embezzled or misapplied substantial amounts of money contributed to the “civil rights” movement. King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor, and numerous prostitutes both Black and White, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days. These types of activities were the norm for King’s speaking and organizing tours.
In fact, an outfit called The National Civil Rights Museum in Memphis, Tennessee, which is putting on display the two bedrooms from the Lorraine Motel where King stayed the night before he was shot, has declined to depict in any way the "occupants - -of those rooms. That "according to exhibit designer Gerard Eisterhold “would be “close to blasphemy.” The reason? Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. spent his last night on Earth having sex with two women at the motel and physically beating and abusing a third.”
I found this while doing more research on Dr. King. Wouldn’t it be nice if the FBI would release the tapes, to end the discussion once and for all?
Many people know Dr. King had some moral issues, much like the so-called Reverends in today’s black leadership(Sharpton and Jackson). You can make an honest argument of whether or not they have a Christian bone in their body, you can do the same with many White so-called ministers too. I think what Dr. King stood for(civil rights for blacks in that era) was the right thing. I am sure he had some other political agenda’s too, but he was instrumental in acquiring the civil rights for blacks and they deserved it. Black people were being sent to wars overseas and sent to the back of the bus at home and that was a grave injustice. The problem was corrected and Dr. King gave his life for that cause and I have a ton of respect for that, regardless of his personal problems. Dr. King didn’t want people to judge each other by the color of their skin, these democratic ministers like Sharton and Jackson do. Isn’t affirmative action a racist act, putting one race above another? Yes it is, it is judging someone by race, that was not Dr. King’s dream in his speech, yet that is the course we are going in race relations in this country. Reverse discrimination is a form of racism, and Rev. Jackson and Sharpton are preaching it and getting paid to very well on the “white people are bad, give me some money,” shakedown of America. I think Dr. King maybe wasn’t a morally strong man behind closed doors, but he did play an huge role in correcting an enormous injustice in history and that is what he will be remembered by and should be also.
The black community needs leaders of strong moral stature, such as Bill Cosby. Someone that preaches family, taking care of your children and not having illegitimate children. Someone againist the gangster rap that erodes the morals of the black community and glorifies killing, drugs and disrespecting women. The problem is the NAACP, Sharpton, and Jackson camps call real leaders that black men should be looking up to “uncle Tom’s” because they aren’t hard line liberals.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor, and numerous prostitutes both Black and White, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days. These types of activities were the norm for King’s speaking and organizing tours.
[/quote]
He had a dream that one day hookers of both colors would be judged by the snapiness of their pussies and their ability to feign enthusiasm rather than the color of their skin.
As an aside, welcome to politics. If you haven’t dipped your wick in a hooker, you aren’t ready for prime time in this game.
[quote]etaco wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor, and numerous prostitutes both Black and White, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days. These types of activities were the norm for King’s speaking and organizing tours.
He had a dream that one day hookers of both colors would be judged by the snapiness of their pussies and their ability to feign enthusiasm rather than the color of their skin.
As an aside, welcome to politics. If you haven’t dipped your wick in a hooker, you aren’t ready for prime time in this game.[/quote]
Not even for the little league…
Gay priests on meth and hung male hookers, that is what you are up against Dude…
[quote]orion wrote:
etaco wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor, and numerous prostitutes both Black and White, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days. These types of activities were the norm for King’s speaking and organizing tours.
He had a dream that one day hookers of both colors would be judged by the snapiness of their pussies and their ability to feign enthusiasm rather than the color of their skin.
As an aside, welcome to politics. If you haven’t dipped your wick in a hooker, you aren’t ready for prime time in this game.
Not even for the little league…
Gay priests on meth and hung male hookers, that is what you are up against Dude…[/quote]
I think the FBI made this up because ,J Edgar was pissed that none of the boys were interested in him when he put his HESHE outfit on to party.
I heard about this a few years back, the way I remember it was that his wife had the records sealed, because in her words, “it would ruin his reputation”.
I have to say I don’t think head hunter meant to just smash King by posting this, he was just informing us on something that I’m sure a lot of people here didn’t know. Why you all take such offense is beyond me, when somebody is bashing a politician currently in office people from the ‘opposing side’ can’t keep their mouths shut.
He laid out some information, he never said he hated King or anything, so why be on his ass about it? I don’t trust a man who appears to have no vices (Hitler) either, he’s just presenting the facts. Maybe all the people creating a third grade pissing match about this should get over it.
Lincoln stepped on peoples rights, Ghandi slept with little girls, Jefferson owned slaves.
Every big name has it’s downfalls. Get over it.[/quote]
That reminds me of a funny little quiz I saw a few years back:
[i]It is time to elect a new leader, and only your vote counts. Here are the facts about the three candidates.
Candidate A: Associates with crooked politicians and consults with astrologists. He’s had two mistresses. He also chain smokes and drinks 8 to 10 martinis a day.
Candidate B: He was kicked out of office twice, sleeps until noon, used opium in college, drinks a quart of whiskey every evening, and occasionally shows up at the office reeking of liquor.
Candidate C: He is a decorated war hero. He’s a vegetarian, an artist, a music lover and an animal lover, doesn’t smoke, only drinks an occasional beer, and has never cheated on his wife.
Which of these candidates would be your choice? [/i]
Candidate A is Franklin Delano Roosevelt, B is Winston Churchill, and C of course is Adolf Hitler.
"He has all of the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire. "–Churchill. He gets my vote.
Headhunter is habitually posting ridiculous nonsense and making sweeping accusations…
Perhaps you should find a more worthy candidate to stick up for.[/quote]
Well, maybe you can explain WHY the tapes are not to be released until 2027. Why all the mystery? All I want is to know the truth. How is that ‘ridiculous nonsense’?
Headhunter is habitually posting ridiculous nonsense and making sweeping accusations…
Perhaps you should find a more worthy candidate to stick up for.
Well, maybe you can explain WHY the tapes are not to be released until 2027. Why all the mystery? All I want is to know the truth. How is that ‘ridiculous nonsense’?
[/quote]
You would think with the Freedom of Information Act and the fact that the major players are all dead that this stuff should already be released.
I do not understand how they can justify sitting on it for 20 more years. It is not as if it was a matter of national security.
I’ll bet the FBI was overreaching their mission and this is potentially embarrassing for them and MLK.