[quote]krazykoukides wrote:
What I like about this story is the fact it makes me happy I didn’t marry an American woman
fucking whores…
hah.[/quote]
Hahaha, yea I definitely think I’m going to go abroad to find a wife, Columbia, Germany, Switzerland are where I’ll start.[/quote]
Hey fucker! Stay out of Germany! That is my territory. Unless you are coming with the appropriate gifts and tithes, keep out!! This is me keeping an eye out for you.[/quote]
I will bring gifts, then we can romp around like kings, and test drive some brides.[/quote]
I find this to be most acceptable. I’ll keep the local beverage on tap!
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
A woman who collected, composed, and published information like this about her self, actually thinking that it would never see the light of day, makes a blond locked in her own car look smart.
[quote]ADvanced TS wrote:
This girl doesnt even deserve to call herself a slut. 13 guys in 4 years ! 3 and a quarter guys per year, raahhhhhh !
I knew many pieces freshman year who were up to 13 before Thanksgiving break. Go get 40-50 more dicks on your resume an then report back, sweetheart.
[/quote]
This. No self respecting college would accept a thesis paper with only 13 sources.
The only people who SHOULD are select University officials (as it reflects poorly on the quality of character of the people to whom they grant admission) and the individuals who received a shitty score (and their families - humiliation by proximity). Everyone else is probably either psyched that they did great (and will have serial cred for the rest of their college careers) or are pleased they didn’t do AS BAD as the 1 - 4’s. Oh, and the girl… for obvious reasons.
I don’t even give a shit about any supposed right to privacy these people have… as if D1 college athletes who indiscriminately sleep around are somehow shocked that one of the random twats they decide to get their dick wet with turns out to be a crazy bitch. If anything, this is a great warning story for people to be a little more discerning about the people whom they choose to fuck.
As far as her being a slut… give me a break. Anyone who thinks most of these jocks weren’t clicking off 13 skanks a SEMESTER is extremely naive.
The content isn’t a big deal, either. Give me 10 seconds with Google - even with the safest search setting - and I can find more crude and lascivious content in seconds. Not to mention a lot of those details are present in nearly every issue of Cosmo based around ‘Pleasing Your Man’. The big deal (I guess) is that she linked those details to specific individuals… but again, those athletes shouldn’t be so fucking surprised.
What else? The reason why this piece fails is for three reasons (in my mind):
the tone. This bitch constantly switched between objective researcher and colloquial schoolgirl. Stick with one and ride it like you stole it to give it a more even tone that I can immerse myself in. As it stands, the whole piece came out hurried and sloppy, and the entertainment value that could have been present had she adopted a stuffy, scholarly tone to contrast the vulgar content was missing.
sense of humor. The girl either has none or doesn’t have one that can be picked up on through her writing. Outside of the (barely passable) ‘nitty gritty’ details, there just wasn’t a hell of a lot to make me want to continue reading. This is one of those things that could have benefited immensely from a couple laughs sprinkled within. You know how the difference between being crazy and being eccentric is money? Well, in this case the difference between being a senseless cunt and being the interwebz ‘Flavor of the Month’ is humor.
the ‘nitty gritty details’. I mean, she didn’t even take it in the pooper, did she? Or rock any DP. Or hook up with someone who likes to take it from a strap-on. As it stands, every story was essentially interchangeable and completely uninteresting given how we live in the age where every porn movie comes standard with a donkey, a midget, and some sort of motorized appliance heavily modified to hold a long, thick piece of rubber.
Oh, and she’s too unattractive/uninteresting to spin this into anything more than a random moment of Internet embarrassment.
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
A woman who collected, composed, and published information like this about her self, actually thinking that it would never see the light of day, makes a blond locked in her own car look smart.
[/quote]
THIS.
However, you may be on team dumb; I am on team evil.
All the guys I showed this to at my university instantly called bullshit on her not wanting this to come out. I mean, why would you create such an elaborate 42-page report to only show it to 3 friends, when you could just gossip about that shit over drinks?
So yeah my bet is on evil bitch (not so evil regarding the guys she rated 8-12 but I doubt they needed the leg-up to slay mad pussy anyways).
EDIT: Regarding the most relevant pooper issue, to my knowledge she doesn’t really specify whether there was anal/vaginal and you could interpret “unable to walk the next day” very well to some rough anal, as the effects would be the same.
[quote]Dre the Hatchet wrote:
EDIT: Regarding the most relevant pooper issue, to my knowledge she doesn’t really specify whether there was anal/vaginal and you could interpret “unable to walk the next day” very well to some rough anal, as the effects would be the same.[/quote]
Maybe. But then that’s just her being a cop out. If you are going to put in the effort to write this whole report, why bother holding back?
I mean, she DID tell a story about being embarrassed over her period starting up right before she fucked some dude (and did it anyway)… so why hold back on the anal?
She wanted to write an interesting report while withholding (or being vague about) all the interesting details? If so, she was clearly flattering herself that we would care more about her perspective on these hookups than we would about the acts, themselves.
What else? The reason why this piece fails is for three reasons (in my mind):
the tone. This bitch constantly switched between objective researcher and colloquial schoolgirl. Stick with one and ride it like you stole it to give it a more even tone that I can immerse myself in. As it stands, the whole piece came out hurried and sloppy, and the entertainment value that could have been present had she adopted a stuffy, scholarly tone to contrast the vulgar content was missing.
sense of humor. The girl either has none or doesn’t have one that can be picked up on through her writing. Outside of the (barely passable) ‘nitty gritty’ details, there just wasn’t a hell of a lot to make me want to continue reading. This is one of those things that could have benefited immensely from a couple laughs sprinkled within. You know how the difference between being crazy and being eccentric is money? Well, in this case the difference between being a senseless cunt and being the interwebz ‘Flavor of the Month’ is humor.
the ‘nitty gritty details’. I mean, she didn’t even take it in the pooper, did she? Or rock any DP. Or hook up with someone who likes to take it from a strap-on. As it stands, every story was essentially interchangeable and completely uninteresting given how we live in the age where every porn movie comes standard with a donkey, a midget, and some sort of motorized appliance heavily modified to hold a long, thick piece of rubber.
Oh, and she’s too unattractive/uninteresting to spin this into anything more than a random moment of Internet embarrassment.[/quote]
I just feel sorry for the guys that got ranked small… I mean, how is their Mom going to console and comfort them with this one? “Hey honey… It’s uhhh okay, I mean… Your Dad is small too and look at us!”
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
A woman who collected, composed, and published information like this about her self, actually thinking that it would never see the light of day, makes a blond locked in her own car look smart.
[quote]DBCooper wrote:
What the fuck is lacrosse?[/quote]
Watch yourself. It’s a great sport, and awesome for kids like me that couldn’t get a good look to play D1 football. Great athletes, great hitting, and lots of scoring.
I will admit that it was dominated by rich white kids, but that has changed dramatically in recent years. The “land hockey” analogy is a very good one.
Here’s a little taste for those that have a minute:
