Duke Girl Publishes Report on Sex?

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

[quote]OctoberGirl wrote:

I did say haterade, I didn’t say you hate them. Again, you and your conclusions.

And I get your point that you judge sluts and whores to be immoral. I don’t see that as necessarily being the case. Especially if the behavior is only being judged on the sex and not why the person is having the sex.

Why as few as possible if you are honest, you enjoy sex, you aren’t hurting anyone, and you take precautions? What is it about having sex with numerous people that makes it immoral?

We just aren’t going to agree. You mentioned my age in a different post so maybe I have had a little bit more experience with life and you have a few years to catch up. Perhaps later in life your opinions will change. I know mine have and I try to keep an open mind and I expect my opinions now on certain things will change later on in life.

[/quote]

I don’t get it. You people called me out first. Mostly because of my use of the word “whore”.
[/quote]

I called you and DoubleDuce out on your repeated comments regarding the subject of this thread…I found your remarks to be judgmental and full of misogynistic crap. You two then took turns telling me that I was full of shit and that any girl or guy who would do this was a whore and not to be trusted.

And now that I see you have gotten married at 20 to a foreign, virginal bride…your attitude is starting to make more sense…men that are afraid of women who have had multiple partners are extremely insecure, Way hit it square on the nose.

[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
calling me judgmental is judgmental. .[/quote]

Not really. Just like saying “you are black” to a black person isn’t racist.

It’s a statment of fact, IF in fact the recipient of the comment is indeed that which it is claimed he/she is.

BBB[/quote]

then you dont know what the word means. even black is a judgment. there are only really judgment based social definitions of race. are you going by skin tone or genes? what % of genes are required to be factually labeled black? And in that case calling her a whore (something i haven’t done, isn’t judgmental. she fits the factual deffiniiton)

describing and labeling a persons character traits is about one of most judgmental thins you can do. especially when you dont know anything about the person you are labeling.

every person on this thread judged her actions. i just dont agree with most of you.

aparently thinking sleeping around with random people is bad makes one a judgmental tool worthy of mass ridicul and name calling. because that is the only thing ive said about the original post. i never insulted women or singled them out. i didnt name call. i didnt condem. i didnt claim to be better than anyone.

and for that ive had my marraige ridiculed, my beliefs joked about and insulted, my wife insulted, and just been generally told how bad a person i am. and im the judgmental one.

im seriously disapointed with some of the posters in this thread whos opinions i have lost respect for. im done her. procede with the redicule and name calling, i refuse to defend myself any further.

it was fun at first, but it really bugs me when good people like my wife and other women are insulted as weak or dependant or backwards for having beliefs and following them.

i feel sorry for those of you who associate strength and independence with having lots of sex.

i might even try to further piss yall off by praying for you. :wink:

out.

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]bushidobadboy wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
calling me judgmental is judgmental. .[/quote]

Not really. Just like saying “you are black” to a black person isn’t racist.

It’s a statment of fact, IF in fact the recipient of the comment is indeed that which it is claimed he/she is.

BBB[/quote]

then you dont know what the word means. even black is a judgment. there are only really judgment based social definitions of race. are you going by skin tone or genes? what % of genes are required to be factually labeled black?

describing and labeling a persons character traits is about one of most judgmental thins you can do. especially when you dont know anything about the person you are labeling.

every person on this thread judged her actions. i just dont agree with most of you.

aparently thinking sleeping around with random people is bad makes one a judgmental tool worthy of mass ridicul and name calling. because that is the only thing ive said about the original post. i never insulted women or singled them out. i didnt name call. i didnt condem. i didnt claim to be better than anyone.

and for that ive had my marraige ridiculed, my beliefs joked about and insulted, my wife insulted, and just been generally told how bad a person i am. and im the judgmental one.

im seriously disapointed with some of the posters in this thread whos opinions i have lot respect for. im done her. procede with the redicule and name calling, i refuse to defend myself any further.

it was fun at first, but it really bugs me when good people like my wife and other women are insulted as weak or dependant or backwards for having beliefs and following them.

i feel sorry for those of you who associate strength and independence with having lots of sex.

i might even try to further piss yall off by praying for you. :wink:

out.[/quote]

If anything I said insulted your wife I apologize. I hope that I didn’t and if I did it was never my intention.

I get so fucking mad when people enjoy themselves, especially when it doesn’t affect me in any way at all.

Eh, 13 partners during college is quite a bit, and I’m pretty sure a lot of guys would agree. I wouldn’t call her a whore though. I probably wouldn’t avoid dating a girl with that much experience, but it is a turn off for me. Yeah I’m moderate/conservative on these issues. It’s also a turn on for me when a girl likes cooking and cleaning.

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

I called you and DoubleDuce out on your repeated comments regarding the subject of this thread…I found your remarks to be judgmental and full of misogynistic crap. You two then took turns telling me that I was full of shit and that any girl or guy who would do this was a whore and not to be trusted.

And now that I see you have gotten married at 20 to a foreign, virginal bride…your attitude is starting to make more sense…men that are afraid of women who have had multiple partners are extremely insecure, Way hit it square on the nose.
[/quote]

What in the hell are you talking about? I never said whores could not be trusted.

And you originally called me out for ONE post that was meant to be a joke.

and yeah, toss it all up to insecurity! Go right ahead!

because an insecure person would be able to live months separated from his wife by an ocean, right?

It’s called beliefs and values, you pricks.

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

then you dont know what the word means. even black is a judgment. there are only really judgment based social definitions of race. are you going by skin tone or genes? what % of genes are required to be factually labeled black? And in that case calling her a whore (something i haven’t done, isn’t judgmental. she fits the factual deffiniiton)

describing and labeling a persons character traits is about one of most judgmental thins you can do. especially when you dont know anything about the person you are labeling.

every person on this thread judged her actions. i just dont agree with most of you.

aparently thinking sleeping around with random people is bad makes one a judgmental tool worthy of mass ridicul and name calling. because that is the only thing ive said about the original post. i never insulted women or singled them out. i didnt name call. i didnt condem. i didnt claim to be better than anyone.

and for that ive had my marraige ridiculed, my beliefs joked about and insulted, my wife insulted, and just been generally told how bad a person i am. and im the judgmental one.

im seriously disapointed with some of the posters in this thread whos opinions i have lost respect for. im done her. procede with the redicule and name calling, i refuse to defend myself any further.

it was fun at first, but it really bugs me when good people like my wife and other women are insulted as weak or dependant or backwards for having beliefs and following them.

i feel sorry for those of you who associate strength and independence with having lots of sex.

i might even try to further piss yall off by praying for you. :wink:

out.[/quote]

x2

Fuck you guys.

Woot! Score x 2 for team whore!

Gee I skimmed this thread so much I missed all the hate.

[quote]debraD wrote:
Woot! Score x 2 for team whore!
[/quote]

Don’t worry Deb, when you break down and invite me up for a weekend I won’t hold your past against you.

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
out.[/quote]

x2

Fuck you guys.

[/quote]

I feel all alone over on this side of the line…maybe it’s time to pull a Frenchy…where’s that white flag…

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

I called you and DoubleDuce out on your repeated comments regarding the subject of this thread…I found your remarks to be judgmental and full of misogynistic crap. You two then took turns telling me that I was full of shit and that any girl or guy who would do this was a whore and not to be trusted.

And now that I see you have gotten married at 20 to a foreign, virginal bride…your attitude is starting to make more sense…men that are afraid of women who have had multiple partners are extremely insecure, Way hit it square on the nose.
[/quote]

What in the hell are you talking about? I never said whores could not be trusted.

And you originally called me out for ONE post that was meant to be a joke.

and yeah, toss it all up to insecurity! Go right ahead!

because an insecure person would be able to live months separated from his wife by an ocean, right?

It’s called beliefs and values, you pricks.
[/quote]

If Utah stopped inventing lies about others, there wouldn’t be much of her posts left.

And I have a computer now so I’m not trying to type crap out on my phone.

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

I called you and DoubleDuce out on your repeated comments regarding the subject of this thread…I found your remarks to be judgmental and full of misogynistic crap. You two then took turns telling me that I was full of shit and that any girl or guy who would do this was a whore and not to be trusted.

And now that I see you have gotten married at 20 to a foreign, virginal bride…your attitude is starting to make more sense…men that are afraid of women who have had multiple partners are extremely insecure, Way hit it square on the nose.
[/quote]

What in the hell are you talking about? I never said whores could not be trusted.

And you originally called me out for ONE post that was meant to be a joke.

and yeah, toss it all up to insecurity! Go right ahead!

because an insecure person would be able to live months separated from his wife by an ocean, right?

It’s called beliefs and values, you pricks.
[/quote]

If Utah stopped inventing lies about others, there wouldn’t be much of her posts left.

And I have a computer now so I’m not trying to type crap out on my phone.[/quote]

Whatever guy…go back and look at the first 5 posts that you and Crazy responded to mine in the middle of this thread and say I am making up lies.

I am not a prick for the record… and I rarely post here anymore, but you and your ever changing story pissed me off.

So continue to claim that you were somehow misquoted or misunderstood or “joking” for Krazys benefit…but I never once lied about anything you said.

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

[quote]UtahLama wrote:

I called you and DoubleDuce out on your repeated comments regarding the subject of this thread…I found your remarks to be judgmental and full of misogynistic crap. You two then took turns telling me that I was full of shit and that any girl or guy who would do this was a whore and not to be trusted.

And now that I see you have gotten married at 20 to a foreign, virginal bride…your attitude is starting to make more sense…men that are afraid of women who have had multiple partners are extremely insecure, Way hit it square on the nose.
[/quote]

What in the hell are you talking about? I never said whores could not be trusted.

And you originally called me out for ONE post that was meant to be a joke.

and yeah, toss it all up to insecurity! Go right ahead!

because an insecure person would be able to live months separated from his wife by an ocean, right?

It’s called beliefs and values, you pricks.
[/quote]

If Utah stopped inventing lies about others, there wouldn’t be much of her posts left.

And I have a computer now so I’m not trying to type crap out on my phone.[/quote]

Whatever guy…go back and look at the first 5 posts that you and Crazy responded to mine in the middle of this thread and say I am making up lies.

I am not a prick for the record… and I rarely post here anymore, but you and your ever changing story pissed me off.

So continue to claim that you were somehow misquoted or misunderstood or “joking” for Krazys benefit…but I never once lied about anything you said.

[/quote]

I did not have repeated comments other than responding to YOUR questioning. We’ve shown how they were no more judgmental than anyone else and that they were in no way misogynistic in the least. I never called anyone a whore, our posts were responces not attacks, and no person ever said anything about trustworthiness and neither of us called anyone insecure. So, let me see what that would leave your post to without the lies.

"I called you and DoubleDuce out on your [lie]…I found your remarks to be [lie]. You two then [lies].

And now that I see you have gotten married at 20 to a foreign, virginal bride…your attitude is starting to make more sense…[lie, Way hit it square on the nose."

Yup not much left. Oh an if those coupole brain cells bump into one another you might realise that if you start making claims about what a person said, it is up to you to quote it. No one can prove they did not say something. Quote me or shut up.

It’s clear why certain people are raging in this thread… they got marked down in her report.

[quote]Rational Gaze wrote:
It’s clear why certain people are raging in this thread… they got marked down in her report.[/quote]

I’m not even mad at this point I’m just here to make fun on Utah and the like.

[quote]krazykoukides wrote:

I find this behavior appalling - from both males and females. I had a friend of mine brag to me about how he bedded somebody’s wife - I literally told him that if he ever told me something like that again, I would never speak to him again. I find it to be very wrong.

and for 13 sexual partners in 4 years to be considered ‘just having some fun’ - I reassert my statement. I am THRILLED my wife is not American. The moral decay apparent in a growing number of people in our society absolutely makes me want to throw up.

I’m pretty sure I’ve read the average number of sex partners for an American female to be 6 or 7 in her life time. I found that gross and wrong… and then this bitch had twice that in 4 years. TOTAL whore.

And no, I am quite content tapping my wife, only and often.

[/quote]

Obvious moral fag is obvious.

I couldn’t let this pile of self righteous bullshit go unanswered, although Utah has already called you on it.

No one cares about your puritanical ideas of sex and your 1950s version of how women should behave. You aren’t morally superior to anyone else because of your views of sex. You’re simply a douche nozzle.

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Rational Gaze wrote:
It’s clear why certain people are raging in this thread… they got marked down in her report.[/quote]

I’m not even mad at this point I’m just here to make fun on Utah and the like.[/quote]

I suppose if I read all these posts maybe I’d understand why you all are fighting or making fun or whatever you call it. Some guys don’t want a girl with ‘too much experience’ and some guys don’t care. Where the hell is the problem here?

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Rational Gaze wrote:
It’s clear why certain people are raging in this thread… they got marked down in her report.[/quote]

I’m not even mad at this point I’m just here to make fun on Utah and the like.[/quote]

I suppose if I read all these posts maybe I’d understand why you all are fighting or making fun or whatever you call it. Some guys don’t want a girl with ‘too much experience’ and some guys don’t care. Where the hell is the problem here?[/quote]

If you are the previous you are a judgmental misogynic tool born 2000 years too late apparently.

edit: forgot both ass backwards and douche bag.

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]on edge wrote:

[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:

[quote]Rational Gaze wrote:
It’s clear why certain people are raging in this thread… they got marked down in her report.[/quote]

I’m not even mad at this point I’m just here to make fun on Utah and the like.[/quote]

I suppose if I read all these posts maybe I’d understand why you all are fighting or making fun or whatever you call it. Some guys don’t want a girl with ‘too much experience’ and some guys don’t care. Where the hell is the problem here?[/quote]

If you are the previous you are a judgmental misogynic tool born 2000 years too late apparently.

edit: forgot both ass backwards and douche bag.[/quote]

Why do you care what other guys want in a girl?