[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
[quote]Varqanir wrote:
[quote]Maiden3.16 wrote:
All of which pale in comparison to income taxes.[/quote]
Not really. Individual and corporate income taxes account for about 17 percent of state revenue, compared to 46 percent from sales tax, license fees, gasoline tax and other taxes, which illegal immigrants would pay by virtue of their being members of the economy.
California collected 55 billion dollars in personal income tax revenue for fiscal 2012, and paid 60 billion in welfare benefits. And you don’t see a connection? We’re never going to “do away” with either welfare or illegal immigration in California without some really draconian measures, but I’d say that the illegal immigrant driver’s license issue is a tiny drop in an incredibly leaky bucket. [/quote]
I have to agree, illegal immigration and welfare both have taxes in common. But this is more than just taxes. California is making an effort to ensure that ILLEGAL immigrants can LEGALLY function here. Someone tell me how this makes sense.[/quote]
A stream runs onto your land.
Do you: build a wall to keep it out? No matter how high or strong you build the wall, you will not keep the water out.
Try to divert the stream so that it flows somewhere else? An expensive undertaking, and where else is it going to go? Someone else’s land.
Go out and curse at the stream, maybe shoot at it in hopes that it will discourage the stream from flowing in anymore? Yeah. Good luck with that.
How about build a dam, and a pond, with a small mill and micro-hydroelectric plant on it.
Sure, it doesn’t prevent the stream from getting onto your land, but at least now the stream is doing something productive for you, rather than being a pain on your ass.
Same thing.
[/quote]
Well I certainly wouldn’t dig a decline so the stream turns into a river.
Illegal immigration is a problem. Giving people that are here illegally the ability to legally function here does nothing to deter the problem and everything to incentivize it. [/quote]
Okay, so you wouldn’t liberalize the immigration process (dig a decline) that much I have been able to deduce from your posts.
What solution do you propose, since building a wall (the border fence), hiring guys with buckets to bail the water back upstream (deport the illegals), and cussing and shooting at the water (griping about the damn wetbacks and forming citizen militia to meet them with force) seems all but ineffective at stemming the flow?
No, really. If 866 miles of the most heavily guarded and fortified border in history couldn’t keep a steady stream of East Germans from illegally emigrating, what could this country do, with a southern border two and a quarter times longer, with eastern and western borders on two oceans, and another border to the north that is the longest international frontier in the world?
Any real, practical ideas? Or just “we gotta DO something!” ?[/quote]
Punish employers from hiring them (drinking out of the stream…lol.) Have employers utilize E-verify to ensure they are not hiring illegals. The stream analogy is bogus. It is not a natural environmental issue. People are choosing to bypass the legal process and break the law. Incentivizing this act by giving them drivers license only makes the problem worse. They know they can come to California and be protected by sanctuary city policy. In most counties and cities in this state, if a local police officer discovers someone is here illegally, they are not permitted to turn them over to the feds. You know how many illegal immigrants have got pulled over and convicted for DUI’s and NOT been turned over to the feds and deported? too many.
There are plenty of practical ways to de-incentivize illegal immigration that are not utilized for political reasons.