Democrats & the Radical Left

I received this in my email from Elizabeth Dole. The bottomline: Democratic leadership is becoming less and less relevant in today’s political climate. Enjoy!


Dear Friend,

I have watched with great interest and sometimes shock the ever developing closeness between some of the most radical, liberal groups in the country and the Democratic Party Leadership.

The Capitol Hill news publication “Roll Call” recently described the intimate collaborations that have occurred between the extreme liberal group “MoveOn.org” and the offices of House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, and The Democratic National Party Chairman Howard Dean. The article described the frequent strategy sessions and conference calls between the Democratic Leadership offices and MoveOn.org. This is the same George Soros funded group that once opposed military action against Osama Bin Laden and the terrorists following 9/11, and whose website featured videos comparing President Bush to Hitler during the 2004 campaign.

In March MoveOn.org hosted a rally that was attended by several Democratic Senators, including Hillary Clinton, Robert Byrd, Deputy Minority Leader Richard Durbin, and of course Minority Leader Harry Reid. Not long after the rally, MoveOn.org spent millions of liberal dollars to buy television ads to distort the debate over The President’s judicial nominees. They were joined in this endeavor by People for the American Way, the left-wing activist group whose agenda includes fighting against prayer-in-schools, opposing the ability to display the Ten Commandments in schools and public spaces, and protecting the right to desecrate the American flag.

But the most disturbing affiliation between the Democratic leadership and the radical left was reported last week by Congress Daily. They reported that Senator Minority Leader Harry Reid "has worked closely with liberal internet community sites like DailyKos.com and his office is “in near daily contact with Kos.”

To illustrate what DailyKos.com stands for and who they represent, here’s what the founder and head of the site had to say about the four Americans who were brutally murdered on the streets of Fallujah, Iraq, before their bodies were dismembered and dragged through the streets: “I feel nothing over the death of mercenaries [sic]. They aren’t in Iraq because of orders, or because they are there trying to help the people make Iraq a better place. They are there to wage war for profit. [Expletive] them.”

In addition to mercilessly attacking President Reagan the day he passed away, the DailyKos also claims that “the French are right,” calls the people who work at the Pentagon “idiots,” labels Colin Powell “a liar,” and describes the President as “a moron.” The site also claims “there is no such thing as partial birth abortion.” And when referring to casualties in Iraq, the site charges that “the American people don’t seem to care anymore.”

The fact that Senator Reid’s office would even casually associate with this group is extremely disturbing, but the fact that his office “is in near daily contact” with this group is utterly reprehensible. The angry liberal left has officially taken over the Democratic Party. Their leadership has waved the white flag and surrendered the party to the most hateful, vitriolic, and extremist political elements in the country. So as the Democrats continue to do everything in their power to obstruct the President’s agenda at every turn, they are being driven by a clear agenda. Their orders have been handed down by the extreme liberal special interest groups, and the Democratic leadership is obeying by marching in lockstep.

I have a question, but first, remember the time I defended Bush when Bob Jones was sending letters to him? It may have been someone else, but it was some guy with a religious university bearing his name.

So, my question is whether or not this is the same issue? Is this report based on the fact that lunatic groups are calling up the democrats and taking up their time?

Or is there really some evidence that something more is going on?

Good point. I don’t know if it’s the radical left pursuing the democrats or vice versa. Regardless, there is a strong perception that the American democratic party is moving further left. Or maybe it is more accurate to say that there are a significant number of far left democrats that are trying take ownership of the democratic agenda away from the more centrist democrats.

perhaps we’re present at the beginning of the birth of the true multiple party system?
Liberals, Democrats, Moderate Pussies …er, republicans, and Conservatives?

How much longer can/will the more moderate/conservative Democrats be able to tolerate the absolute moon-bat fringe?
And by the same token, how much longer can the Conservatives tolerate having their agendas thwarted by one or two “maverick” glory hound senators?

On the other hand, I wonder how many votes the “Moderate Pussy” party would get by virtue of voter apathy?
:wink:

As a registered loser (independent), I probably cannot criticise the far left or justify them intellegently, as I dont support all their views. Though as radical as that article makes them seem, Im willing to bet that MoveOn.org and the other mentioned are almost completly benign to any political ratification as are the far right, in perspective. Far Left blows up SUV/Gas Guzzler auto lots, Far Right blows up abortion clinics.

Neither can accuratley represent the true inentions of either party, and so neither can speak for the majority who happen to shy away from arson and other vigilante acts.

To say that America doesnt care about Mercenaries dying or US troops for that matter is completly shortsighted of the reality of progress, or morality for that matter. How the US deals with it up might be for debate, but bieng a radical asshole is not. Majoity rules in a democratic society, whether we like it or not.

Its a fact, and even I know some moderate democrats who compromably deal with a republican majority. And I personally think the majority of people should decide the changes theyd like to see.

And you can always tell whose losing by whose complaining the most.

[quote]

On the other hand, I wonder how many votes the “Moderate Pussy” party would get by virtue of voter apathy?
;)[/quote]

I second that.

Is she the dumbest idiot on the planet or what? How many times can she say radical while realizing a vast majority of americans agree with these “radicals” on just about every single issue including dissapproval of Bush. Let me guess the GOP saw the polls again today and last week, and are getting the slander machine rolling again. What did the polls say? Well it seems once again a large majority of the country agrees with liberals on EVERY SINGLE ISSUE known to man.

Oh that and they disagree with Bush on every single issue. And since vast majorities agree with liberals that means GOP attack dogs will be ratcheting up the fake “radical” b.s. before some of their voters realize they’re agreeing with these “radicals”.
Funny stuff.

lumpy wrote:

"Is she the dumbest idiot on the planet or what? How many times can she say radical while realizing a vast majority of americans agree with these “radicals” on just about every single issue including dissapproval of Bush. Let me guess the GOP saw the polls again today and last week, and are getting the slander machine rolling again. What did the polls say? Well it seems once again a large majority of the country agrees with liberals on EVERY SINGLE ISSUE known to man.

Oh that and they disagree with Bush on every single issue. And since vast majorities agree with liberals that means GOP attack dogs will be ratcheting up the fake “radical” b.s. before some of their voters realize they’re agreeing with these “radicals”.
Funny stuff."

Thanks for making BluePfalz’s point.

JeffR

[quote]vroom wrote:
I have a question, but first, remember the time I defended Bush when Bob Jones was sending letters to him? It may have been someone else, but it was some guy with a religious university bearing his name.

So, my question is whether or not this is the same issue? Is this report based on the fact that lunatic groups are calling up the democrats and taking up their time?

Or is there really some evidence that something more is going on?[/quote]

I’m sure moveon.org and the others are a real pain in the butt to middle of the road moderates like Dean and Pelozi…

Yes, by all means vroom, I want proof too! I demand to see how in the world wacko left wing groups would ever have anything in common with the people mentioned…

no really…

Yes…they agree with these radicals! Oh wait…the majority voted for Bush…oh well

100meters,

“Well it seems once again a large majority of the country agrees with liberals on EVERY SINGLE ISSUE known to man.”

Dumbest quote I’ve read in some time. My liberal friends cannot even agree on every single issue amongst themselves.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
100meters,

“Well it seems once again a large majority of the country agrees with liberals on EVERY SINGLE ISSUE known to man.”

Dumbest quote I’ve read in some time. My liberal friends cannot even agree on every single issue amongst themselves.
[/quote]

Yeah, sorry, I have to agree. There seem to be a few sweeping generalizations going around.

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
100meters,

“Well it seems once again a large majority of the country agrees with liberals on EVERY SINGLE ISSUE known to man.”

Dumbest quote I’ve read in some time. My liberal friends cannot even agree on every single issue amongst themselves.
[/quote]
It’s called reading the paper.
If a majority agrees with the “Radicals”, then they’re not really that radical.
Not liking Bush,
Not liking Iraq,
Roe v. Wade,
stem cells,
clean enviroment,
hating privitization,
etc.
all not radical.
And when it’s not really radical you co-opt the Lefts languages (clear skies) and label them radical to confuse voters. Works like GANGBUSTERS! look at JeffR.

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Yes…they agree with these radicals! Oh wait…the majority voted for Bush…oh well

[/quote]

Well at least you got the point…oh wait you didn’t. Did he win on the issues? NO!
Did he win based on perception of character? YES (He can keep us safe.)

Man, that letter was real tearjerker. I almost feel sorry for the radical right?almost except for the fact that this is the same group who takes money from the most radical right wing, evangelical, non-choice, gun-toting, stem-cell-wasting, electrocution-bringing, single-mother-hating, “get-a-job-you-lazy -poor-person”-saying bunch of people I?ve ever seen.

I don’t know. To me, it seems these days that both sides are moving closer to the extremes with the middle ground being cut out almost totally. Hard-line political ideology and “winning” seem to be more important than working together and leading the nation forward.

Just my $0.02.

[quote]100meters wrote:
ZEB wrote:
Yes…they agree with these radicals! Oh wait…the majority voted for Bush…oh well

Well at least you got the point…oh wait you didn’t. Did he win on the issues? NO!
Did he win based on perception of character? YES (He can keep us safe.)

[/quote]

100meters:

You are starting to be quite entertaining! I thank you for this.

However, I have to correct you (again…and again).

President Bush was “REELECTED” (that means twice) because the American people voted for him TWICE!

know why? They agreed with his ideas!

Now smile and go have another glass of Koolaide. :slight_smile:

Better yet go to the window open it up wide and give a DEAN SCREAM! YIIIIHAAAAA!

[quote]LIFTICVSMAXIMVS wrote:
Man, that letter was real tearjerker. I almost feel sorry for the radical right?almost except for the fact that this is the same group who takes money from the most radical right wing, evangelical, non-choice, gun-toting, stem-cell-wasting, electrocution-bringing, single-mother-hating, “get-a-job-you-lazy -poor-person”-saying bunch of people I?ve ever seen.[/quote]

And it’s exactly stereotyping like that which will ultimately kill the democratic party!

Please continue as it is much easier to sterotype than to actually think through a problem.

[quote]Muskie wrote:
I don’t know. To me, it seems these days that both sides are moving closer to the extremes with the middle ground being cut out almost totally. Hard-line political ideology and “winning” seem to be more important than working together and leading the nation forward.

Just my $0.02.[/quote]

I nominate this as the best post on the political forum for the past several weeks!

[quote]ZEB wrote:
Please continue as it is much easier to sterotype than to actually think through a problem.
[/quote]
How these so called “sterotypes” tend to vote and distribute their funds.

“right to life” – republican
“NRA” – rebulican

You are right “stereotypes are a real time saver”.
Sen. Dole wants to complain about special interest groups–this is a little ironic. Every party will have special interests becuase it is these core ideologies that make up the parties. Saying that politics shouldn’t pander to any special interest group in not only impractical it is short sighted and naive. Without special interest groups we have no politicts.

You guys want a good laugh check this out:

notice the american flag in the link (netscape users).