Defining a 'True Christian'?

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris quoted: from a ex-Calvinist:
A really long diatribe further demonstrating the poisonous influence of the RCC on the mind of men[/quote]Thank you very much for letting this apostate make several of my points for me in living color and far better than I ever could have myself. Keep em comin. Geeez. The meandering, ever evolving mind of fallen men masquerading as the “one true most holy apostolic church”. Please fellow believers here wondering why poor ol Trib is so hard on the RCC. Read this, I beg of thee. If this piece does not demonstrate to you the synthetic eye wateringly odorous sophistry at it’s absolute pinnacle that IS the Roman Catholic Church, then what would ever do it completely escapes me. (Yes, I read every last syllable).

See, this stuff is normal for Catholics. Try to understand that as you squint your eyes through your growing headache in an attempt to digest it. This IS Christianity to them.

[/quote]

Wow…in all charity…this is an emotional, non-logical reply. Your reply did not address the issue of word anathema. It was a purely irrational and emotional comment that shows your complete and utter bigotry and hatred of not only the Mystical Body of Christ, but all of those included in it, including myself.

Your ignorance prevails you, Tirib. And I, now, have no doubt that the father of lies has deceived you.

P.S. You have the Judas syndrome…you base your opinion and hatred on the Catholic Church by those who do not follow the Catholic teachings? Tirib, your logic make no sense, that is like saying Christ isn’t true because Judas betrayed him.

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Wow…in all charity…this is an emotional, non-logical reply. Your reply did not address the issue of word anathema. It was a purely irrational and emotional comment that shows your complete and utter bigotry and hatred of not only the Mystical Body of Christ, but all of those included in it, including myself.

Your ignorance prevails you, Tirib. And I, now, have no doubt that the father of lies has deceived you.

P.S. You have the Judas syndrome…you base your opinion and hatred on the Catholic Church by those who do not follow the Catholic teachings? Tirib, your logic make no sense, that is like saying Christ isn’t true because Judas betrayed him.[/quote]You should have had no doubt a long time ago my friend. The boys of Trent sure wouldn’t have. Now we’re getting somewhere. I’m interested to hear what some others may say.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Wow…in all charity…this is an emotional, non-logical reply. Your reply did not address the issue of word anathema. It was a purely irrational and emotional comment that shows your complete and utter bigotry and hatred of not only the Mystical Body of Christ, but all of those included in it, including myself.

Your ignorance prevails you, Tirib. And I, now, have no doubt that the father of lies has deceived you.

P.S. You have the Judas syndrome…you base your opinion and hatred on the Catholic Church by those who do not follow the Catholic teachings? Tirib, your logic make no sense, that is like saying Christ isn’t true because Judas betrayed him.[/quote]You should have had no doubt a long time ago my friend. The boys of Trent sure wouldn’t have. Now we’re getting somewhere. I’m interested to hear what some others may say.
[/quote]

Wow, I’m sorry Tirib, maybe I was delusional to think myself a friend of yours. I obviously am not.

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Wow…in all charity…this is an emotional, non-logical reply. Your reply did not address the issue of word anathema. It was a purely irrational and emotional comment that shows your complete and utter bigotry and hatred of not only the Mystical Body of Christ, but all of those included in it, including myself.

Your ignorance prevails you, Tirib. And I, now, have no doubt that the father of lies has deceived you.

P.S. You have the Judas syndrome…you base your opinion and hatred on the Catholic Church by those who do not follow the Catholic teachings? Tirib, your logic make no sense, that is like saying Christ isn’t true because Judas betrayed him.[/quote](Yes, I read every last syllable). Now we’re getting somewhere. I’m interested to hear what some others may say.
[/quote]

Wow, I’m sorry Tirib, maybe I was delusional to think myself a friend of yours. I obviously am not.[/quote]Let me clarify please. I said “You should have had no doubt a long time ago my friend. The boys at Trent sure wouldn’t have.” in response to “I, now, have no doubt that the father of lies has deceived you.”. I have no ill will toward you Chris. None. Quite the contrary.

Something just this minute became clear to me. There is zero sarcasm in what follows now. I’ve been frustrated trying to understand why you guys cannot grasp the concept of my hating the Roman Catholic Church and loving YOU. It’s been staring me right in the face the whole time. Your whole intuition is built on the premise that your individual persons, the RCC and God almighty are all mutually identified. In essence that you’re all the same thing. Not that you would ever state that you are God, but only that you instinctively cannot fathom any of the three by itself in relation to creation or human history. A sort of ecclesiastical trinity, with a small t. In that light it simply follows that you would regard hatred for Rome and the papacy as the same thing as hatred for you. Not so, though I will attempt to be more aware of this going forward.

I view the mystical body of Christ as anybody and everybody who winds up in heaven. What Earthly body they associated with, while not irrelevant. in itself dictates nothing. What do you think.? That there’s a “back of the bus” area for us “separated brethren” in heaven? Think with me Chris. If we both die in the next minute and I am at your side praising His name in eternity then either my view of the “mystical body of Christ” is also God’s view (or actually God’s view is my view) or the most tortured in house logic of all time must be attributed to the infinite intellect that IS almighty God. How can it not be invisible if He saves both us. One adoring the RCC and one spitting all over her? But if He did save us both and we find out that the mystical body of Christ is in fact invisible, then your churches authority goes right out the window.

Of course you will reply with some modern revision showing how the RCC can have her authority and an evil father of lies deceived attack dog like me can still go to heaven. I deny that categorically. If the RCC is Christ’s church and Paul were alive today he would declare me lost and in need of salvation after 60 seconds of reading these posts. And he would do it while declaring his love for me. I also hate the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (among many others) because they are blasphemous and idolatrous communions that promote paganism in the guise of Christianity. I do not hate the members of those non Christian cults.

I would cringe to be witness to you attempting to explain to God why YOU did not hate those organizations as He does. If you do hate them, do you also hate the people in them? Are you catching on? Your saying “yeah but that’s them, not Christ’s one true holy and apostolic church” doesn’t help your explanation. Either you accept false religions that God clearly hates or you also hate them yet love their adherents. Just like I say I’m doing with the RCC.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Wow…in all charity…this is an emotional, non-logical reply. Your reply did not address the issue of word anathema. It was a purely irrational and emotional comment that shows your complete and utter bigotry and hatred of not only the Mystical Body of Christ, but all of those included in it, including myself.

Your ignorance prevails you, Tirib. And I, now, have no doubt that the father of lies has deceived you.

P.S. You have the Judas syndrome…you base your opinion and hatred on the Catholic Church by those who do not follow the Catholic teachings? Tirib, your logic make no sense, that is like saying Christ isn’t true because Judas betrayed him.[/quote](Yes, I read every last syllable). Now we’re getting somewhere. I’m interested to hear what some others may say.
[/quote]

Wow, I’m sorry Tirib, maybe I was delusional to think myself a friend of yours. I obviously am not.[/quote]Let me clarify please. I said “You should have had no doubt a long time ago my friend. The boys at Trent sure wouldn’t have.” in response to “I, now, have no doubt that the father of lies has deceived you.”. I have no ill will toward you Chris. None. Quite the contrary.

Something just this minute became clear to me. There is zero sarcasm in what follows now. I’ve been frustrated trying to understand why you guys cannot grasp the concept of my hating the Roman Catholic Church and loving YOU. It’s been staring me right in the face the whole time. Your whole intuition is built on the premise that your individual persons, the RCC and God almighty are all mutually identified. In essence that you’re all the same thing. Not that you would ever state that you are God, but only that you instinctively cannot fathom any of the three by itself in relation to creation or human history. A sort of ecclesiastical trinity, with a small t. In that light it simply follows that you would regard hatred for Rome and the papacy as the same thing as hatred for you. Not so, though I will attempt to be more aware of this going forward.
[/quote]

You still aren’t getting it. There isn’t an ecclesiastical trinity with a lower case t, because there is no third entity in the situation, there is no separate entity known as RCC except for legal purposes, if there was no buildings, if there was no land, if there was no papers, no Bibles, no art, no statues, no icons, and the only buildings we could have in the Roman Empire was houses, and we were in the first days after Jesus assumption into Heaven there would still be a Holy Church, made up of baptized believers. The Mystical Body of Christ, is Jesus’ body, we are either in it or not. You are separated from that body when you are in a state of mortal sin. Once Jesus’ you’re forgiven of that sin and take communion, you are once again in the Mystical Body of Christ. Now, you may or may not be in the Mystical Body of Christ, that is for God to know, I don’t know if you willingly deny the truths you know, I can never say I do, because I do not know your heart. So, if you are in formal heresy, then you may not be in a state of mortal sin, because of the three fold criteria of sin: knowledge, willingness, graveness. In order to be in a state of Mortal Sin, you have to knowledge of the truth, it has to be of grave nature, and you have to willingly go against that knowledge. Now, I have always supposed that you’re an 1) an loon and have no clue what you’re talking about when it comes to the truths of the Holy Church, and 2) in other times you are not willingly breaking truths you do not know, because you don’t know they exist. So, I believe that you have been in mortal sin, but I hope you have a perfect contrite heart for your sins, and God has forgiven you. I do not believe you are in a state of Mortal Sin, so I believe you are in the Mystical Body of Christ, not because of anything you did but because of the mercy of Jesus. However, I might be wrong and you could be in a state of Mortal Sin (hopefully you’ll come to your senses and come back home and get immediately out of a state of Mortal Sin) and will be to the day you die, when you’ll eventually die in separation from God.

Yes, anyone that has died within the Mystical Body of Christ goes to Heaven. And this includes Moses and Abraham and Adam and people of the Old Covenants who died following God’s Laws and had the Faith. Even though they didn’t know about the Mystical Body of Christ, or maybe they did.

If we die the next minute and you are by my side, it’s because we both died in communion with the Holy Church, which is the Mystical Body of Christ, which includes the Church Triumphant, Suffering, and Militant.

It is not invisible because we are not invisible creatures. We are physical. As well, Jesus founded a Universal Church (that’s not a Universal Building, or Organization, or anything), He found a Universal Church, and not Universal Churches. He has one Church, and there is nothing in scripture about an invisible church, it was very visible, Paul had the marks of Jesus.

My Church’s authority would not go out the window, it would just mean the mercy of Jesus is great.

You’re placing your ideas on me and expecting me to agree. Why would I hate someone that loves God, plenty of people hate me, but I still love them. I am nobody, plus I am not important, who cares if someone doesn’t like me. A lot of people didn’t like Jesus and he didn’t do anything wrong. So, I have full consciousness in the realization that I ain’t perfect and a lot of people probably hate me.

And, I don’t really and truly, and will deny until you prove you know sound doctrine and believe it and deny it, that you hate the Catholic Church (which includes me of course) because as Bishop Fulton Sheen said very few Americans hate the Holy Church, but millions of them hate what they mistakenly think is the Holy Church.

To B.C:

You are my brother in Christ. At least you believe he is the Son of God, very God of very God, eternally begotten, and that he died for all our sins. The Lord wants me to tell you of my love for you in Christ as a brother.

Scripture clearly says by faith alone we are saved:

  1. Rom. 3:28-30, “For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law. 29Or is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, 30since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one.”
  2. Rom. 4:5, “But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness,”
  3. Rom. 5:1, “therefore having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,”
  4. Rom. 9:30, “What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained righteousness, even the righteousness which is by faith.”
  5. Rom. 10:4, “For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.”
  6. Rom. 11:6, “But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise grace is no longer grace.”
  7. Gal. 2:16, “nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, that we may be justified by faith in Christ, and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law shall no flesh be justified.”
  8. Gal. 2:21, I do not nullify the grace of God; for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died needlessly.
  9. Gal.3:5-6, “Does He then, who provides you with the Spirit and works miracles among you, do it by the works of the Law, or by hearing with faith? 6Even so Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness.”
  10. Gal. 3:24, “Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, that we may be justified by faith.”
  11. Eph. 2:8-9, “For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God. 9Not by works, lest any man should boast.”
  12. Phil. 3:9, “and may be found in Him, not having a righteousness of my own derived from the Law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which comes from God on the basis of faith.”

I gave a definition earlier of what faith is (a clear definition from the Bible). Works are the fruits of true faith. In simple terms, they just happen when we accept Christ as our savior. We are instructed to obey the commands of God (which are outward works). And when given the opportunity we should. But if we do not have the opportunity, is salvation taken away from us? The Lord Jesus commanded that we partake in communion (or Eucharist), in remembrance of his death (which is an action, and therefore considered works). If an individual genuinely accepts Christ as his savior and he dies before he takes communion, or is even baptized, will he be saved? You say you don’t know. I say I do know. Scriptures clearly say that by faith alone we are saved. If given the opportunity the individual in question would have partaken in these things. But he didn’t. And it doesn’t matter because he had the intentions of doing them, which comes from faith.

@forbes:

I do not need to sling Bible verses back and forth, if you really and truly wish me to address everyone of those, I can of course pull out my commentary and give you a exegesis of the Bible verses you posted.

However, we need to look at the big picture, the Devil can sling Bible verses, so can man.

I don’t know your definition of faith or works, we need to put that on the table if we’re going to debate this subject.

And, the reason I don’t know (I know based on what I hold as true, but it may not be so if I am thinking in your terms) because you haven’t explained what you mean by faith and works. So, I don’t know if we are thinking the same thing.

So, let me know what your definition of faith is and what works are and I will go from there.

Faith is believing what you cannot prove without any doubt. I have faith the sun will rise tomorrow. I have faith my TV will turn on when I press the button. I have faith that this post will go through (see, I make funny too!).

Works are the fruits, the outward expression of what is truly inside. In essence, it is obeying God’s law. Everything that the Lord commanded should be obeyed in theory, but not everybody can obey all commands. The Lord Jesus commanded us to remember his death through communion, to be baptized, to tithe etc. However there are Christian’s in some countries who cannot take communion or be baptized because their churches have been desecrated. Some people (in those very countries) are living on the streets because their homes were destroyed and their jobs taken away. How can they tithe? We who are fortunate can and should do these things. But not all can. Will these people be saved if they were to die before they fulfilled these commands of the Lord? The scriptures say YES, because we are saved by faith alone.

Faith is believing. Works are expressing what you believe. In the end what you believe and hold to your heart matters more than what you do.

@forbes:

Yes, you didn’t quite answer what I was asking, so I’ll rephrase it, what do you have faith in?

And, about works, you obviously are not knowledgable about the definition of “good works,” yes, good works included the sacraments, but they are not exclusive to what makes up “good works.” If I am in the woods for a week, how am I able to reasonably get to a Parish for mass on Sunday? I am not. However, that doesn’t mean I am excluded from doing good works, doing good works are plainly and simply being obedient to God’s will. In your original example, about the Muslim woman who converts to Catholicism, she still has no excuse, just as the Good Thief, has no excuse to not do good works, or be obedient to God’s will while they are still alive.

[quote]forbes wrote:
<<< In the end what you believe and hold to your heart matters more than what you do.[/quote]I would say that what you believe and hold to your heart dictates what you do. It is the evidence of what you believe. And that is universally true of all people.

[quote]forbes wrote:
Faith is believing what you cannot prove without any doubt. I have faith the sun will rise tomorrow. I have faith my TV will turn on when I press the button. I have faith that this post will go through (see, I make funny too!).

Works are the fruits, the outward expression of what is truly inside. In essence, it is obeying God’s law. Everything that the Lord commanded should be obeyed in theory, but not everybody can obey all commands. The Lord Jesus commanded us to remember his death through communion, to be baptized, to tithe etc. However there are Christian’s in some countries who cannot take communion or be baptized because their churches have been desecrated. Some people (in those very countries) are living on the streets because their homes were destroyed and their jobs taken away. How can they tithe? We who are fortunate can and should do these things. But not all can. Will these people be saved if they were to die before they fulfilled these commands of the Lord? The scriptures say YES, because we are saved by faith alone.

Faith is believing. Works are expressing what you believe. In the end what you believe and hold to your heart matters more than what you do.[/quote]

Oh I disagree. If you think abortion is wrong but then you have an abortion anyway, which matters more your thought or your action?

If you feel attracted to somebody who is not your spouse but you do not act on it what matter more, your feelings or your actions or lack of action?

In most cases you cannot help how you feel, but you can always help what you do.

" So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.
(James 2:17 ESV)"

Pat and B.C:

I don’t think you’re understanding me. I’m not saying works are not important. Of course they are. But works show the contents of the heart.

James 2:17 is saying that faith without works is dead, implying that if there are no works, faith isn’t there.

To me, works are the physical manifestation of faith. Which still means that faith alone saves you.

How do you get around these verses then:

  1. Rom. 3:28-30, “For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law. 29Or is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, 30since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one.”
  2. Rom. 4:5, “But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness,”
  3. Rom. 5:1, “therefore having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,”
  4. Rom. 9:30, “What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained righteousness, even the righteousness which is by faith.”
  5. Rom. 10:4, “For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.”
  6. Rom. 11:6, “But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise grace is no longer grace.”
  7. Gal. 2:16, “nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, that we may be justified by faith in Christ, and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law shall no flesh be justified.”
  8. Gal. 2:21, I do not nullify the grace of God; for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died needlessly.
  9. Gal.3:5-6, “Does He then, who provides you with the Spirit and works miracles among you, do it by the works of the Law, or by hearing with faith? 6Even so Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness.”
  10. Gal. 3:24, “Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, that we may be justified by faith.”
  11. Eph. 2:8-9, “For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God. 9Not by works, lest any man should boast.”
  12. Phil. 3:9, “and may be found in Him, not having a righteousness of my own derived from the Law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which comes from God on the basis of faith.”

They are pretty clear.

If someone has works (much like the pharisees) but have no faith, are they saved? No.

Faith without works does not exist, so what is the limiting factor?

Faith.

As for your examples Pat, scripture says that even your thoughts can be just as bad as actions:

Matthew 5:28 “But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”

If you have the intention of doing something wrong, in the eyes of God it is like you have done it.

[quote]forbes wrote:
Pat and B.C:

I don’t think you’re understanding me. I’m not saying works are not important. Of course they are. But works show the contents of the heart.

James 2:17 is saying that faith without works is dead, implying that if there are no works, faith isn’t there.

To me, works are the physical manifestation of faith. Which still means that faith alone saves you.

How do you get around these verses then:

  1. Rom. 3:28-30, “For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law. 29Or is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, 30since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one.”
  2. Rom. 4:5, “But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness,”
  3. Rom. 5:1, “therefore having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,”
  4. Rom. 9:30, “What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained righteousness, even the righteousness which is by faith.”
  5. Rom. 10:4, “For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.”
  6. Rom. 11:6, “But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise grace is no longer grace.”
  7. Gal. 2:16, “nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, that we may be justified by faith in Christ, and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law shall no flesh be justified.”
  8. Gal. 2:21, I do not nullify the grace of God; for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died needlessly.
  9. Gal.3:5-6, “Does He then, who provides you with the Spirit and works miracles among you, do it by the works of the Law, or by hearing with faith? 6Even so Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness.”
  10. Gal. 3:24, “Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, that we may be justified by faith.”
  11. Eph. 2:8-9, “For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God. 9Not by works, lest any man should boast.”
  12. Phil. 3:9, “and may be found in Him, not having a righteousness of my own derived from the Law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which comes from God on the basis of faith.”

They are pretty clear.

If someone has works (much like the pharisees) but have no faith, are they saved? No.

Faith without works does not exist, so what is the limiting factor?

Faith.[/quote]

They need each other and above them all you need love for faith and works are useless with out them. You don’t need me to list the 1 Corinthians reading I hope. Don’t worry I am not advocating works with out faith. I am saying you have to act right and do right as well.

[quote]forbes wrote:
As for your examples Pat, scripture says that even your thoughts can be just as bad as actions:

Matthew 5:28 “But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”

If you have the intention of doing something wrong, in the eyes of God it is like you have done it.[/quote]

Close but not exactly. As per your example you have “…has already committed adultery with her in his heart.” But it’s not exactly the same as committing adultery itself. It means that having lustful intent even if you do not succeed is a sin in itself.
This is not the same though as finding a woman attractive as a man should. Being attracted to a woman who is not your spouse, so long as you make no intent or pursuit is not the same as finding a woman attractive, planning to do something about it and failing to succeed… The intent to sin vs. self control so you don’t.
So in both situations, you have said hot chick. In one circumstance you have acknowledgment of hotness, but a will and intent to avoid a compromising circumstance.
The other you have said hot chick, you want to turn her every which way from sunday, but she thinks your a pig slaps you and walks away. The first is not a sin, the second is a sin even if you did not consummate you lustful intent.

[quote]forbes wrote:
Pat and B.C:

I don’t think you’re understanding me. I’m not saying works are not important. Of course they are. But works show the contents of the heart.

James 2:17 is saying that faith without works is dead, implying that if there are no works, faith isn’t there.

To me, works are the physical manifestation of faith. Which still means that faith alone saves you.

How do you get around these verses then:

  1. Rom. 3:28-30, “For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law. 29Or is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, 30since indeed God who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith is one.”
  2. Rom. 4:5, “But to the one who does not work, but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is reckoned as righteousness,”
  3. Rom. 5:1, “therefore having been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ,”
  4. Rom. 9:30, “What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained righteousness, even the righteousness which is by faith.”
  5. Rom. 10:4, “For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.”
  6. Rom. 11:6, “But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise grace is no longer grace.”
  7. Gal. 2:16, “nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, that we may be justified by faith in Christ, and not by the works of the Law; since by the works of the Law shall no flesh be justified.”
  8. Gal. 2:21, I do not nullify the grace of God; for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died needlessly.
  9. Gal.3:5-6, “Does He then, who provides you with the Spirit and works miracles among you, do it by the works of the Law, or by hearing with faith? 6Even so Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness.”
  10. Gal. 3:24, “Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, that we may be justified by faith.”
  11. Eph. 2:8-9, “For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God. 9Not by works, lest any man should boast.”
  12. Phil. 3:9, “and may be found in Him, not having a righteousness of my own derived from the Law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which comes from God on the basis of faith.”

They are pretty clear.

If someone has works (much like the pharisees) but have no faith, are they saved? No.

Faith without works does not exist, so what is the limiting factor?

Faith.[/quote]

Um, I’ll have to show you that “faith” is faith in the truths of the Church. There are a lot of once saved, always saved Christians, who believe their Lord and Savior is Jesus Christ, but they are okaying homosexual marriages, abortion, contraception, cloning, female ordination, stem-cell research, &c. So, sola fide has produced Christians that do not believe in the truths of Jesus, and are not obedient to God’s will.

@forbes, well since you asked for it, and guess what I got a big chunk of time open.

  1. Rom. 3:28-30, justified by faith: Faith is a gift of grace that moves us toward God (Phil 1:29). It leads to justifciation because it leads to Baptism (6:3-4; 1 Cor 6:11). The object of justifying faith is both personal and propositional: it embraces God as well as the revealed tenets of the gospel. Catholic theology holds that faith doess not act alone in this process but reaches out with hope for divine mercy and love for the Lord. Faith manifests itself in the lives of believers through obedience (1:5), love (Gal 5:6), and good works (Eph 2:10). The Council of Trent decreed that man, can never by his own efforts merit intitial grace of justification that makes him a son of God and a member of the New Covenant. This grace is an entirely free gift from Jesus Christ conferred in Baptism.

Paul uses this expression, works of the law, eight times in high writings, twice in romans (3:20, 28) and six times in Galatians (Gal 2:16, 3:2, 5, 10). Christian scholarship, both ancient and modern, has understood it in different ways. (1) St. Augustine held that it meant observing the entire Law of Moses, whole and undivided. With this view, Paul contends that no act of obedience to the moral, cermonial, or juridical commandments of the Torah can bring about the justification of the sinner. (2) St. Jerome, understand the expression to mean the ceremonial laws of Moses, such as circumcision, dietary laws, feasty days, and Sabbath observance. With this view, Paul charges that the ritual works of the Torah, which defined the Jewish way of life during the Mosaic age, have become obsolete in the New Covenant and thus have no bearing on justification. Both views are correct in their proper context: initial justification in Baptism takes place apart from any observance of the Law (Tit 3:4-7), where as final justification at the Last Judgement takes place apart from the ceremonial works of the Law, but not apart from observing the moral commandments of the Law (Rom 2:13; Mt 19:16-19; 1 Cor 7:19; Jas 2:8-13).

Because the Torah defines what is good and evil, it acts as a moral informant and makes the sins of Israel stand out in stark clarity (2:17-23; 7:7; Heb 10:1-3).

  1. Rom. 5:1-5, The justified are endowed with theological virtues. By faith, they live in peace with God and have access to his grace; in hope, they long for the glory of God that awaits them: and through love, they show that the charity of the Spirit dwells in their hearts (CCC 1813). Equipped in this way, believers can become more like Christ through endurance and suffering (CCC 618).

  2. Deals with ceremonial law.

  3. Rom. 10:4-8 “the end”: The Greek can mean “termination” or “goal.” The latter sense is more propbably, for Jesus came to fulfill the Law rather than abolish it (Mt 5:17) (CCC 1953).

Christ is the end that completes, not the end that destroys, for the deatils of the Law were shadows that prefigured his coming (St. Augustine, Against the Adversary of the Law and the Prophets 2, 26-27).

“shall live by it”: An excerpt from Lev 18:5.

Israel is urged to follow the Torah and shun the ways of the Egyptians and the Canaanites. Adherence to the Law would have brought life, but Israel needed to learn that obedience was humanly impossible without the grace and help of God that come through faith.

6-8: This is an interpretive paraphrase of Deut 30:12-14.

Moses contends that Israel could not escape responsibility for obeying the word of God, as though the Torah were somewhere beyond its reach. In the spirit of Moses, Paul insists that Israel cannot escape responsibility for obeying the word of the gospel, as though it were forced to look high and low for Christ. On the contrary, Israel cannot plead ignorance because the gospel has come to its doorstep through the Scriptures and the missionary efforts of the Church (10:17-19)

  1. Rom. 11:6, Justification is a free gift of grace, not a wage that is owed on the principle of justifice and fair compensation (6:23; Tit 3:5). In secular Greek, (with the idea of Reckoned in Rom. 4:4) the verb iogizomai is a business term for recording credits and ebits. It can also be translated “counted.” When Paul stresses that righteousness is booked to our credit as a gift, he does not imply that the gift is merely imputed to the believe in an external way. In his mind, the divine record corresponds to reality, that is, we are counted righteous because we are made righteous in Christ (5:19).

  2. “justified” Established in a right relationship with God. Justification involves the cleansing of sin, the infusion of divine life, and the adoption of the believer into the family of God through Baptism (1 Cor 6:11; Tit 3:5) (CCC 1987-95).

“Works of the law”: What are the “works of the law”? According to some, Paul uses this expression to refer to legalism, that is, the misguided attempt to amass favor with God and to earn salvation for ourselves by the performance of good works. On this reading, Paul is said to reject all attempts to merit eternal life by SHEER human effort and obedience to the Mosaic Law as a path that leads to salvation. ON this reading, Paul is said to stress the problem of human weakness and man’s inability to keep the law either consistently or comprehensively. Logically, from this perspective, observance of the Law cannot justify the sinner before God because no one can obey the Law without fault. However, this also might be again referring to Mosaic ceremonial works.

  1. Paul is reasoning that if the Mosaic Law had been sufficient all along to remove sin, establish us in righteousness, and bring us into God’s family, then the Cross would have been completely uncessary (3:21).

The Law can neither remit sin nor triumph over eternal death nor free those held captive because of sin. Christ died to provide those things that the Law could not (Ambrosiaster, Commentary on Galatians 2:21).

  1. “Abraham” The great-grandfather of Israel by race and the father of all believers by grace. Paul sees the gospel of justification proclaimed in the life of Abraham, who was righteousness by faith completely apart from his circumcision (Rom 4:9-12).

“believed in God” A citation from Gen 15:6.

This was a time of testing for Abraham, when God was stretching his faith in a moment of discouragment (1 Mac 2:52). Though faced with formidable obstacles, such as his age and the barrenness of his wife, he trusted that God could do the impossible by giving him a son. The promise was later fulfilled in the birth of Isaac (Gen 21:1-3). It is clear from the context of Genesis, as well as Heb 11:8-12, that this is not the moment of Abraham’s conversion, for it is not the first time he puts his faith in the Lord.

  1. custodian or tutor “Paidagogos” (Gk.): The word is used twice in the NT, here and at 1 Cor 4:15. It refers to a household slave in Hellenistic society who was charged by a father to oversee the moral formation of his son. This tutelage normally lasted from the time the hcild was a minor until he reached maturity. The Tutor would protect him, and Paul used this familiar custom to explain how the Mosaic Law served a similar function in Israel.

  2. A distinction is made between legal righteousness, which persons under the Old Covenant tried to attain by faulfulness to the Law (Deut 6:25), and divine righteousness, which we receive through faith in Jesus Christ under the New Covenant (Rom 5:17). For Paul, legal righteousness is not a saving righteousness because it depends on human effort apart from the inward grace of God. This disctinction is also set forth in Rom 9:30-32 and 10:3.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Wow…in all charity…this is an emotional, non-logical reply. Your reply did not address the issue of word anathema. It was a purely irrational and emotional comment that shows your complete and utter bigotry and hatred of not only the Mystical Body of Christ, but all of those included in it, including myself.

Your ignorance prevails you, Tirib. And I, now, have no doubt that the father of lies has deceived you.

P.S. You have the Judas syndrome…you base your opinion and hatred on the Catholic Church by those who do not follow the Catholic teachings? Tirib, your logic make no sense, that is like saying Christ isn’t true because Judas betrayed him.[/quote](Yes, I read every last syllable). Now we’re getting somewhere. I’m interested to hear what some others may say.
[/quote]

Wow, I’m sorry Tirib, maybe I was delusional to think myself a friend of yours. I obviously am not.[/quote]Let me clarify please. I said “You should have had no doubt a long time ago my friend. The boys at Trent sure wouldn’t have.” in response to “I, now, have no doubt that the father of lies has deceived you.”. I have no ill will toward you Chris. None. Quite the contrary.

Something just this minute became clear to me. There is zero sarcasm in what follows now. I’ve been frustrated trying to understand why you guys cannot grasp the concept of my hating the Roman Catholic Church and loving YOU. It’s been staring me right in the face the whole time. Your whole intuition is built on the premise that your individual persons, the RCC and God almighty are all mutually identified. In essence that you’re all the same thing. Not that you would ever state that you are God, but only that you instinctively cannot fathom any of the three by itself in relation to creation or human history. A sort of ecclesiastical trinity, with a small t. In that light it simply follows that you would regard hatred for Rome and the papacy as the same thing as hatred for you. Not so, though I will attempt to be more aware of this going forward.

I view the mystical body of Christ as anybody and everybody who winds up in heaven. What Earthly body they associated with, while not irrelevant. in itself dictates nothing. What do you think.? That there’s a “back of the bus” area for us “separated brethren” in heaven? Think with me Chris. If we both die in the next minute and I am at your side praising His name in eternity then either my view of the “mystical body of Christ” is also God’s view (or actually God’s view is my view) or the most tortured in house logic of all time must be attributed to the infinite intellect that IS almighty God. How can it not be invisible if He saves both us. One adoring the RCC and one spitting all over her? But if He did save us both and we find out that the mystical body of Christ is in fact invisible, then your churches authority goes right out the window.

Of course you will reply with some modern revision showing how the RCC can have her authority and an evil father of lies deceived attack dog like me can still go to heaven. I deny that categorically. If the RCC is Christ’s church and Paul were alive today he would declare me lost and in need of salvation after 60 seconds of reading these posts. And he would do it while declaring his love for me. I also hate the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (among many others) because they are blasphemous and idolatrous communions that promote paganism in the guise of Christianity. I do not hate the members of those non Christian cults.

I would cringe to be witness to you attempting to explain to God why YOU did not hate those organizations as He does. If you do hate them, do you also hate the people in them? Are you catching on? Your saying “yeah but that’s them, not Christ’s one true holy and apostolic church” doesn’t help your explanation. Either you accept false religions that God clearly hates or you also hate them yet love their adherents. Just like I say I’m doing with the RCC.

[/quote]

“I’ve been frustrated trying to understand why you guys cannot grasp the concept of my hating the Roman Catholic Church and loving YOU.”

Because it’s a non-sequiter and you are hopelessly lost in a sea of lies; and though you have been thrown the life preserver; you’d rather sink.
I cannot respect anyone who in the face of choosing true over prejudice, simply choose prejudice.
You’re allegations are false and your hatred baseless.
Jesus created the church and said the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it, yet you call Christ a liar.
You cannot love me because you hate the faith I love. Therefore you hate me. You hate my church, you hate my people, you hate me, you hate BC and all other Catholics. It’s fine we’re used to it.
I don’t apologize for my faith, I don’t give a shit if you like it. I would rather die or become an Atheist before I ever practiced a belief such as the one you profess here. I consider your professed hatred as an abomination before God and man.

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]forbes wrote:
<<< In the end what you believe and hold to your heart matters more than what you do.[/quote]I would say that what you believe and hold to your heart dictates what you do. It is the evidence of what you believe. And that is universally true of all people.
[/quote]

Found a site you’d like. They talk just like you!

http://www.priestsrapeboys.com/

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]Tiribulus wrote:

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
Wow…in all charity…this is an emotional, non-logical reply. Your reply did not address the issue of word anathema. It was a purely irrational and emotional comment that shows your complete and utter bigotry and hatred of not only the Mystical Body of Christ, but all of those included in it, including myself.

Your ignorance prevails you, Tirib. And I, now, have no doubt that the father of lies has deceived you.

P.S. You have the Judas syndrome…you base your opinion and hatred on the Catholic Church by those who do not follow the Catholic teachings? Tirib, your logic make no sense, that is like saying Christ isn’t true because Judas betrayed him.[/quote](Yes, I read every last syllable). Now we’re getting somewhere. I’m interested to hear what some others may say.
[/quote]

Wow, I’m sorry Tirib, maybe I was delusional to think myself a friend of yours. I obviously am not.[/quote]Let me clarify please. I said “You should have had no doubt a long time ago my friend. The boys at Trent sure wouldn’t have.” in response to “I, now, have no doubt that the father of lies has deceived you.”. I have no ill will toward you Chris. None. Quite the contrary.

Something just this minute became clear to me. There is zero sarcasm in what follows now. I’ve been frustrated trying to understand why you guys cannot grasp the concept of my hating the Roman Catholic Church and loving YOU. It’s been staring me right in the face the whole time. Your whole intuition is built on the premise that your individual persons, the RCC and God almighty are all mutually identified. In essence that you’re all the same thing. Not that you would ever state that you are God, but only that you instinctively cannot fathom any of the three by itself in relation to creation or human history. A sort of ecclesiastical trinity, with a small t. In that light it simply follows that you would regard hatred for Rome and the papacy as the same thing as hatred for you. Not so, though I will attempt to be more aware of this going forward.

I view the mystical body of Christ as anybody and everybody who winds up in heaven. What Earthly body they associated with, while not irrelevant. in itself dictates nothing. What do you think.? That there’s a “back of the bus” area for us “separated brethren” in heaven? Think with me Chris. If we both die in the next minute and I am at your side praising His name in eternity then either my view of the “mystical body of Christ” is also God’s view (or actually God’s view is my view) or the most tortured in house logic of all time must be attributed to the infinite intellect that IS almighty God. How can it not be invisible if He saves both us. One adoring the RCC and one spitting all over her? But if He did save us both and we find out that the mystical body of Christ is in fact invisible, then your churches authority goes right out the window.

Of course you will reply with some modern revision showing how the RCC can have her authority and an evil father of lies deceived attack dog like me can still go to heaven. I deny that categorically. If the RCC is Christ’s church and Paul were alive today he would declare me lost and in need of salvation after 60 seconds of reading these posts. And he would do it while declaring his love for me. I also hate the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (among many others) because they are blasphemous and idolatrous communions that promote paganism in the guise of Christianity. I do not hate the members of those non Christian cults.

I would cringe to be witness to you attempting to explain to God why YOU did not hate those organizations as He does. If you do hate them, do you also hate the people in them? Are you catching on? Your saying “yeah but that’s them, not Christ’s one true holy and apostolic church” doesn’t help your explanation. Either you accept false religions that God clearly hates or you also hate them yet love their adherents. Just like I say I’m doing with the RCC.

[/quote]

You claim to love Catholics, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and Mormons while hating their churches.

You claim Paul would love you while condemning your apostasy, if the Catholic church were God’s church.

Yet you believe God hates both the sinner and the sin?

Maybe you don’t believe that after all?

I was thinking about this last night and came to the conclusion that the greatest lie the devil told was that our actions don’t have consequences. This is the lie he told Eve ‘you will not surely die’. This is also the lie of sola fide ‘what you do doesn’t matter as long as you have faith’.