[quote]eic wrote:
thmgoodw wrote:
When someone’s official squat is 260 pounds higher than their deadlift, it usually means that they lift in one of those federations that allow 8 ply squat suits and squats that don’t come close to parallel.
Yes. Gear helps least in the DL, no? The mofo is strong, no doubt, but the total is inflated from gear. [/quote]
I must ask a simple question. Do you know what powerlifting is?
I have to ask this rhetorical question because it seems there are countless people calling these double / unlimited ply total “inflated.” This seems to come from two sorts of people. The first are those who do not understand the sport, most of which have never done a true squat below parallel. The second group are haters would wouldn’t dare try to even handle those kinds of weights.
I’ve used single ply gear in the past (I’m mostly raw at the moment) and I can tell you that these suits do not magically give you 100 lbs or more just by putting them on. This is the attitude that breeds ignorance and is more of a cop out for people who are scarred to lift incredibly heavy weights.
Even Ed Coan has stated that (although he ONLY benched in the high 500s (maybe he hit a low 600, not sure)) he would never try to bench 800 lbs in a double ply shirt. People may bash these 1000 lbs benches, but I have yet to see ANYONE on this forum even approach that level, especially those haters out there.
Coan can still out squat anyone on this forum at age 46 and I doubt anyone is going to put Coan down saying his numbers are inflated. Coan competed in the APF/WPO and was not able to get a handle on the double ply gear. Clearly, adding plys is not so easy as just putting them on and getting under the weight.
I think people need to take a step back and say, WOW, that is a monstrous total for anyone @ 275. Its even great considering this is a 19 year old kid. He’s a gifted powerlifter and deserves people’s praises for putting up when it count.
I also find the deadlift vs squat comparison hillarious. WHO CARES? If you look at john inzer, his deadlift was about 100 lbs over his squat. I believe he pulled over 700 @ 165 and squatted over 600. His bench never got to 400. He was “basically” raw. Why aren’t people complaining that his bench wasn’t 500 when he can squat 700? Some people are bio-mechanically better at squatting than deadlifting or benching and visa versa, etc etc. Very few people excel at all three lifts. If you do, great, if not and you still beat people, good too.
Another person you don’t hear people complaning about is Wade Hooper. He squats in the high 700s (he’s hit 804 in training) benches in the low to mid 500s, but only deadlifts in the low 600s. Anyone care to take a stab at hooper or coan?